DMCA §1201 disagrees with you.
Considering what I read out of Cory Doctorow, and how DMCA Section 1201 leads to what he calls "Felony contempt of business model", I think BMW and Mercedes are taking advantage of it in the most insidious of ways possible.
Good point. What saved the recording industry was not stronger anti-piracy laws but the switch of people’s listening habits from downloads to streaming.
Thanks! Followed! They're even on my instance!
Fair point, and fair enough. Basically, just fair all around.
Hopefully Bellingcat will be able to sue and get the account restored.Section 230 (and moreover, the first amendment) says Elon can moderate as he sees fit, even if based on the whims of his ego. And yes, I do think §230 should protect titanic, immature douchebags like Elon as much as it should protect the rest of us.
factoring in that their society is built on a foundation of shaming yourself and martyring yourself for the sake of the organization’s function and reputation…I fail to see the downside…
So after Zaslav failed to make WB/D perform better, he got a bigger paycheck? You know, I'm reminded of how in Japan, CEOs who don't perform to expectations receive pay cuts (Say what you want about Nintendo (and I have even boycotted them due to the stories I hear about in Techdirt), but if they underperform, their CEOs receive pay cuts instead of pay increases). Yet here in "the greatest country on earth" CEOs get paid more for doing a worse job. Is there any wonder the writers are on strike?
Or "Café au" (or "Café à la" or "Café à l'" or "Café Aux". French is hard.).
As someone else who is on the spectrum, me three.
Not to mention that the Oscar Winner was Everything, Everywhere, All At Once which was one of the most original movies ever made.
It is? I've lived in New York City for all my life and I didn't know that. I guess I learn something new every day!
"Harpo" has something to do with "Oprah"? I honestly would have never noticed that "Harpo" was "Oprah" spelled backwards; I would have thought it was a reference to the silent Marx Brother.
Whichever megacorp spotted him doesn’t give him a record contract, they pay a couple of session musicians starvation wages to record higher-fidelity replicas of his songs, which they then put on Spotify, Youtube, etc.They can even do that in the current © system with mechanical licenses. That's how I was able to release my Genesis cover (on the Sega Genesis), Mama: https://ironcurtain.bandcamp.com/album/mama-feat-meiko
Basically asking to free the musician's toolkit is–shall I say it–asking for a right–to–repair for musicians? It sounds like the same thing for me…
Before that, anyone could just copy a circuit, as Ricoh did to create the 2A03 from the 6502 (except that they cut 5 lines to ensure it couldn’t execute patented instructions).Ah. Now I know where the NES's sound chip which I used to make a chiptune album comes from!
There are key differences, though. -Patents are [still] opt-in; Copyright is opt-out. -Patents last for a maximum of 20 years. Copyrights last for life of the author plus 70 years or 95 years for a corporate work. -Patents could be abandoned earlier than its maximum term. Copyrights could at one point but no longer can. So no, Patents though extremely similar to Copyrights, hasn't been twisted and perverted in the same way Copyright has thanks to the Berne Convention and 20-year retroactive term extensions (though with patents there is evergreening).
Certainly a more reasonable outcome than other companies.If you're implying Nintendo, I completely agree with you (Sony also counts, considering what happened to GeoHotz).
Envy Denmark's Supreme Court
I am so jealous that Denmark's Supreme Court makes reasonable decisions whilst the Supreme Court of the United States' seldom ever does anymore.