Prosecutors Flee DOJ After Being Told To Investigate The Murdered Woman, Not The Murderer
from the what-a-fucked-up-country dept
Last week, we wrote about how ICE agent Jonathan Ross murdered Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old poet and mother, on a Minneapolis street in broad daylight. We wrote about how the Trump administration immediately began lying about it despite multiple video angles showing exactly what happened. We wrote about how the media called documented murder a “dispute.”
This week, we’re writing about how career Justice Department prosecutors—people who’ve spent their careers putting away fraudsters, drug dealers, and actual criminals—looked at how the administration is handling this case and said: we want no part of this.
Because apparently the DOJ’s response to an ICE agent murdering an unarmed American citizen wasn’t to investigate the agent who pulled the trigger. It was to investigate the victim and her widow.
A federal agent shot an unarmed woman multiple times in the head at close range. Video evidence directly contradicts every administration claim about what happened. And the Justice Department’s priority is figuring out what activist groups the dead woman might have been associated with?
Really?
According to reporting from the New York Times, at least six federal prosecutors in the Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office resigned on Tuesday over this approach:
Joseph H. Thompson, who was second in command at the U.S. attorney’s office and oversaw a sprawling fraud investigation that has roiled Minnesota’s political landscape, was among those who quit on Tuesday, according to three people with knowledge of the decision.
Mr. Thompson’s resignation came after senior Justice Department officials pressed for a criminal investigation into the actions of the widow of Renee Nicole Good, the Minneapolis woman killed by an ICE agent on Wednesday.
Mr. Thompson, 47, a career prosecutor, objected to that approach, as well as to the Justice Department’s refusal to include state officials in investigating whether the shooting itself was lawful, the people familiar with his decision said.
Read that again. Senior DOJ officials pressed for a criminal investigation into the widow. The woman whose wife was just murdered by a federal agent. That’s what prompted career prosecutors to walk out the door.
And Thompson wasn’t alone. The Times reports that Harry Jacobs (Thompson’s deputy on the fraud cases), Melinda Williams (who ran the criminal division and successfully prosecuted sex traffickers and fentanyl dealers), and Thomas Calhoun-Lopez (chief of violent and major crimes) all quit as well.
The Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office wasn’t the only place seeing an exodus.
According to MS Now, at least six leaders of the Criminal Section of the Civil Rights Division—the unit that’s supposed to investigate police killings—also resigned in protest:
Top leaders of the criminal section of the Civil Rights Division have left their jobs to register their frustration with the department after the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon decided not to investigate the ICE officer’s fatal shooting of Renee Good last week. The criminal section of the division would normally investigate any fatal shooting by a law enforcement officer and specializes in probing potential or alleged abuse or improper use of force by law enforcement.
The departures – including that of the chief of the section, as well as the principal deputy chief, deputy chief and acting deputy chief – represent the most significant mass resignation at the Justice Department since February.
So we potentially have twelve or more DOJ officials walking out the door because of how this administration is handling a single case. Career prosecutors who spent years working for the DOJ and at least a year under this administration. People who had no apparent problem with everything else this DOJ has been doing. But investigating a murder victim while protecting her killer was apparently the line they couldn’t cross.
Let me say it plainly: when career prosecutors who’ve stuck around through a year of this administration’s chaos decide this is the moment to quit, it tells you something important about just how far outside normal law enforcement practice this has gone.
Also, remember why ICE supposedly flooded Minneapolis in the first place? Daycare fraud. A viral video from a small-time MAGA grifter claiming day cares were running scams, which the administration used to justify what it called “the largest immigration enforcement operation in history.”
And who was the lead prosecutor on those fraud cases? Joe Thompson. The same guy who just quit because the DOJ would rather investigate a murder victim’s activist connections than the agent who killed her.
As Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara put it to the NY Times:
“When you lose the leader responsible for making the fraud cases, it tells you this isn’t really about prosecuting fraud,”
No shit.
If you want evidence of just how upside-down the Justice Department’s priorities have become, look no further than what they’re actually investigating. A separate Times report from Sunday laid out how the FBI’s inquiry into the shooting is focused not on the agent’s actions, but on Good’s “possible connections to activist groups“:
The decision by the F.B.I. and the Justice Department to scrutinize Ms. Good’s activities and her potential connections to local activists is in line with the White House’s strategy of deflecting blame for the shooting away from federal law enforcement and toward opponents they have described as domestic terrorists, often without providing evidence.
Let’s summarize again: an ICE agent murders a woman in broad daylight. The division specifically designed to investigate when cops kill people has decided not to investigate the murderer. Instead, the DOJ is being told to investigate the dead woman and her widow’s social media connections.
And long term DOJ officials are rushing out the door, wanting absolutely nothing to do with any of this nonsense.
Meanwhile, Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon was busy on social media retweeting posts warning people not to “ram ICE officers” because they’ll use deadly force—you know, completely prejudging the case she’s supposed to be overseeing. As former DOJ domestic terrorism counsel Thomas Brzozowski put it to the NY Times:
“It’s not appropriate for officials to characterize this incident as domestic terrorism before the investigation is complete,” said Thomas E. Brzozowski, the former counsel for domestic terrorism in the Justice Department’s national security division. “There used to be a process, deliberate and considered, to figure out if behavior could be legitimately described as domestic terrorism.”
“And when it’s not followed,” Mr. Brzozowski said, “then the term becomes little more than a political cudgel to bash one’s enemies.”
“There used to be a process.” Past tense. That’s where we are now.
The administration’s approach makes sense only if you understand that the goal was never justice—it was narrative control. The White House needs Good to be a terrorist, not a victim, because acknowledging that an ICE agent murdered an unarmed American citizen for no reason undermines everything they’ve been saying about their immigration crackdown. So they investigate the victim. They investigate the widow. They investigate the “activist groups.” Anything but investigate the guy who actually pulled the trigger.
Former Trump attorney and current Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s statement was revealing: “there is currently no basis for a criminal civil rights investigation into the ICE agent.”
No basis. A federal agent shot an unarmed woman multiple times in the head. Video shows her trying to drive away, not toward officers. And there’s “no basis” for investigation. There’s a reason why every time a Trump legal move is flailing around, Blanche seems to show up and wave his arms theatrically yelling “nothing to see here folks.”

What would constitute a basis, exactly? Does the agent need to announce “I am now violating this person’s civil rights” before pulling the trigger?
Minnesota officials aren’t buying it. Governor Tim Walz called Thompson “a principled public servant” and added that his resignation is “the latest sign Trump is pushing nonpartisan career professionals out of the justice department, replacing them with his sycophants.” Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey called the resigned prosecutors “heroes” and the people pushing to prosecute Good’s widow “monsters.”
Drew Evans, superintendent of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension—the state agency that normally investigates police shootings and which the DOJ has deliberately excluded from this investigation—put it simply:
“We’re losing a true public servant,” said Mr. Evans. “We really need professional prosecutors.”
The absence of a credible and comprehensive investigation into Ms. Good’s killing stands to “undermine trust in our public safety agencies,” Mr. Evans added.
We’re well past that point. When the Justice Department investigates murder victims while shielding their killers, “trust” has already been destroyed.
The mass resignations tell us something crucial: there are still at least a few people inside the system who know the difference between law enforcement and state-sanctioned murder. Though, it raises the question of whether there’s anyone left who knows that distinction.
Thompson and his colleagues apparently decided they’d rather walk away from careers they spent decades building than participate in the investigation of a grieving widow while her wife’s killer walks free.
But their departures also mean the fraud cases—the ones the administration claimed justified this whole Minneapolis operation—are now in serious jeopardy. The prosecutor who knew every defendant, every transaction, who’d built those cases from the ground up over years, just walked out the door. If the administration actually cared about prosecuting fraud in Minnesota, they’d be begging Thompson to stay. Instead, they drove him out because protecting an ICE agent from accountability matters more to them than the stated reason they sent ICE to Minneapolis in the first place.
Renee Nicole Good was murdered by her own government. And the Justice Department’s response was to investigate her.
That’s the country we live in now.
Filed Under: civil rights division, doj, harmeet dhillon, investigations, joe thompson, jonathan ross, minneapolis, prosecutors, renee nicole good


Comments on “Prosecutors Flee DOJ After Being Told To Investigate The Murdered Woman, Not The Murderer”
If the agent is not held accountable it is only a matter of time till another murder occurs. With each one we risk becoming desensitized to it. Eventually the citizen will shoot back for fear of losing their life to an uncontrollable and unaccountable ICE personnel.
Re:
Cops will shoot someone in self defense again, yes.
Re: Re:
He wasn’t a cop and there’s no credible evidence of the murder happening due to self-defense.
Re:
Is losing your life to an accountable LEO better? The dead never really get justice. Sometimes people get revenge on their behalf, but never justice.
Re: Re:
No, of course it isn’t better. Nobody should have died.
My point is that things will continue to escalate because this administration won’t police itself.
Hey, Dumb@ss, the agent had internal bleeding. He wasn’t just hit, he was hit hard. Remember when you claimed he couldn’t possibly have been hit, nor even seen the car as a reasonable threat? Except I don’t think you were mistaken, I think you were lying.
Renee Good committed several different crimes when she started to drive at the agent (evading arrest, assault, attempted murder). “Drive, baby, drive!”
Telling someone to commit a crime is usually also a crime. No, it doesn’t really matter what some liberal (former) prosecutors think about that. Still a crime.
You are lying about everything. But you’ve been censoring comments so this will probably never show, and if it does, like a day later. (I’m posting this early afternoon on 1/14, btw)
Re:
Citation fucking needed, because there’s video evidence showing otherwise.
Hmm, your legal “expertise” vs an actual lawyer’s…It’s almost impossible to know which one to believe.
Every accusation a confession.
Hiding comments is not censorship.
Re: Re:
There is not. You’re living in an alternate reality.
Oh, hey! I hear there’s a NYT “analysis” saying he couldn’t have been hit.
Except, he was hit. You are not entitled to your own set of facts.
Re: new method of incurring injury
And not just hit hard, but hit hard by an invisible vehicle that was able to get around the visible vehicle that avoided him entirely by steering in the opposite direction.
Those invisible vehicles are the worst!
Re: Re:
You people are imagining stuff and then calling it an argument, absolutely amazing.
Re:
I’m posting this early afternoon on 1/14, btw
Spam filter smacking you around again, Tubby?
Re:
Yeah, he had “internal bleeding”, but was treated and released immediately. Do you know what else that is called? A fucking bruise, dumbass.
How much “internal bleeding” do ICE agents cause their detainees everyday?
Re: Re:
Now you’re just arguing about how hard he was hit.
A few days ago, you were saying not only was he not hit, but that he couldn’t possibly have been hit.
It does not actually matter how hard he was hit, dumbass.
Re: Re: Re:
Even if he was hit, the fact that it took days for ICE to confirm the “internal bleeding” thing tells me they were trying to think of a way to talk about what is effectively a minor injury with the highest possible chance of garnering sympathy for him from already-sympathetic ICE supporters and people too ignorant to know better.
Re: Re: Re:
Personally, I’m not convinced he was hit. I was pointing out the wild spin that’s being applied to what appears be minor boo-boo. For all I know, it was a self inflicted wound to manufacture a story to cover his ass. ICE’s credibility is pretty thin these days.
Re: Re: Re:
Every doctor I’ve heard from says that even a plausible possibility of internal bleeding, would have been an automatic 24 hour stay at the hospital for close monitoring and observation.
The whole “internal bleeding” story was just a clumsy lie to try to buttress a false narrative that anyone who bothers to check out the videos simply isn’t going to believe anyways.
Additionally, people being struck by moving vehicles don’t stay firmly on their feet and fire accurate pistol shots within a fraction of a second of being struck.
I swear, cultists don’t even try to exercise critical thinking ability.
Re:
No — Ross did not have internal bleeding.
We know this because (as many doctors have pointed out) if he had internal bleeding, or even evidence that it was a significant possibility, he would have been kept in the hospital at least over-night for close observation and treatment.
So that was just yet another clumsy lie from Trump administration mouthpieces.
Unfortunately… when good(or even just OK) public servants resign in disgust and protest because “thats a line we won’t cross”.
It means their roles are vacant and will be filled with people who are thrilled to not only cross that(or any) line.
But likely think that line in the sand is a starting line and they should go full speed ahead towards the next Overton Window shift.
Re:
I was thinking that that’s probably why so many have stayed this long – the idea that “yes, this is terrible, but if I go, they’ll replace me with somebody who will make it even worse.”
Let's investigate Jonathan Ross
What’s his history of domestic violence? Has he assaulted women? Is he a rapist in addition to being a murderer?
Sadistic thugs like Jonathan Ross generally don’t begin their violent career with murder; they usually work their way up to it. We need to know and we deserve to know what else he’s done.
And of course...
I’m sure we’re going to see a flood of morons invade these comments, like the last article about this whole debacle, saying ‘BUTS GOOD’S TOTES RAMMED GUY!’
Since I don’t make a point to reply to people who just leave comments before running off to likely crank out more disgusting CSAM garbage on ExTwitter, I’ll just say this:
Post your proof, candy-asses. But you won’t, because there isn’t any that’s not obvious AI slop. So maybe just don’t bother.
Re:
He had internal bleeding, dumbass.
Not that being hit is even required to make it a legal shooting. But not only was he hit, he was hit hard.
Re: Re:
Just because Trump says something doesn’t make it true, bootlicker.
Re: labor-saving device
Such effort is no longer necessary. There is a bot available through Twitter which can generate the material for you.
I have read that some countries are taking exception. They are either regulating or contemplating regulation of Twitter or of the bot, but so far as I know it is still in service.
The writing on the wall
I do not think that the twelve were happy with the way Trump and MAGA were perverting the rule of law even before the Good killing, but the administration’s handling of the case would have felt like a bale of straw capable of breaking many a camels’ back.
I respect their resignation, bur alas that will (again) mean less honest and capable people in government; on the positions where they can really make a difference.
Re:
This regime won’t be able to replace them with anyone remotely competent and capable, so at least there’s that…
Re: Re:
“Not remotely competent and capable” is pretty much the unspoken mission statement of the administration, and they don’t need to be to do serious damage to the system, anyway.
DOJ is helping Trump break Fed independence as we speak. They have no more credibility left than does the CDC or DHS.
If a federal agency says the grass is green, that grass is dead and brown. If a federal agency says the sky is blue, that sky is gray and overcast.
Every single statement from the federal executive is a lie. It has all been co-opted by lying fascists.
It’s still a win for the regime if principled people leave and there’s no consequences from said people leaving
After all, they’ve just got rid of experience and skilled people who refused to kiss the jackboot
Considering all the fraud
in Minneapolis, this is a good time and excuse to abandon ship.
Re:
You say that like career prosecutors wouldn’t want to stop fraud. Man, you really just buy into anything you hear on Fox News or OANN, huh?
Re: Re:
They very obviously did not.
Re: Re: Re:
Did you know that the daycare fraud investigations in Minnesota had been an ongoing thing for years before you made that comment, or did you just not care?
Re: Re: Re:2
Yes! And they were ignored, MN politicians actively killed investigations, and punished whistleblowers.
Absolutely hilarious that you think that made your point, rather than making mine, cakeboy.
Re: Re: Re:3 federalism
Ahem, no. Minnesota pols do not get to kill Federal investigations.
Re: Re: Re:3
[citation needed]
It’s hilarious that you still use this line even though (A) I schooled you so hard on the Masterpiece Cakeshop case—multiple times!—that it took you literal years to start inching your way towards wanting to relitigate that shit with me and (B) your intentional misunderstanding of the case and the principles involved therein is so hideously wrong that relitigating that shit with me will result in you being made to look like an even bigger bigot than you already do with your use of ableist slurs.
Re: Re: Re:2
The transportation fraud as well?
Re: Re: Re:3
Can you prove that fraud was completely ignored—and if so, whether it was exclusively Democrats/left-leaning politicians who ignored that fraud?
Re: Re: Re:4
You sure like moving goalposts
Re: Re: Re:5
Daycare fraud and transportation fraud are both forms of fraud. You’re the one who tried to switch subjects from one to the other because you didn’t want to answer whether the first form of fraud was ignored. But if you go back and look at my first post in this particular chain, what I asked was this:
The question you’re currently dodging is in alignment with that train of thought. So the question remains: Can you prove that fraud was completely ignored—and if so, whether it was exclusively Democrats/left-leaning politicians who ignored that fraud?
Now, if you want to address daycare fraud instead of (or before) transportation fraud, feel free. But the question stands for both forms of fraud. If you can’t answer the question, don’t put yourself in a position to be asked.
Part of the problem is that the right doesn’t even know how to understand reality or do investigations. They start with conclusions based on narratives that they’re told then look for evidence confirming it. They know who is guilty or not instinctively. They just need to prove it.
That’s why they were outraged that Trump was even investigated for Russiagate or any other crime because they “knew” he was innocent so there was no point in even looking at why the investigations started. And they don’t. They think Russiagate was about the Steele Dossier that was obviously fake because that’s the conclusion they were told and they don’t need to look into it any further.
Similarly, they think investigations are how you find the proof of the claims they make, so you can get subpoenas and arrests based on hunches and if you can’t find the evidence you need to keep looking until you do. So Renee Good and her spouse were part of an evil terrorist network because somebody made the claim and they get to dig into her private life to prove it. And if they never find the proof that proves how powerful the evil network is.
In soviet america...
… the government terrorizes you!
They aren’t doing an investigation; they’re doing opposition research. They aren’t looking for evidence that will show this asshole was justified in shooting her; they’re looking for talking points to convince their half of the voters that she deserved to die.
Even if she was antifa or part of some terrorist organization, that doesn’t justify murder in cold blood as a) due process is still a thing, and b) Ross didn’t know that at the time. You can’t simply justify things after the fact.
But MAGA doesn’t care about facts or logic, so why should it care about the linear flow of time?
Re: "It's Evil! Don't touch it!" (parents immediately touch and explode)
Trump has always been our soup-brained god-king of the universe, we just didn’t know it yet because thanks Obama
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
The agent had internal bleeding. Was very definitely hit.
And you’re blocking comments, MM.
Re:
We heard you the first time because, contrary to your readily-disproven claims, your comments are not being blocked, personally by your sitcom arch-nemesis or otherwise.
And if you’re lying about something as easy to disprove as that, I find the rest of your claims difficult to take on faith in turn.
Re:
A bruise can be considered “internal bleeding” but I don’t see where he was hit and it was his own irresponsibility to step in front of a car which is against training protocols.
Re: Re: Against protocols -- but known practice anyways
The Man Who Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Standing in Front of Cars
https://hejon07.substack.com/p/the-man-who-learned-to-stop-worrying
Decade-old probe found immigration agents stepped in front of cars to justify shooting
https://www.rawstory.com/border-patrol-shooting-2674878723/
US Border Agents Intentionally Stepped in Front of Moving Vehicles to Justify Shooting at Them
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/us-border-agents-intentionally-stepped-front-moving-vehicles-justify-shooting-them/
Note also that Ross himself was a CBP agent of some years standing when this investigation was performed and the report written — therefore he knows better, and did it anyways.
Re: new technology
Yes, by an invisible vehicle that was able to get around Good’s vehicle as it was turning away from the ICE goon. Those invisible vehicles are a great new technology for hitting people.
Worse, the ``blocking” is failing miserably. Someone should file a bug report.
Re:
And you’re blocking comments, MM.
Oh no! How ever will you be able to say the same shit over and over again, Fuckface?
Re:
That liquid inside him wasn’t blood, it turned out he’s full of bile and sh*t, with numerous recordings of his actions from multiple angles, with numerous witnesses to back that up.
He put himself in the path of her vehicle so he could murder someone for observing his crimes because he believes he will be pardoned.
Re: Re:
Dude thinks he won’t be arrested for it, let alone arrested, prosecuted, and sentenced for it.
Re: Re: Re:
The sad fact of the matter is that unless we get a Democrat in the White House, he won’t be. Republicans will see to that.
Re:
If the doctors even suspected internal bleeding, Ross would not have been allowed to leave the hospital.
So it’s a lie. A very clumsy lie, one that they didn’t even try to trot out until later and it became clear that the general public, with access to several videos contradicting the official narrative, simply wasn’t buying official line. So they flailed about for something to buttress the official narrative, and decided an “invisible injury” would fit the bill and save their convenient little faerie tale — too bad the medical community is saying it just doesn’t work that way.
Don’t we have to wait for the investigation and the courts before calling it murder or do we not care about due process?
Re:
Whether her killing legally counts as murder is for the courts to decide. But I can (and will) call it a murder all I want.
Re: Re:
Go ahead.
I just wanted to be clear on your stance regarding due process. You obviously don’t believe in it.
Re: Re: Re:
Did you just conflate someone’s opinion with not believing in due process?
That’s so stupid on so many levels and ignoring the fucking elephant in the room, the killing of a woman that got no due process at all. Do you even know what the words “due process” mean?
Re: Re: Re:2
Adrian isn’t here