The EU appears to be on track to doing so.
The latest move -- just in the last week -- is Germany mandating the use of only open source document formats for all government/public administration.
"And now it’s clear this administration is so inept and inherently dangerous it can’t even convince white people to live here. Let that sink in for a bit."
“I am no longer needed for the actual technical work of my job. I describe what I want built, in plain English, and it just… appears. Not a rough draft I need to fix. The finished thing. I tell the AI what I want, walk away from my computer for four hours, and come back to find the work done. Done well, done better than I would have done it myself, with no corrections needed. A couple of months ago, I was going back and forth with the AI, guiding it, making edits. Now I just describe the outcome and leave.”
Say "Essentially, I'm just a trained monkey," without saying "Essentially, I'm just a trained monkey"?
look forward to the press pretending they always had grave concerns
Assuming that "the press" as we know it, that consistently engaged in this semi-covert boosterism, survives its own forays into AI, and is in any meaningful sense still around to pretend it was actually warning us all.
Please do keep the 'Editor's Pick' comments.
The popular vote is exactly that -- the popular vote. Comments that garner votes in the moment are not necessarily the most insightful.
Also, I doubt that every story receives equal attention from the readers (certainly not from myself) and so very good comments may easily be missed because few readers actually read them. I have found myself visiting an overlooked story (or revisiting a barely skimmed story) based on the Sunday overview.
Trust in news media appears direc[t]ly correlated to one’s own trustworthiness.
According to Gallup, “Mass media is untrustworthy” is believed by 59%/49% of Republicans/Independents, 6% of Democrats.
So... that would actually be an "inversely correlated" relationship.
--
Assuming your reported numbers were correct, we'd not be surprised.
But of course, not only are your numbers wrong, but your rankings reversed (again: not surprised):
( Data from the Gallop website:
2024: https://news.gallup.com/poll/651977/americans-trust-media-remains-trend-low.aspx
2025: https://news.gallup.com/poll/695762/trust-media-new-low.aspx )
Decade-old probe found immigration agents stepped in front of cars to justify shootingImmigration agents were faulted more than a decade ago for tactics that have fallen under intense scrutiny in the wake of a fatal shooting of a motorist in Minneapolis.
https://www.rawstory.com/border-patrol-shooting-2674878723/
US Border Agents Intentionally Stepped in Front of Moving Vehicles to Justify Shooting at ThemAn internal review of the US Border Patrol raises serious questions about the agency’s use-of-force policy.
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/us-border-agents-intentionally-stepped-front-moving-vehicles-justify-shooting-them/
Buddy, the only reason she’s not a full time housewife right now is because you lefties are hateful, violent people willing to shoot a guy for saying things you don’t like.
"For every human problem there is a simple solution -- one that is direct, obvious, and wrong." . (Mencken? Attribution unclear)
Somehow, quite unconsciously, I long ago came to the conclusion that most "incidental inclusion" isn't actually incidental.
I suspect you were actually trying to make a point... Maybe you could try saying it in English?
"Here's a nickle, kid. Now go away, and quit bothering sensible folk with your dumb shit."
The EU appears to be on track to doing so. The latest move -- just in the last week -- is Germany mandating the use of only open source document formats for all government/public administration.
On target:
Yeah... Sure thing, bro... I mean, if I was posting such utterly brain-dead, delusional crap, I'd be posting anonymously too.
Say without saying?
Seconded.
Please do keep the 'Editor's Pick' comments. The popular vote is exactly that -- the popular vote. Comments that garner votes in the moment are not necessarily the most insightful. Also, I doubt that every story receives equal attention from the readers (certainly not from myself) and so very good comments may easily be missed because few readers actually read them. I have found myself visiting an overlooked story (or revisiting a barely skimmed story) based on the Sunday overview.
Okay, that's fair; I got tripped up over the different wording. Thanks for the reply.
- 2024: Democrats 54%, Independents 27%, Republicans 12%
- 2025: Democrats 51%, Independents 27%, Republicans 8%
( Data from the Gallop website: 2024: https://news.gallup.com/poll/651977/americans-trust-media-remains-trend-low.aspx 2025: https://news.gallup.com/poll/695762/trust-media-new-low.aspx )This is backwards: You're effectively arguing that those sites which do exercise editorial control shouldn't be held responsible for the content.
Except SCOTUS -- they can just say "No."
Stepping in front of vehicles (on purpose)
Decade-old probe found immigration agents stepped in front of cars to justify shooting Immigration agents were faulted more than a decade ago for tactics that have fallen under intense scrutiny in the wake of a fatal shooting of a motorist in Minneapolis. https://www.rawstory.com/border-patrol-shooting-2674878723/ US Border Agents Intentionally Stepped in Front of Moving Vehicles to Justify Shooting at Them An internal review of the US Border Patrol raises serious questions about the agency’s use-of-force policy. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/us-border-agents-intentionally-stepped-front-moving-vehicles-justify-shooting-them/
Who needs judges anyways? WE decide what the law is !!! (L'etat, c'est nous. Louis XIV would approve.)
You do know that writing down a "viewpoint" in actual words, doesn't magically turn that viewpoint into reality, right?