Judge Says He’s Sick Of The Government’s Shit; Threatens To Make DHS, DOJ Testify Under Oath
from the let's-move-your-contempt-from-civil-to-criminal dept
Of course, we’ll see what comes of this, but it’s starting to look like this administration won’t outlast this level of judicial scrutiny. It may have bullied its way past courts during Trump’s first year back in office, but now lines are being drawn. Whether or not those lines matter is an open question. But the important thing is that they’re being drawn. All the government has to do is cross them. And there’s no reason to believe it won’t.
This is not the only court drawing these lines. The administration has already been hit with hundreds of adverse rulings. Multiple courts have threatened contempt sanctions. Some courts have even begun making those threats a reality.
Trump may flood the zone, but now it’s clear the zone is willing to flood right back. Stare into the abyss, etc. Judges are done with dealing with this shady AF administration. They’re putting in the (legal) papers that Trump got mad.
This is from a recent order [PDF] handed down by a New Jersey federal court:
The Government’s handling of Petitioner’s detention is emblematic of its approach to immigration enforcement in this state. On the merits, its detentions are illegal. The Government knows this. Its reliance on Section 1225 has been roundly rejected.
“Roundly rejected.” Just like prior restraint. This is active and ongoing restraint. And while it doesn’t do much to the First Amendment, it certainly does plenty of damage to other amendments dealing with the deprivation of personal liberty.
The court goes on to point out that the US Attorney for New Jersey has conceded to “violating 72 orders” issued in immigration cases handled in this jurisdiction alone. And yet, nothing changes. The US Attorney claimed the violations were “unintentional.” The court disagrees.
Sadly, the well-deserved credibility once attached to that distinguished Office is now a presumption that “has been sadly eroded.” The Government’s continued actions after being called to task can now only be deemed intentional.
And:
It ends today.
This is how it goes from here. The judge says any further arrests or detentions in violation of this order will result in mandatory testimony under oath, if not actual sanctions. It’s not the best threat I’ve ever heard, but it’s still more than most courts are willing to do, even as the administration continues to pretend courts are mere nuisances, rather than an integral part of the American republic that constitutionally has as much power as the Executive Branch.
Let the judges cook.
Filed Under: dhs, doj, ice, mass deportation, new jersey, trump administration, zahid quraishi


Comments on “Judge Says He’s Sick Of The Government’s Shit; Threatens To Make DHS, DOJ Testify Under Oath”
And if DHS and Noem commit perjury, will they be put to death?
And still no actual penalties
And there are still no actual penalties being levied.
This reminds me of the Robin Williams quote: “Stop, or I’ll say stop again.”
This might be considered progress, but it’s minimal.
Re:
Any progress is better than none at all.
Re: Re:
There has been no progress. Just more hollow warnings.
Re: Re: Re:
The warnings are the progress. I’ll hope it moves into actual legal consequences, but I’ll also celebrate the little wins where I can get them.
Re:
I sometimes wonder if the judiciary has been so hesitant to impose any actual penalties is because they’re at least a little bit afraid those will be ignored as well and the entire judiciary is shown to be a farce.
Re: How about
Dont Jump or I will shoot.
Re:
Courts generally do a slow ramp-up with these things. But there is usually a large hammer at the top.
Re: Re:
Yet they keep that hammer close at hand. If you called a judge out on their bullshit hypocrisy in court they wouldn’t hesitate to hold you in contempt.
Re: Re: Re:
The judges are hesitating right now.
Re: Re: 'You'd better do it by the count of five! One... two... two and a quarter...'
Bullshit. If the average citizen did even half of the crap the regime is doing every judge involved would have brought the hammer down on that person well before this point, the judges involved are just too spineless and cowardly to impose penalties on the regime’s actors and have their impotence exposed when the regime calls their bluff and ignores them.
Re:
“Ni”
Aw man, he only threatened to make them testify under oath?
The next step for Republicans would be to make it a felony to enter illegally so they don’t have to rely on civil law to detain them. If judges keep getting in the way they can retaliate. If they have enough seats in congress, I have no doubt they will do it.
I’m only commenting about the shape of the law and the Republican position on the subject. I’m not actually endorsing that somewhat likely result.
They pinkie swear!
Live by the lie, die by the lie…
Calling it now. Subpoena’d officials simply refuse to testify and the hapless DOJ stooge lawyer sighs and says “Unfortunately due to a scheduling conflict Kristi Noem wasn’t able to be here today, also have you seen current value of the stock market? That’s called winning!”
Wait, they aren’t already making testimony under oath? That seems like a serious problem that should have been remedied already.
Lying under oath does happen to be one of the few crimes we have proven to be impeachable.
Re:
Only while wearing a certain color tie.
Start at the beginning
Dear Judge,
1st
Go grab a few of those TRAINED agents. Question them.
2nd
Then Find the group leaders. Same here.
3rd
Keep going up, as quick as you can, BEFORE they find a scapegoat.
Or another STUPID REASON.
Even noney...
I’d say it’s even money that they don’t even show up to testify. They’re that ballsy. Or is the proper term arrogant? Hard to tell these days.
Re:
People with integrity are ballsy.
The GOP is arrogant.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Again, these district judges routinely require crazy stuff, ruling outside their jurisdiction, i.e. breaking the law themselves only to be routinely overturned on appeal.
It’s real funny that you want to treat the judiciary as your cheering section but that literally means they are bad, activist judges.
Re:
Truthful testimony under oath is “crazy stuff” now?
…says someone who probably jizzes in his pants every time SCOTUS ignores legal precedents to rule in favor of Trump doing some horrid thing that makes the country worse for anyone who isn’t a wealthy white male.
Re:
activist judges
Disagreeing with the orange tard and his goons doesn’t make them ‘activist’ anything. It just means that the stable of lawyers this incompetent DOJ has are a bunch of DEI fuckups. If you really believe in merit-based hiring, why don’t you fire the fuckup lawyers that make you look like fools, instead of complaining about it?
Seems simple to me, but apparently not so much to you people.
Re:
Hoo boy, wait to you see what the heavily blue state of West Virginia’s judges think about Trump and his band of merry assholes…
https://www.techdirt.com/2026/03/03/fuck-ice-says-west-virginia-court-threatening-fines-and-contempt-charges/
Suck it up shithead.
Re:
Are you paid to be this stupid? I’m wondering how many of you aholes are assigned TechDirt to spew this garbage nonsense.
Re: When
You can get everyone in a group to Vote, in any way and be 100% almost Every time.
Its a parade. Its not a real vote, when THERE HAS TO BE alternative thoughts.
TRUMP does not Rule over the Pentagon.
contempt of court
if….IF one of these judges do decide to lock up any of these trump cartel criminals. they would just run to one of these appeals judges they have on tap and have there contempt of court charge reversed! and be out by dinner time!
If he was actually sick of the treatment he's be punishing rather than threatening
I hope the judge is practicing their shocked face when the regime ignores this order as well.
Judges can issue as many threats as they want, until they actually follow through and start throwing people in cells they’re just bluffing and everyone knows it, and the longer they continue to let the regime smack them around without consequence the more the US legal system exposes itself as a paper tiger where the only power it actually had against the powerful was the other side agreeing to play along.
Give an Inch and they take a Mile
We have seen this before from lawless governments; Hitler comes to mind as the result of unrestrained, enabled power. If no one challenges these despots, they will continue to take the mile.