Microsoft CEO Laments Criticism Of “AI Slop,” Causing The Whole Internet To Double Down On Criticism Of “Microslop”
from the have-you-considered-no-longer-being-terrible dept
We’ve noted more than a few times how Microsoft’s use of AI in journalism has been an embarrassing mess. Microsoft’s steadily deteriorating MSN websites have been criticized for years for the lazy use of AI slop, resulting in numerous false headlines, fake stories, and low-quality engagement trash. Like Google and others, the pursuit of impossible scale has made quality and usefulness an afterthought.
Microsoft’s also been broadly criticized elsewhere when it comes to its rushed adoption of AI, whether it’s the privacy implications of the company’s Windows 11 “recall” feature, or forcing the install of Microsoft’s Copilot AI assistant on smart TV owners who never wanted it and can’t uninstall it. Microsoft also adores forcing copilot integration into Windows 11 in ways, again, nobody asked for and often can’t disable.
Copilot may very well be useful to some people; but like most tech companies, Microsoft’s rushed, ham-fisted adoption has been a bit of a tone-deaf mess. And it actively undermines the stuff that LLMs can actually accomplish. This is before you get to the environmental impact of AI, or its quickly-expanding, guardrail-optional use in global military imperialism at the hands of insane autocrats.
This all recently resulted in some fairly significant backlash for Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella. Nadella recently shared a fairly innocuous end-of-year post at LinkedIn.
Most of the short post isn’t really all that interesting or incorrect; he notes that AI is stumbling through a phase where we’re beginning to sort between “spectacle” and “substance,” something that’s likely to result in a big bubble pop this year due the chasm between real-world usefulness and broad tech company misrepresentation of AI (he doesn’t really acknowledge that latter part, of course).
Where Nadella got into trouble was apparently this part, where he fairly innocuously laments the rising criticism of “AI slop.” It was first highlighted by Windows Central:
“We need to get beyond the arguments of slop vs sophistication,” Nadella laments, emphasizing hopes that society will become more accepting of AI, or what Nadella describes as “cognitive amplifier tools.” “…and develop a new equilibrium in terms of our “theory of the mind” that accounts for humans being equipped with these new cognitive amplifier tools as we relate to each other.”
Nadella’s problem here is he dismissively puts the onus on the consumer when it comes to “getting beyond” concerns about AI slop. That dodges any responsibility for the very rich people and companies dictating the entire trajectory of AI to start using it more responsibly.
They aren’t so far; most wealthy tech leaders see AI largely as a way to undermine labor and create a giant lazy badly-automated ouroboros of shallow clickbait garbage that shits out ad engagement cash with very low lift. Often these efforts redirect money away from human artists and journalists and creators into the pockets of some very sleazy people operating with clearly zero ethical guardrails.
The press aggregation machine (much of it ironically now badly automated) latched on to Nadella’s demand that people stop calling it AI slop, immediately resulting in people doubling down on AI slop criticism in a way that made “Microslop” trend across the internet.

Automation, broadly, certainly has its uses and is, generally, not going away. The backlash to AI is, in many ways, tethered tightly and unavoidably to a growing disdain for wealth disparity at the hands of the authoritarian-simping extraction class keen on eliminating literally all ethical oversight of industry.

A great way for billionaires like Nadella to diffuse this growing animosity about their rushed, clumsy, non-transparent, integration of language learning models into everything (whether you like it or not) in ways that aren’t ethical or useful is to, you know, stop doing that. Another great step might be to stop kissing the ass of authoritarians who are actively destroying democracy, civil rights, and the rule of law?
It sounds like many people might be willing to get over AI slop once the billionaires in charge of its development, trajectory, and implementation stop doubling down on AI slop, and stop being tone deaf, irresponsible assholes.
Filed Under: ai, ai slop, automation, billionaires, journalism, llms, msn, satya nadella
Companies: microsoft


Comments on “Microsoft CEO Laments Criticism Of “AI Slop,” Causing The Whole Internet To Double Down On Criticism Of “Microslop””
Here is to Microsoft thinking that complexity and having poor security with antiquated principles are professional and cool, one of the stupidest behaviors I have seen.
At least they aren’t as stupid as Google mismanaging YouTube. LMAO remember the YouTube shooting and how people said YouTube’s stupidity led to that disaster and YouTube seemingly didn’t learn anything about stupid mismanagement?
With Microsoft, stupidity leading to tragedy would come in the form of extreme security failures.
Oh, Microsoft has a theory of the mind now? I’d like to hear that.
“Nadella’s problem here is he dismissively puts the onus on the consumer”
Decisions stops or proceed at Nadella.
Re:
Nadella’s problem is:
Gates had vast markets (first end-users and then businesses) to conquer, delivering huge profits and bonuses via the sales of Windows and Office licenses.
Ballmer had a shiny new Cloud to seed with Azure, with money to be made renting out Windows servers and services to businesses who didn’t want to run their own.
Nadella has… a mature market with no vast new lands to colonize, just annual renewals of the same old 365 services to keep the corporation in business. Nadella is desperate for something – anything!!! – to report explosive growth in and justify his salary.
Nadella reminds me of Donald Sutherland’s character in Animal House, explaining that “Milton is boring. Mrs Milton probably found him boring” but take the assignment on Paradise Lost seriously because “Hey guys, this is my job!” That’s Satya and “AI”. “Stop talking it down. This is my bonus!”
AI has it's place but it is already overused where it is not wanted
I think AI has good assistive roles for making jobs easier. I think making AI as a replacement role is a huge mistake and I wish CEOs could see this. Unfortunately, the $$$ in their eyes cause blindness.
I know we have crossed opinions in the past on a certain prior internet reporting site but by and large I have been behind you.
AI has caused a headache in MD because the grid wants to trample over peoples lands in order to run wiring to VA so they can have the juice needed to run more AI centers in VA. The process was invasive enough that they wanted to stop hunters from hunting their own lands on days surveys would be conducted. I know it sounds dumb not being able to shoot a deer on your own property but if you are dependent on that sustenance, it could be a big deal. To be honest, I don’t live in the affected area and I don’t even hunt but if I put myself in their shoes and was like OMG.
AI is awesome but should not be used to take the remainder of our life’s juices just for the sake of it. It feels like another “5G” (which took John C Dvorak out of PC Magazine for his opinion), “.net” (remember Microsoft calling everything .net?) and Java (Sun Microsystems calling everything “Java”)
AI is already being oversold and will underdeliver. It has a benefit but we need to focus on improvements elsewhere too. It should not be a mechanism to extract the resources of innocent utility customers dry to deliver this under achievement.
Re:
I was surrounded by servers and workstations that were Sun Based. I also used X terminals that still had a 8-bit color map; so I’ve been around. I explicitly remember Sun for a short period of time calling everything “JAVA”
With that said, I respect your skill as a JAVA programmer. I took a week long course in JAVA just for the heck of it and by the end of the week I just about saw my soul leaving my body.
I liked that JAVA made inheritance much cleaner than C++ but the sheer quantity of libraries that JAVA had intimidated me. I suspect you know what libraries to use and avoid. I bet you are a great programmer!
Re:
Even that is questionable in at least some circumstances.
Coincidentally, I did a write-up today covering this very topic. There was a study done to determine if AI could help speed up software development. Basically, the question was whether or not babysitting AI would make things more efficient. The people conducting this study were convinced that it would increase productivity and assumed it would increase the time to complete the various test tasks by around 24%. What they found was that using AI bloated the time to complete tasks by 19% instead.
When they learned this, they started dismissing their own results and argued that it was a small study and is not indicative of the future of AI. Oops!
https://www.freezenet.ca/study-ai-slowed-software-development-down-by-19/
Re: Re:
ITYM “decrease the time” here.
Re: Re: 'The data says I'm wrong so the data must be flawed.'
When they learned this, they started dismissing their own results and argued that it was a small study and is not indicative of the future of AI. Oops!
Talk about giving away the game and letting it slip that the only reason you did the study was to support your current position on AI…
Yet another reason to not give M$ a dime.
(Note that Microsoft gets $5 on every brand new Android phone, because of 250k patents they’ve got on mobile technologies.)
slopification: including life, the universe, and everything in training
The larger AIs are great assistants when looking at input that either has a clear specification or is highly curated. Python modules are a great example; ask an AI to code a module with a detailed set of goals, and you have a good chance of getting good code.
However, if you ask for a design that also has a lot of forums loaded with poorly based opinions or outright misinformation, chances of success are poor. A good example is the area of vintage analog components. If you restrict to a specific component, such as a 6SJ7 preamplifier tube, there is a good chance of success. However, if you pick a preamplifier tube, a driver tube, and a final tube with a request to specify components and connections, the output goes to hell.
I’ve been using Ollama to create local, targeted AIs.
I’ll get over it when all the tech CEOs have been converted to pig slop.
I get the feeling that humans are not their intended audience.
I mean. My issues with AI that it’s raising prices, and being subsidized by the poor, all so people can undress women and girls.
Java
I never saw Sun Microsystems claim everything was Java… only where there was Java actually used.
(a former Sun user and closing in on 30 years a Java programmer)
It’s funny. So far the main successes of AI are, voice scams, deep fakes, email scams,and nudify apps.
Those are the areas it has been working the best.
News? Terrible. Code? Alright, video games? Terrible. Video? Meh. Art? Meh.
Re:
I take it that you weren’t impressed when Microsoft produced an Ai “Minecraft” where the terrain would change when your back was turned.
If the general Internet user can recognize the low quality of AI-slop, it must be really really bad. I wonder what the source of that reality-distortion-field is where those executives live in. Coke residue from the dollar bills?
One thing AI was very useful for was to show how wealth concentration generated a completely out of touch with reality, complete assholes that think they are above the law and everyone cast of billionaires that are just rushing humanity into misery, climate catastrophe and generally very bad things. Often associated with fascism/nazism, human trafficking, sexual abuse and pedophilia. One of the worst of them is president of the strongest military force in the world.
We are going extinct sooner or later, guided (or forced) by a class of people that should not exist. There’s no winning, no improving in sight.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
And what are you, personally, doing about it other than whining on an Internet forum?
Re: Re:
Not using what I can avoid from these people. Which is very little considering I can’t avoid AWS, Azure, Google and the likes. It’s also very difficult to avoid physical stuff from huge corporations and otherwise asshole owners. Suzano, a Brazilian company owned by assholes has the monopoly in cellulose production and market, did you know? I can’t avoid stuff that needs cellulose. I’m also voting for people that actually want to tackle wealth concentration and attending protests and gatherings to pressure politicians to do the right thing. Have you ever inhaled tear gas? I have and it’s not fun.
But that’s the limit of what I can do both in terms of possibilities and in terms of my own mental health.
Also, don’t be the person that says “what are you doing instead of complaining in the internet”. It’s obnoxious.
If AI (or really, almost any new technology) were really so helpful, useful, and in-demand, why do all these companies insist on making it opt-out instead of opt-in?
If there were any legitimate value to most users, they would seek it out without having it shoved down their throats.
Re:
The fact Google and Microsoft keep having to add formerly premium AI services to their ‘free’ products to try and justify their investment tells you how much demand there is for gen Ai.
Oops
Defuse, not diffuse
“No, it’s the children who are wrong.”
Re:
I now have an incredibly cursed desire to ask Copilot how to make Steamed Hams, just to see if at some point it lists “Aurora Borealis” as one of the ingredients.
He should’ve kept his mouth shut and lived with “MicroSloth”.
Another reason for calling AI slop slop is just how bad GenAi is at doing what people want it to do.
For example, the agentic AI Microsoft wants people to use, while they admit that it might install malware onto your computer if it comes across a website that tells it to.
If Microsoft wants to stop people calling it Ai slop, they shouldn’t be trying to release the Ais when they are so bad. If that’s not possible for the money they are willing to spend, they need to be willing to cancel the project.
Instead, they had Recall skip their internal testing.
But somehow it’s out problem when we call slop slop.
I personally don’t have an issue with AI, but the reason I refused to get into Windows 10 was because of the forced rebooting.
And the reason I will never get into Windows 11 is because of the “taking screenshots of everything you do every 5 seconds.”
I’m enjoying Linux, and I’m never going back.
Re:
I bought a new laptop in 2024 and I haven’t run into a single issue with Win11. But I also made sure to disable and remove Copilot (as well as watch for, then disable and remove, any further AI bullshit). The moment that shit gets forced onto my laptop, it’s either Ubuntu or Linux Mint for me.
And what sucks about that, at least for Microsoft, is that every computer I’ve ever owned has been a Windows machine, going all the way back to the ’90s and Windows 3.11 being on my very first computer. (I even bought Windows 95!) I’ve never had any real problems with Windows for as long as I’ve had a computer. And it’s literally the only OS with which I have any extensive experience. I legit don’t mind using Windows, even when I know I’m supposed to be annoyed or whatever with it. That Microsoft could alienate someone like me into trying Linux speaks deeply to the rot at the core of the company.
Re: Re:
If you want a fun trip down memory lane, you can install Windows 3.1 in DOSBox and play 16 bit DOS games. I did that at one point and had lots of fun with that. SkiFree, MicroMan, Gravity Well, Mordor – the Depths of Dejenol, Dare to Dream, Quatra Command, and Castle of the Winds were some good 16 Bit Windows memories for me that were great to relive.
Re: Re: Re:
GOG has a lot of older games, too—including several in its Preservation Program, which aims to keep games compatible with and working on PCs now and in the foreseeable future. One of the most requested games for that program is one that’s been talked about on this site numerous times before: No One Lives Forever.
Re: Re:
So… you’ve run into at least two issues with Windows 11. Which I guess makes your “single-issue” comment technically correct.
Re: Re: Re:
I never ran Copilot or any other AI features on Win11, and I don’t think my laptop is powerful enough to even run that “take a picture of your computer every few seconds” thing. I disabled those features practically right out of the gate, and since then, I’ve either removed them outright or kept them disabled. AI shit isn’t an issue on my laptop; if Microsoft forces AI shit on me by making it impossible to disable or remove, that’s when I jump to Linux and don’t look back.
This is a classic response from a thin skinned CEO that can’t handle having the truth shown to them. They wonder why people are posting videos of how to remove the slop generator or switching to a competitor’s OS (Linux) that doesn’t have a slop generator.
AI, for when you can't think for yourself
Since he apparently can’t figure it out maybe he should ask Copilot why so many people loathe AI and consider it a garbage(and now CSAM) generator that basically no-one but execs want.
Angry Tech Man Shakes Fist at Sun
“We need to get beyond the arguments of slop vs sophistication…”
Satya, my man. You currently have a product that costs billions of dollars to create and maintain, and you have relentlessly marketed it as a tool that will improve upon human efficiency. So long as said product continues to aggregate news incorrectly and is repeatedly befuddled by human hands, arguments that your product produces slop will persist. This is not a user issue. This is a Microsoft has a bad product that produces slop issue. Make good products that are reliable and maybe, just maybe people will stop calling you microslop.
The criticism isn’t going to stop until AI pushers go away, learn the meaning of consent then come back with a product people actively seek out rather than taking whatever they want then forcing the end product into things that worked better without them. If they produce something people want, they will find a market, they will not brute force one by breaking working software or making a search engine that starves the sites it draws from and is wrong an unacceptable percentage of the time.
Nothing about Gen AI as it stands is about making a better product and certainly not a better world, it is a totem of greed.
Know what’s funny? Slop content was already a problem before LLMs came to prominence. Rage bait slop has been a problem on the internet for well over a decade now. Even in creative media like video games, low effort asset flip slop is certainly nothing new. All “AI” has done is exacerbate a problem that has already existed.
That’s not to say we don’t need some sensible regulations to govern the use of “AI” tools but we need to stop pretending like slop content hasn’t been a problem for much longer than the current AI bubble has existed.
Re:
The difference there is that none of the major companies were calling asset flip slop a good thing.
I get the plan now
They’re not pushing “AI” per-se, they’re just pushing 1984 with all their might. The goal is to turn it into a necessity, as “cognitive amplifier tools”. Right, by keeping connected to their cloud, of course.
I can’t wait for another AI shill piece from Glyn Moody to show up on Techdirt, with both Glyn and Mike ignoring the criticism they receive for letting people push AI slop here.
Can we ban Satya Nadella from using AI? I’d hate for it to become a stupidity amplifying platform!