Dude, I understand the point you think you're making.
But you say "I agree with Trump on some things" often enough, you're making a different point than you think you are.
GTFO with this “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” Psychiatrists can’t help people work their way through a stupid phrase the GOP has been using for the past few years because they can’t actually produce a coherent counterargument.
It's been more than the past few years. They've been using it so long it started out as "Bush Derangement Syndrome".
The ironic thing is that their interference with his Colbert interview probably won him the nomination.
Somebody should come up for a name for that, when somebody tries to hide something and calls attention to it instead.
People shouldn't need a decoder ring to figure out what in fuck's name you're talking about. Enough with the cute nicknames; Mad Magazine isn't hiring.
Yes, and for now they're all together as a collection. You're advocating for the collection to be split up and auctioned off piecemeal to private collectors, and you believe this would be better, for reasons you haven't explained.
The quoted section doesn’t actually say anything about having to determine whether they’re physically in Utah?
The law states that they must perform age verification for individuals "in this state". The quoted section defines "individuals in this state" as anyone physically located in the state, regardless of whether they're using a VPN to make it appear is if they're not located in the state.
How can websites possibly comply with the law without determining whether a given user is physically located in the state?
...the Callais decisions aren't shadow docket rulings and are very definitely precedential.
They've gutted what was left of the Voting Rights Act. It's kind of a big fucking deal.
Tim, AI detractors are worried about its impact on jobs, the environment, and the economy, and we've explained that to you so many times that when you say what we're worried about is bots in Ultima Online it kinda seems like the misunderstanding is willful.
Not a fan of dismissing serious government abuses as "distractions" from other government abuses. Some of us can pay attention to more than one abuse at a time.
Also, Kash Patel repeated the exact same lie in a Senate hearing yesterday.
Dude, I understand the point you think you're making. But you say "I agree with Trump on some things" often enough, you're making a different point than you think you are.
The ironic thing is that their interference with his Colbert interview probably won him the nomination. Somebody should come up for a name for that, when somebody tries to hide something and calls attention to it instead.
People shouldn't need a decoder ring to figure out what in fuck's name you're talking about. Enough with the cute nicknames; Mad Magazine isn't hiring.
Yes, surely if we eliminated fines then there would be no other ways in which rich people would have any unjust advantages over poor people.
Good week for people named Wilson.
(And I can think of at least two Supreme Court Justices who might be sympathetic to that argument.)
Nono, the argument is that denying the sexual assault is part of the job.
Yes, and for now they're all together as a collection. You're advocating for the collection to be split up and auctioned off piecemeal to private collectors, and you believe this would be better, for reasons you haven't explained.
...the Callais decisions aren't shadow docket rulings and are very definitely precedential. They've gutted what was left of the Voting Rights Act. It's kind of a big fucking deal.
Evidently Another Anonymous Coward is not aware that there is an election in six months. Well, nobody tell him.
Not a fan of dismissing serious government abuses as "distractions" from other government abuses. Some of us can pay attention to more than one abuse at a time.
Nah, too Catholic.
How about 9 years? Trump asks vaccine critic to chair committee on vaccine safety