Trump Kicks Kristi Noem To The Curb For Being Exactly The Sort Of Person Trump Wanted Her To Be

from the maga-is-the-stripper-that-doesn't-love-you-back dept

I come here to celebrate the apparently permanent sidelining of former DHS head, Kristi Noem. I know the adage usually does some hedging before damning with faint praise, but I’m not interested in praise, faint or otherwise, much less pretending this isn’t worth celebrating.

Noem openly pined for the VP position, but shot herself in the foot by shooting a dog in her gravel pit and then telling the world about it in her incredibly premature memoirs. What was meant to be a self-congratulatory anecdote about doing what needs to be done was correctly read by pretty much everyone as little more than a person gloating about inflicting misery on animals and her own children.

Kristi Noem spent most of her time as the DHS Secretary making sure she showed up front and center in social media posts. She also was always the first to portray anyone killed or wounded by federal officers as “terrorists,” and refused to walk back those comments after the facts proved otherwise.

She gifted herself with an expensive private jet so she could arrive at the next photo op in style. She moved into an expensive taxpayer-funded residence despite already living in another expensive taxpayer-funded residence. She blew $220 million on an ad campaign featuring her blown-dry looks and vapid statements that apparently also funneled some of that windfall back into her own pockets.

She continued to stay the course even as the national winds shifted in response to oppressive, blue state-targeting “immigration enforcement” efforts. She stood idly by while her officers violated rights, physically assaulted peaceful protesters, and literally murdered two people in one US city alone.

Realizing this putsch was hurting him more than helping him, Trump first sent Nazi-cosplayer Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino back to the actual border, forcing him out of the spotlight and back into the necessary but not-at-all-glamorous job of actually securing the border.

Noem was next. In a somewhat surprising move, Trump booted a true MAGA believer into irrelevance, taking Noem from an “is” to a “was” while she was engaged in a press briefing. She’s now the Special Envoy to the Shield of the Americas, which is exactly the sort of made-up position you’d shunt someone into if you didn’t want to be blamed for their hiring, but also didn’t want them to do any more damage to your administration.

Now that Noem’s been turfed, the knives are out. It’s not just leading GOP members now pretending she’s this administration’s Nikolai Yezhov. It’s also pro-Trump outlets like Fox News smelling the blood in the water but, of course, only speaking out now that the water’s more red than blue:

We can now openly admit what has been unfolding before our eyes for a year: that Kristi Noem was an utter, complete, total catastrophe, her tenure in charge of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) little more than a self-promoting crusade.

She was unqualified for the job from day one, and largely responsible for the awful excesses of ICE and the frustrating failures of FEMA

President Donald Trump’s decision to fire her, which took way too long, liberates many Republicans to acknowledge what many in the media, including me, along with Democrats and outside critics, have been saying all along: Noem was a slow-motion train wreck. 

Walk into the ocean, Howard Kurtz. You pretend like you’re a journalist and analyst and yet you state — openly! — that you weren’t willing to speak out against Kristi Noem (an apparent “utter, complete, total catastrophe”) until after Trump fired her. If you had any spine or ethics, you would have made your opinions known months ago and been hailed as a savvy insider. Now you just look like a practice squad Monday morning quarterback.

But enough about Kurtz. Here’s more about Noem, who was a spectacular failure on every level. Here’s another lowlight of Noem’s short federal career, as reported by The New Republic:

ICE’s former deputy director, Madison Sheahan, wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on 2,500 vehicles custom-wrapped to say “ICE” on the side, three sources told the Washington Examiner. The gaudy cars feature massive ICE logos, red stripes, and a golden decal of President Donald Trump’s name on the back window.

The vehicles first appeared in a DHS video intended to make ICE look cool. But a fleet of ostentatious cars are useless to Trump’s masked militia, which typically disappears people using unmarked vehicles.

Noem stans might want to pretend this doesn’t have anything to do with her since it was a former deputy director handling this purchase. No dice, weirdos. Noem has made it clear since day one that she’s the only one who can approve spending like this, which is something she used to defend refusing to send FEMA aid to places that weren’t sufficiently Trumpish.

That’s on top of other things that may have forced Trump to dump a die-hard ally. The first was the $220 million-worth of masturbation Noem performed, which came in the form of Noem-focused DHS ads featuring her sitting on a horse in front of Mt. Rushmore in South Dakota. Noem claimed the ad campaign was approved by Trump while testifying to Congress. Trump immediately said otherwise when questioned by reporters.

Then there were the three jets (two Gulfstreams and a remodeled 737) Noem wanted for her own personal use as DHS Secretary. On top of that, there were the rumors that Noem and her de facto chief of staff, Corey Lewandowski (another ridiculous MAGA asshat) were having an extramarital affair.

All of this was piled on top of a rapidly disintegrating “surge” in Minneapolis, which single-handedly managed to turn public opinion against Trump, at least in terms of immigration enforcement. Noem insisted on being the public face of this, competing with fellow sadists like the previously-mentioned (and similarly demoted) Gregory Bovino.

We should all dance on the professional grave of Kristi Noem, who sold out entirely to MAGA just to be stuck in a Special Envoy cubicle until she either gets demoted again or decides she’s better off back in South Dakota. Noem made her own bed. Now she gets to lay in it, along with her killed dog, which means she’s not only having to deal with her own shittily-made bed, but the fleas that come with it.

She couldn’t even make it 18 months. That’s heartening. That means a bunch more people who sold their souls for MAGA rock and roll are likely to find their loyalty repaid with GTFO orders from the boss man who won’t tolerate anything that doesn’t immediately look like a win. They deserve everything that’s coming to them, including the possibility of criminal or contempt charges for playing fast and loose with the laws and the US Constitution while holding, however briefly, their positions of power.

We won’t miss you, Kristi. You were the epitome of everything people hate about political appointees. The most you can hope for is that your swift defenestration will be somehow instructive for those following in your shady, subordinate footsteps. If not, you’ll be nothing more than a foul breeze, remembered only for the odor you created while passing through the political system. But you were exactly what Trump wanted, right up until he decided he didn’t.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Trump Kicks Kristi Noem To The Curb For Being Exactly The Sort Of Person Trump Wanted Her To Be”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
43 Comments
Bolivar diGriz (profile) says:

Re:

Mullin deserves censure for his ridiculously over the top support of his cult leader’s senile rantings. He didn’t get to choose his name.

I’m from Australia. We recently had a would-be leader who had changed her name (decades ago) from Susan to Sussan for no good reason. That is someone who deserves to be ridiculed for her name. Not Mullin. As I said, he has provided numerous real reasons for us to ridicule him.

Of course, as with all these fanatics, once he gets his new office door updated and starts issuing murderous orders, ridicule will no longer be the correct response.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

What’s fucked up about her getting fired is that Trump said he didn’t know about or approve of Noem’s multimillion-dollar ad campaign and Noem said he did. Why is that fucked up? Because it means one of three things:

  1. Kristi Noem was able to pull off her ad campaign without Donald Trump’s prior knowledge or consent.
  2. Trump gave his consent and lied about it because he realized the optics of having approved Noem’s ad campaign would not be good.
  3. Trump gave his consent and lied about it because he genuinely cannot remember giving his consent.

None of those options speak well of the mental acuity of the oldest man to ever serve as the president of the United States.

MrWilson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

and would rule out most past presidents.

Yeah, that was intentional.

Presidents in their 60s have historically been up to the job.

Meh. Capability to do the job is not necessarily fitness to be good at it and I feel like age has a significant impact on lack of empathy for a populace that is on average much younger and gives too many years to career politicians to get entrenched in political games. The opposite side of course is Trump not being a politician at all and just a grifter who is used to getting his way by any means possible. But I’d also love a net worth cap as well. No billionaire officials and maybe even a 20 million net worth cap to start, with full blind divestment during years of service.

I know this will never happen, but hey, neither could Trump’s authoritarianism either!

Thad (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2

I feel like age has a significant impact on lack of empathy

Nah, fuck this ageist horseshit. Tom Cotton, Josh Hawley, and Markwayne Mullin are all under 50. We can talk about stamina and cognitive ability as factors of age but getting old doesn’t turn you into a psychopath.

Trump isn’t evil because he’s old. He’s senile because he’s old. He was evil when he was young.

MrWilson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3

I’m not saying everyone under 55 is inherently empathetic and it just disappears at that age. I’m saying actual empathy is harder to come by when you’re further removed from the lived experiences of people much younger than you.

I’m also not saying Trump is evil because he’s old. He was evil in the 80s. But it’s a good thing to also bring up that being so old allows for manipulation from people like Stephen Miller on top of the higher likelihood of lack of empathy.

But an age cap would prevent a lot of people who are no longer concerned about what it’s like to be young and vulnerable and poor (or never were vulnerable and poor to begin with) from holding office. A lot of old people are concerned about “legacy” or enforcing their values based on their antiquated upbringing rather than making the world a better place here and now.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:4

I’m saying actual empathy is harder to come by when you’re further removed from the lived experiences of

“other people”, is how I’d finish that sentence. Would a rich 54-year-old lawyer really be able empathize with the American public? And if you think youth makes people more empathetic, look at all the young Nazi assholes working and voting for Trump; also look at the Trump of 30–40 years ago.

We might do better by saying that nobody can become president if their gross household income was more than double the country’s median, in any of the 3 preceding years.

MrWilson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:5

Yeah, that’s why I earlier mentioned the net worth cap too. You’d still get assholes, but you’d just reduce the number of them since there’s this odd coincidence of wealthy people who run for office being selfish greedy assholes and sociopaths. It’s still galling that there are poor assholes who lick boots and hate people who are different from them, but propaganda and religion are great brainwashing technologies.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:6

Yeah, that’s why I earlier mentioned the net worth cap too.

Sure, but I think it needs some refinement, and the age cap seems comparatively useless.

I find 20 million too high now, and it might be quite low in 100 years. It’d need to be inflation-adjusted. But the U.S. has an infrastructure to measure annual income, and does not track net worth (officially; the NSA probably knows). Income seems the more expedient choice.

Then again, all of these relatively coarse minor tweaks—which could have prevented past problems—are probably better at making us feel good than at preventing problems in the future. A lot of blame has to go to the Trump voters, who got exactly the out-of-touch tyrant they voted for.

How about every voter writes their own name on the ballot, we pick one at random, and that person becomes President?

MrWilson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:7

How about every voter writes their own name on the ballot, we pick one at random, and that person becomes President?

The movie version of Harrison Bergeron did this. You’d randomly have an inadequate, maybe compassionate, maybe egomaniacal, maybe easily corrupted president.

I’d be more inclined to analyze patterns of behavior to find a good leader who doesn’t want to lead. They would probably be the least likely to abuse power. Power is too often sought by those who want it and thus want to abuse it. But reluctant leaders are more reticent to abuse it.

Of course there’s a lot more nuance and many more factors at play, and human beings being part of the system of human politics is an essential weakness of the system, so it’s never as simple as one can imagine in their mind.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:8

I’d be more inclined to analyze patterns of behavior to find a good leader who doesn’t want to lead.

Isn’t that the job of the electorate? As you suggest, that’s kind of the problem with all these ideas.

The totally random ballot is mostly a thought experiment, but sortition is a real thing. For example, it was used in the Republic of Venice, as part of a rather convoluted electoral system. American jury selection is still basically random.

It might actually be a good idea to select political candidates at random; maybe totally random, maybe random among applicants, maybe with certain required qualifications. Maybe the applicants don’t know whether they’ll end up on the ballot for Mayor or President.

MrWilson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:9

I’d be interested in an experiment in blind voting where you don’t know who the candidate is. They list their positions and values generally, but also offer specific positions on specific legislation and how they would vote. If you choose to vote for them, you mark which positions they stated that have motivated you to vote for them. If during their term in office, they violate that trust by not following through with the position, you get to cancel your vote. If enough votes are canceled, they get automatically recalled. To prevent bad actors from just lying about their positions, you could also have them agree as an oath of office to fraud criminal charges if their positions in office are wildly different than their campaign conditions.

Of course this system would require a lot of overhead and vetting of candidates by neutral third parties and would be a mess to administer.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:8

You’d randomly have an inadequate, maybe compassionate, maybe egomaniacal, maybe easily corrupted president.

Keep in mind that President was never meant to be a particularly powerful position, and the title was initially considered almost excessively humble:

The House of Representatives didn’t want Washington to get drunk on power. They didn’t want to call him King in case that gave him ideas, or his successor ideas. So, they wanted to give him the humblest, meagerest(ph), most pathetic title that they could think of. And that title was president. President. They didn’t invent the title. I mean, it existed before, but it just meant somebody who presides over a meeting. It was like the foreman of the jury. And it didn’t have much more grandeur than the term foreman or overseer.

So, for an alternate perspective: don’t worry so much about who is President, but about what power they have. The ever-increasing concentration of power into that office is what makes power-seekers want it. The President has the unilateral power to set tariffs? Sure, let’s do that. Commander of the military? Time for a war. Every time a law defers to the President, Trump’s people interpret that as broadly as possible, and use it.

Times have changed. In an emergency that calls for tariffs, representatives can achieve a quorum via telecommunication in a matter of hours, so it hardly seems justifiable to let the President act first. Let Trump shake hands in foreign countries while the adults do the real work.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Trump gave his consent and lied about it because he genuinely cannot remember giving his consent.

Lying requires intent. What you’re describing would be mere dementia, not lying.

A fourth option is that Trump spoke without even trying to remember (not strictly the same as “cannot remember”), because truth doesn’t matter. Quoting Wikipedia:

In philosophy, Harry Frankfurt, among others, analyzed the concept of bullshit as related to, but distinct from, lying; the liar tells untruth, [while] the bullshitter aims to convey a certain impression of themselves without being concerned about whether anything at all is true[…].

Tell me that doesn’t fit Trump to a T.

I have my doubts about mental acuity too, but option 3 is really the only one that has anything to do with it. The rest are more about leadership ability (remember that all of Trump’s “business wisdom” was ghost-written) and ethics.

If we consider the behavior in a cynical “realpolitik” way, without any regard to ethics, much of it is actually logical. Trump has learned across a lifetime that this shit works, and is possible to get away with. So why stop?

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
n00bdragon (profile) says:

Re:

Or #4 (and most likely), if Noem even asked him, Trump gave a noncommittal answer like “just get it done” which Noem took as approval but which later on morphed into Trump’s traditional “Well, I didn’t say Simon Says” denial.

Still doesn’t reflect well on him though. Someone like that shouldn’t be anywhere near the resolute desk.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Donald Trump isn’t being kept in on the loop on basic ass stuff because while everyone wants to be in grandpa’s will, nobody wants to actually take care of grandpa.
I imagine everyone in the administration has been grifting, and everyone says everything they do comes straight from the top. Why bother looping in Donald?
However, Noam managed to bungle hard enough and thoroughly enough that someone was willing to tattle on her to Grandpa just to get her out of there.
Grandpa, of course, isn’t upset that she’s stealing two hundred million dollars, he’s upset that he wasn’t cut in for his share.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

How much ass stuff does the President really need to know?

At a minimum, how to properly wipe his ass, how to properly clean himself without wiping shit up his back, proper ass hygiene, proper diaper fitment, when to throw out underwear, and the cautionary tale of ‘when a fart, is a shart.’

I mean he needs to know how not to embarrass himself through deficient ass-hygeine, right?

You asked, I delivered. /s

Anonymous Coward says:

“On top of that, there were the rumors that Noem and her de facto chief of staff, Corey Lewandowski (another ridiculous MAGA asshat) were having an extramarital affair.”

Somehow, until this moment, I managed to remain blissfully unaware of this. I don’t mean that Lewandowski is a ridiculous MAGA asshat, although I submit that such a description is triply redundant. No, I mean the affair part of this statement.

First, I’m going to have to open the good scotch tonight to try to wash this out of my brain.

And second, I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised: no decent person, no thinking person, no one with any standards of any kind, would fuck either one of them…so they were probably each others’ last resort.

Third, I think I’ll make that drink a double.

Anonymous Coward says:

Now I want one of those wrapped “ICE” cars so I can just drive it around where ICE is actually trying to arrest innocent people, just to make it obvious!

Think they’d shoot at me? Hm!

(as an aside, don’t feel too sorry for Noem. From South Dakota as Guv and from the USA (yes, you, taxpayer) she’ll have magnificent retirement benefits plus all that she managed to grift off with).

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

As someone who voted for Biden, I will acknowledge that he had his issues, and that some of them were no doubt caused by his age.

But: he’s a fundamentally decent man who devoted his life to the service of his country, persisted despite unspeakable personal tragedy, and gave the very last of what he had left to give to try to rescue a country ravaged by four years of Trump.

So if in doing so, he erred or slipped or missed, then it’s certainly fair to point that out — but I will suggest balancing that against his lifelong record and against what he was faced with on the day he entered the Oval Office.

Biden, on his very worst day, was a far better President — and human being– than Trump could ever possibly be on his very best day.

Bolivar diGriz (profile) says:

Re: Re:

As someone who voted for Biden… he’s a fundamentally decent man

You have my sympathy. Unfortunately you have jumped from your native timeline to a much more dystopic one. The Joe Biden in this timeline was a mediocre opportunist who was rarely on the right side of history and was known for being willing and happy to compromise any principles he may possibly have once held in order to proactively compromise with Republican extremists.

As a single-term president his record was good – but then, being sandwiched between Trump terms does put your record in a better light than it otherwise would be. On the other hand, given his cognitive decline and the post-election revelations that he spent much of his presidency being puppeted by advisors, he can’t really be given full credit for his presidency either.

Jon Reeves (profile) says:

Don't forget the blankie!

And lest we forget, she had her lap dog Lewandowski fire a pilot mid-flight (and then rehire him) for not bringing her special blankie from the disabled plane they had to move from. (Though there is now reporting that the blanket was a cover – no pun intended – for something – unreported what – more embarrassing that was in the same bag.)

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Richard Nixon was never convicted of any crimes related to Watergate, but Gerald Ford still pardoned him for those presumed crimes. Donald Trump pardoned plenty of people for their actions on the 6th of January 2021, including people who had been charged with crimes but had not yet been convicted or even faced trial. Unless you know of a law or legal precedent that completely overrules Ex parte Garland, presidential pardons can be granted to people who have only been charged with a federal crime.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

To wit: Joe Biden pardoned his son Hunter of any crimes he could’ve been charged with so the Trump regime couldn’t go after him after Trump took office again. I wouldn’t call that the most ethical use of the pardon power, but it’s much more ethically sound than Trump basically selling pardons these days. Also, it’s a father protecting his son out of love, so I have a hard time faulting Biden for handing out that pardon.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

defending the border” is not in any way a necessary job.

And also historically didn’t really happen. Even just a few decades ago, people in certain border areas would freely cross it without any repercussions. Like to use the Haskell Library, Peace Arch Park, or that American gas station at the dead end of a Canadian road.

Border controls are stricter now than when the countries were literally at war.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...