Though Facebook has the advantage of possibly still having people you want to talk to using it. So if you want to switch, you need to cut tie with them or pull them with you.
CBS News is much easier for viewers to replace.
If viewership is down, that means that viewers are going elsewhere. Somewhere that CBS can't control what they see.
It matters where they are going. If they are going to somewhere more to the right, that's a win for Trump. If they are going to somewhere left of where CBS News, that's a bit of a loss. Left of where CBS News used to be, it's a bigger loss of information control.
The difference is that RTX was always sold on the premise that the reduced framerate was a worthwhile cost for the benefits of the improved lighting and being way less work for devs than prior lighting methods. To the point that people put RTX into Doom just because they could.
While DLSS was always sold on the benefit being the improved framerate.
The fun detail I see from people who are claiming that DLSS5 produces more "realistic" graphics is that they refuse to even attempt to defend it putting lipstick on all the women.
DLSS before 5 was attempting to render the output at a higher framerate with minimal change from what rendering without it would produce.
DLSS 5 makes changes, like putting lipstick on all the women, and the demonstration needing dual 5090s makes it sound like it's going to come with a significant reduction in framerate.
It's like Nvidia has inverted every target they had for prior versions of DLSS and are surprised that people don't like it.
I'm going to make two predictions there.
The first is that there will be journalists who make corrections to their reporting that changes who won the bet. Some because they gave in to the threats, others because they found out that their initial story was actually wrong.
The threats from one side will stop and be replaced by similar threats from the other side of the wager.
The second is that there will be times when Polymarket pays out based on initial reporting. Then new information will arrive and change who should have been paid from that bet. Probably involving bets around when someone dies.
That mess will involve lawyers.
Anyone familiar with match fixing in sports and sports betting should be really worried about the equivalent happening when people are betting on wars.
We are talking about a CBP drone here. Look at everything else they have been up to recently.
When military forces claim that a CBP drone was acting threatenly, I don't have enough information to rule out the possibility that it was doing something stupid.
We can't.
But I'm hoping that there is some easily proven tampering. Because such tampering by the Trump administration makes it more difficult for them to use these ballots as proof of anything in court.
How effective is throwing a show onto a worse timeslot when the youtube channel exists ?
Dumping multiple episodes at a time isn't an option for a show that is filmed the same day it airs.
What exactly happens if none of the above or no confidence wins ?
If you repeat the election, which candidates get to stand for round 2 ?
Consider how voters will respond to that when it happens.
Is a million dollar drone really a worthwhile use of police funds, when compared with buying multiple cheaper drones with that same money ?
Though it does mean that anyone who shoots it down will have a greater impact.
You're not going to be looking at one or two ICE thugs breaking into your home. There will be more of them.
Do you really think they will let you live long enough to get into a courtroom ?
I can't see anyone making two different versions of a game, one that complies with this and one that doesn't. So I'd expect a price increase worldwide.
Though it will be tricky to separate this price increase from prices going up for other reasons.
How often do you see AAA publishers going bankrupt ?
Because the EU has one trick they use to enforce the GDPR and other laws: They don't just go after the subsidiary that violated the law. They look at the entire structure of linked companies and treat them all as a single entity.
To use a gaming example, if Blizzard broke this law by killing a game, the EU would be able to go after Activision. Maybe even Microsoft.
Though Facebook has the advantage of possibly still having people you want to talk to using it. So if you want to switch, you need to cut tie with them or pull them with you. CBS News is much easier for viewers to replace.
If viewership is down, that means that viewers are going elsewhere. Somewhere that CBS can't control what they see. It matters where they are going. If they are going to somewhere more to the right, that's a win for Trump. If they are going to somewhere left of where CBS News, that's a bit of a loss. Left of where CBS News used to be, it's a bigger loss of information control.
The difference is that RTX was always sold on the premise that the reduced framerate was a worthwhile cost for the benefits of the improved lighting and being way less work for devs than prior lighting methods. To the point that people put RTX into Doom just because they could. While DLSS was always sold on the benefit being the improved framerate.
Maybe. But remember that Nvidia thought that this version, running on dual 5090s, was far enough along to be worth showing off.
The fun detail I see from people who are claiming that DLSS5 produces more "realistic" graphics is that they refuse to even attempt to defend it putting lipstick on all the women.
DLSS before 5 was attempting to render the output at a higher framerate with minimal change from what rendering without it would produce. DLSS 5 makes changes, like putting lipstick on all the women, and the demonstration needing dual 5090s makes it sound like it's going to come with a significant reduction in framerate. It's like Nvidia has inverted every target they had for prior versions of DLSS and are surprised that people don't like it.
I'm going to make two predictions there. The first is that there will be journalists who make corrections to their reporting that changes who won the bet. Some because they gave in to the threats, others because they found out that their initial story was actually wrong. The threats from one side will stop and be replaced by similar threats from the other side of the wager. The second is that there will be times when Polymarket pays out based on initial reporting. Then new information will arrive and change who should have been paid from that bet. Probably involving bets around when someone dies. That mess will involve lawyers.
I imagine that they don't care. That they have structured their gambling so that they win on any outcomes.
Anyone familiar with match fixing in sports and sports betting should be really worried about the equivalent happening when people are betting on wars.
We are talking about a CBP drone here. Look at everything else they have been up to recently. When military forces claim that a CBP drone was acting threatenly, I don't have enough information to rule out the possibility that it was doing something stupid.
We can't. But I'm hoping that there is some easily proven tampering. Because such tampering by the Trump administration makes it more difficult for them to use these ballots as proof of anything in court.
How effective is throwing a show onto a worse timeslot when the youtube channel exists ? Dumping multiple episodes at a time isn't an option for a show that is filmed the same day it airs.
What exactly happens if none of the above or no confidence wins ? If you repeat the election, which candidates get to stand for round 2 ? Consider how voters will respond to that when it happens.
Is a million dollar drone really a worthwhile use of police funds, when compared with buying multiple cheaper drones with that same money ? Though it does mean that anyone who shoots it down will have a greater impact.
You're not going to be looking at one or two ICE thugs breaking into your home. There will be more of them. Do you really think they will let you live long enough to get into a courtroom ?
I wonder how many things these political appointees did before the grand jury that will render the indictment invalid.
I can't see anyone making two different versions of a game, one that complies with this and one that doesn't. So I'd expect a price increase worldwide. Though it will be tricky to separate this price increase from prices going up for other reasons.
How often do you see AAA publishers going bankrupt ? Because the EU has one trick they use to enforce the GDPR and other laws: They don't just go after the subsidiary that violated the law. They look at the entire structure of linked companies and treat them all as a single entity. To use a gaming example, if Blizzard broke this law by killing a game, the EU would be able to go after Activision. Maybe even Microsoft.