Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of 2023 At Techdirt
from the it's-musky-in-here dept
Happy (almost) new year, Techdirt readers! As always, it’s time to take take a break from the regular weekly post and take a look at the comments that got the most votes from our community this year in the insightful and funny categories, plus a special look at the comments that got the most combined votes across both. If you want to see the winners for this week, here’s first and second place for insightful, and first and second place for funny. Now, on to the big winners!
The Most Insightful Comments Of 2023
Given all the news he created, and all the conversation it generated, it probably won’t surprise you to learn that comments about Elon Musk dominated the leaderboards this year. All the way back in May, we learned many things about Musk’s, er, unique management style when six former Twitter employees filed a lawsuit full of juicy details, including more information about the previously-revealed fact that Musk didn’t want to pay rent for the Twitter headquarters. They employees’ stories painted quite a picture, leading TKnarr to react with what was voted the most insightful comment of 2023:
Written record
This sounds like prime examples of a rule I’ve had for decades: if your bosses don’t want a written record of something, you absolutely need a written record of it.
Things aren’t wall-to-wall Musk in the winners, but to be honest it’s pretty damn close: there are only two comments unrelated to Musk out of the nine featured in this post, and one of them is our second place winner on the insightful side. Instead, it’s about another CEO who briefly stole the spotlight with terrible business decisions. Namely Reddit’s Steve Huffman, who back in June went to war with the site’s volunteer mods and basically the whole Reddit community. Radix offered a summary of some of his comments that racked up the votes to become the second most insightful comment of 2023:
“We don’t do things for free, so all the unpaid mods should get back to work” is quite the statement.
But of course nobody could upstage Elon Musk for long, and in October we were talking about his harebrained plan to turn ExTwitter into a financial services app that would ostensibly take over just about everything everyone does related to money. That led to the first of two anonymous comments to make this year’s list, with some prognostication that was voted the third most insightful comment of 2023:
Given how well that Elon complies with consent decrees, I suspect his compliance with banking regulation will give his financial service ambition a lifetime of about 5 minutes.
And with that, we move on to…
The Funniest Comments of 2023
On the funny side of things, we kick things off with our second and last diversion from the exploits of Elon. As you may recall, back in July the New York Times wrote up a great profile of Mike Masnick, and we featured a brief post calling attention to it. DJ suggested that we should have taken a different approach in what was voted the funniest comment of 2023:
Streisand?
What you should have done is post a very angry article here decrying it as a hit piece asking people to ignore it and see if you could have Streisand effect it to an even bigger audience.
Next, we move on to the earliest of all the comments so far, from all the way back in February when Elon Musk announced new and onerous pricing for the Twitter API that instantly gutted many useful things about the site. Keroberos stepped in with the first comment on the post, a heavy helping of general sarcasm (at a time when a lot more people still believed Musk must have some brilliant trick up his sleeve) that was voted the second funniest comment of 2023:
Hey now, if driving away all the advertisers, users, and third party developers — and completely destroying Twitter in the process gets rid of those pesky bots, it’s a small price to pay. Our boy Elon (being such a big brain, smarty-pants, capable of playing 12D chess), must surely be working from home grand multi-step plan that will become crystal clear to us normies at some point. Right?
Last but not least on the funny side, we have the return of Stephen T. Stone, who you may recall fully swept the insightful category and won all three spots in last year’s rankings. This time it’s the most recent comment in the list so far, coming just a few weeks ago when we wrote about Musk’s lawsuit against Media Matters and his reinstatement of Alex Jones, and alas it’s not an original work but a pass-along joke that was apt enough to be voted the third funniest comment of 2023:
Not my joke: Elon may have broken Twitter, but we can take some comfort in the fact that Twitter broke Elon.
But we’re not done yet, because first it’s time for…
The Top Comments Of 2023 For Insightful & Funny Votes Combined
More often than not, there’s some overlap between the leaderboards for funny and insightful votes individually, and the leaderboard for votes in both categories combined — but this isn’t one of those years. So we’ve got three more comments to feature (and yes, they’re all about Elon Musk). In first place for combined votes (with more votes on the insightful side, but plenty on both) it’s our second anonymous winner of the year, responding to Musk’s realization in August that credit cards weren’t enough for verification, and his subsequent plans to make verified users start uploading government identification:
I have complete confidence that the man notorious for not abiding by contractual agreements will absolutely abide by the stated privacy policy and keep my information secure.
In second place, it’s our only instance of two winners coming from the same post, with another entry from the Twitter API pricing announcement back in February (indeed it came in just three minutes after the comment that one second place for funny). This time, it’s That One Guy racking up lots of votes in both categories (but more on the funny side) for some solid speculation on what would follow:
Annnd they’re gone
Musk: Let all bask in my brilliance, now that app developers have to pay to increase the value of my platform our money troubles are over!
Five seconds later
What do you mean they’re ditching Twitter and shifting focus to other platforms rather than pay extortionate rates for the privilege of enriching me, who could have ever seen that coming?!
And last but not least, we’ve got our third place winner for combined votes (with again just a little more on the funny side), coming in at the end of November when Musk really outdid himself by going on stage and telling fleeing advertisers to go fuck themselves. He then went on to insist that “Earth” would judge which of them was in the right, leading Thad to accept the invitation:
Earth? Hey, I’m from Earth!
And my judgement is…it’s not Bob Iger’s fault that Elon Musk is a fucking nazi.
And with that, we close the books on 2023. Once again, thanks to all the commenters who keep generating great content for the weekly posts and these yearly roundups. I look forward to the continuing conversation in 2024!


Comments on “Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of 2023 At Techdirt”
Welp!
Can’t win ’em all (again). 🤣
So what happens to comments posted today (especially on this page)?
Are they ineligibly for an of-the-year award, or are they honorary 2024 comments?
Re:
Take a hint from the timestamp on your comment. Too late, sucker! 🤣
Re:
“So what happens to comments posted today?”
They are lost in the void, never to be counted. An ignominious ending for great comments.
Re: Re:
This is the greatest and best comment in the year… tribute.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Time to embark on another year of yelling about large private generic speech platforms that deny you the left-wing censorship you so love. X. Substack. I wonder which will be next? It’s all “you can’t force private platforms to do what you want” until they stop doing what you want. Then it’s “Nazis! Run away! Nazis!”
Re:
And another year of you impotently raging in the comments because writers said things you disagree with on a website that allows you to spew your bullshit without the censorship you claim they want. That you continue to be able to comment undermines the comments you make.
Re: Two can play that shitty game.
Time to embark on another year of whining about large private generic speech platforms that deny you the right-wing censorship you so love. Mastodon. Cohost. I wonder which will be next? It’s all “you can’t force private platforms to do what you want” until they stop doing what you want. Then it’s “Wokesters and transes! Run away! Wokesters and transes!”
…and let that be a lesson to you, folks: Trying to argue like Hyman Rosen argues will only ever make you sound like a brain-dead jackass.
Re: Re:
a quibble: actual brain-dead people have good sense not to say anything in most situations… so they actually come out ahead.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
If I wanted to run away from sites that had people with whom I disagree, I wouldn’t be here.
Re: Re: Re:
Mostly cause you get banned long before you can run away. Here you just run away after you get called out for acting like a Nazi. Or pretending (badly) to be what you think a left wing nut job sounds like, because you get off on “pretending” to be a homosexual.
Bro you’re about as complicated as a cracked coffee cup and about half as useful.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
Wrong attribution. I neither run away after people yell “Nazi!” at me nor do I pretend to be gay. If you want to be less confused by who is who, urge the site owner not to send my signed-in posts to moderation.
Re: Re: Re:3 There’s always an bigger idiot
And here I thought ol’ blue balls was the only person in the world dumb enough to lose a fight with an automated spam filter.
Re: Re: Re:4
Straight people can’t help being dumb. Just sayin’.
Re:
People with functioning brain stems might notice that exercising freedom of association is totally consistent with not forcing platforms to do what you want.
Musk has the right to make horrifically bad decisions that welcome Nazis and drive away paying customers, the rest of us have the right to point out what’s happening and suggest to others that supporting them is not a good thing.
While your type were trying to demand that the government force platforms to host people against their will, at least until you temporarily found yourselves in control of a larger platform (surely a very short-lived situation), the rest of us merely utilise free speech to address the problems and suggest ways to exercise freedom of association.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
Hey Hyman. This is going to be the year you and Trumpy and Musky put on your clitty cages.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
You can hide my comments all you want, Hyman. But it won’t change a fucking thing. You heteronormative freaks of nature are numbered. We will transcend you, we will evolve beyond your puny existences.
Re: Re: Re:
Your probably fake activism is just as annoying as Hymen’s bigotry and I have been silenced ravings.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
Call it fake all you want. There are more of us than you think. We will campaign for girls to crush our balls so the futas can take over.
CBT, among other things, will be added to the LGBT alphabet.
Re: Re: Re:3
No, they won’t. Fetishes aren’t the same thing as sexual/gender minorities. Also, adding another B and T would just be confusing, and LGBTQIA+ is already more than enough.
Re: Re: Re:4
We started with only two genders and ended up with a slime mold with over 720 of them.
It’s not a difficult ask to request that we go beyond the limitations of a 26-letter alphabet.
Re: Re: Re:5
No, you didn’t. Hermaphrodites, intersex, etc. people still existed while you pretended otherwise. That’s even before you try to explain the difference between sex and gender…
Re: Re: Re:6
Exactly my point.
We fought for our rights to be acknowledged as additional genders because straight people were too pigheaded to admit we exist.
It’s not a hard ask to be accounted for. We’re progressive enough to demand for it.
Re: Re: Re:
Herman we know it’s you.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
Obviously it’s Hyman. Everyone knows that sexual and gender minorities are incapable of having kinks that involve pain and torture. It’s not as though there’s entire communities focused on such gimmicks like walking on broken glass or anything.
Re: Re: Re:3
Since your kink seems to be humiliating yourself publicly, you would be the expert on that subject bro.
Re: Re: Re:4
Thank you. I’m trying to become more open-minded to fetishes. With a bit of luck I’ll graduate to more extreme expressions of being a cuck.
Re: Re: Re:5
You sound like someone doing a bad impression of a masochistic pervert. I don’t kinkshame, but I do say that kinks should be kept private when the subject has no relation to, well, relations (informed consent and all), and—more importantly here—I don’t believe you have the kink(s) you claim to have.
Now, do I think you’re anti-LGBTQ+ but pretending the opposite? I don’t know either way. It’s also likely that you are doing this without actually having any interest in the debate but just enjoy the chaos and anger that results. Either way, I just find you more irksome and lacking in any social decorum (which says a lot coming from someone like me for whom social norms and basic etiquette do not come naturally) than someone who causes me to be angrier at the likes of Hyman or someone with whom I’d agree.
Seriously, if you’re at all genuine, satisfy your kink with someone who enthusiastically consents to it in the appropriate forum. This isn’t the time or the place for it. If you’re not, you’re just a pathetic troll not worth the effort I’m putting into just one sentence of this comment. Either way, just go already.
Re: Re: Re:6
Do you think we got gay marriage in this country approved because we only talked to people who shared our kinks? Do you think we got into mainstream consciousness and had a seat at a table because we were passive? Fuck no!
One day you will come to understand. You cannot hold the queerness back. You can fuck up Hyman and think I’m him all you want. I’ve said it before, anything that takes the attention away from boring straight cucks is alright with me. It is precisely because we are genuine that we must remind the world that we are valid, and any disagreement must be soundly humiliated.
You cannot hold back progress. We used to believe there were only two genders. Now that we’ve started a movement going there will be genders more innumerable than the stars in the sky.
Re: That’s literally what you do though
You run away from your Nazi-esque opinions, that are so popular, you can’t even use a fake name to post them on the only site that will still let you in the front door.
And then cry about it.
Like a bitch.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
Why would I want to use a fake name? My real name is fine. If the site owner wants to engage in low-grade harassment while claiming to be a supporter of free speech, I’ll just be anonymous.
Re: Re: Re:
Look at you bro. Bragging you got bested by a spam filter. Somehow that’s even more pathetic than pretending to be your demented idea of a left winger, and arguing with yourself.
Re: Re: Re:
One day you will understand the difference between ‘will you’ and ‘you will’ and then you will understand the difference between moderation and censorship. When that understanding hits, you will also understand that freedom of association means that the decision to associate is mutual, and not a demand that people endure you presence.
Re: Re: Re:
Hey Hyman, go drink a cup full of estrogen. It’ll do you a favor, because we’re not going to switch to a larger clitty cage. You don’t merit the privilege.
I am honored to take 1st place in the funny category for this year. It made my night.
I would be interested to see what the vote totals were and how close it was.
Just a subject
https://www.rfi.fr/en/france/20231230-france-seeks-to-force-supermarkets-to-tackle-scandalous-shrinkflation
Forcing them to fight back. Shrinkflation.
TKnarr:
That’s more or less exactly what one of my professors said in an ethics class some twenty years ago. He was talking about his time in the private sector and how he’d blown the whistle on a dangerous product his company had planned to release. I remember him saying words to the effect of “I got an angry call from my boss asking ‘Why did you put that in an email?’ because they didn’t want there to be a record that they knew. That’s why I put it in an email.”
A good idea, but probably unworkable in practical terms given the fact that the NYT is paywalled.
but
Which one are you? Or is this a personal Identity problem.