Is there equity in waiting? You're investing your time, name, various intangible resources. So this company is trying to create equity here and make it liquid.
Personally I'd like to see it go forward. It'd be an interesting experiment. Yes, the initial blowback will be that waiting lists get incredibly long and that opportunists will stalk ticket sellers and the like. I believe that the market will balance itself out though. Just like real estate, when too many people pile on the price goes down until enough people get off and a balanced market is achieved.
In the long run I could see this service benifiting people. Much like eBay does. eBay has really driven down the price of a lot of items and at the same time made a lot of money for a lot of people.
How long until someone dies in one of these and they're called evil. Like the kid who spent 36 hours or a video game and died.
Entertainer and Athlete is definitly an interesting comparison. I'll have to think about that for awhile.
That really seems like a random thing to ban. You could always just go to higher altitudes. Is Denver suddenly off limits? I think this one will fall through.
And how is it unnatural. It just simulates an environment that anyone could go to. It only exists for convience, not cheating.
It's not like the creator of it decided he wanted to play with atmosphere one day. The benifits of high altitude were already known and he just simulated it.
If you're going to have it go off in proximity to sex offenders, what's next? you could theoretically mash this service with Goolge Earth or MapQuest. Anything with local information.
This is going to feed every persons paranoia. Are people on diets going to have alerts sent to their spouses anytime they get near a candy bar or a fast food joint?
I feel that the analogy is missing the point not just in the tangibility of goods, but because software patents are on ideas and processes that are incredibly obvious.
If someone pantented renting out a house and then told you that you couldn't rent your house. That would be anagelous to the situation with software patents.
I read the linked article and it seems a much a come on for a wifi security package as anything else. Secure your wifi or some organization will come and sue you.
I think this has mostly to do with the money they make from selling their archives.
There will always be R&D. People think. People tinker. I try to improve things all the time. I'm always looking at source code trying to learn something or taking something apart to see how it ticks.
There will no longer be a monopoly as an incentive for R&D, true. However, R&D is driven by more than just the incentive of a monopoly.
I lived in Taiwan for 3 years and got to deal with the wonderful Zhong Hua Telephone, the government monopoly. They are very protective of their monopoly. I wonder if they'll end up like the RIAA/RCAA.
and now with VOIP and other voice/data offerings why would people want/need a land line with their net connection?
All in all, I think having a cell network in subways would be more safe, not less. Having all those eyeballs be able to report accidents, crimes and suspicions would make things a lot safer and a lot harder for any would be terrorist trying to sneak something on the subway.
"Please direct me to 3 (I'm serious) such sources."
Mostly I use Yahoo!News, Google News and other news aggregates to stay abrest of change in the business world. When something strikes my fancy for an investment, I check them out at places like Motley Fool.
This tiered approach provides me with all the information in the WSJ and more.
(I'm not sure if that counts as 2 or 3 sources for investing info)
"If a person can't walk and cell-talk at the same time, what makes them think they can drive and cell-talk at the same time?"
good points :)
It?s not a bribe in this case. The state is entering into a financial arrangement with a company just like any other entity. The amount of return you get from that arrangement can effect how quickly you accept things.
States are sometimes commercial entities just like companies. They sell products like lower taxes, subsidies, etc. States market directly to companies to enter into financial arrangements of this sort with them. Look at Deleware and Nevada. Two states that set themselves apart as business friendly states.
there's actually one of these DVD vending machines, called redbox, at my local mcdonalds. i was kinda taken a back by it at first as i don't really equate fast food with my movie rentals. however, their ads on all the tables seems to at least partially clear up who their target market might be. the ad showed a bunch of kids in a minivan staring up at the dvd screen. so i guess after a game it mcdonalds for burgers, ice cream and dvds :)
i'm sure some exec. in mcdonalds is all hyped about this, but it doesn't seem like the rest of the company is really paying attention to it. from what i saw the franchise owner in the store really wasn't paying much attention to it. i also inspected the half installed machine. it seems to be franchised itself to someone other than the mcdonalds owner. i guess like those internet kiosks in malls. it doesn't seem like mcdonald's corp is dumping too much of their own money into this.
How in the world is spending time in a store stealing? That would mean that stores made sales to 100% of the customers who come in the door. Sometimes I go to a store just because I know they have things I like. I don't go specifically to buy something. So if I walk out of the store, have I stolen? Or how about this. I see something I like, but it won't fit in my budget right now. Then I see it online or at another B/M store for less. If I buy it there, am I stealing from the previous store? The customer is under no obligation to the store.
B/M stores and web stores are competing more closely. Their markets are converging. Just like telephone, cable, net and other electronic sectors. PDAs and SmartPhones are a good example.
my thought exactly. kids will give there parents the slip whether or not tech is involved. someone will just figure out how to spoof the signal and put it on a cat or something.
it's azazing how many people are getting behind mr. cortell. i'm pleased to see people taking action on this. his personal site which details a lot of what 's going on is http://jorge.cortell.net you can also find a recording of his lecture at http://homepage.mac.com/jorgecortell/blogwavestudio/LH20041021114344/index.html
This seems like one of those random things that happens from time to time. I would have loved to see the bid process - since i'm assuming it's a city contract that's paying Wizmark. Did anyone at the police or city government actually test these things? :) Can you imagine the powerpoints for this product?