He's going to really lose it once he rolls them out and they tank. He'll blame everyone but himself, of course.
He's also forgetting that news media did that with Facebook, then Facebook fucked them over. They aren't going to make the same mistake again, especially not for a Nazi bar website.
Even as stupid as Musk is, I'm shocked he thought it was a good idea to announce to the world he's 300lbs+. The only way that'd be anything close to a weight to be proud of was if he was 7'8" tall, and even then it'd just barely squeaking into the normal weight BMI category.
Well, except most people are used to the old system and won't know that the image is a link to click on. Hard to phish someone if they don't click on the link, and even harder when they don't notice the link in the first place.
Succinct headlines should be the goal for news media and used to be, they've gotten lazy in the Internet era. So that's one teeny-tiny good thing this change might cause: forcing publishers to start having actually succinct headlines again, instead of long click-baity ones. (Do note: this is not an endorsement of the change. It's still dumb as hell and shouldn't be done. And it probably won't actually get them to change anyway.)
It also doesn't make the tweet much shorter in height, so even if that was Musk's goal, he failed. (Yet again.)
If that was the goal, removing them for users in France, Australia, Canada etc. that want money for them would make sense. Killing them for everyone is just dumb. Besides, even if that's the goal, something needs to be done to make it clear the image is a link to an article. That's clearly not happening.
Block works that way because stalkers and harassers can continue to stalk and harass people if they can still read and reply to their tweets. For example, asking others to relay their message to the person they blocked. Totally innocent people can read it, be duped into thinking the block was a mistake, and then tweet/DM the victim to let them know what the reply said. That keeps the harassment going, instead of it stopping. Mute will not solve this problem. You need those types to not know if their target is even tweeting any more, so they can't do anything to harass them further. You also don't want stalkers being able to see their target's tweets, because they may be able to use those to track them down in the real world. (Which can result in attacks, even murders.) Sure, a person can set their profile so that only people they follow can see their tweets, but then they're sacrificing communicating with others just to keep a stalker away. That's further victimization and something we can avoid by having blocking available to victims. Blocking's not about shutting down discussion and never has been, it's about shutting down harassment and abuse.
From what I've read about the video he posted a screenshot from, it's not just sexual abuse, she's also being tortured. If so, I guess Elmo's also cool with torturing small children.
I'm hoping that once exTwitter finally goes bankrupt, the bankruptcy court doesn't allow the golden parachute she negotiated to be paid out. That'd leave her with very little to show for sucking up to the world's largest snowflake for months. And she'll probably have destroyed her relationship with all the major advertisers by then, making her unemployable in marketing.
They do need to advertise. The only way they can profit is if the line keeps going up. That requires new, naive people investing in crypto. Then the earlier people can cash out and leave the naive people holding the bag. (See also: Ponzi scheme) There's a lot of crypto ads looking for new suckers.
While the FBI would happily stoop that low, they don't need to. They prefer to use confidential informants and tips and reports from websites/users that come across child porn. Why put in more effort than necessary when that kind of info drops into their laps for free on a daily basis? The odds are they are absolutely investigating that guy, and once they get a search warrant for his devices, will find loads of child porn. The video that screenshot was from isn't something people run across by accident. It takes effort to obtain, usually by creating and trading new child porn for it. I wonder what bankrupt-me-elmo will say when that happens?
Was big enough. I doubt he'll get anyone to invest billions in any of his ventures in the future after burning $44 billion with Twitter.
Musk has always succeeded in spite of himself. He almost destroyed Paypal pushing for his whole X thing, as well as moving it to Microsoft servers. (At that time, MS server products could not scale to the level Paypal required.) The only reason Paypal succeeded and Musk made a fortune from it was because they did a coup and removed him as CEO. Tesla wasn't perfect, but was okay-ish before Musk started taking more hands-on control in recent years. He's removed all the sensors from the cars except cameras, insisting that's all that's needed to achieve Full Self Driving. (It's not, and is a big part of why they keep running into stopped vehicles with Autopilot on.) He even used a firmware update to disable the other sensors on existing Teslas that had them. As a result Teslas were made less safe and more dangerous to others on the road. He's destroying that company, just more slowly than Twitter. And the only reason SpaceX is so successful is because he put a competent CEO in charge and let her run things with minimal interference. If he started meddling with it, he'd undoubtedly ruin it as well.
Linked to CSAM? Oh hell no, they posted a screenshot from a video that's reportedly the most vile CSAM video floating around out there. (See the comments by rahaeli on this post. They saw the post and work in Trust and Safety, so they've seen the video it's from.) Musk reinstated an account that posted CSAM. Not linked to it, posted it directly. That seems like an explicit endorsement of sexually abusing children to me.
I'll reply to you, because I'm not going to reply to Matthew, but this part:
Otherwise I could make you guilty of kiddie porn by emailing you some. Leave a thumb drive on your front porch, etc.Indeed, you can. Possession of child porn is a crime, regardless of how you came into possession of it. If the police are interested in scoring easy "we're doing something about child porn points!", they can arrest and charge you for it and not bother investigating to find who sent it to you. And you can end up in jail for it. So yes Matthew, you could indeed do that and ruin someone's life by being an amoral, sociopathic asshole.
Yep, the way the laws are written simple possession of child porn is illegal and it doesn't matter how you came in possession of it. I've always thought that deters reporting. After all, the police could arrest and charge you for possession of it, since you had to have a copy to report it, thanks to how web browsers work. It'll be in the browser's cache and most people don't know how to clear that. Plus if you have a platter hard drive, clearing the cache won't delete the file. It'll still be recoverable from the slack space.
Turns out Musk really is a genius, only it's at fucking things up and making the wrong decisions. He should manage to make a right decision 50% of the time by sheer chance, but he's got a 100% wrong decision streak going. That takes talent.
Not for search engine indexing issues.
And no country that called its system communism was actually communism. Instead they were Marxism, highly modified communism that led to the problems the Soviet Union so aptly displayed. That's not to say I think communism would work, just that there's not been any large scale experiment with it yet.