Cowardly And Complicit CBS Pulls Colbert Interview With Dem Politician To Please Republicans
from the "pathetic,"-said-eeyore dept
The right wing extremist takeover of CBS continues to go just about how you thought it might.
CBS is under fire yet again, this time for forcing Stephen Colbert’s “The Late Show” to cancel a scheduled appearance with Texas Democratic State Representative James Talarico because it might upset our full-diapered president. Colbert acknowledged the cancellation on his Monday evening show, saying CBS lawyers explicitly forbade him from broadcasting the interview:
“He was supposed to be here, but we were told in no uncertain terms by our network’s lawyers, who called us directly, that we could not have him on the broadcast.”
Colbert says he was also told by network lawyers that he also couldn’t mention he was told by CBS to not have him on, a request he proceeded to immediately ignore in a lengthy rant about Brendan Carr and the censorial, authoritarian, and pathetic Trump FCC:
“Let’s just call this what it is: Donald Trump’s administration wants to silence anyone who says anything bad about Trump on TV, because all Trump does is watch TV, OK? He’s like a toddler with too much screen time. He gets cranky and then drops a load in his diaper.”
As we’ve noted previously, Trump FCC boss Brendan Carr has been threatening to leverage the “equal time” rule embedded in Section 315 of the Communications Act to take action against daytime and late night talk shows that don’t provide “equal” time to Republican ideology. He most recently tried to threaten ABC’s The View.
Carr’s goal isn’t equality; it’s the disproportionate coddling and normalization of an extremist U.S. right wing political movement that’s increasingly despised by the actual public. It’s also an attempt to create a climate where media giants are afraid to host voices critical of the president for fear of being drawn into expensive and costly legal battles, even though Carr has little hope of actually winning any.
The “equal time” rule is a dated relic that would be largely impossible for the Trump court-eviscerated FCC to actually enforce. The rule was originally created to apply specifically to political candidate appearances on broadcast television, since back then, pre-internet, a TV appearance on one of the big three networks could make or break and politician attempting to run for office.
In the years since, the rule has seen numerous exemptions and, with the steady evisceration of the regulatory state by the right wing, is not something viewed as seriously enforceable.
Enter Carr, who is distorting this rule to suggest that it needs to apply to every guest a late-night talk show has. It’s a lazy effort by Carr to pretend his censorship effort sits on solid legal footing. It does not. The FCC’s lone Democratic Commissioner accurately pointed out that Carr has no authority to do any of this:
It’s a legal fight that CBS could easily win, but because the network is owned by Trump billionaire donor Larry Ellison, it’s too feckless, pathetic, and corrupted to bother. Ellison very clearly purchased CBS (and installed contrarian troll Bari Weiss at CBS News) to create a safe space for right wing interests; one of his first orders of business was firing Colbert last year. His show is now scheduled to end in May.
Ellison has been hoping the Trump DOJ will scuttle Netflix’s pending merger with Warner Brothers so that Ellison can further expand his planned media empire with the inclusion of Warner IP, CNN, and HBO. To gain approval of that transition, CBS lawyers and executives are further incentivized to be abject cowards.
The ham-fisted effort by Trump and his FCC earlobe nibblers will, of course, only act to drive more attention to Colbert’s interview with Talarico on YouTube. As of my writing this sentence, the video has over a million and a half views, a number I suspect will be significantly higher in short order. The comment section is filled with people with lots of nice things to say about CBS and Brendan Carr:

Obviously this is an ugly assault on free speech and the First Amendment by a sad and desperate authoritarian government, but at its heart it’s just foundationally, historically pathetic. It’s also another sad chapter in the embarrassing capitulation of what’s left of modern corporate broadcast media, which is positively begging for irrelevance at the hands of more modern alternatives.
Filed Under: brendan carr, censorship, equal time, fcc, first amendment, free speech, james talarico, media, stephen colbert, trump
Companies: cbs


Comments on “Cowardly And Complicit CBS Pulls Colbert Interview With Dem Politician To Please Republicans”
I hope someone eventually institutes malicious compliance and has one Republican on after another, then proceeds to ask them nonstop to justify the administration’s various kinds of tomfuckery.
Once again, every accusation is a confession. Conservatives performatively pearl clutched and bitched about supposed left wing bias in media (while actually leftist media is functionally non-existent in the mainstream) and pretending that the government alerting media platforms to user agreement violations and actually illegal voter fraud was somehow an authoritarian takeover of media. And now the Trump administration is just blatantly doing far worse than it has ever accused anyone else of, picking winners of mergers that it should be blocking, directly threatening networks and influencing coverage, demanding edits where it once decried them.
WAR IS THE MOST PEACEFUL WE’VE EVER BEEN.
FREEDOM HAS NEVER BEEN MORE SLAVERY.
IGNORANCE IS THE BEST STRENGTH.
BIG FCC IS WATCHING YOU.
Why? The rest of the post talks about how they have no legal authority to enforce it, and would lose in court, but it seems naïve at this point to expect Trump’s people to care about any of that. Hell, Gomez could be shipped “back to” China just for suggesting it.
This is going to become the norm going forward, with media conglomerates afraid to host democrats at all out of fear of the next pointless megamerger getting revenge blocked. By 2028, you are going to see networks regularly refusing to broadcast adverts from Democrat and left leaning groups entirely.
Did you hear that…??
That was the sound of countless undecided primary voters, all suddenly choosing the man the Trump regime is this scared of being able to win Texas.
I’m so glad they pulled it. If they hadn’t, I may not have seen it. James Talarico is incredibly articulate and has real Christian values. No wonder the Trump administration is terrified of him. This man has President written all over him. Don’t be distracted. Vote!
Equal time is, unfortunately, impossible.
In no way could we possibly air any opposing facts or views for equally as long as the regime’s narrative as it is 24-7 non-stop.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
The goal is literally equality. It’s also the law.
MSM is so far left it’s ridiculous.
Re:
The goal with the FCC’s implicit threats is to silence enemies of the regime by threatening government interference with legal speech. Or do you think the FCC would be making threats about enforcing the “equal time” rule if Colbert gave an interview with a right-leaning politician without also giving an interview to a left-leaning politician?
Also: Mainstream media outlets in the United States are all owned by a bunch of billionaires. Precisely none of them lean more than a millimeter to the left because no self-respecting leftist would ever want to be a billionaire. You only think mainstream media outlets are “far left” (which they’re not) because they prioritize reporting facts and maintaining credibility over spreading the lies and fantasies that right-wingers prefer to believe in as emotional support. I mean, OANN isn’t even on cable or satellite providers these days because it was a less credible news organization than Fox News.
Re: Re:
The is about equal time and it’s especially uncontroversial when it’s office candidates since air-time essentially equates a contribution.
Oh, btw, turns out the other candidate he didn’t want to give airtime to was Jasmine Crockett, meaning this was all intra-party democrat nonsense, didn’t involve “the right” even a tiny bit.
You people are all such ret@ards it really is spectacular, cakeboy.
Re:
“MSM is so far left it’s ridiculous.”
MSM is also anti-inflammatory.
Re:
[citation needed] but will never materialize.
Which billionaire capitalist corporation is advocating for socialism, collectivism, anarchism, syndicalism, or any such systems?
Oh wait, you don’t know what those mean and think “far left” is when the government isn’t overtly corrupt and run by billionaires because you were defenestrated through the Overton window like a former Putin ally.
Re: Re:
There are dozens and dozens and dozens of studies, dumbass. It’s like nearly the only thing social science is even replicable on.
Re: Re: Re:
These studies, are they in the room with you right now or do they just exists in your imagination?
Re: Re: Re:
If there are dozens, you could certainly cite at least one if not six. Go for it, dude.
Re:
Ah yes, those far leftists at Fox, Paramount, Sinclair, Amazon and so on and so forth. Can’t turn on the TV these days without someone saying billionaires are bad and republicans should be punished for their crimes… Oh wait, we get billionaires censoring the media’s criticism of their actions, using their controlled media to bribe the president and sooth his permanently brused ego and even the few shows that come close to the left will happily trot out war criminals from the Bush admin…
I suppose everything looks lefty when you’re to the right of Pinochet.
Re:
Where’s your proof?
Re:
Literally none of that is even remotely true.
I watched this interview online...
I watched this interview online, and Mr. Talarico has some very interesting things to say. He’s pretty clear about his religion, and also very clear about the need for government to stay uninvolved and far away from religion – all religions. He’s ‘walked that walk’ in the Texas state legislature, too… so it’s not just empty talk. Talarico strikes me as kind of ‘the anti-Paxton’ of Texas politics, and I think he’d be a real quality candidate and would, if he can somehow get elected, make an excellent Senator – far, far better than Paxton ever will.
“Cowardly” , “complicit” …there was another word used the last time that the Nazis invaded democracy: collaborator. Seems à propos nowadays.
I saw a post claiming that the interview’s been viewed 15 million times, or seen by about 6x as many people as would have seen it if they’d just run it on The Late Show.
I feel like there should be a name for when something like that happens.
Re:
Yes, maybe the name could reference an effort to keep something from public availability that merely drew the public eye.
Say, you hear about that Streisand lady’s house?
So, who at CBS is a pedophile. Is it the lawyers, or one of the executives?