Afroman Wins: Jury Rules Mocking Cops Who Raided Your Home Is Protected Speech

from the celebrate-with-some-lemon-pound-cake dept

As we wrote just yesterday, the defamation trial brought by seven Adams County, Ohio deputies against rapper Afroman was going about as well for the officers as their original botched raid on his home. Today we can report the inevitable conclusion: the jury sided entirely with Afroman, clearing him of all liability after just hours of deliberation.

To recap briefly: deputies raided Afroman’s home in 2022 with guns drawn, found essentially nothing, filed no charges, broke his door (and his gate!), and got caught on his security cameras doing embarrassing things — including one deputy who appeared to cautiously eye a delicious-looking lemon pound cake. Afroman turned the footage into multiple viral music videos. The deputies, upset about being mocked, sued him for $3.9 million claiming defamation and emotional distress. The jury took just a few hours to say: nah.

The best part might be the closing argument from the officers’ attorney, who told the jury:

“Mr. Foreman doesn’t get to wrap himself in the American flag and say you can’t touch me, I can say what I want, no matter how untrue it is, no matter how much pain it causes people, because I have freedom of speech. He can’t do that.”

Afroman’s lawyer quickly responded that he can, in fact, do exactly that. That’s how the First Amendment works. Especially when talking about public officials. And then the jury agreed. This is especially delicious given that Afroman literally wrapped himself in the American flag for the entire trial, showing up each day in that wonderful suit.

Afroman’s own testimony summed up the whole case more concisely than any lawyer could:

“All of this is their fault, and they have the audacity to sue me.”

And through all of this, Afroman never stopped making music mocking these officers — right up to the trial. Here he is calling out Deputy Randy Walters:

And here he is set to the tune of the Battle Hymn of the Republic, reminding everyone that the proof of everything he’s saying is right there on the internet for anyone to see:

So the deputies sued because they were embarrassed by viral music videos, and, in doing so, created a three-day trial that generated a whole new wave of viral content about them, drew national media attention, and ended with a jury telling them they had no case. The Streisand Effect remains undefeated.

As Afroman’s lawyer told the jury in closing, citing NWA’s “Fuck Tha Police” and Richard Pryor’s comedy:

“I’m sorry they feel the way they do, but there’s a certain amount that you have to take as a public official, it’s part of the duties of the job. What chilling effect does that have on the world we live in? You don’t like what a public official does and you make a joke, and you’re dragged into court?”

There’s a serious point underneath all the absurdity. Public officials who raid your home for no good reason, find nothing, and break your stuff don’t get to then use the courts to punish you for talking about it. That’s the whole ballgame on the First Amendment, and the jury understood it perfectly.

Afroman summed it up outside the courtroom saying:

I didn’t win. America won. America still has freedom of speech. It’s still for the people, by the people!

Well said. And I hope the Adams County Sheriff’s Department is looking forward to Afroman’s next release.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Afroman Wins: Jury Rules Mocking Cops Who Raided Your Home Is Protected Speech”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
19 Comments
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
NickD says:

Deposition transcripts are terrifying

In the full trial record, Deputies testified under oath they chased down people with the intent to arrest them for calling them “lemon pound cake” and the like, under the guise of ‘disorderly conduct’ to teach them a lesson. One specifically talked about running after a kid to arrest him for that as a ‘major misdemeanor’ (regular disorderly conduct is a ticket-only offense), which requires:

(a) The offender persists in disorderly conduct after reasonable warning or request to desist.

and admits he never warned the kid and the kid didn’t persist in the conduct.

Straight from the transcripts:

Q. I want to go back to this in
1 Seaman. What would you have arrested this
2 man for?
A. Disorderly conduct. Cussing and
screaming and causing a scene in front of a
bunch of people. He had the people at the counter scared to death

Q. So you admit that you would have
went after him, but you would have had to
9
10 have to persist to be PDC [persistent disorderly conduct]?
A. Yes. Right. But there again —
Q. Did you tell him to stop?
A. I didn’t get a chance to tell
14 him anything. He had started screaming and
15 yelling and takes off the back door and jumps
16 in a car and takes off.
Q. In the State of Ohio can you
arrest a person for a minor misdemeanor?
A. No. But persistent is a first
20 degree misdemeanor. You can only be arrested
21 for persistent. You cannot be arrested for
22 disorderly conduct.
A. If he would have continued.
. You said you took off after him
3 and he took off running. When did you tell
him to stop?
A. No, he took off out the back
door. And I went out — just out and pursued
after him. He jumped in the car and took
off. I was going to tell him to calm it
down, that’s enough.
Q. Shawn, if he’s running away, why
would you be chasing him to tell him that?
A. It wasn’t a foot chase. He
13 takes off out the back door, so I walked
14 across the store and go out the back door anc
15 he’s already taken off. It wasn’t like I was
16 chasing him down.
But there again, you asked for
18 an example of some of the nonsense I went
19 through. This is some of it. You know, I
20 had —
Q. I’m not so sure, Shawn. I’ll be
22 honest, this is troubling to me. But I’m
23 going to leave it and let’s go to another
24 example. Because I’m troubled by this
25 example.

The real story is Adams county deputies are willing to trample freedoms for feelings.

The whole sad file is available under cause number 2023-0069 (of course) at https://www.adamscountycourts.com/recordSearch.php?k=searchForm0104

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Ninja (profile) says:

“Mr. Foreman doesn’t get to wrap himself in the American flag and say you can’t touch me, I can say what I want, no matter how untrue it is, no matter how much pain it causes people, because I have freedom of speech. He can’t do that.”

Funny thing, the deputies think they can use the courts to do just that with those who are pointing their wrongdoing and they dislike. Much like the orange Epstein buddy up in the chain.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...