This, honestly. Being seen as "soft on crime" is almost a political death sentence in today's environment. The Legislature still should have written a First Amendment-compliable bill, though.
I'm a Minnesotan, and I figured this law was made with good intentions, but was made overly broad because our state legislatures are split down the middle. And yes, I agree that a bill this broad in nature is a bad thing and should have been narrowed down in committee.
Your idea is psychotic, I hate to say.
You first, since your ancestors somewhere down the line were most likely immigrants (and potentially undocumented ones at that).
To be fair, anyone who speaks out against the Party is a "democratic operative" according to that dingus.
And where's the proof?
Wouldn't that technically be double jeopardy?
This, honestly. Being seen as "soft on crime" is almost a political death sentence in today's environment. The Legislature still should have written a First Amendment-compliable bill, though.
Not surprised, considering this is the most lawless and corrupt administration in American history.
Why do you lie?
Oh really? Me thinks you might be wrong.
No. It's just you who needs help.
I'm a Minnesotan, and I figured this law was made with good intentions, but was made overly broad because our state legislatures are split down the middle. And yes, I agree that a bill this broad in nature is a bad thing and should have been narrowed down in committee.
Then where's your proof?
Derp derp "socialism bad". Your take is laughable.
That is a lie and you know it.
How many rubles were you paid to post this slop?
Most likely, some ancestor of yours was an undocumented immigrant. Please deport yourself at once.
Maybe the government should stop violating the Constitution.
Maybe you should stop lying?
The court pretty much indicated it was a SLAPP suit. When will you pull your head outta your ass?
Derp derp derp