CBS Folds Like A Moist, Flushable Towelette In Response To Baseless Trump Threats
from the “Pathetic,”-Eeyore-said.-“That's-what-it-is.-Pathetic.” dept
When last we checked in with CBS, the company was preparing to fold under pressure from the Trump administration, amidst bogus accusations that 60 Minutes had unfairly made Donald Trump look bad. As we’ve noted previously, the accusations are utterly baseless, but that’s apparently not stopping the CBS board from kissing authoritarian ass and throwing their journalists under the bus.
According to the New York Times, CBS/Paramount board members, keen on getting approval of their $8 billion merger with Skydance, are likely moving forward with a fat settlement with the Trump administration. In the process they’re sending a very loud message to everyone that they’re no longer interested in protecting journalism, or their own journalists:
“Paramount’s interest in settling has dismayed CBS’s news division, in particular the staff of “60 Minutes,” the country’s most popular weekly news program. Four days after the April 18 board meeting, the show’s executive producer, Bill Owens, abruptly announced he would resign, citing encroachment on its journalistic independence and saying Paramount “is done with me.”
Last weekend 60 minutes covered the fracas in what feels like a death knell for the once-respected cable TV news magazine:
Last fall Trump sued CBS claiming (falsely) that a 60 Minutes interview of Kamala Harris had been “deceitfully edited” to her benefit (they simply shortened some of her answers for brevity, as news outlets often do). As Mike explored, the lawsuit was utterly baseless, and tramples the First Amendment, editorial discretion, and common sense.
CBS/Paramount is looking for regulatory approval for its $8 billion merger with Skydance (run by Larry Ellison’s kid David, who has been palling around with Trumplings at MMA fights). Trump and his FCC boss Brendan Carr quickly zeroed in on this, and began using merger approval as leverage to bully CBS into even more feckless coverage of the administration.
Carr has launched an “investigation” into CBS claiming that the minor edits to the Harris interview violate the FCC’s “Broadcast News Distortion” policy, a rarely enforced rule preventing news outlets from killing stories or dramatically changing stories in exchange for bribes. It’s completely bogus, but whether CBS is guilty doesn’t matter; the right wing has ensured CBS looks guilty of being unfair to the right wing.
Again, legal experts everywhere have pointed out this is all indisputable bullshit. Even longstanding GOP members and former Republican FCC officials have acknowledged the accusations are baseless and the FCC is overstepping any real-world authority. CBS certainly has the money to fight the case. But CBS owners like Shari Redstone are more interested in cashing out of the struggling (one wonders why) media industry:
“Shari Redstone, the company’s controlling shareholder, has said she favors settling the case. She is set to receive a major payday in a pending sale of Paramount to a Hollywood studio, Skydance, that requires sign-off from the Trump administration.”
It’s another example of why consolidated corporate power probably shouldn’t be in the journalism business, and we ought to explore better ways to fund independent media (including public financing). Corporate media owners simply, clearly, and routinely aren’t capable of putting the truth before making money, resulting in an ocean of substandard, pseudo-journalistic, ad-based simulacrum.
The far right doesn’t want reformers untethering journalism and media from commercial interests because they know that ad engagement model is eminently exploitable, something that wasn’t remotely subtle last election season. Looking for major merger approvals, tax cuts, and mindless deregulation, consolidated U.S. media companies have demonstrated they’re more than willing to throw the truth under the bus for financial gain. You see it absolutely everywhere you look. Again: not remotely subtle.
Incompetent authoritarians fear the truth because it illustrates their corruption and incompetence. It’s why they’re bullying media companies and trying to pull the rug out from America’s already woefully under-funded public broadcasters. And even in some of the flimsiest cases widely viewed as winnable, the brunchlords in charge of U.S. media have shown they have the structural integrity of damp cardboard.
What’s left of CBS after the Skydance merger will be run by Skydance exec and soon-to-be CBS boss Jeff Shell (booted from NBC after sexual harassment allegations). It’s inevitable that, like the Washington Post and LA Times, whatever’s left of CBS journalism will follow the trend of even further pandering to the right wing, under the pretense that this sort of feckless ass kissing is the pinnacle of objectivity.
At the same time, the continued, pointless “growth for growth’s sake” impact of even more mindless media consolidation will erode U.S. media quality even further and trigger even more layoffs across the sector, as the recent AT&T, Time Warner, and Discovery series of mergers so ably demonstrated.
It’s utterly pathetic and demented. All around.
Filed Under: brendan carr, brunchlords, donald trump, free speech, journalism, media, press, settlement, shari redstone
Companies: cbs, paramount, skydance


Comments on “CBS Folds Like A Moist, Flushable Towelette In Response To Baseless Trump Threats”
Apropos nothing, there’s no such thing as a flushable towelette. The “flushable” towelettes will absolutely destroy your sewer line.
Re:
They’re more likely to destroy someone else’s sewer line; the city’s, specifically (look up “fatberg”). And it’s infeasible for them to trace that back to a specific person, so this is likely to keep happening as long as misleading labeling is tolerated by the authorities.
Re: Re:
A problem created by corporations and lack of regulation that seems fine until it starts destroying the infrastructure then it’s everyone’s fault as there’s no way to punish the people responsible in the framework that exists? That seems suoer familiar… Do the flushabke towelettes like guns and have strong feelings about why Ukraine should surrender too?
Re: Re: Re:
They can’t be punished because it’s not technically a lie. These things are successfully flushed every day. The people responsible never said things would work well in the sewers after successful flushing.
So, you’re right to call out the lack of regulation, but it’s perhaps more accurate to blame the lack of even any attempt at regulation. A regulator could define the term “flushable” to mean “flushable without fucking up your sewer system”. It doesn’t seem like anything that should be controversial or burdensome. Of course, someone would then have to enforce it.
But, so far, we’re not even trying to do anything (other than blame the public for trusting packaging).
Re:
This is exactly why the only flushable towelettes I use are home-made ones I create out of toilet paper soaked with water.
Please don’t flush those “flushable” wipes unless you want to help pay for your plumber’s new boat.
Explain to me again why increased funding for publicly operated news services will increase the independence and quality of news when the problem is the government transparently interfering with independent news? Who do you think is going to control this public news services?
Just envision this scenario if you will, because it’s more likely than you think: King Donald (or, more likely, through his minions) offers to increase funding for… let’s say NPR for the sake of argument. Instead of its current 25m a year in federal funding he offers say… 250 million, but on the condition that it transform itself into a feckless “voice of the people”. Do you trust the current governing structure of that organization to stand up to that? What if he decides to start up a federal television channel? Ask his buddy at the FCC to allocate a band for America TV. Just take the bandwidth of some “disloyal” station and start shitting literal propaganda straight from the President’s desk to the people.
No. The fact that government can find some leverage to shit up the private media ecosystem isn’t a reason to hand them the keys to pump even unlimited sewage into everything forever.
Re:
That’s nice. Please remember to sweep up that pile of hay that used to be the poor strawman you just beat to death.
Re: Re:
LMAO
Re: Re:
FYI, that’s not an AC building a strawman, that’s you burying your head in the innards of the strawman you epically failed to build.
Re:
Here’s the thing, NPR, and PBS are quite decentralized, a lot of their production is done by the member stations, and the federal funding is indirect, it flows from Congress to the CPB to NPR/PBS….And to top it off, most of their operating funds come from donations by the public, not from the government, So congress (or Trump) can threaten to turn some of their funds on or off, but they really can’t leverage to take it over…
Re: Re:
I do enjoy the notion they can’t do something. They just do it and tell the courts ‘make us’ when told to stop.
Re: Re: Re:
That doesn’t change the reality that PBS/NPR arn’t goverment agencies, the way the US Agency for Global Media is. The PBS board is elected by member stations, not the appomted by President.
Re: Re:
And in yesterday’s news, Trump can’t deport vulnerable US citizens Now fuck off, MAGAt.
It gets worse, Now Trump is threatening the NYT for reporting on the settlement proposal
https://deadline.com/2025/04/trump-new-york-times-cbs-lawsuit-1236381418/
I think we all know where this is going, the next presidential election cycle will feature stations refusing to take Democratic party ads for fear of lawsuits should they lose, and giving candidates ‘equal time’ will be used by the big 3 broadcasters as an excuse not to put the Democrat on TV, as Trump or his chosen successor will refuse to go on the ‘mainstream media’ entirely. Fox will interview both candidates but their treatment will not be equal.
Love the headline subtext lyric from Roger Waters Pros and Cons album.
Did anyone.. and I mean anyone expect a different result from the same media that’s sane-washed Mango Stupid for years now?
Re:
PR companies cosplaying as news companies: ‘How were we supposed to know that the guy we’ve spent years covering for and pretending isn’t a deranged dictator was in fact a deranged dictator?!’
It's a mystery
And the major ‘news’ companies continue to wonder why people increasingly don’t trust them and get their news elsewhere…