Trump’s Latest Lawsuit Against CBS Proves He’s No Free Speech Champion

from the that's-not-how-free-speech-works dept

As we head into the election tomorrow, there has been some general talk about how many people think that Donald Trump is somehow better on things like free speech and the economy. It’s pretty clear that that is wrong. On the economy, it’s evident he has no clue what he’s talking about and his plan on both tariffs and deportations would tank the US economy massively.

But the free speech claims are even more bizarre. During his first presidential campaign, he threatened to “open up” our libel laws to make it easier to sue. And while he was unable to do that, it hasn’t stopped him from regularly suing the media for its free speech in a series of SLAPP suits designed to silence and suppress their speech, while frightening others away from speaking up against him in any way.

Late last week, Donald Trump filed another one of his anti-free speech lawsuits, and this one is way crazier than the others. First of all, this one is directly with him as the plaintiff (some of the ones in the past have been on behalf of his campaign). But this one isn’t even about what a media property said about Donald Trump. No, he’s suing CBS claiming that the way it edited a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris violates that Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA).

This action concerns CBS’s partisan and unlawful acts of election and voter interference through malicious, deceptive, and substantial news distortion calculated to (a) confuse, deceive, and mislead the public, and (b) attempt to tip the scales in favor of the Democratic Party as the heated 2024 Presidential Election—which President Trump is leading— approaches its conclusion, in violation of Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code § 17.46(a), which subjects “[f]alse, misleading, or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce” to suit under Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code §17.50(a)(1). See Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (the “DTPA”), Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code § 17.41 et seq.

This is one of the most blatant attacks on free speech rights and the First Amendment I’ve seen in a while. It’s literally saying that he can sue a news organization if he doesn’t like how they edit a story. Editorial discretion is among the very clearly protected rights of a news organization under the First Amendment.

Trump’s entire argument is that when she appeared on 60 Minutes (which also invited Trump, though he skipped out on it after initially agreeing) they edited one of her answers to make it shorter. But, um, that’s what they always do? In an edited “magazine style” TV show, as Trump well knows having done a bunch of these, they talk to you for a much longer time than they have to air, and then they air only portions of both the questions and the answers.

Indeed, it’s easy to show that if anyone has benefited from the media’s willingness to take rambling, incoherent answers and make them sound normal, it’s Donald Trump. The media does this to him nearly every single day.

Anyway, if we’re talking about word salad, here’s Donald Trump last night appearing to practically fall asleep mid-sentence talking about how “a whistleblower released the information on the 18 on the 800,000 [pause] cobs plus [longer pause]. The whistleblower said, you know, there were not 800,000 and 18,000, you add ’em upissst, and then you add 100 and think of it. 112,000 jobs.”

Trump: "A whistleblower released the information on the 18 on the 800,000 cobs plus."

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.bsky.social) 2024-11-04T01:48:59.170Z

In the case of CBS, it aired the shorter, more concise version of Harris’s answer on 60 Minutes, leaving out some of the explanatory rambling before getting to the details. Earlier, on Face the Nation, they played a longer clip that included some explanatory language that wasn’t a “word salad” as the complaint argues (yes, the complaint directly calls it a “word salad”) but is perhaps not particularly eloquent.

In both versions of the Interview (the “October 5 Version” and the “October 6 Version”), Whitaker asks Kamala about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Whitaker says to Kamala: “But it seems that Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening.”

In the October 5 Version, aired on the CBS Sunday morning news show Face the Nation, Kamala replies to Whitaker with her typical word salad: “Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in several movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region.”

In the October 6 Version, aired on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Kamala appears to reply to Whitaker with a completely different, more succinct answer: “We are not gonna [sic] stop pursuing what is necessary for the United States to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end.”

Incredibly, the complaint itself includes Trump ranting about all of this, kinda highlighting how he is way more prone to “word salad” than his opponent.

As President Trump stated, and as made crystal clear in the video he referenced and attached, “A giant Fake News Scam by CBS & 60 Minutes. Her REAL ANSWER WAS CRAZY, OR DUMB, so they actually REPLACED it with another answer in order to save her or, at least, make her look better. A FAKE NEWS SCAM, which is totally illegal. TAKE AWAY THE CBS LICENSE. Election Interference. She is a Moron, and the Fake News Media wants to hide that fact. An UNPRECEDENTED SCANDAL!!! The Dems got them to do this and should be forced to concede the Election? WOW!”). See President Donald J. Trump, TRUTH SOCIAL (Oct. 10, 2024)

Yes, somehow Trump’s lawyers think this makes him look good. They also seem to think that referring to Trump as “President Trump” but referring to Vice President Harris as “Kamala” makes this look like a serious case.

It is not. It is clearly an attack on basic First Amendment rights and free speech law. It is an attack on the editorial discretion of CBS, the very same editorial discretion that Trump regularly benefits from.

He is attacking the First Amendment and free speech by using bogus lawsuits to challenge those in the media who don’t portray things the way he wants them portrayed. That is a fundamental attack on free speech.

And, as Eugene Volokh explains, these issues have been covered before in court, in the context of “false” statements. This case isn’t even about false statements, just Trump not liking how an interview was edited.

That said, Trump filed this case in the Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division, guaranteeing that Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk will hear it. Kacsmaryk is considered one of a small group of “the worst judges in America” as someone in a single judge division who is known as the go-to judge for Trumpists looking to “rubber-stamp their looniest ideas.”

There is no reason for this case to be in Texas, as Trump is a Florida resident, and the two CBS organizations he is suing are based in New York and Delaware. By any sane measure, the case would be tossed on jurisdiction alone.

I’ve also seen some people argue that RFK Jr.’s embrace by Trump is again about “free speech,” but that is similarly nonsense.

RFK Jr. has been filing a ton of bogus lawsuits over private entities’ editorial discretion and is now backing up Trump in arguing that CBS should “lose its license.”

RFK Jr: "He oughta pull CBS's license!"

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.bsky.social) 2024-11-01T03:30:17.237Z

This is a pretty incredible thing for RFK Jr. to be saying, considering at this very moment he is suing the Biden administration, falsely claiming that they made Facebook block his anti-vax nonsense.

So, if you’re following RFK Jr.’s logic, it’s an obvious First Amendment violation that Facebook blocked his anti-vax statements which violated their own policies, because the White House also agreed that RFK’s anti-vax claims were dangerous. But it’s not a First Amendment violation for Donald Trump to “pull CBS’s license” for how it edited an interview?

The only “principle” here is “it’s not okay if it happens to me, but it’s totally okay if we do it when we’re in power.”

That’s not about principled free speech.

And that’s not even getting into how little either Trump or RFK Jr. understand how this works. CBS doesn’t have “a license” to pull. Affiliate stations have broadcast spectrum licenses, and the government isn’t supposed to punish them based on what they cover or how. Yes, CBS has a small number (15 across the country) of affiliates that are “owned and operated” by the company, but the vast majority (236) are owned by other entities. So even the idea of “pulling CBS’s license” makes no logical sense.

But, either way, as we head into election day, the idea that Donald Trump is a free speech supporter is literally backwards. He’s spent years suing people for their speech, and now he’s even doing it in response to editorial discretion he dislikes. Donald Trump has no conception of free speech. He only supports speech he likes, and he is eager to punish any speech he dislikes.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , , ,
Companies: cbs

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Trump’s Latest Lawsuit Against CBS Proves He’s No Free Speech Champion”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
57 Comments
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
egftechman (profile) says:

Fox "News", Newsmax, OAN included also

Will Fox “News”, Newsmax, and OAN be bound to the same proposed “opening up” of libel/slander rules also? They have already admitted to being deceptive in the Dominion Voting Machines case.

Can Democrats sue FNC, Newsmax, OAN, Et al. for creatively editing stuff that airs on their networks?

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

“creatively editing” Interesting way to put it…CBS did a little more than that and Trump is suing them for interfering in the election. They take one candidates words and twist them to make it sound like he said something negative that he didn’t and they take the other candidates words and twist them around/or completely replace them to make her sound better/smarter. That election interference imo.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Btw, they may have sued fox for speaking about their machines but we all know there was a lot of funny business going on with the machines. There’s no way to prove the election was stolen now, but most of us know it was. There was plenty of evidence of that but even without the eveidence, just the claim that Biden got more votes than any man in the history of politics including Trump and Obama while hiding out in the basement letting the media and the elites campaign for him is obsurd and I think they’re doing the same with Kamala now even though she didn’t make it past the first round when she ran in 2020. https://x.com/SpartaJustice/status/1848833574352654576

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Koby (profile) says:

Mix And Match

It appears that it is more than just sloppy editing by CBS. The network may have deceptively spliced in a different answer from a different question to make Kamala’s response seem coherent. And the written transcript is wrong. This matter could be easily settled by CBS releasing the raw footage of the interview. But, strangely, they have refused. And so the most likely conclusion is that CBS did engage in fraudulent editing.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

Otherwise known as 'not free speech or the first amendment'

The only way to believe convicted felon Trump is ‘pro-free speech’ is if you buy into the republican definition of the term, where it only protects speech they agree with/speak, includes a right to use the property of others even if they don’t want you there and has a total shield against any negative consequences for what’s said.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

I just don’t think grifting, racist, sexist, pedophiles(not yet convicted), and criminals who are so inept at business they lost money running a casino and have proven repeatedly to lack any scruples should be in charge of the mechanisms of power especially the us armed forces.

I’m really surprised this is such a contentious viewpoint.

David says:

Re: It's not the destination that counts but the way

The outcome of nuisance lawsuits is insignificant compared to the procedure. In particular so for litigants like Trump who make dragging out a lawsuit an art form (cf all the lawsuits originating from his presidency and earlier which he is planning to bin and revenge once back in power).

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Arijirija says:

I for one wish the TV networks would give him exactly what hye wants – no editing of his comments, full stop. As I wish the newspapers would do the same – no editing of his comments, whatever. If it’s half an hour of babble, or a half-page of it, so be it. No explanations either. Let him speak for himself. Unadulterated Trump. Bafflegab Unlimited. See Mangon and Madame Gioconda in J G Ballard’s The Sound-Sweep

Anonymous Coward says:

So, if you’re following RFK Jr.’s logic, it’s an obvious First Amendment violation that Facebook blocked his anti-vax statements which violated their own policies…

Because someone from the Federal Government getting in touch with Facebook and asking them to look at a post and assess it for rule violation is totally different from a private citizen doing the same thing after clicking the ‘Report this post’ link seems to go nowhere. Fuck you, RFK Jr. Fuck you.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
09:31 Court To Bondi: Demanding Platforms Censor Speech And Bragging About It On Fox News Is, In Fact, A First Amendment Violation (14)
11:03 A First Amendment Legend Eviscerates Brendan Carr With Substance And Style (13)
05:28 Brendan Carr Cooking Up New Sham Investigation Of Jimmy Kimmel (11)
09:29 Oh Look, The MAGA FTC Built The Censorship Industrial Complex It Was Screaming About (22)
15:16 War As A Pretext: Gulf States Are Tightening The Screws On Speech—Again (6)
15:12 The FAA’s “Temporary” Flight Restriction For Drones Is A Blatant Attempt To Criminalize Filming ICE (14)
13:03 Trump Threatens CNN For Very Basic Reporting On His Shitty, Unpopular War (24)
05:25 Trump Attacks On Public Media Blocked By Judge (But It's Too Little, Too Late) (5)
05:24 Supreme Court Shrugs Off Opportunity To Save The First Amendment From The Fifth Circuit's Antipathy (6)
15:34 Free Speech Experts: Jonathan Haidt's Moral Panic Is As Old As Democracy Itself (32)
15:31 Hegseth's War On Anthropic Encounters The First Amendment (9)
12:25 America's Self-Proclaimed Free Speech Warrior, Brendan Carr, Gets A Letter Documenting His First Amendment Violations (10)
10:44 The Trump Admin's Own Investigators Found No EU Internet Censorship. So They Ignored The Findings. (14)
09:25 5th Circuit Flips Cop V. Protester Case To Jury After Spending 7 Years Pretending The 1st Amendment Doesn't Exist (12)
13:34 Court Says Pentagon Can't Pick And Choose Which News Outlets Have Access (7)
15:28 Rep. Finke Was Right: Age-Gating Isn’t About Kids, It’s About Control (13)
13:11 Fifth Circuit: Actually, Putting The Ten Commandments In Schools Is Probably Fine (26)
09:18 Afroman Wins: Jury Rules Mocking Cops Who Raided Your Home Is Protected Speech (19)
14:51 Afroman's Defamation Trial Is Going About As Well For The Deputies As Their Original Raid Did (28)
05:23 Pete Hegseth: We Can't Wait For Larry Ellison To Turn CNN Into Another Right Wing Propaganda Mill (13)
05:20 Brendan Carr Pretends To Be Tough, Demands Broadcasters Support Disastrous War (27)
09:27 Ninth Circuit Guts California’s Kids Code Once Again (3)
12:16 Don’t Ban Kids From Using Chatbots (42)
13:03 Congressional Republicans Push Bills That Would Block Kids Access To Content For Ideological Reasons (14)
12:58 Utah’s Proposal To Tax Online Pornography Is A Civil Liberties Disaster Waiting To Happen (21)
05:26 Brendan Carr Can't Explain Why 'Equal Time' Rule Doesn't Apply To Right Wing Radio (13)
09:24 Ron Wyden Is Begging His Colleagues To Stop Trying To Hand Trump A Censorship Weapon (13)
09:23 Palantir Sues Swiss Magazine For Accurately Reporting That The Swiss Government Didn't Want Palantir (14)
05:26 Trump FCC Demands 'Pro-America' Media Programming All Summer Long (35)
12:12 Administration Says DHS Can Demand Social Media Info From Legal Immigrants And US Citizens (28)
More arrow