Insight is not merely in the words on the screen, but in the point they make. And it seems you have tried to debunk a comment without factoring the context under which it was found insightful.

TL;DR: You have addressed a comment whose point is “Economic factors traditionally used by Biden’s opponents do not indicate a disastrous impact on the economy from presidential policy”, and complained “I think some of these are slightly exaggerated, and you all are stupid for falling for it.”. But since you didn’t address the point, the claim that biden is sinking America, the best interpretation we can give you is meaningless pedantry. But it will appear to many observers that you are acting in bad faith, whether in support of Trump or for your own ends.

The comment you take issue with was in response to a claim that biden’s policy is sinking the US economy. And in an election year, claiming the Democrat nominee is sinking the US economy is a clear call for a change in administration at the voting booth. The claim the Biden Admin is sinking the US should be seen as endorsement of the leading GOP candidate (the GOP being the party of fiscal responsibility). Those who voted insightful understand that, for your complaints to matter, you would need more than minor quibbles on details to evidence the claim being debunked. If you aren’t addressing the point being made, you are engaging in pointless pedantry. Factoring the context, your commentary reads as “biden maintained trends in the economy despite global slumps in economic activity but isn’t beating Trump, so clearly biden is an economic disaster.” Its not coherent.

Unemployment rate is low but still very slightly higher now than the best Trump month

Biden’s best month so far was February 2023. As evidenced by (this february 2023 announcement)[https://www.commerce.gov/news/blog/2023/02/news-unemployment-its-lowest-level-54-years] unemployment in Jan 2023 was a 54 year record low, being 0.1 percent lower than Trumps best month. Comparing Jan 2024 to Trump’s best month is not apples to apples. Biden’s best month to Trumps best month, Biden wins.
And even if you reworked your claim to be accurate, at worst Biden is maintaining the unemployment levels seen under Trump, not driving us to a fiscal cliff (unless of course, you want to claim both Trump had been doing so for 4 years and low unemployment is bad.) Burden of proof is on yourself (or others) to evidence the original claim.

oil production is up like 2-3% from Dec 2019

In what will be a reoccuring theme, Biden’s numbers took a hit due to a global pandemic. Price per barrel of US OIL went negative in 2021. There was low demand. Oil production in 2021 and 2022 was negatively impacted. but as oil demand increased in late 2022 and 2023, production increased and passed 2020 production in Jan 2023. You could highlight that none of those changes are anything other than natural market movement. And I’d agree with you. But that means these metrics don’t evidence an economy sinking due to presidential policy and so the marginal increases do not dispute the point made. Burden of proof is on yourself (or other defenders) to evidence the original claim.

the stock market is indeed at an all time high but that’s true most years

The claim is not that GDP is high, or rising, but that it is beating expectations. That is to say, the economy is doing better than expected under global and policy conditions.

This claim evidences that by another standard economic measure, Biden policy is not sinking the US economy. Trump ran on improved GDP as a measure of his economic success. To those claiming Biden is sinking the economy, This economic figure both matters and disputes that claim. Burden of proof has shifted to yourself (or the original commenter) to evidence the original claim. Dispute over details is insufficient.

inflation-adjusted wages were lower in Jan 2024 than Jan 2020

The claim was that wages are rising (a comparison of wage growth), not that they are higher than in 2020 (a comparison of the value of the wages).

https://www.hiringlab.org/2024/01/17/january-2024-us-labor-market-update/

Wage growth is above pre-pandemic levels. Most who would consider this insightful likely understand that the pandemic overall suppressed wage growth and in fact led to an average decrease is wages. We see that that decrease began in 2020 under Trump, recognize that the decrease was caused by global pressures on both ends, and note that wages have recovered and are growing.

This standard economic metric does not evidence that Biden’s policy is sinking the economy. He might not be creating optimal growth, but the claim being disputed is that he is sinking the economy. Under this standard economic measure, Biden’s economy is afloat. Burden of Proof now moves to you (or the original poster) to evidence claims Biden’s numbers indicate a sinking economy, not simply that Biden’s economy isn’t optimal by your nebulous unstated metrics.

unionization rate is slightly lower now than under any Trump years

(Accurate based on the DOL reports) [https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/union2.pdf], however the unionization rate dropping from 10.3% in 2019 to 10.3% in 2021 to 10.1% in 2022 is not indicative of a sinking US econmy. (the 2020 spike being considered an outlier of the general trend by the DOL). Burden of proof is not on Biden defenders to evidence a rising economy, only to evidence an economy afloat.

Further more, various union actions in 2023 are likely not accounted for in the 2023 numbers. DOL measurements of Union Membership are based on surveys of individual households and various statistical issues could be in play. For instance, Union workers not under a union contract may choose to report themselves as not members of a Union for various reasons depending on how questions are asked.

there’s been more inflation under Biden than Trump despite that it’s 3 years to 4.

Again, that is not the claim being made. Every G8 country had a massive rate ofinflation in late 2020-2022. The US saw the quickest reduction in the rate of inflation in the g8, and US inflation did not top G8 inflation over the period. At worst, this shows biden policy had no impact on inflation. At best, this shows biden policy was moderately successful of resisting global inflation pressure. That does not indicate a sinking economy.

No president can cause deflation. not in a free market capitalist economy. and no free market capitalist economy thinks deflation is positive. the best presidential policy can do is to serve as a check on the market to resist high inflation created in the market by capitalist urges to maximize investor returns by selling less for more. To this end, Biden’s 2021-2023 inflation numbers show a response to inflationary pressures that resisted the worst seen in other comparible economies. Burden has shifted to you, or other defenders, to evidence that the result of Biden’s policies, getting the rate of inflation back under control, is a sign of a sinking economy, but that would suggest inflation is good, and your complaint is that inflation is bad. So you somewhat self evidenced that Biden is not sinking the economy.

Your point was stupid, but thanks for giving me an opportunity to channel my manic energy to it.