Wyden’s Office Gets FTC To Protect The Data Of 1.6 Billion People Tracked By Now-Bankrupt Data Broker
from the dysfunction-junction dept
There are two major reasons that the U.S. doesn’t pass an internet-era privacy law or regulate data brokers despite a parade of dangerous scandals.
One, lobbied by a vast web of interconnected industries with unlimited budgets, Congress is too corrupt to do its job.
Two, the U.S. government is disincentivized to do anything because it exploits this privacy dysfunction to buy data, dodge warrants, and expand surveillance.
So instead of passing a privacy law or regulating data brokers, Americans get a sort of regulatory simulacrum designed to distract you. Most recently that popped up in the form of hysteria about TikTok privacy, as if TikTok’s privacy abuses aren’t a broader symptom of our corrupt failure to protect consumers from a vast and unaccountable network of ethics-optional surveillance and monetization.
We’ve documented how data brokers routinely sell access to very granular location and behavioral data to any nitwit who asks for it. That’s long been a problem, but it’s become an uglier problem given the rise of U.S. authoritarianism and the frontal assault on women’s reproductive health care.
That point was made very loudly recently after Senator Wyden’s office found that one data broker, named Near Intelligence, recently sold the location data of women seeking abortion healthcare to an activist group, which turned right around and sent targeted misinformation to vulnerable women.
When it originally went public, Near bragged about how they owned a database tracking the movement and online behavior of 1.6 billion people across 44 countries. But the company went bankrupt last year, and, as The Markup notes, there was a real risk that this database would fall into the hands of any number of random knobs and shitwhistles looking to exploit and abuse it.
Enter Ron Wyden’s office again, which sent a letter to the FTC last week urging the agency to step in and block the transfer of this data. As The Markup notes, the FTC agreed, and an order this week blocked the sale or transfer of a huge trove of user data:
“This week, a new bankruptcy court filing showed that Wyden’s requests were granted. The order placed restrictions on the use, sale, licensing, or transfer of location data collected from sensitive locations in the US and requires any company that purchases the data to establish a “sensitive location data program” with detailed policies for such data and ensure ongoing monitoring and compliance, including the creation of a list of sensitive locations such as reproductive health care facilities, doctor’s offices, houses of worship, mental health care providers, corrections facilities and shelters among others.”
The problem of course is the FTC lacks the staff and resources to tackle privacy violations at any real scale. Thanks in large part to years of mindless “deregulatory” assault by corporate America (about to dramatically accelerate thanks to several looming Supreme Court decisions), which dreams of a future where U.S. corporate oversight has the integrity and functionality of a decorative gourd.
Genuinely fixing this problem requires congressional action. A greater FTC budget. More staff. A clear, well-crafted privacy law that draws hard and clear lines about the collection and sale of sensitive consumer data. Hard regulations governing how and where and when sensitive user data can be collected, and precisely who it can be shared with and sold to with consumer consent.
But all the financial incentives point in the opposite direction thanks to the extreme profitability of hyper surveillance at scale across countless industries, so it seems obvious that the problem gets progressively worse — until there’s an unprecedented (potentially fatal) scandal that’s simply impossible to ignore.
Filed Under: anonymization, behavioral data, data brokers, ftc, location data, privacy, ron wyden, security
Companies: near intelligence
Comments on “Wyden’s Office Gets FTC To Protect The Data Of 1.6 Billion People Tracked By Now-Bankrupt Data Broker”
“U.S. government is disincentivized to do anything because it exploits this privacy dysfunction to buy data, dodge warrants, and expand surveillance”
??
… but then somehow the ‘GOVERNMENT’ FTC can fix things if we citizens just give that ‘bare-bones’ FTC bureaucracy a lot more money, staff, and legislative power ?
totally illogical
Re:
“The Government” is a single entity that thinks and acts with homogeneous logical common sense in every issue.
Re: Re:
… the original TD post/quote here specified “U.S. government”
as a unified entity for the predicate issuepremise here.
do you disagree with that TECHDIRT characterization?
Re: Re: Re:
Yes.
Re: Re: Re:
“do you disagree with that TECHDIRT characterization?”
irrelevant to the post .. are you high?
Re:
No, it makes perfect sense
The Government as a whole (and its security services in specific) benefits from a weak FTC, because it gives them shortcuts to get data. Ergo, it does not fund the FTC, which would limit this ability, citizen data leaks be damned.
Re: Re:
“The Government as a whole”
If one were paying attention it would be apparent that the government is a collection of many things, some work in opposition, others work in unison .. but mostly it is chaotic mess that somehow seems to limp along. Not sure how this can be viewed as a homogeneous, coherent entity. Never has been and never will be.
Re: Re: Re:
So you’re arguing that there is no such thing as the Federal Government led by the President? Oh-kay.
Congress has an owner, and it's not the people
Even if they ever decide to do something about it, it’ll only target US children. As if foreign nationals (and adults) are somehow immune to the ill effects of mass data collection.
Why can’t they make it like the laws against sex tourism, where they can send you to prison even if the victim isn’t a US citizen?
Not just corrupt. there’s no republican OR democrat parties.
The Trump vs Biden thing is fake. Behind the scenes both sides are best buddies, handing each other lucrative government contracts etc.
Its a 100% fake system designed to LOOK like there’s a choice at the election.
AND bonus..they’ve gotten both voter sides so riled up they won’t even speak to each other…divide and conquer.
Re: One side tried to overthrow an election. The other has not. 'No difference' indeed
That’s got to be the strangest ‘There’s no point in voting’ propaganda I’ve seen in a while…
Privacy?
TikTok?
What about Facebook demanding we use REAL/our Own names?
What an easy way top scan DATA and have the real names RIGHT THERE.
Re:
Since a real name is the name that an individual identifies most strongly with by definition, I got to be on Facebook as ‘Princess Fairycorn’, and every time I got a demand to change to my ‘real name’, I just screamed, “Trans hatred all up in here!” Facebook soon gave up the ghost, and now no one has to use a real name anymore.
Re: Re:
Absolutely.
REALITY
How easy would it be to-
Get 1/2 of this country to stop paying taxes to affect the government? To affect the Payment to our representatives?
The only source of payments would be from the corps. How would they feel about paying the TOTAL BILL.