Paramount Already ‘Informally’ Considering Scaling Back Bari Weiss’ Role At CBS
from the dysfunction-junction dept
When right wing billionaire Larry Ellison (and his nepobaby kid David) hired trolling blogger Bari Weiss to run CBS News, Weiss arrived with the promise of “balanced, fact-based news,” “independent, principled journalism,” and a unique “entrepreneurial drive and editorial vision” that would completely modernize the network and reach the “everyday Americans” she claimed were being “ignored by mainstream media.”
In reality, she was hired by the billionaire to take what she did at her weird little troll blog (troll people for clicks, coddle the extraction class, punch left) and weave it into CBS News in a way that would get ratings and go viral on social media. She wasn’t hired to do journalism, she was hired to do attention-grabbing class and race agitprop.
The problem (for Weiss) is her role in that regard has been an abject failure, resulting in all sorts of internal chaos and the lowest ratings in a quarter century. She’s clumsily tried to censor stories critical of Trump, set up softball interviews for Benjamin Netanyahu, fired a bunch of people she worried were too “woke,” shuttered CBS radio (with a disregard for archives), and has caused generalized mayhem and a mass staff exodus, all while sporting a security detail costing the company $10,000 to $15,000 per day.
So, unsurprisingly, leaks are starting to emerge that Paramount is getting tired of the failures, and is starting to have “informal” conversations about scaling back Weiss’ role at CBS (and any planned oversight she might have if the Ellisons can pull off their acquisition of Warner Brothers and CNN). From the paywalled Puck report and this non-paywalled alternative:
“Bari would likely cede day-to-day control over Evening News, CBS Mornings, and 60 Minutes to this more experienced, as-yet-unnamed executive, shifting her focus to the news division’s digital growth while maintaining broad editorial influence across all the company’s platforms.”
Weiss, who was a trolling New York Times opinion columnist before she was the trolling editor in chief at Free Press, had no meaningful journalism or major news org management experience. That’s shown up repeatedly at CBS with all sorts of gaffes, like last-second impromptu edits made to the nightly newscast teleprompter in a way that easily confused her chosen nightly news host Tony Dokoupil. Or in the way Dokoupil couldn’t get the basic paperwork to properly cover the president’s trip to China.
All of these things would be fine if Weiss was getting ad attention and making money, but she isn’t. In part because she seems to have no understanding of modern media, and no idea of how to convert her weird troll blog aesthetic to a massive TV news organization. Despite all of her promises of media revolution, Weiss effectively has the brain of a 90-year old conservative man.
So it seems unlikely that Weiss will have much success managing CBS’ “digital growth” either. Ultimately that means the Ellisons will, after they’ve had enough time to try and justify the $150 million they paid for Bari’s troll blog, find someone worse who can try to get the network the attention it craves. Weiss, as is the case with all brunchlords, will somehow find a way to fail upward. It’s physics.
The problem for everyone involved is that the Paramount and Warner Brothers mergers have saddled the new giant company with an ocean of debt. Debt that historically only gets paid off one way: by hiking prices, firing workers, and cutting corners in a way that degrades product quality. That’s rocky terrain for a broadcast TV network already struggling with dying broadcast viewership and sagging relevance.
Good night and good luck.
Filed Under: agitprop, bari weiss, brunchlords, cbs news, journalism, larry ellison, media
Companies: cbs, paramount


Comments on “Paramount Already ‘Informally’ Considering Scaling Back Bari Weiss’ Role At CBS”
"Special Projects"
This sounds a lot like the “Special Projects” that one of my former employers would assign people to when they wanted the person to leave, but don’t want to overtly fire them.
Re:
The more common name for this phenomenon, in both pop culture and real life, is “Kicked Upstairs”.
Re:
They don’t want to fire her at all, just to replace her with someone “more experienced”. Of course, that could be any intern or janitor that worked more than two hours for Paramount.
But it’s pretty clear she’s actually very appreciated for “maintaining broad editorial influence”, but unfortunately nobody knows what this word salad means.
The WB curse
Hopefully, the purchase of Warner will do to Paramount what the purchase of Warner did to it’s previous buyers. Fuck their shit up and cause them to lose untold amounts of money. Unfortunately, this destruction of value will cause a lot of unnecessary job loss, but I think we’ve already crossed that Rubicon and this will be the least bad outcome of this whole mess.
A train wreck in slow motion.
It’s amusing how incompetent these people are. The only thing they have is money to pay people who actually understand stuff to do their work. When they pivot from hiring the best to hiring their preferred (and thus as incompetent as they are) then things go bad very fast.
Re:
There is a certain ring to it. Fire austensibly because of DEI/woke being the hiring criteria and implying they are not the best in the hiring pool, then turning around and hiring based on loyalty.
A thief believes everybody steals and so on.
Turning CBS into a propaganda outlet was only ever going to work if they did it slowly and with some subtlety so people wouldn’t immediately notice, like boiling a frog, Berating and firing journos, replacing hosts with idiots from the Daily Beast’s ‘lets hire right wing trolls to generate hate clicks’ period, cancelling shows and requiring documentaries give the fascists equal time to tell lies and go unquestioned wasn’t that.
Re:
That’s how the world regrettably got FUX NooZ (and Rupert Murdoch).
Regan got rid of the Truth in Reporting act, requiring legit news organizations VERIFY their stories as accurate. Since then the majority of US stations have been bought out merged into, or outright stolen by rich, white, conservatives. Meaning the originally progressive, or slightly right leaning news, dove off the deep end. Now reporting as anyone to the left of Hitler is considered the “Far Left”. And Conservatives can never do anything wrong, while non-conservatives can do nothing right.
Let theses destroyers whither
These RW jerks killed Star Trek. I hope they all burn in all the various alien hells.
yeah, Weiss is a very predictable failure … but no one can salvage CBS News or TV news in general.
The TV NEWS businesses and culture abandoned JOURNALISM long ago and it ain’t coming back.
Move On, ignore these Media fools and their petty infighting & output.
If we want to watch Faux news, we would just turn on Fox news. When the ship is sinking, stop drilling holes.
Re:
And if Fox News is “too leftist” for right-wingers, they have other options. Trying to turn an ostensibly centrist news outlet into Fox News Lite isn’t going to work so long as (A) Fox News is still on the air and (B) right-wingers keep moving rightward.
Feature, not a bug.
Sadly, a failing news division may be preferable to the monied class than a pro-active 5th estate.
Re:
… libertarians generally favor letting people spend their own money as they please
but Federal and State governments severely restrict competition in TV radio cable business, resulting in the bland biased media garbage available
even Fox News is actually a big-government, Neocon Leftist outlet
Re:
It’s another part of the long term project, first they attacked journalists as untrustworthy elites so the right stopped trusting them, then they filled the space with absolute slop like Fox News, Daily mail online and Breitbart so the left stopped trusting them, then they started pivoting formerly reputable papers and TV outlets into the right wing space to chase profit so nobody can trust anything, with AI generated fakery replacing local news as a layer of sewage on top of the cake in place of icing.