If the Dems ever get control of the administration, they should just treat this settlement as if it never existed.
And if the Dems win enough seat in this year's elections, they should defund the fund.
"... shifting her focus to the news division’s digital growth while maintaining broad editorial influence across all the company’s platforms.”
This sounds a lot like the "Special Projects" that one of my former employers would assign people to when they wanted the person to leave, but don't want to overtly fire them.
it’s the rationale being upheld by the decision that will ultimately amount to a more important gain for the vulnerable in the long term.
In the past, I would have agreed with you on this point, but this court has shown quite clearly that it doesn't even see its own decisions as holding precedential value.
In another case, this court might simply choose to ignore what it said before and grant the win to its preferred side.
Until someone in the administration loses their freedom or law license, they don't care. The so-called apology is performative bullshit, as evidenced by the fact that the false accusation is still live.
They don't work on people who know about them.
Penn and Teller did a episode on them as part of their "Bullshit" series. They only way they work is that, after the interview, the subject is told that they failed and should confess now. Some people do confess.
It's just a sophisticated con, using "technology" that looks authentic.
I am absolutely not advocating for that outcome. I am just being pessimistic about the future of democracy in the USA.
There is hope: Hungary recently threw out Orban: perhaps the USA can go down the same route and throw out Trump and the rest of the the authoritarians.
History is written by the victors and we have yet to see who those are.
It's possible that we (or our children will see) the end of the Republic and that Roberts will be hailed as a hero who brought this about.
They just admitted that their whole security is entirely dependent on not letting a "bad guy" into the ballroom.
That .... seems like poor planning and the plot of some future movie about someone killing or abducting the President.
The Origin Of The Supreme Court’s ‘Shadow Docket’ Was An Naked Expression of Partisan Power.
FTFY. It's abundantly clear that the shadow docket is being used to push a right-wing agenda that has little connection to the Constitution or Federal law.
Who is the audience here? Is it one person (Trump) who will see the flash-bangs and the arrests, but will never hear about the prosecutions falling apart?
Now that the GOP has control of the White House again, Republicans are back to not caring about the warrantless searches of US persons’ communications enabled by FISA loopholes very few congressional reps seriously want to see closed.
Do these Republicans really think that the Administration isn't searching their private information just because the Administration is nominally controlled by the same party?
The NYT ran a headline that included "North American Treaty Organization"
Since it is early April, I did wonder if this was a joke, but there are several sources for it.
Ask any blind person with a dog. The TSA typically commits several rule violations when inspecting a blind person with a dog, starting with separating that person from their dog.
One blind person I know was put into one of the [now discarded?] puffer machines that blow air from below without any hint of what the machine would do to her. She had no idea what to expect.
Future administration -- just ignore the fake "settlement"
If the Dems ever get control of the administration, they should just treat this settlement as if it never existed. And if the Dems win enough seat in this year's elections, they should defund the fund.
This is their solution to ..
... Medicare and Social Security funding. Get enough people to die earlier and the finding issues go away
"Special Projects"
Two in one week!
Thank you for this recognition.
Marketing
How much free marketing did Mr. Cohen get from this stunt?
Consistency?
They don't care
Until someone in the administration loses their freedom or law license, they don't care. The so-called apology is performative bullshit, as evidenced by the fact that the false accusation is still live.
They don't work
They don't work on people who know about them. Penn and Teller did a episode on them as part of their "Bullshit" series. They only way they work is that, after the interview, the subject is told that they failed and should confess now. Some people do confess. It's just a sophisticated con, using "technology" that looks authentic.
Lie detectors don't work
I wonder why those people who know that lie detectors don't work haven't already told Patel this? Or perhaps they have and he doesn't believe them?
History
I am absolutely not advocating for that outcome. I am just being pessimistic about the future of democracy in the USA. There is hope: Hungary recently threw out Orban: perhaps the USA can go down the same route and throw out Trump and the rest of the the authoritarians.
History
History is written by the victors and we have yet to see who those are. It's possible that we (or our children will see) the end of the Republic and that Roberts will be hailed as a hero who brought this about.
Bad security
They just admitted that their whole security is entirely dependent on not letting a "bad guy" into the ballroom. That .... seems like poor planning and the plot of some future movie about someone killing or abducting the President.
Correction.
Audience?
Who is the audience here? Is it one person (Trump) who will see the flash-bangs and the arrests, but will never hear about the prosecutions falling apart?
Return
Naive
What does NATO stand for?
The NYT ran a headline that included "North American Treaty Organization" Since it is early April, I did wonder if this was a joke, but there are several sources for it.
AM Radio
When is Carr going to crack down on the mostly-right-leaning AM radio stations? Oh right ..... never [as he should not].
TSA already breaks the rules
Ask any blind person with a dog. The TSA typically commits several rule violations when inspecting a blind person with a dog, starting with separating that person from their dog. One blind person I know was put into one of the [now discarded?] puffer machines that blow air from below without any hint of what the machine would do to her. She had no idea what to expect.
Faulty "Something" logic