Bari Weiss Shows Her True Colors, Kills A 60 Minutes Story Critical Of The President’s Concentration Camps
from the creating-a-safe-space-for-racist-zealots dept
We’ve noted repeatedly how right wing billionaire Larry Ellison hired Bari Weiss to run CBS for a very obvious set of reasons: to coddle wealth and power, validate and amplify right wing grievance bullshit, divide and distract the electorate, and undermine real journalism.
And she’s doing all of those things incredibly well.
Weiss’ first major move was to host a town hall with a right wing opportunist nobody was actually interested in. Her second major move? To effectively kill a major 60 Minutes story about the president’s concentration camps. More specifically, to derail a 60 Minutes story focusing on the stories of Venezuelan men deported by the Trump administration to a brutal prison in El Salvador (CECOT).
CBS announced they were “postponing” the story, which had already seen multiple layers of fact checking and legal review, just three hours before it was poised to broadcast. Veteran 60 Minutes correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi was understandably pissed off, and shared a must-read complaint with her colleagues about Weiss’ ham-fisted effort to undermine the network’s journalism:
It’s quite a letter, which leaked almost immediately:
News Team,
Thank you for the notes and texts. I apologize for not reaching out earlier.
I learned on Saturday that Bari Weiss spiked our story, INSIDE CECOT, which was supposed to air tonight. We (Ori and I) asked for a call to discuss her decision. She did not afford us that courtesy/opportunity.
Our story was screened five times and cleared by both CBS attorneys and Standards and Practices. It is factually correct. In my view, pulling it now-after every rigorous internal check has been met is not an editorial decision, it is a political one.
We requested responses to questions and/or interviews with DHS, the White House, and the State Department. Government silence is a statement, not a VETO. Their refusal to be interviewed is a tactical maneuver designed to kill the story.
If the administration’s refusal to participate becomes a valid reason to spike a story, we have effectively handed them a “kill switch” for any reporting they find inconvenient.
If the standard for airing a story becomes “the government must agree to be interviewed,” then the government effectively gains control over the 60 Minutes broadcast.We go from an investigative powerhouse to a stenographer for the state.
These men risked their lives to speak with us.
We have a moral and professional obligation to the sources who entrusted us with their stories. Abandoning them now is a betrayal of the most basic tenet of journalism: giving voice to the voiceless.
CBS spiked the Jeffrey Wigand interview due to legal concerns, nearly destroying the credibility of this broadcast. It took years to recover from that “low point.” By pulling this story to shield an administration, we are repeating that history, but for political optics rather than legal ones.
We have been promoting this story on social media for days. Our viewers are expecting it.
When it fails to air without a credible explanation, the public will correctly identify this as corporate censorship. We are trading 50 years of “Gold Standard” reputation for a single week of political quiet.
I care too much about this broadcast to watch it be dismantled without a fight.
Sharyn
Before killing the segment, Weiss had recommended numerous changes, including adding a new interview with Trump’s unhinged racism-czar Stephen Miller, and replacing the term “migrants” more frequently with words like “illegals.” You know, to be fair and balanced:
“Ms. Weiss first saw the segment on Thursday and raised numerous concerns to “60 Minutes” producers about Ms. Alfonsi’s segment on Friday and Saturday, and she asked for a significant amount of new material to be added, according to three people familiar with the internal discussions.
One of Ms. Weiss’s suggestions was to include a fresh interview with Stephen Miller, a White House deputy chief of staff and the architect of Mr. Trump’s immigration crackdown, or a similarly high-ranking Trump administration official, two of the people said. Ms. Weiss provided contact information for Mr. Miller to the “60 Minutes” staff.
Ms. Weiss also questioned the use of the term “migrants” to describe the Venezuelan men who were deported, noting that they were in the United States illegally, two of the people said.”
Alfonsi notes that the 60 Minutes team had already asked for comment from the White House, the State Department, and the Department of Homeland Security. She also noted that Weiss had basically implemented a “kill switch” for any journalism the Trump White House finds inconvenient.
One presumes they found this particular story extra problematic not just because it exposes the Trump administration’s brutal and unconstitutional industrialized racism machine, but because it humanized Venezuelans at a time when the administration is trying to inflame racial tensions to justify its illegal, militaristic pursuit of Venezuelan precious metal and oil resources.
CBS, of course, wasn’t exactly a bastion of independent, hard-nosed journalism before Weiss and Ellison came to town. The network’s very first response to authoritarianism was to hire more right wing voices. Like many media outlets, it had already been compromised by generational bullying by the U.S. right wing, designed to discredit all factual opposition of right wing ideology for having a “liberal bias.”
Weiss was just hired to finish the job.
The latest paper-edition of the Onion satirical newspaper put it pretty well:

This should not have surprised anybody who has been paying attention. As noted previously, Weiss doesn’t have any actual experience in journalism (certainly not enough to warrant the promotion). She’s an opportunistic, contrarian-for-contrarianism’s-sake troll who built a blog dedicated to culture war grievance and lazy engagement bait.
Billionaires hired Bari Weiss to inflame cultural divides, disorient the public, and undermine journalism. They fire real journalists and replace them with Weiss (and others like her) to divide and distract the electorate from the actual causes of most U.S. dysfunction: usually unchecked corporate power, extreme wealth disparity, corruption, and our increasingly sociopathic, technofascist billionaire class.
Weiss part of an army of fake journalists employed by U.S. billionaires for this purpose (aided in some instances by hostile foreign intelligence), and despite the agenda never being subtle, the consolidated corporate media (the remnants of which Ellison is steadily trying to buy up and dominate) is utterly incapable of being honest with itself about any of it. Quite by design.
I see a lot of commentary pointing out that “Bari Weiss isn’t very good at journalism,” which distracts from the point that she wasn’t hired for journalism. She was hired to blow smoke up the ass of establishment right wing power, whether that’s Trump’s concentration camps or Netanyahu’s industrialized murder of toddlers.
If Weiss gets fired sometime next year it won’t be because she’s a terrible journalist that undermined the outlet’s already sagging credibility, it will be because she’s a clumsy propagandist and a ratings bore.
Filed Under: 60 minutes, bari weiss, cecot, concentration camps, disinformation, journalism, media, propaganda, sharyn alfonsi, venezuela
Companies: cbs, paramount


Comments on “Bari Weiss Shows Her True Colors, Kills A 60 Minutes Story Critical Of The President’s Concentration Camps”
Welcome to the Ministry of Truth
Re:
Ministry? No. This is private business willingly acting as an arm of the government.
Re: Re:
That’s a distinction without much of a difference in our late-stage capitalist hellscape.
Re: Re: Re:
I mean the part where they didn’t do it for the previous government is pretty fucking different.
Mark my words: Bari Weiss is the new Thierry Meyssan, a closet neo-Nazi and anti-American bigot.
And like Meyssan, Weiss deserves to be destroyed like Osama bin Laden.
I wonder if ther's a term for that...
One of Ms. Weiss’s suggestions was to include a fresh interview with Stephen Miller, a White House deputy chief of staff and the architect of Mr. Trump’s immigration crackdown, or a similarly high-ranking Trump administration official, two of the people said. Ms. Weiss provided contact information for Mr. Miller to the “60 Minutes” staff.
Speaking of asking the regime what it thinks on the matter Weiss maybe should have asked them how well the ‘just ignore it and it’ll go away’ strategy has been working out when it comes to the Epstein files.
CBS could have run the episode and it would have rightly garnered attention and condemnation of the regime’s monstrous actions but instead Weiss tried to bury it and ensured that a lot more people are going to be talking about it and assuming that the regime comes out looking even worse than they’d been thinking in it.
Catch and kill.
This is a ‘Catch and kill’ on a news story that truly deserves to be told. What Weiss did resembles what Pecker did not too long ago. CBS just ran what little credibility it had left into a minefield as a result of what Weiss did, on behalf of the toadie she answers to.
Re:
And I’m sure it’s a complete coincidence that after cratering their reputation like this they’ll be less likely to be believed if they come out with any reports damning of the regime going forward since there’s now good reason to assume that any story they run while Weiss is in charge was run past the regime first for ‘official approval’.
Re: Re: Happenstance, coincidence, enemy action
This is no coincidence, it’s enemy action. Guess what side Weiss and the toadie she answers to are on, the first two don’t count.
Re: Re: Re:
(the italics indicate sarcasm)
Re:
This is definitely a “Kill”, “Catch” is another matter entirely, as the practice of “Catch and Kill” involved a the negotiating an -exclusive- with their source, and then sitting on the story. Here, CBS doesn’t have that exclusive, and and other news organizations might be smelling blood in the water..
Re: Catch and kill
They are not killing a story. They are killing journalism.
Don’t worry, this will turn to gold, just like everything else Trump touches. You know, like casinos, for example.
Bari Weiss, official zampolit (political officer) for CBS News, is hell-bent on turning the network of Walter Cronkite, Dan Rather, Mike Wallace, and Connie Chung into “Fox News for people who know which fork to use for the salad.”
PBS is reporting that it aired in Canada, Streisand in 3…2…1…
Aaaaanyway, because Bari Weiss is incompetent she didn’t realize she was only spiking the story in the US. It aired in Canada and it’s on the Internet where anyone can check it against what she eventually chooses to run in the US.
@snarkyrobot.bsky.social comments:
Re:
I never thought I’d see a positive version of malicious compliance these days, but this is absolutely perfect.
Trying to kill the story five minutes before it goes live was inevitably going to cause it to leak. And now if it goes up at all, any chances will be scrutinized and turned into an even greater controversy. I love it.
Re: Re:
The way things are in both government and business right now, I suspect there are rather a lot of people engaging in positive malicious compliance that we’re not hearing about.
Re:
And it can be viewed here: https://www.thereset.news/p/breaking-heres-the-60-minutes-segment
Job Performance
She knew exactly why she was given the job and she knew exactly who gave the order and she followed through to keep the former and gratify the latter. I guess that counts as loyalty?…