Elon Musk’s Twitter Moderation Flags Article About Elon Musk’s Twitter As Dangerous
from the not-so-easy-being-the-boss-of-free-speech dept
Spaceboy Elon Musk promised the Twitter he was pretty much sued into purchasing would bring an end to all the free speech violations he claimed were happening every day under its liberal overlords. But being an edgelord troll rarely converts into competent management. Musk is speedrunning the moderation learning curve. But he is also discovering there are no God codes available to make the moderation game easier.
Comedy is legal, tweeted the Man Who Would Be Twitter King, shortly before deciding true parody was no longer legal. Pay-to-win verification will make Twitter more trustworthy, he shouted, before yanking $8 verification after it ushered in a historic wave of account impersonation.
A CEO who answers to shareholders will make decisions that may seem poorly thought out, but ultimately benefit shareholders. A guy who thought running Twitter would allow him to better serve a base of “censored” conservatives and rabid fanboys tends to make decisions that valorize him as a free speech warrior while giving this questionable customer base something to rally around.
Who knows why this happened, but one can credibly imagine Twitter’s new cleaning crew has been ordered to give any Musk-related tweets more scrutiny. Musk doesn’t seem to enjoy criticism, which aligns him with pretty much everyone everywhere. But he also has the power to mute criticism, which aligns him with authoritarian regimes/billionaires who own social media platforms.
So, this is the sort of thing that happens. Michael Luciano of Mediaite wrote an opinion piece discussing Musk’s actions since he took ownership of Twitter. Despite it being a very even-handed discussion of Musk’s business decisions, Twitter/Musk moderation decided it was a bit too spicy for public consumption.
Twitter deemed a Mediaite article that is critical of the company’s new owner Elon Musk as “potentially spammy” on Friday night, and diverted users to a warning page when they click the post.
The warning had been removed as of Saturday morning after multiple media outlets – including this one – reported on it.
[…]
The post, which is marked “Opinion” and was initially only accessible to users who read through a daunting message and clicked, “Ignore this warning and continue,” is titled “What Elon Musk Is Doing Right at Twitter.”
The entirety of the post’s text reads, “Nothing.”
Succinct. Accurate. And, apparently, potentially dangerous to Twitter users. According to the notice sent to Mediaite, the one-word post violated a bunch of Twitter rules, despite none of the violations listed applying to the post’s content.
The message listed the following categories, none of which the blocked post appears to violate:
– malicious links that could steal personal information or harm electronic devices
– spammy links that mislead people or disrupt their experience
– violent or misleading content that could lead to real-world harm
– certain categories of content that, if posted directly on Twitter, are a violation of the Twitter Rules.
All the post said was that Musk was wrong. The most nefarious explanation is that Musk has elevated moderation of Musk/Twitter-related content and encourages remaining moderators to pull the trigger when the content appears to criticize Musk. The less nefarious explanation is that a bunch of Musk fans brigaded the link, reporting it en masse as ”dangerous,” forcing moderators and/or moderation AI to succumb to the hecklers’ veto. Of course, the other possible explanation is simply mere incompetence, supported by reports of others, such as NBC News also having their links blocked.
Either way, it’s a terrible look for the new boss, who has claimed Twitter is more about free speech than ever. And he’s also learning about the flipside of moderation fuck-ups: the Streisand effect. Any time something negative about Musk is buried (inadvertently or deliberately), it will attract more attention from Twitter users. Musk can’t win.
And that’s the hard truth of content moderation: you’ll never make everyone happy. An even harder truth is that you can’t even make your preferred customer base happy. At best, you can only hope to make users less miserable by removing illegal content and putting procedures in place that give users the power to create the experience they want, rather than being subjected to the outer limits of whatever the platform allows.
To quote the far-more-idealistic Google from several years back, “Don’t be evil.” But evil is subjective. So, maybe the best you can do is not be worse than your predecessors. And if that’s the low bar Musk needs to reach, he’s still appears to be unwilling to attempt clearing it.
Filed Under: blocking, content moderation, elon musk, links
Companies: mediaite, twitter
Comments on “Elon Musk’s Twitter Moderation Flags Article About Elon Musk’s Twitter As Dangerous”
Free speech for me but not for thee
I’m sure the same people who screeched up a storm about the ‘suppression’ of the Hunter Biden laptop story and/or declared that adding commentary to a post is censorship are making just as much noise and loudly condemning Twitter/Musk’s attempt to bury an unflattering story regarding him, right?
Right?
Re:
Judging by the way those same people showed up to that story about Newton, Iowa officials arresting a man because of his speech, I expect they’ll be along at about…oh, let’s say half-past never.
Re:
If Koby’s anything to go by, they’ll either toss out an unrelated whataboutism that ‘proves’ the left are the real baddies, or go completely radio silent because the last thing they’ll ever do is admit that free speech has only ever been a smokescreen for the never ending conservative quest for control. Censorship is fine if they’re doing it.
Re: Re: Simpson Meme:
You know that Simpsons episode where Marge becomes a Real Estate agent, and Lionel Hutz (who works there) says “There’s the truth and then there’s the truth!!”
Same thing for these nazis. “There’s free speech and then there’s free speech!!”
Re: Re: Re:
I believe Giuliani actually said “truth isn’t truth.”
Re: Re: Re:2 Where have I heard that before... ah yes...
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
― George Orwell, 1984
Elon Musk is using the Republican definition of free speech, and that is if I agree with it you can say it, otherwise you will be sent to the reeducation camp.
Just look what a great job he’s doing serving the shareholders at Tesla.
Re: TSLA stockholders
TLSA’s stock price is down 50% since Apr. and now Musk goes out of his way to piss off a US Senator who threatens to have Congress put the hammer down on Musk’s companies.
Not to mention Musk’s $58B compensation and Autopilot trials.
At what point do TSLA stockholders say they’ve had enough of his antics?
Re: Re:
Musk somehow made TSLA stocks to correlate with bitcoin 😀
Re:
Correct. I should have used the verb “may” or the modifier “rarely”. I mean, at least for this guy.
Re: Re: Bruh
Dick pics are actually based. Chill out bro it was probably a joke.
So, no different from most of the world then.
Musk is a nucking futcase!
Well, at least they got one thing right…
Spaceboy? I thought we’d already agreed on Space Karen.
Re:
Per jwz.org, it’s Apartheid Emerald Mine Space Karen.
I mean its not like he’s firing long term employees when a fanboi suggests he should… oh wait…
Who needs 2FA?
We fired that guy & killed it along with unknown other features.
Re:
To be more accurate, “who the fuck uses SMS verification anyway? I mean, it’s not like email can be spoofed easily, after all…”
But subjectivity is objective
“…evil is subjective.”
“Yes, but subjectivity is objective.”
“Not in a rational scheme of perception.”
“Perception is irrational. It implies imminence.”
“But judgment of any system of phenomena exists in any rational, metaphysical or epistemological contradiction to an abstracted empirical concept such as being, or to be, or to occur in the thing itself, or of the thing itself.”
“Yeah, I’ve said that many times.”
Musk dismantling twitter out of petulance and spite is probably genuinely harmful to a lot of people, but it’s honestly put me in the best mood I’ve been in since about 2015