Another Day, Another Bogus SLAPP Suit From Devin Nunes And Steven Biss

from the pain-and-suffering dept

A week after promising yet another defamation lawsuit, Devin Nunes and his lawyer Steven Biss have delivered, suing the Washington Post and reporter Shane Harris for defamation in Virginia federal court. Once again, I’ll remind you that Virginia has a very limited anti-SLAPP law, though that may be changing soon thanks, in part, to Nunes filing so many SLAPP suits in Virginia.

This latest lawsuit is more of the same. He’s seeking $250,350,000 (or basically the same amount Jeff Bezos paid for the entire paper a few years back) for both compensatory and punitive damages for (I’m not joking): “insult, pain, embarrassment, humiliation, mental suffering, injury to his reputation, special damages, costs, and other out-of-pocket expenses.” Remember when Devin Nunes pretended to be a free speech supporter? Now he thinks that a newspaper owes him basically its entire value for insults and embarrassment. Come on.

As is typical of a Biss LOLsuit, the complaint is more performative for Nunes supporters than it is legally persuasive for a court of law. It includes plenty of hyperbole and silly insinuations about Bezos and the Washington Post, like the following:

Billionaire, Jeff Bezos (?Bezos?), purchased WaPo in 2013 for the purpose of using WaPo?s mighty pen to influence Federal elections. Bezos failed to defeat the GOP in 2016, in spite of WaPo?s notoriously libelous reporting. Bezos? WaPo heavily promoted the Russian ?collusion? hoax between 2017 and 2019, in spite of the fact that there was no evidence that any member of the Trump campaign colluded with any ?Russian? to influence the 2016 Presidential Election. This is 2020. As this case illustrates, Bezos and his printing press remain desperate to defame the President of the United States and his allies in Congress. This defamation must end.

Yeah, okay. As with all of Nunes’ other lawsuits, this one stands basically no chance at all, but again calls into significant question Nunes’ competency as an elected official. He’s now sued multiple journalists and news organizations, along with political consultants and (of course) satirical Twitter accounts, all for daring to report on his activities. If he can’t take that, he doesn’t deserve to be an elected official — especially not in a country with the free speech traditions of the United States. Nunes swore to defend and protect the Constitution, which includes the 1st Amendment, and he’s making a mockery of that by rushing to the courts, demanding well over a billion dollars total, because the news has reported critically on him and his activities.

Meanwhile, the Campaign Legal Center may need to update its letter to the Office of Congressional Ethics, asking it to explore how the hell Nunes is paying for Biss’ services, because to date, there is no clear disclosure for how Biss is being paid, and House rules do not allow free legal services without an explicit Legal Expense Fund. And, as CLC notes, Nunes does not appear to have filed the paperwork for that to occur.

In the meantime, while these lawsuits will likely get thrown out and are increasingly laughable, they do create a very real chilling effect. Even dealing with a bogus SLAPP suit takes time and money — and many news organizations may shy away from reporting critically on Nunes in fear of having to deal with such a lawsuit, even if they know they’ll succeed in the end. And that, of course, is a key reason why we see so many SLAPP suits. Even if they fail in court, they can still stifle speech.

One hopes that Nunes’ colleagues in Congress might see how he’s using the court system to stifle criticism and think that maybe, finally, we need a federal anti-SLAPP law.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , ,
Companies: washington post

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Another Day, Another Bogus SLAPP Suit From Devin Nunes And Steven Biss”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
38 Comments
This comment has been deemed funny by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

One hopes that ...

One hopes that Nunes’ colleagues in Congress might see how he’s using the court system to stifle criticism and think that maybe, finally, we need a federal anti-SLAPP law.

One also hopes that geneticists are able to create unicorns, complete with all of the magical powers that are traditionally attributed to them.

I leave it as an exercise to the reader to guess which of the above is more likely.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Anti-Russian sentiment has gone a bit far.

When you interfere with elections by misinforming simpletons who don’t know any better, you better believe that those who aren’t the product of generations of inbreeding are going to have some hatred for them.

Fuck those commie bastards.

Annonymouse says:

Re: Re: Re:

You do realize or maybe you don’t, but the USofA through it’s three letter agencies and various corporate agents has been sticking their fingers in every election everywhere they have access, be they freind or foe. Heck they have been screwing over allies and neighbors for nigh on two centuries.

Toom1275 (profile) says:

Billionaire, Jeff Bezos (“Bezos”), purchased WaPo in 2013 for the purpose of using WaPo’s mighty pen to influence Federal elections. Bezos failed to defeat the GOP in 2016, in spite of WaPo’s notoriously libelous reporting. Bezos’ WaPo heavily promoted the Russian “collusion” hoax between 2017 and 2019, in spite of the fact that there was no evidence that any member of the Trump campaign colluded with any “Russian” to influence the 2016 Presidential Election. This is 2020. As this case illustrates, Bezos and his printing press remain desperate to defame the President of the United States and his allies in Congress. This defamation must end.

Becaise tarting out with ridiculous and desperate lies from paragraph 1 like that is such an effective way to convince the judge your case isn’t vexatious.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
This comment has been deemed funny by the community.
David says:

Well, yeah.

In the meantime, while these lawsuits will likely get thrown out and are increasingly laughable, they do create a very real chilling effect.

It’s sort of being asked to a game of chess against someone in the final phase of rabies.

It should definitely increase your odds of winning, but you’d rather not be in the game at all.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: 'Hey, you're only allowed to do that for MY side!'

What makes that particular bit of whining all the funnier is that I can all but guarantee that he has no problem with the likes of Fox ‘influencing Federal elections’ and sees their actions in that area as perfectly acceptable expression of their free speech since they support him and his party.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Liar.

Several commenters did in fact address that the last time it was brought up(by yourself I would guess), namely by pointing out that simply asking someone not to run something does not a SLAPP suit make, so either you simply dumped the comment and then never bothered to check it again to see what the replies were or you saw the replies that refuted the claim and are simply repeating it as though they were never made.

So, lazy, not interested in actually having a discussion, or dishonest, which are you?

That One Guy (profile) says:

Gotta get me some of that

One hopes that Nunes’ colleagues in Congress might see how he’s using the court system to stifle criticism and think that maybe, finally, we need a federal anti-SLAPP law.

They could respond in that fashion, sure, just like I could wake up to find a literal pot of leprechaun gold at the food of my bed, but I imagine most of them will look at him weaponizing the courts and turning legal filings into PR stunts for the gullible and start thinking how that looks like a mighty tempting and effective thing for them to get in on.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: calls into significant question Nunes' competency

Nah. Nunes is demonstrating all of the current qualifications for federal political office. If you accept that a competent politician is one who lies, does the bidding of their paymasters rather than their constituents, works tirelessly to divide the country, talks out both sides of their mouth and has no idea what the constitution and its amendments say then Nunes is infinitely competent. Maybe he should run for president. He obviously has all the right skills.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...