... someone could, you know, run ads making sure voters could know about politicians like Quirk-Silva and their corruption. I guess that's just a pipe dream, though.
Look at all the major "news" outlets... WP, NYT, etc. They are all guilty of "non-journalism" these days. They want so desperately to "both sides" every issue.
AT&T needs to be broken up again. "Ma Bell" is far worse than they were back before the first imposed break up. And FOP? While I am generally favorable to unions, the police unions in this country have become just shy of terrorist organizations. Some serious sanctions and actions against these terrorist organizations should be paramount.
To the surprise of nobody. You can be assured the only one to get anything out of all of this, in some measure we may not see right now, is Trump. He has never done anything without getting some grift from it somehow. Consumers? Taxpayers? They were never considered.
... of TorGuard, I can attest that the VPN still works perfectly well. I just choose to use a server in Vancouver Canada instead of one in the US. Or I can choose a myriad of other servers in other countries. There isn't any performance hit that I can see, at least not on my 200MB/15MB cable service. Anyone that was using a US server was an idiot, anyway.
When is Rupert Murdoch and his empire going to be dealt with appropriately? Isn't it clear by now that his empire is a Domestic Terrorist Organization and should be treated as such?
NOTE: I have no intention of shooting anyone or anything. I don't own any weapons of any kind and loathe them. This is simply a hypothetical question expounding upon the seemingly common trope that 2nd amendment advocates posit about being able to defend themselves from any and all threats with impunity.
So since LEOs are a provable and documented threat to the safety of everyone and everything, should it then be reasonable that the general public can shoot them on sight? Just asking for some clarification.
I have a WeChat account that I use to keep in touch with many of my Chinese friends. I'm not a Chinese citizen, I'm a very white American. I did not need to use some other person to open my WeChat account. I even have a Weibo account, which linked to my WeChat account. Now, I can't do monetary transactions in WeChat because that does require having a Chinese ID card and bank account, which I, of course, don't have. But, the app and account itself are not restricted otherwise. There is something with this Australian story that doesn't make much sense.
No sympathy for Assange
Assange is to journalism like Giuliani is to jurisprudence. Assange sold his soul to the wrong devil and now that sale is coming back to bite him.
Soak...
...Rinse... repeat. Same as it ever was... Might as well use all the typical clichés since this scenario is repeated so often by the same players.
If only...
... someone could, you know, run ads making sure voters could know about politicians like Quirk-Silva and their corruption. I guess that's just a pipe dream, though.
Why?
Why would ANYONE rent a car from Hertz now? I definitely would not risk it, regardless of the price for the rental.
It's not just the WP
Look at all the major "news" outlets... WP, NYT, etc. They are all guilty of "non-journalism" these days. They want so desperately to "both sides" every issue.
The first step
AT&T needs to be broken up again. "Ma Bell" is far worse than they were back before the first imposed break up. And FOP? While I am generally favorable to unions, the police unions in this country have become just shy of terrorist organizations. Some serious sanctions and actions against these terrorist organizations should be paramount.
Same as it ever was...
To the surprise of nobody. You can be assured the only one to get anything out of all of this, in some measure we may not see right now, is Trump. He has never done anything without getting some grift from it somehow. Consumers? Taxpayers? They were never considered.
ACAB
It is always true: ACAB!
out of a job?
LoL. They'll be elected to a legislative body.
Take the money
Take it from the police unions and pensions. THEN the police might actually give a F. Until then, why should the police care at all?
Competition!
Surely, they can do like Truth Social and just start their own satellite TV service. I mean, that was so successful, right?
So...
...Serpico will be the next GOP candidate for US Senate from Illinois?
Never
trust a cop. NEVER. There is no such thing as a "good cop". They will lie, cheat, steal, and murder to protect themselves from being held accountable.
As a customer...
... of TorGuard, I can attest that the VPN still works perfectly well. I just choose to use a server in Vancouver Canada instead of one in the US. Or I can choose a myriad of other servers in other countries. There isn't any performance hit that I can see, at least not on my 200MB/15MB cable service. Anyone that was using a US server was an idiot, anyway.
The problem...
When is Rupert Murdoch and his empire going to be dealt with appropriately? Isn't it clear by now that his empire is a Domestic Terrorist Organization and should be treated as such?
Follow the money
Somebody at McDs is getting a kickback from Taylor.
Criminal gangs
LEOs are nothing but criminal gangs and terrorist organizations. And should be treated as such.
Re: fair is fair
NOTE: I have no intention of shooting anyone or anything. I don't own any weapons of any kind and loathe them. This is simply a hypothetical question expounding upon the seemingly common trope that 2nd amendment advocates posit about being able to defend themselves from any and all threats with impunity.
fair is fair
So since LEOs are a provable and documented threat to the safety of everyone and everything, should it then be reasonable that the general public can shoot them on sight? Just asking for some clarification.
Huh?
I have a WeChat account that I use to keep in touch with many of my Chinese friends. I'm not a Chinese citizen, I'm a very white American. I did not need to use some other person to open my WeChat account. I even have a Weibo account, which linked to my WeChat account. Now, I can't do monetary transactions in WeChat because that does require having a Chinese ID card and bank account, which I, of course, don't have. But, the app and account itself are not restricted otherwise. There is something with this Australian story that doesn't make much sense.