T-Mobile Tries To Save Its Unpopular Merger With A Few Concessions, But Nobody's Buying
from the ill-communication dept
Sprint and T-Mobile have been facing some increased scrutiny of their claim that merging and reducing the total number of major wireless competitors from four to three will be a wonderful thing for both consumers and the wireless market. New York and California regulators in particular have apparently been pushing back a little at the idea that more consolidation is what’s needed in a largely consolidated and anti-competitive telecom sector:
New from @Capitol_Forum: California and New York antitrust enforcers are skeptical of T-Mobile and Sprint's claims about efficiencies their merger will bring; they're "asking for more evidence and data to back up those justifications for the deal." https://t.co/TN0VOAC39C
— 4Competition Coalition (@4CompCoalition) January 15, 2019
You might recall that the companies’ previous merger attempt was blocked in 2014 after regulators noted that removing one of just four major carriers would result in a proportionally-lower incentive to actually compete on price. That’s really not debatable if you’ve paid attention to telecom and broadband industry history (it’s a major reason why we all loathe Comcast). That’s especially true in Canada, where consolidation to just three players has resulted in the highest mobile data prices in the developed world. AT&T’s attempt to acquire T-Mobile in 2011 was blocked for the same reason, a move that many forget (some intentionally) resulted in T-mobile being more competitive than ever.
This week, T-Mobile attempted to salvage the deal by offering up a few concessions. In a letter to FCC boss Ajit Pai (pdf), T-Mobile CEO John Legere proclaimed that the agency should ignore critics of the deal, since they’re “largely” employed by “big cable and big telco”:
“Critics of our merger, largely employed by Big Telco and Big Cable, have principally argued that we are going to raise rates right after the merger closes. I want to reiterate, unequivocally, that New T-Mobile rates are NOT going to go up. Rather, our merger will ensure that American consumers will pay less and get more.
Of course that’s nonsense. Every major consumer group (you know, the people paid very little to actually try and represent consumers) oppose the deal. And it’s not just critics saying that greater consolidation in wireless will raise rates. It’s history. You can, if the option is available to you, ask a Canadian how reducing the wireless sector’s total carriers from four to three works out for both competition and the end user. This kind of rhetoric only exemplifies how T-Mobile’s hip Millennial consumer advocate branding schtick only goes so far — assuming T-Mobile’s opposition to net neutrality and weird attacks on the EFF hadn’t clued you into that fact already.
Legere goes on to promise Pai that the newly merged T-Mobile won’t raise rates for a period of three years as a condition affixed to the deal:
“To remove any remaining doubt or concerns about New T-Mobile?s prices while we are combining our networks over the next three years, T-Mobile today is submitting to the Commission a commitment that I stand behind ? a commitment that New T-Mobile will make available the same or better rate plans for our services as those offered today by T-Mobile or Sprint.”
Right, but this is the same FCC that just had its authority over telecom operators completely gutted by a massive telecom industry lobbying campaign Legere supported. There’s also zero indication coming from the Pai end that he’d have any interest in holding T-Mobile accountable were they to violate this agreement. Regulatory apathy is extremely common when it comes to actually enforcing merger conditions, and Pai worships at the altar of the (false) belief that mindlessly deregulating the broken telecom sector will somehow miraculously create more competition than ever.
Needless to say, critics of the deal aren’t calmed much by a three year promise not to raise rates. The 4Competition Coalition, comprised of consumer groups and smaller mobile carriers (not a “big telco” or “big cableco” among them), was quick to issue a statement proclaiming that the promise meant less than nothing:
“Committing to not raise ?rate plans? for three years is an empty promise that does not provide any real price protection for consumers. In fact, T-Mobile?s announcement has confirmed exactly what their own data shows: The merger will eliminate wireless competition and increase prices for consumers. The company?s pledge is riddled with loopholes and ensures that any network improvements will allow them to justify higher monthly bills, effectively rendering the pledge meaningless.”
Wall Street analysts, meanwhile, saw the Legere concessions as a sign of desperation. From a research note circulated by Wall Street firm New Street Research:
“The question for investors is whether this commitment is in indication that the deal is more likely or less likely to be approved. Count us in the less likely camp. We admit the clarified commitment could represent a concession that DOJ and/or FCC staff (or the White House) asked for in exchange for agreeing to support the deal. But we think that is unlikely for a number of reasons.
First, generally when it comes to mergers, the first side to offer concessions is likely to be the side that is losing.”
John Legere is entertaining enough that many have been willing to overlook the historical evidence that these kinds of deals are almost always bad for employees and consumers. If they value the health of the telecom sector and their wallet, they really shouldn’t.
Filed Under: ajit pai, competition, fcc, john legere, merger, mobile, rates
Companies: sprint, t-mobile
Comments on “T-Mobile Tries To Save Its Unpopular Merger With A Few Concessions, But Nobody's Buying”
Oh no,.. they’ll keep the already high prices for 3 years before they all jack rates up after that. Wow, what a deal,…NOT! Everyone with half a brain knows what the results will be if it happens.
Notice he only said keep the rates the same for 3 years. That’s nothing, but he also didn’t say that a bunch of people that will now be redundant will be out of a job.
Doesn’t “keeping the same price” just mean “continuously adding new line items to the bill” anyway?
Re: Re: Re:
No, it just means that they’ll lower the data cap on the plan. And maybe the bandwidth allotted.
Heh heh. "Not." Like Wayne’s World! I remember Wayne’s World.
What will they call it when people cut the wireless?
Opting out of society.
Re: Re: Re:
You ever notice patterns repeat themselves?
What was once the shiny new thing is quickly and unceremoniously replaced with the next big new shiny thing.
Rinse – Repeat
Anonymous writing skill
Cracking MBBS program is quite tough; getting a seat in reputed college with affordable fee structure can lead you in a hectic situation. Thus this is a major reason why students choose China as an international country for MBBS studies.
By going through the overall scenario of the country whether it is regarding employment or growth; China has achieved reorganization from all over the world. Therefore from last few decades, China is in highlight because of its leading MBBS colleges.
MBBS education in China is the cost-friendly option for International students; as they can get ample of facilities from topmost reputed universities. According to survey MBBS institutes in China have always tried to offer quality services to their students whether in the field of research or additional studies program. Hence the credit goes to the management team of universities as well as the education board of China. To hold this status or motivating students the qualified professors are trying their best for a brilliant experience.
This can help be helpful for a student throughout life. For Indian students, there are approximately 45 Universities in China for MBBS approved by MCI.
for more information visit :
Legere has become a creepy clown, sort of like Pennywise. He tries to be all cutesy and "hip", but comes across as disingenuous and condescending. Don’t believe his BS.
I’m reminded of the famous clip of Steve Buscemi pretending to be a cool highschool student.
The study MBBS in China is an incredible chance to discover the world’s most crowded nation. You will encounter China’s order mix of antiquated and present-day human advancement and in also its picturesque magnificence and clamoring nightlife. Visit new places with different students from around the world that you’ll meet, and you’ll end up opening your eyes to China as well as to the entire world.
China has been putting forth training to outside students for over fifty years and today it positions one among the best nations of the world that are most-looked for after by global students for quality instruction. The incredible educational foundation in Asia, shoddy cost savvy and exceedingly presumed in technology, Medicine wise, Engineering, the accessibility of guidance in the English medium, an ever increasing number of Chinese medical universities have made courses accessible to students in the English medium. for more information visit:
very good article
Slowly and steadily China has become the hub of education; students are looking forward to pursuing their MBBS from this country. Therefore we can say it is the alternate for those who have prepared themselves to get exposure from international countries. China is a secured destination for girls either inside or outside the campus; students are free to move or enjoy their lifestyle. Therefore these are some attractive features about the country which attracts for study mbbs in china for Indian students to try something different.
We understand that MBBS programs depend upon research and training; thus Chinese universities provide high-technology research centers for their students. The qualified professors are there to guide the students in their education process. Hence we can say students can enroll here without undergoing stress regarding studies or mentioned facilities.for more information visit :
Re: very good article
This advertisement brought to you by the nice people at The Chinese Ministry of Tourism.
Re: Re: very good article
Come visit today! We’ll only invade your privacy a little* bit.
*Little is not a statement of actual level of invasion of privacy. China reserves the right to access every existent record of your activity throughout the term of your life, the activities of your family, your friends, your family’s friends, your friends’ friends, the friends of those, that guy you bought a sandwich from once, and that dude who you looked at briefly because he crossed your path. China reserves the right to do anything they like with this information, and your person, and the person of anyone you may be linked to in any fashion, however, tenuous. Basically, we own you.
Re: Re: very good article
You’re saying that wasn’t just more of Blue’s drivel, irrelevant and linking to malicious websites and all?
Re: Re: Re: very good article
idk – just making fun of the bullshit
"Efficiency" means they’ll be able to fire people. It doesn’t imply anything about end-user costs.
Free markets already.
Just let them merge already. If they jack their prices some upstart company will jump in and offer competitively priced services, thus disrupting the market, this is the way of things…it takes time, but it has happened this way throughout history and across multiple industries, it only becomes a problem when the government effectively creates a monopoly though over-regulation, poor legislation or from the barrier to entry in the marketplace being so high that a monopoly is effectively guaranteed. I would rather watch a merger occur and let them stand or fall on their own with a combined network than watch Sprint flail and twist in the wind until it eventually fades from existence through its own negligence and poor service. I say this a a former Sprint customer who was frequently disappointed with low signal, no signal or dropped signal every time I left an urban area. God forbid I venture anywhere near a wilderness and still expect even a roaming signal!
Re: Free markets already.
LOL – free markets – I bet they self regulate dont they
Re: Free markets already.
Where does that company get the spectrum needed to implement their service? They certainly would not get tower sharing agreements at a level needed to undercut the incumbents.
Re: Re: Free markets already.
Details details … the free market will solve all your problems while doing your laundry.
Que es Bueno por GOOGLE?
Not a merger that reduces the online ad pie.
…what the fuck are you talking about?
Re: Sir do you smell toast?