So you claim to be the registered user bhull242, who hasn't been blocked?
Or are you butthurt because Comcast is still an ISP?
You aren't making any sense, AC.
To "Prove" you are being blocked - you need to be blocked. And you aren't.
To "Prove" you have made such a super awesome statement that got you in trouble, you may want to actually point to the post in question and explain.
But you can't, as far as I've seen. Just a bunch of disconnected posts going, "It's so obvious YOU FOOLS" and, "AH! So much proof!"
Amusing. Do you claim to have a registered account here that TD has shut down?
They have the right to pick their own fights.
If leaving up the gay content in the Sadui dictatorship just barely passes muster, attacking the royals may cross a line they don't want to cross.
The Saudi family is a bunch of mass murdering psychos - the safety of local employees is a real concern.
Depends on if you get SWATted, or the Very Fine People who support El Cheetos start burning crosses on your lawn. Generally doxing is considered a threat. "I know where you live and so does everyone else."
Abuse and oppression are never proper. At the same time, however, I have a very hard time mustering much sympathy for the self-destructively stupid.
So... They got was was comin' to them?
And so it's wrong for anyone outside of China to express their support for them? Because they are stupid for wanting a better deal.
How exactly do you think people get the right to democracy?
Clearly the red AC feels that Hong Kong shouldn't have democracy, independence or freedom.
His is arguing from the point of mainland China and hold that the state has the right to do whatever the hell it wants. Therefore any murder, torture and retaliation is not just justified, but a necessary consequence of disobedience.
And point out that is wrong to "Murder, torture and oppress" is a feeble distraction form the point he is trying to make.
Did I get that right, "Red AC"?
Yes you are correct - it is most proper for the people of Hong Kong to be murdered, tortured and beaten by their government. Thanks for reminding us that is always wrong to protest against your government.
Mike is trying to ban me, right after I disagreed with Stephen about public and private.
'Sup Liar. As pointed out multiple times you are making this shit up. GG.
The comments on private vs public weren't "dissent" they were nonsense - I wouldn't be so eager to take ownership of them AC.
How about this - create an account and join in with your own voice. See how that works. And see if you get downvoted multi-posts and OT comments like you are now. Or will you just complain that you are being persecuted when clearly you are using the AC status to avoid accountability.
The missing bit of this story
Why would Mike and TD have access tot hat information if the Times didn't put in in the original article? Have you considered logging into the Times to present your displeasure at the author instead of whining about it here?
Just saying, seems like you just wanted to gripe for the sake of it.
Also "The Law is the Law" excuse.
But the law is supposed to have a good reason. To protect us.
If we don't need protection from people who aren't causing us harm, maybe it shouldn't even be a misdemeanor at all. And it's certainly a waste of resources to make an elevated response.