"The problem is that Microsoft has often hidden behind claims that it has to collect a lot of this data or the operating system won't work"Just like Win 98 could not work without Internet Explorer. Yeah, right.
Totally unlike all the Drumpfists who'd try for hurting their chief huckster. Right.
None of you guys get it to you?I said that out of concern that TD is driving people away.OR, it could be that people understand what actually is bias and what isn't - some people even manage that when the author doesn't share their opinion.Do you get that?
Yeah, I'm sure they all fear your wrath... or something.
"Keep spinning TD, you are only going to drive views away."Good riddance!
"They're big companies -- and certainly, like with all big companies, we should be wary about how they might abuse their powers."Which is why the solution to the problem is to create yet another big company. Makes perfect sense.
Remember back in the day when the trolls posting at Techdirt tried hard (and failed still)?
> In this case, the site in question came into our result set > erroneously but the process we have with the search engines > ensured that it was not taken down and is still live now. No, the fact that a search engine DOES NOT TAKE DOWN content it indexes is the reason that's it's still live now.
This never gets old, Oettinger trying to speak English:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RrEQ8Ovw-Q
Mike,you know you're obligated to care about our opinion.Love,Anonymous Cowards.
> You didn’t present those other facts.Straight from the **IA's playbook but this way you don't like it?
> This coming from a Sanders supporter.who will offer ample evidence for his statements in his next post or STFU, right?
You've tried markdown?http://commonmark.org/help/
What about the safety of the born (from bad food or roads)?
And failed to impress as usually.
So, there's 50 shades of racism? Or is this just another way of saying that only white people can be racists?
> For some reason, anything "on the internet" is seen as the > truthRight, I totally believe everything said on the Alex Jones channel!
Probably because of the level of evidence. Since it's definitely his voice on the tapes, he cannot say that someone else is lying about him.
More comments from techflaws >>
Submit a story now.