It should be impossible to use a thumb drive or any non-government issued electronics within SCOTUS. On entry and departure, security should check for illicit electronics. No private mobile devices should be allowed within SCOTUS.
SCOTUS should probably issue a no-port laptop to a staff member. SCOTUS work should only be doable on a Virtual Machine that has no access to local storage. A staff member should have no admin privileges on the laptop and have no ability to install unapproved software. To work at home, a staff member should use a secure VPN to get on the internal SCOTUS intranet from a secure SCOTUS virtual machine on the no-port laptop. There should be no ability to transfer a remote file from a SCOTUS server to the laptop's internal storage. The staff member should not be able to mount his own remote file system on the SCOTUS VM. SCOTUS VM apps should be unable to access the staff member's private network.
There are few other needed security features, but none of them would be particularly burdensome for a SCOTUS staff member that needs to work at home. A SCOTUS staff member is probably only doing word processing and reading on his laptop.
At the time of the ratification of the Constitution, a state had the power to bring a charge of criminal libel for libel that caused a breach of the peace.
Amendment IX confirms that sans Constitutional Amendment a state continues to have the power to bring a charge of criminal libel for libel that causes a breach of the peace.
See U.S. v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460, 130 S. Ct. 1577, 176 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2010).
From a grammatical standpoint Fuck Trump is an archaic cohortative or optative and means May Trump fuck. (Compare Long live the King!)
Fuck you! is an archaic imperative form.
Neither Fuck Trump nor Fuck you refers to an actual sexual act.
Goldman is not even qualified to take the patent bar.
Goldman does not have even 5% of the knowledge, which I have in common carriage law, in telecommunications law, or in technology law. I was taught by the real experts in these fields when I worked with the legal department of pre-Breakup AT&T.
See draft petition for certiorari.
The public square is a traditional public forum. The Internet is a government-designated public forum.
For all the talk of “the new public square,” as we’ve noted in the past, it’s the internet itself that is the new public square, and there are tons of different communities forming in that public square, each with their own rules. And it’s that diversity that enables so much speech online. Different places where different people can speak, and where there are different rules and norms and accepted behavior. It’s not all just one free for all, because that would just be pure noise and no signal. Twitter has been one key piece of all that. And much of that is because of Gadde’s leadership on these very issues.
[Gadde is genocidal racist scum!]
I suppose it's too hard for the white racist dummies of TechDirt to understand.
Exclusion of blacks and of other darkies like my wife is standing operating procedure of white racists like the TechDirt nitwits.
When the federal government started to tell a state that Blacks could not be excluded from the public square, the state's white racists would set up a private entity to create a discriminatory exclusionary open forum in a public forum so that Blacks and other darkies like my wife could be excluded. The federal judiciary responded by ruling that such a private entity
1, proxied for the government when it set up an open forum in a public forum and
2. under State Action Doctrine legally could neither discriminate nor exclude members of the public.
When a depraved TechDirt white racist dummy babbles about the free speech of a social medium platform, the depraved TechDirt white racist evinces the mentality of the worst Jim Crow white racist. The utter villainy of a TechDirt white racist dummy is indisputable and incontrovertible!
Twitter routinely removes a pro-Palestine user and his content -- apparently per the orders of the viciously anti-Muslim racist Vijaya Gadde.
My wife and I were banned for Palestinian-Jewish miscegenation. The depraved racist Twitter management put a depraved genocidal Ziø colonial settler Yoel Roth,
who served in the Waffen-IDF and
who is in the USA illegally,
in charge of Twitter suspensions.
There is probable cause to try Twitter and Twitter top-management for criminal conspiracy in genocide and for material support to terrorists because genocide is the only form of terrorism that is well defined in US federal criminal law.
Stephen T. Stone's cluelessness and stupidity is truly awesome even among TechDirt's white racist nitwits.
You don’t have a right to an audience. You don’t have a right to use someone else’s private property as your own personal soapbox. And you don’t have a right to force anyone into either becoming your audience or helping you publish/distribute your speech. Having any or all of those things is a privilege. Nobody owes you such privileges; losing them doesn’t keep you from speaking your mind.
Stephen T. Stone understands no element of either US Constitutional, statutory, or common law.
Only a tech nitwit denies that a social medium platform is a common carrier.
The public has a right to non-discriminatory common carriage. If a private company creates an open forum in the government-designated public forum of the Internet, every member of the public has a right to an audience in the forum. A social medium platform has to provide message common carriage to every member of the public.
Of all the vile and despicable racists on TechDirt, Stephen T. Stone is the most despicable in his racist and disgusting desire to deprive large sections of the public of their Constitutional rights.
TechDirt white racist dummies are the Internet equivalent of the white racist thugs of Ax Handle Saturday.
Stephen T. Stone combines the worst of white racist stupidity and ignorance with the thinking of Julius Streicher.
During the early days of telegraphy, many argued for telegraph exceptionalism just as many today argue for Internet exceptionalism.
In two early cases, Parks v. Alta Cal. Tel. Co., 13 Cal. 422 (1859), and Mac Andrew v. The Electric Co., 17 C. B. (Eng.) 3 (1855), they were held to be common carriers; but in other early cases the courts, when they considered the nature and power of electricity, thought it so strange, wonderful and incomprehensible, that no ordinary human care or skill could possibly suffice to control it perfectly, and, deeming it therefore unjust to hold telegraph companies bound by the strict rules which govern common carriers, sought out reasons for making a distinction between these new carriers of thought and the old carriers of merchandise.
See Benjamin F. Rex, “Liability of Telegraph Companies for Fraud, Accident, Delay and Mistakes in the Transmission and Delivery of Messages,” The American Law Register, May, 1884, Vol. 32, No. 5, New Series Volume 23 (May, 1884), p. 282. By 1869 practically everyone conceded that an 1869 telegraph company was a common carrier just as a 2022 social medium platform is a common carrier today.
No one, who advocated telegraph exceptionalism, showed the malignant mentality that Stephen T. Stone and the rest of the depraved TechDirt white racist dummies evince.
A racist discriminatory social medium platform, which holds out an open forum in a public forum, proxies for the government and can exclude neither a user nor his content.
Like every white racist dummy, Anonymous Clown considers himself and his depraved racism above the law.
A depraved white racist like Anonymous Clown is more than annoying. He is vile and disgusting.
The US government designated the Internet a public forum in 47 U.S. Code § 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material. I explain in detail in the Draft Petition.
TechDirt Tech and legal nitwits are vile white racist dummies.
Twitter and the other depraved racist social medium platforms hold out an open forum in the government-designated public forum of the Internet.
Twitter and the other depraved racist social medium platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Youtube, and LinkedIn become state proxies by holding out open forums in a public forum.
Under State Action Doctrine, Twitter and the other depraved racist social medium platforms violate the First Amendment by abridging the freedom of speech of the public.
All my assertions have been vetted by some of the top experts in this area. When my petition for cert has been further refined, I will make it available on the Internet.
Place of Public Accommodation, Public Forum, and State Action (Proxying)
The concepts of public accommodation and public forum are related while the issue of state action often relates to a public forum even if a public forum does not play a role in Burton v. Wilmington Pkg. Auth, 365 U.S. 715, 81 S. Ct. 856 (1961). A lot of time would probably not have been wasted on litigation if State Action Doctrine had been named State Proxy Doctrine or State Proxying Doctrine.
No USB Laptop For SCOTUS -- Why Not?
It should be impossible to use a thumb drive or any non-government issued electronics within SCOTUS. On entry and departure, security should check for illicit electronics. No private mobile devices should be allowed within SCOTUS. SCOTUS should probably issue a no-port laptop to a staff member. SCOTUS work should only be doable on a Virtual Machine that has no access to local storage. A staff member should have no admin privileges on the laptop and have no ability to install unapproved software. To work at home, a staff member should use a secure VPN to get on the internal SCOTUS intranet from a secure SCOTUS virtual machine on the no-port laptop. There should be no ability to transfer a remote file from a SCOTUS server to the laptop's internal storage. The staff member should not be able to mount his own remote file system on the SCOTUS VM. SCOTUS VM apps should be unable to access the staff member's private network. There are few other needed security features, but none of them would be particularly burdensome for a SCOTUS staff member that needs to work at home. A SCOTUS staff member is probably only doing word processing and reading on his laptop.
The Leak Could Have Come From Nobody!
SCOTUS seems to have been using some notoriously insecure software packages.
Please Learn Something About Constitutional Law
At the time of the ratification of the Constitution, a state had the power to bring a charge of criminal libel for libel that caused a breach of the peace. Amendment IX confirms that sans Constitutional Amendment a state continues to have the power to bring a charge of criminal libel for libel that causes a breach of the peace. See U.S. v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460, 130 S. Ct. 1577, 176 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2010).
A Message Common Carrier Like Twitter Violates the Law When It Moderates Content
It also exposes itself to massive liability in the case of (group) distributor libel. Musk is correct to fire all content moderators.
So What do Techdirt's White Racist Dummies Think of My Litigation Now?
Despite Musk's avowed free speech policy, Twitter has basically told me to bring it on. You can read the current draft at: petition to SCOTUS for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. You can read a short summary at 9th Amendment Challenge to Social Medium Abuse.
No one wants to copulate with Trump!
From a grammatical standpoint Fuck Trump is an archaic cohortative or optative and means May Trump fuck. (Compare Long live the King!) Fuck you! is an archaic imperative form. Neither Fuck Trump nor Fuck you refers to an actual sexual act.
SCOTUS Guidance Has Been Pellucid
SCOTUS has been crystal clear about Amendment I. See Iancu v. Brunetti, 139 S. Ct. 2294, 204 L. Ed. 2d 714 (2019).
Goldman is Way Out of His League
Goldman is not even qualified to take the patent bar. Goldman does not have even 5% of the knowledge, which I have in common carriage law, in telecommunications law, or in technology law. I was taught by the real experts in these fields when I worked with the legal department of pre-Breakup AT&T. See draft petition for certiorari.
The Article Itself Says It All!
The public square is a traditional public forum. The Internet is a government-designated public forum.
[Gadde is genocidal racist scum!] I suppose it's too hard for the white racist dummies of TechDirt to understand. Exclusion of blacks and of other darkies like my wife is standing operating procedure of white racists like the TechDirt nitwits. When the federal government started to tell a state that Blacks could not be excluded from the public square, the state's white racists would set up a private entity to create a discriminatory exclusionary open forum in a public forum so that Blacks and other darkies like my wife could be excluded. The federal judiciary responded by ruling that such a private entity 1, proxied for the government when it set up an open forum in a public forum and 2. under State Action Doctrine legally could neither discriminate nor exclude members of the public. When a depraved TechDirt white racist dummy babbles about the free speech of a social medium platform, the depraved TechDirt white racist evinces the mentality of the worst Jim Crow white racist. The utter villainy of a TechDirt white racist dummy is indisputable and incontrovertible!Genocide-Supporting Racism of Twitter
Twitter routinely removes a pro-Palestine user and his content -- apparently per the orders of the viciously anti-Muslim racist Vijaya Gadde. My wife and I were banned for Palestinian-Jewish miscegenation. The depraved racist Twitter management put a depraved genocidal Ziø colonial settler Yoel Roth,
- who served in the Waffen-IDF and
- who is in the USA illegally,
in charge of Twitter suspensions. There is probable cause to try Twitter and Twitter top-management for criminal conspiracy in genocide and for material support to terrorists because genocide is the only form of terrorism that is well defined in US federal criminal law.Astounding Legal and Tech Ignorance of White Racist Dummy Stephen T. Stone
Stephen T. Stone's cluelessness and stupidity is truly awesome even among TechDirt's white racist nitwits.
Stephen T. Stone understands no element of either US Constitutional, statutory, or common law. Only a tech nitwit denies that a social medium platform is a common carrier. The public has a right to non-discriminatory common carriage. If a private company creates an open forum in the government-designated public forum of the Internet, every member of the public has a right to an audience in the forum. A social medium platform has to provide message common carriage to every member of the public. Of all the vile and despicable racists on TechDirt, Stephen T. Stone is the most despicable in his racist and disgusting desire to deprive large sections of the public of their Constitutional rights. TechDirt white racist dummies are the Internet equivalent of the white racist thugs of Ax Handle Saturday. Stephen T. Stone combines the worst of white racist stupidity and ignorance with the thinking of Julius Streicher. During the early days of telegraphy, many argued for telegraph exceptionalism just as many today argue for Internet exceptionalism. See Benjamin F. Rex, “Liability of Telegraph Companies for Fraud, Accident, Delay and Mistakes in the Transmission and Delivery of Messages,” The American Law Register, May, 1884, Vol. 32, No. 5, New Series Volume 23 (May, 1884), p. 282. By 1869 practically everyone conceded that an 1869 telegraph company was a common carrier just as a 2022 social medium platform is a common carrier today. No one, who advocated telegraph exceptionalism, showed the malignant mentality that Stephen T. Stone and the rest of the depraved TechDirt white racist dummies evince.The Facts of Racism and a Depraved White Racist Dummy
When white racist dummy Stephen T. Stone is confronted with a legal admission of racism from Facebook/Meta, he writes:
A white racist dummy never finds merit in a non-white's complaint of racism.Depraved Racist Dummy Anonymous Clown Does Not Understand Law
A racist discriminatory social medium platform, which holds out an open forum in a public forum, proxies for the government and can exclude neither a user nor his content. Like every white racist dummy, Anonymous Clown considers himself and his depraved racism above the law. A depraved white racist like Anonymous Clown is more than annoying. He is vile and disgusting.
Facebook has made a legal admission that concedes Facebook commits racial, ethnic, national, and religious discrimination
In the depraved POV of a white racist TechDirt legal and tech nitwit, such white racist discrimination is a good thing. See Human Rights Due Diligence of Meta’s Impacts in Israel and Palestine . It is hard to be more vile and disgusting than a white racist TechDirt dummy.
What's hard about public forum law?
The US government designated the Internet a public forum in 47 U.S. Code § 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material. I explain in detail in the Draft Petition.
Incoherent Racist Blather from White racist Anonymous Clown
TechDirt Tech and legal nitwits are vile white racist dummies. Twitter and the other depraved racist social medium platforms hold out an open forum in the government-designated public forum of the Internet. Twitter and the other depraved racist social medium platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Youtube, and LinkedIn become state proxies by holding out open forums in a public forum. Under State Action Doctrine, Twitter and the other depraved racist social medium platforms violate the First Amendment by abridging the freedom of speech of the public.
Depraved Delusion of a White Racist Supporter of Discrimination by a Social Medium Platform!
I explain exactly why a 2022 social medium platform is not a 1996 Interactive Computer Service on p. 30 et seq. of Petition II to SCOTUS for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. It is hard to be a more despicable liar than a supporter of white racial discrimination by a social medium platform.
Suppose One is a Wannabe Lyncher!
The FBI is a good place to get one's jollies by beating on a minority because an FBI agent is mostly immune to prosecution.
What a Depraved White Racist Subsapient Like Stephen T. Stone Wants
No one sapient cares what a depraved white racist subsapient like Stephen T. Stone wants. In the end SCOTUS will make the ruling.
I Was an Internal AT&T Expert on Common Carriage and Technology Since the Late 70s.
All my assertions have been vetted by some of the top experts in this area. When my petition for cert has been further refined, I will make it available on the Internet. Place of Public Accommodation, Public Forum, and State Action (Proxying) The concepts of public accommodation and public forum are related while the issue of state action often relates to a public forum even if a public forum does not play a role in Burton v. Wilmington Pkg. Auth, 365 U.S. 715, 81 S. Ct. 856 (1961). A lot of time would probably not have been wasted on litigation if State Action Doctrine had been named State Proxy Doctrine or State Proxying Doctrine.