Nope. They’re both residents of Floriduh. VP has to come from a different state than POTUS.
Our house troll has chosen a new daddy, it seems. Fortunatel for the house troll, DeSantis does seem to favour minor children for company.
dear god this is horrible :(
could have opened the door to the Red Sox having the ability to assert a legal claim to merchandise that simply bears the name “Boston,” I thought you could only trademark names in a particular form, not names themselves. And why not trademark that expression together with the team name? Someone was having a serious attack of stupid when they recommended trying this!
❤️
Things I am sick of arguing about on this blog:
Porn and teenagers, especially teenage boys, is a dreadful mix, and does a lot of harm. I agree that education for all genders on the way porn distorts sexual interactions and perceptions is much more important. It's just too damn late to get the porn off the internet, and if you make it 'forbidden fruit', it's much more likely to pique teenage attention. Showing it for what it mostly is, which is artificial and dull and unsatisfying emotionally, and explaining that, would work much better
" the horror film turns Pooh and Piglet into partners in slashy crime" Oh? ::perks up in fanficcer:: Not that kind of slashy, I bet "President Xi as Winnie the Pooh" This is hilarious :)
"One wonders if they are just trying to line people up so the second 230 gets jiggled they will file all of these cases." Bingo! :(
Stephen, Stephen, you keep laying out the facts like the house trolls give a fuck about them. It's never going to work.
"All social media" Not Mastodon. "If all social media vanished tomorrow because of lack of users and revenue, the world would not be any worse for it." Really? I think the lack of easy connection between people and quick and simple access to news and information would have a strongly deleterious effect on the world. It's like saying if all phones disappeared tomorrow, nothing would happen. It's an inane argument.
The first public lending libraries were for paid subscribers. Tax payers and the government have taken over the cost for individuals. I hope we don't return to the state of things in the early nineteenth century because that will substantially reduce access, and then where will these precious publisher profits come from?
He bases values on his 'feelings' about his companies. He and Donald have a lot in common.
"The company could be worth $10 billion or $1 billion or $50 billion." I'm going with no billion, personally. He's King Midas all right - in reverse
Oh ffs :(
Another democracy dies while people suck up to the authoritarian in charge :(
They won't, which is the stupidest thing about this mess. It's self-destructive on a massive scale.
This is obviously a legally horrible decision, and hurts the IA which is a global treasure and should be protected at all costs. But I can't even see how it benefits the publishers. I've said here before that ebook pirates don't covert to paying customers because that's not something they want to do. Cutting off their supply doesn't suddenly open up a whole new market for creators. The same is true for people who want to borrow a book by a new author to read it before buying it. (I'll also repeat for the slow of understanding that I completely support library ebook lending and deplore all attempts to restrict that or impose fees for repeat use. And I also support the right of first purchase for physical books to be lent and resold.) There are very few authors who are so wonderful that if a prospective reader can't try them out first, they will eagerly hand over $20 for a Kindle version or ebook just to see if they like their work. (And if you think you're the exception, you're wrong.) This is particularly true for popular genre works, where the big money is for publishers. Like the attempt to make providing ebooks for other libraries more costly, all this decision is likely to do is drive down the habit of reading fiction for that very segment of the audience who are the most devoted readers and fans - the kind of people who make multiple purchases of books to give as gifts, and the kind of readers who enthusiastically boost and review the books they love to other readers. Any author who values a few dollars in royalties (or sucking up to their publisher) over keeping their audience enthused and happy, needs to have their head read because they're bonkers. I don't know who this judge is, but he sounds like yet another useless, fanatic Trump appointee trying to change established law to suit his own theories. America is going to suffer badly from the Trump era for decades because of these people. I hope the 2nd Circuit smashes this decision to bits.
Thank you for this, you are a life saver!
He’s got that horrible artist who keeps portraying him as brave, fit, and patriotic for that kind of bullshit