Important Things At Twitter Keep Breaking, And Making The Site More Dangerous

from the there's-no-autocompleting-safety dept

It turns out that if you fire basically all of the competent trust & safety people at your website, you end up with a site that is neither trustworthy, nor safe. We’ve spent months covering ways in which you cannot trust anything from Twitter or Elon Musk, and there have been some indications of real safety problems on the site, but it’s been getting worse lately, with two somewhat terrifying stories that show just how unsafe the site has become, and how risky it is to rely on Twitter for anything.

First, former head of trust & safety at Twitter, Yoel Roth, a few weeks after he quit, said that “if protected tweets stop working, run.” Basically, when core security features break down, it’s time to get the hell out of there.

Protected tweets do still seem to kinda be working, but a related feature, Twitter’s “circles,” which lets you tweet to just a smaller audience, broke. Back in February, some people noticed that it was “glitching,” in ways that were concerning, including a few reports that some things that were supposedly posted to a circle were viewable publicly, but there weren’t many details. However, in early April, such reports became widespread, with further reports of nude imagery that people thought was being shared privately among a smaller group being available publicly.

Twitter said nothing for a while, before finally admitting earlier this month that there was a “security incident” that may have exposed some of those supposed-to-be-private tweets, though it appears to have only sent that admission to some users via email, rather than publicly commenting on it.

The second incident is perhaps a lot more concerning. Last week, some users discovered that Twitter’s search autocomplete was recommending… um… absolutely horrific stuff, including potential child sexual abuse material and animal torture videos. As an NBC report by Ben Collins notes, Twitter used to have tools that stopped search from recommending such awful things, but it looks like someone at Twitter 2.0 just turned off that feature, enabling anyone to get recommended animal torture.

Yoel Roth, Twitter’s former head of trust and safety, told NBC News that he believes the company likely dismantled a series of safeguards meant to stop these kinds of autocomplete problems.

Roth explained that autocompleted search results on Twitter were internally known as “type-ahead search” and that the company had built a system to prevent illegal, illicit and dangerous content from appearing as autocompleting suggestions.

“There is an extensive, well-built and maintained list of things that filtered type-ahead search, and a lot of it was constructed with wildcards and regular expressions,” Roth said.

Roth said there was a several-step process to prevent gore and death videos from appearing in autocompleted search suggestions. The process was a combination of automatic and human moderation, which flagged animal cruelty and violent videos before they began to appear automatically in search results.

“Type-ahead search was really not easy to break. These are longstanding systems with multiple layers of redundancy,” said Roth. “If it just stops working, it almost defies probability.”

In other words, this isn’t something that just “breaks.” It’s something that someone had to go in and actively go through multiple steps to turn off.

After news of this started to get attention, Twitter responded by… turning off autocomplete entirely. Which, I guess, is better than leaving up the other version.

But, still, this is why you have a trust & safety team who works through this stuff to keep your site safe. It’s not just content moderation, as there’s a lot more to it than that. But Twitter 2.0 seems to have burned to the ground a ton of institutional knowledge and is just winging it. If that means recommending CSAM and animal torture videos, well, I guess that’s just the kind of site Twitter wants to be.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,
Companies: twitter

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Important Things At Twitter Keep Breaking, And Making The Site More Dangerous”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
76 Comments
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Who Cares (profile) says:

Re:

They kind of had to once the Israeli government started issuing statements/tweets along the lines of what Musk tweeted about Soros has an antisemitic feeling to it and Musk is stoking antisemitism on Twitter.

The reaction by Musk is telling though. The clearest admittance that he wants freedom of consequences in addition to the freedom of his speech (as if past actions weren’t enough of an indication for either).

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Matthew M Bennett says:

Pretty sure Roth was fired, not quit

…and has lied on many things regarding his time at Twitter, so why believe him about this?

It turns out that if you fire basically all of the competent trust & safety people at your website

I love your fiction that any of those people were competent or doing much that was useful.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

I love your fiction that any of those people were competent or doing much that was useful.

Well, I suppose when you are the kind of person that gets off on watching animal torture videos, then they weren’t doing anything useful for your type.

Thanks for admitting that you get off on watching animal torture videos.

I wonder if there is bottom to your depravity…

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Note that there are two separate things involved. First, there are the things that autocomplete suggests. Second, there are the things available to be found. Those are not the same, depending on how the autocomplete database is built and maintained. If I search for “woke ideologues with…” and autocomplete suggests “…their heads up their rears”, that doesn’t mean that accepting that search will actually produce content containing it. It’s plausible that autocomplete is simply accumulating and learning the things that people ask for and feeding them back. A better system might be to order autocompletion by the amount of content that would be retrieved, but that might be considerably slower to determine.

On the other hand, if Twitter doesn’t mind hosting animal cruelty videos (I don’t know if it does or doesn’t, but the Supreme Court has said that it’s OK), autocomplete should in fact help you find them. Note that TechDirt has a whole article dedicated to complaining that Twitter de-emphasized Bellingcat in searches. A large generic speech platform with search capability should not be placing its thumb on the scales to make certain content difficult to find.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2

Correct, that’s not useful. If searches are turning up illegal child pornography on Twitter, Twitter should use those searches to remove it. If people are searching for child pornography and autocomplete is learning from that, I don’t see too much wrong with having the topics show up, although the pearl-clutchers will. Ideally, the autocomplete topics should be hatred by the available results, so removing actual child pornography would result in removing those topics from searches.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Strawb (profile) says:

Pretty sure Roth was fired, not quit

If you’re pretty sure, feel free to provide sources. Because I can find multiple that say he resigned.

…and has lied on many things regarding his time at Twitter, so why believe him about this?

Again, feel free to provide sources for his lying.

I love your fiction that any of those people were competent or doing much that was useful.

Well, Twitter has experience pretty much unprecedented failures, bugs and crashes since Musk took over. To anyone with an IQ above room temperature, those are clear indications that “those people” did something useful.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

However, in early April, such reports became widespread, with further reports of nude imagery that people thought was being shared privately among a smaller group being available publicly.

I mean, given how much republicans really wanted/want to see Hunter Biden’s dick, to the point that they threw a fit when old Twitter told them they couldn’t publicly available nudes might not have been a bug so much as a feature

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...