Microsoft Wisely Gets On The Right Side Of History And ‘Right To Repair’
from the right-side-of-history dept
Microsoft has apparently realized that it’s just good business sense to get itself on the right side of history, and the right side of the growing “right to repair movement.” The company has increasingly been urging lawmakers to support the Washington State Fair Repair Act, which would ensure that consumers and indie repair shops have the parts, tools, and documentation to repair their own gear.
Unfortunately, the bill bogged down in the Washington legislature thanks to opposition from both Republicans and Senator Lisa Wellman, a Democrat and former Apple executive. But right to repair activists say that Microsoft’s support of the legislation has started to change the equation:
“We are in the middle of more conversations with manufacturers being way more cooperative than before,” Nathan Proctor, who heads the U.S. Public Research Interest Group’s right-to-repair campaign, told Grist. “And I think Microsoft’s leadership and willingness to be first created that opportunity.”
A long list of companies like John Deere have spent decades trying to monopolize repair options in everything from consumer electronics to medical equipment and agricultural gear. The end result is always higher repair costs, fewer repair options, and more waste. Microsoft and Sony have historically been part of the problem, with efforts to make it harder to repair game consoles.
Many such companies have been waging war on state and federal efforts to make it easier for consumers to fix their own tech hardware. That’s ranged from Apple falsely claiming this will turn states into dangerous meccas for hackers, to the automotive industry falsely claiming that making it easier to access and repair modern cars will be a boon to stalkers and sexual predators.
But the more fiercely companies try to monopolize repair, implement obnoxious DRM, lock down repair manuals and tools, consolidate repair options and drive up costs, the more annoyed consumers, activists, and environmentalists get, and the greater the momentum for meaningful legislation becomes.
While US consumer rights are generally a hot mess right now, the right to repair movement is a refreshing exception. It’s popular, bipartisan, and is only going to accelerate after decades of consumer anger. Companies can either try to swim upstream against it and make things even worse for themselves, or they can follow Microsoft’s (belated) lead and make sure they’re on the right side of history.
Filed Under: independent repair shops, medical, playstation, right to repair, tractors, xbox
Companies: microsoft


Comments on “Microsoft Wisely Gets On The Right Side Of History And ‘Right To Repair’”
Wrong side of history
Maybe after being on the wrong side of history when it came to open source, Microsoft is now more careful to be on the right side of history.
Re:
I think Microsoft’s strategy in the case of Open-Source–and in the case of Right-to-repair–is “If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em.” That is, Microsoft realizes that they’ve lost the battle so they’ll figure that they’ll try to work with the new reality rather than fight against it, since they tried that and it failed.
Re: Re:
Microsofts strategy for decades has been embrace, extend, extinguish. It doesn’t always work, but it always starts with embrace. Microsofts success has been when its been willing to embrace and try to take over from within. Sometimes they do it outright. Sometimes they just influence and end up at the front. Its no different here.
Re: Re: Re:
Fair enough.
Re: Re:
Microosft may had a checkered history with consumer-rights but after being the victim of anti-trust actions by the D.O.J and the launch of the original Xbox game-console they never persecuted developers of third-party applications as long as they never implied endorsement of Microsoft and did not distribute Microsoft I.P. Some involved even got hired by Microsoft and were allowed to discuss their work after vulnerabilities got fixed.
Certainly a more reasonable outcome than other companies.
Re: Re: Re:
If you’re implying Nintendo, I completely agree with you (Sony also counts, considering what happened to GeoHotz).
Re:
The more cynical among us might see the Gates Foundation as Bill’s means of rehabilitating his public image.
Re: Re:
Given Bill’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, that’s all the more plausible.
Re: Re: Re:
And the years of sexual harassment that we recently learned were the real reason Microsoft pushed him out.
Re: Re:
We that’s every rich person’s foundation, so yeah by default.
Re: Re:
That and the Netflix series about him.
Hidden motive?
What Riders are on the Washington Right to Repair Bill? What does the fine print have in store to reward MS?
Re: No need... they just continue...
No need for riders on the bill, Microsoft will still be getting the usual tax breaks.
RIGHT TO REPAIR
Hooray! Hooray! Hooray!
The Fox and the henhouse
I’m pretty sure they wouldn’t be voicing their support for these bills if the Windows Phone had taken off. MS knows their hardware offerings are of little importance, which is why they went ahead with this. It’s a PR move.
Um, isn’t Microsoft the company that made users jump through hoops if they wanted to replace the hard drives in its consoles? And don’t the latest versions of Windows not allow users to choose which updates they want to install, and then automatically re-install any components that the users dare to uninstall?