Trump’s Fake Drug War: Pardons Honduran President Convicted Of 400 Tons, Illegally Invades & Arrests Venezuela’s President Over Weaker Charges
from the there-is-no-rule-of-law,-only-transactions dept
If you needed proof that Trump’s “war on drugs” is pure theatrical bullshit designed to justify geopolitical adventurism and the transactional nature of how he views absolutely everything, look no further than the past two months of his foreign policy.
Two months ago, Donald Trump pardoned Juan Orlando Hernandez, the former president of Honduras who was convicted in a Manhattan federal court of facilitating the importation of at least 400 tons of cocaine into the United States. The conviction wasn’t based on hearsay or shaky evidence—it came after a three-week trial featuring multiple cooperating witnesses, business ledgers documenting drug transactions, undercover video recordings, and testimony detailing how Hernandez turned Honduras’ entire government apparatus into a cocaine superhighway.
As Bloomberg’s detailed investigation lays out, the evidence was quite strong. Hernandez’s brother, Tony (who was also an elected official), had been convicted earlier of basically running a massive drug smuggling campaign, and there were clear ties between Tony’s operation and his brother. And there’s this colorful story:
In 2021, during the trial of another trafficker Sandy Gonzalez had arrested, a former accountant for a Honduran agricultural company testified that he attended meetings with Hernández, who accepted bribes from the accountant’s boss and spoke openly of his connections to traffickers. Hernández, he said, bragged about fooling his American counterparts into thinking he was on their side in the drug war. “He then took a sip of drink,” the accountant said of Hernández, “and he said: ‘We are going to stuff drugs up the gringos’ noses, and they’re never even going to know it.’” At that same trial, witnesses said that in return for protection, the trafficker paid bribes to Hernández to ensure his business enjoyed military protection. Data scraped from the trafficker’s phone—which included the president’s cellphone number in the contact list—showed that on two separate days when news broke about the president’s alleged involvement in Tony’s drug-smuggling activities, the trafficker downloaded driving directions to the presidential palace.
A judge sentenced him to 45 years in prison. Trump pardoned him anyway, claiming he’d been “treated very harshly and unfairly.”
So with that conviction and evidence in mind, let’s look at what Trump claims justifies launching an illegal war. Trump (without the required permission of Congress) ordered military strikes on Venezuela this weekend, and captured President Nicolas Maduro, claiming the operation was justified by… drug trafficking charges.
The charges against Maduro appear less direct and less clear than those against Hernandez.
It also details specific actions that Maduro allegedly took as part of the conspiracy. It says, for example, that between 2006 and 2008 when he served as foreign minister that Maduro sold Venezuelan diplomatic passports to known drug traffickers “in order to assist traffickers seeking to move drug proceeds form Mexico to Venezuela under diplomatic cover.”
He also allegedly facilitated the flights of private planes under diplomatic cover to bring drug proceeds back from Mexico to Venezuela.
Prosecutors allege that Maduro and Flores worked together for years to traffic cocaine that had previously been seized by Venezuelan law enforcement. They say the Maduros had their own state-sponsored gangs to protect their operation, and that they ordered “kidnappings, beating and murders against those who owed them drug money or otherwise undermined their drug trafficking operation.”
Notice what’s missing there: actual convictions, actual evidence of tons of cocaine moved, actual documentation like the ledgers and recordings that convicted Hernandez. And indeed, as The Guardian notes, many experts are deeply skeptical that Maduro is actually the drug kingpin Trump claims:
“It just shows that the entire counter-drug effort of Donald Trump is a charade – it’s based on lies, it’s based on hypocrisy,” said Mike Vigil, the former DEA chief for international operations. “He is giving a pardon to Juan Orlando Hernández and then going after Nicolás Maduro … It’s all hypocritical.”
Contrary to Trump’s claim that Hernández, 57, had been the victim of a “Biden set up”, Vigil said there was overwhelming evidence that the Central American politician was “a big fish in the narco world”. Not only had Hernández helped turn Honduras into a major transit point for South American cocaine heading to the US, but Vigil said he had also transformed it into a cocaine-producing hub which was now home to coca plantations and makeshift labs for processing coca leaves.
[….]
Meanwhile, despite Trump’s claims that Maduro is the leader of a narco organization called the “Cartel of the Suns”, many experts doubt such a group even exists.
“Maduro is not a saint,” said Vigil, noting how he and several allies were indicted for trafficking cocaine in the US in 2020. “[But] they’re not a cartel, they don’t have an infrastructure,” he added, calling such allegations “nonsense”.
So to recap: Trump pardoned a president who was actually convicted in US court of moving 400 tons of cocaine, with overwhelming evidence including recordings, ledgers, and multiple witness testimony. Then, two months later, he launched military strikes—without Congressional authorization, in violation of both US and international law—and captured a different president based on an indictment that experts say lacks solid evidence that he’s running an actual drug cartel.
The main difference? Hernandez sucked up to Trump from the start. From Bloomberg:
President Hernández had enjoyed good relationships with President Obama and Vice President Biden, but he harbored a special affinity for President Trump, whose transactional style suited him well. Hernández had adopted the slogan “Honduras is open for Business.” During Trump’s first term, Hernández established Próspera, an economic development zone on the Honduran island of Roatán. Próspera offered investors a self-governed haven where they could set their own regulations and pay next to nothing in taxes. Libertarian-inclined Trump supporters invested in it.
Hernández had met with Trump in New York just before his brother’s trial, when they signed a series of bilateral agreements intended to encourage a Honduran crackdown on northbound migrants. “You’re doing a fantastic job,” Trump told Hernández. “My people work with you so well.”
He continued to court Trump’s favor even after his brother’s guilty verdict. The following spring, at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, the US Food & Drug Administration publicly rebuked Trump’s claim that hydroxychloroquine, an anti-malarial medicine, could effectively treat the virus. Hernández seized an opportunity.
“Well, I never spoke to a scientist,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, “but I will tell you this: I did speak with the president of Honduras, just a little while ago. I didn’t bring it up—he brought it up. He said they use the hydroxychloroquine, and he said the results are just so incredible, with the hydroxychloroquine. Check with him. Call him. The president of Honduras. A really nice guy.”
For the rest of Trump’s term, even as his Justice Department was compiling more evidence of his ties to trafficking, members of the administration repeatedly praised Hernández for his commitment to battling migration and organized crime.
What’s really going on doesn’t take a very deep analysis: Hernandez was a right-wing ally who supported Trump’s policies and had publicly supported Trump. Maduro is a left-wing adversary. One gets pardoned despite a conviction based on overwhelming evidence. The other gets military strikes based on flimsier charges.
Even more absurd: Trump has been conducting all these “kinetic strikes” we’ve written about on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean, killing approximately 80 people and destroying about 20 boats—most of which likely contained far less cocaine than Hernandez was convicted of moving, and many of which may have just been impoverished fishermen. Meanwhile, he’s letting the guy actually convicted of industrialized drug trafficking walk free.
Once again, this is all about political alignment and personal loyalty. Hernandez worked with the Trump administration, endorsed Trump’s preferred candidate in Honduras’ recent election, and had allies like Roger Stone lobbying for his pardon. Maduro is a geopolitical adversary Trump wants removed.
To everyone who can keep more than one thought in their head at the same time, the hypocrisy is clear: you can’t credibly claim your military action is justified by the need to combat drug trafficking when you just pardoned someone convicted of far more extensive drug trafficking. You can’t bomb boats supposedly carrying cocaine while freeing a man who moved 400 tons of it. You can’t invoke “law enforcement” as justification when you’re simultaneously undermining the very legal proceedings that proved another leader’s guilt.
This is nothing more than naked illegal geopolitical maneuvering dressed up in drug war rhetoric. And the fact that the administration thinks this narrative will fly shows how little they think of the public’s ability to notice the contradiction sitting right in front of us.
As one expert put it to The Guardian:
Orlando Pérez, a Latin America expert from the University of North Texas at Dallas, said Trump’s double standards on which drug-smuggling presidents to pursue revealed there was no consistent strategy to fight the region’s drug traffickers. “It’s all ad hoc and based on political considerations,” he said.
“One [Hernández] is a rightwing supporter of the US – and the other [Maduro] is not,” Pérez added. “It is ideological. It is political. It is self-interested in terms of advancing an ideological agenda – and it has nothing to do with effective anti-drug policies.”
When your “drug war” pardons the convicted trafficker and invades over the unproven allegation, you’ve pretty much admitted it was never about the drugs at all.
This is about way more than the hypocrisy, though the hypocrisy is staggering. We should be aghast at the complete erosion of any pretense that US foreign policy is guided by law, evidence, or principle rather than personal loyalty and political convenience. When the same action (drug trafficking) earns you a pardon or an invasion based solely on whether you’re useful to Trump, you’ve turned “law enforcement” into a pure protection racket. And when you can’t even maintain the fiction for two months, you’ve stopped pretending the rules matter at all.
Filed Under: donald trump, drug trade, honduras, hypocrisy, invasion, juan orlando hernandez, nicolas maduro, transactions, venezuela


Comments on “Trump’s Fake Drug War: Pardons Honduran President Convicted Of 400 Tons, Illegally Invades & Arrests Venezuela’s President Over Weaker Charges”
One bold stroke sacrificing Ukraine, Taiwan, Europe, Near East, NATO
With the U.S. withdrawing from the role of “world police” in order to reinvent itself as supervillain and axis power, they sacrifice the moral authority and clarity that is essential for maintaining influence and restraint where the military does not reach.
Your bias is showing.
Missing important context: Unlike Hernandez, who left the office peacefully, Maduro, a dictator, have falsified election results multiple times, as well as enacted a tyranny over Venezuelan people (who, mind you, are HAPPY he’s gone). Regardless if these charges hold up or not, he deserves what he got and frankly he’s lucky he’s still even alive. I also hope he’s in genpop and is experiencing everything the American prison system has to offer.
Re:
By that standard, couldn’t Maduro have rightfully invaded the US and abducted President Biden? After all, Trump made a similar amount of noise about a “stolen election”…
Re: Re:
Trump is the last person who should be sending the message that if some government finds a foreign leader problematic, they should abduct that leader. It’s not hard to speculate about how that could backfire—and one should check Trump’s approval ratings before using the excuse that the people want their dictator gone.
Re:
If he can be black-bagged and thrown in genpop without due process, so can you.
“Yes, I’d give the Devil the benefit of law – for my own safety’s sake!”
Re:
Always interesting when people make up excuses why someone deserves what they get even if the whole thing looks illegal as fuck.
There’s no actual context missing because it doesn’t actually matter what Maduro has done or not. Heck, he can be guilty as hell which is beside the point, the point is that Trump and the US government can be bought and they are doing illegal things which is no different at all from what Maduro and his government has been doing.
In short, the bias is that if you want have the moral superiority you don’t go around behaving like a corrupt dictator/government. If you can’t do that you are a corrupt dictator/government.
Re: Re:
Moral superiority doesn’t win wars.
Re: Re: Re:
It actually does, moral superiority gives you allies instead of enemies – and that wins wars.
But that is beside the point I was making which tells me everything I need to know about how bad your reasoning is.
Re:
I’m not usually one to side with Trump, but I’ll give his word more weight than yours when it comes to his own motivations.
Re: Re:
Frankly, given the constancy with which Trump is lying about verifiable facts, I have a hard time believing he would be honest about his motivations.
Re: Re: Re:
Sure, but unlike Steven, I don’t pretend Trump’s motivations are nobler than what he and his people claim.
Abducted. The word is ‘abducted’. Or kidnapped, if you prefer.
it was never about drugs
He also gave money to Argentina
It was never about drugs.
Most cocaine comes from Columbia, Brazil, Peru, and Argentina. Most fentanyl comes from Mexico
Venezuela is way down the list of worst offenders.
Their biggest illegal export is oil.
Is Columbia next? Mexico? Cuba? This was never about drugs; it’s about grift! Follow the money. Big oil paid in advance.
Shouldn’t you be happy? It will be used for the AI you love so much.
Well, duh...
It was really a combination of three things:
1: Maduro making fun of Trump’s dancing. (Trump hates it when people get ‘personal’).
2: The US oil barons wanting more (since the general long-term spoils of the last Iraq war have gone mainly to China).
3: Sticking it to China by removing one of their allies in the region.
“Narcoterrorism” isn’t a real crime. Call this what it is: Kidnapping
The official business of the United States is now kidnapping and ransom. I can scarcely believe that I’m writing that sentence.
Re:
The official business of the United States is whatever expands the Reich.
Re:
Does that mean USA special forces are now gangsters?
Re: Re:
“are now”?
I have some bad news for you…
Re:
“The morally superior choice.”
It's not about the Benjamins or the drugs...
It’s all about the oil fields, baby. Apart from airing his usual pet peeves, Trump said it explicitly in his press conference – he wants US oil companies to take over as much of the oil production operations as possible.
Re: 'Look over there, a distraction!'
I’m sure having a distraction from all those pesky Epstein files that Trump is in didn’t even cross the regime’s mind either…
'I don't care what they DID, I only care if they're on my side.' -Law and Ordery party
Standard republican position really, ‘Any crime is acceptable as long as it’s done by a republican or republican ally, nothing, whether crime or not, is acceptable so long as it’s done by a non-republican.’
Another Point of Interest
Regarding the difference between Hernandez and Maduro: as noted, Hernandez was convicted in federal court after a very long trial. Maduro and his wief, on the other hand, was basically just indicted by a grand jury. And you know what they say about grand juries and certain simple meals consisting of cured pork.
There is no way that the U.S. comes back from this just with elections and trials. Changes to the rules and systems of law and the Constitution are going to be required. Some of those changes are ones that Techdirt regulars may recoil at, but they’re changes that would bring us in line with the actually functional democracies elsewhere in the world. It’s going to be a long road to restoring trust in America and the dignity of the country post-Trump, and a Reconstruction 2.0 is going to be required.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Trump knew he could get the left to defend richard tater
He is testing the waters to see if Americans actually want a dictator to rule over them. Looking like you would prefer it.
Re:
It’s possible that you are a very, very dumb person. Your posting history here suggests that’s absolutely the case.
Re: Re:
Compared to your posting history, I am a genius
“The Truth About Venezuela” on Triggernometry
Youtube link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqP6MkCmqgs
It must be very painful for you that your political enemies are proven right about everything.
But no, the Venezuela operation was 100% legal and it’s hilarious (and very telling) you’re mad about it.
Re:
Are you high? Seriously. What drugs are you taking?
First off, I don’t believe in “political enemies.” I believe in supporting anyone who is doing the right thing, and the current GOP is a fascist shithole of corrupt destroyers of basic democracy. And that’s bad. They’re not “political enemies.” This isn’t a fucking game.
I’d support any politician who was doing good for the country. But these cult leaders you obsess over are literally destroying everything that made America good.
And what the fuck do you mean that they’ve been proven right about everything? Fucking EVERYTHING they touch has turned to shit. They’ve destroyed US leadership around the globe, have damaged the economy, have made everything more expensive. I can’t think of a single thing they’ve done that has helped people.
And as for Venezuela, not a single thinking person thinks that what was done was legal. It is so clearly a violation of both the laws and the Constitution that anyone claiming otherwise is an idiot and a liar.
Meanwhile, I remember you used to be against regime change. It’s so easy to tell the cultist morons like yourself: last week you were all against regime change and foreign wars. And now you’re all repeating about how regime change is great and that war is peace.
Fucking idiot.