Investigation Shows Trump’s Boat Strikes Aren’t Killing ‘Narco-Terrorists’
from the riding-in-boats-while-brown dept
The Trump administration has been ramping up its rhetoric against Venezuela since Day 1. Efforts to arrest up to 3,000 migrants a day focused on Venezuelans, many of whom had fled to the United States seeking a land with actual freedom.
Those who weren’t simply locked up in ICE’s many forever prisons were sent to places even worse than the autocratic government they had fled. Many Venezuelans were branded Tren de Aragua gang members by faulty databases, fired cops, and a collective of bigots willing to push Trump’s xenophobic agenda.
That meant many alleged gang members were sent off to be tortured by the corrupt El Salvadoran government while imprisoned in the country’s infamous CECOT. The few people who managed to fight back against the Trump regime were soon faced with options even less palatable than an indefinite stay in El Savador’s CECOT hellhole.
The Trump administration simply can’t find enough people to arrest to satisfy ghoulish racist/Trump advisor (but I repeat myself) Stephen Miller’s desire to eject one million brown people from this country by EOB 12/31/2025. Now, it’s decided it can bump those bigoted numbers up by simply murdering people in boats seen heading north from Venezuela.
The Trump administration has constantly engaged in war rhetoric to defend its actions. First, it claimed the mere existence of foreign gangs justified its mass deportation efforts. More recently, it’s claiming the mere existence of an international drug trade is all the justification it needs to engage in extrajudicial killings.
To date, the Trump administration — headed up by hard-drinking, OpSec-ignoring, leader-in-name-only Pete Hegeseth — has murdered the occupants of at least 17 boats in international waters. As has been the case almost always with Trump 2.0, the administration acted first and bodged together legal justifications later.
It’s unlikely these legal justifications will hold up in court — at least any court that isn’t 5/9ths wholly subservient to Donald Trump. But, for now, no court has stopped the administration from doing what it wants, which means it continues to kill people it openly admits it doesn’t have the evidence to bring criminal charges against. Instead, it continues to angrily tap the “King Trump” signs it has placed around the Oval Office, daring anyone in the government to try to rein in the Executive Branch.
The narrative is this: drug trade is roughly equal to terrorist attacks that justify violent military responses. Bringing drugs to purchasers and middle men is nothing more than an act of war. Therefore, killing people just because is nothing more than the US defending itself against an undeclared war perpetrated by… I guess… uncut fentanyl?
Unlike the Trump administration, the US press is actually putting people on the ground and talking to those directly affected by its new War on Boats. Venezuela isn’t a safe place to visit, much less leave. And yet, the Associated Press has managed to talk to people in that country who are now seeing people they know being straight up murdered to satisfy the GOP’s racist blood lust.
In dozens of interviews in villages on Venezuela’s breathtaking northeastern coast, from which some of the boats departed, residents and relatives said the dead men had indeed been running drugs but were not narco-terrorists or leaders of a cartel or gang.
Most of the nine men were crewing such craft for the first or second time, making at least $500 per trip, residents and relatives said. They were laborers, a fisherman, a motorcycle taxi driver. Two were low-level career criminals. One was a well-known local crime boss who contracted out his smuggling services to traffickers.
Now, most Trump fans will immediately point to this as evidence that the administration is right about the people it’s killing in international waters. But even the most charitable readings of administration statements will prove this wrong. Trump and Hegseth have continually portrayed the people they’ve killed as “narco-terrorists” with ties to the upper levels of international drug cartels. The reality — at least for a small portion of the people murdered by our government — is that these are people just trying to make a little bit of money to make their lives back in Venezuela a little less miserable.
The US government has killed at least 66 people this way. And that includes people who just happen to have operable boats at a time when that’s really all that’s needed to put your in the cross hairs of the next military drone strike.
One of the people killed in a boat strike was Robert Sanchez, who was just a fisherman trying to make a living and, hopefully, obtain a better boat to increase his success chances while out in open waters. But because he went fishing off the coat of Venezuela, he was determined eligible for death from above:
Sánchez had just finished offloading a day’s catch last month when he told his mother he would be taking a short trip and would see her in a couple of days. They had no idea where he was going.
After seeing clips on social media that mentioned his death, relatives broke the news to his mother, but not until after ensuring she had taken her blood pressure medication. Sánchez’s youngest son, a third grader, could not accept for days that his father was gone. He kept asking adults if his father could have survived the explosion, noting he might still be at sea.
No, the adults told the boy. His father was gone.
Even if we decide — for the sake of argument — that everyone killed by boat strikes was a person in a boat carrying drugs to another destination, that still doesn’t excuse the administration’s actions. Sure, there’s been a “War on Drugs” ever since Richard Nixon deputized a drug-addled Elvis Presley, but that war has always been carried out using the USA’s accepted rules of engagement. While due process might be a bit of joke — what with the reliance on plea bargains and sting operations that are pretty much just entrapment — it was at least considered something worthy of lip service, if nothing else.
Now, it’s just the US government sinking boats and killing people and pretending this is all OK because… well… the Trump administration says it’s OK. But if you’re OK with this, you’re pretty much going to be OK with any expansion of extrajudicial killings of alleged drug traffickers. If there’s no significant push back, the administration will move these efforts inland, much like it has with its “border security” actions. CBP and Border Patrol officers are now wandering the streets of cities far removed from this nation’s southern border. It’s only a matter of time before this administration decides that the quasi-legal stuff it does in non-US territory is what needs to happen on US city streets.
At that point, your belated objections will mean nothing. The time to protest is now. Waiting until you have to step over the bodies of your fellow US residents to express your displeasure with this administration will be far too little and far too late.
Filed Under: boat strikes, defense department, dhs, doj, extrajudicial killings, ice, mass deportation, murder, pete hegseth, trump administration, venezuela, war on drugs


Comments on “Investigation Shows Trump’s Boat Strikes Aren’t Killing ‘Narco-Terrorists’”
Are you implying Donald Trump is an Elvis Presley without talent?
All part of the plan.
https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/ice-national-guard-deployments-just
Buckle up.
I think that the USA is shortly going to attack Venezuela
The boat killings are just to drum up a figleaf narrative to provide an implausible reason for Trump to do what he wants to do anyway
We’ve seen it all before – the lies, then more lies, then more lies, all the while the actions alongside those lies become more and more extreme with each new set of lies
Trump’s game is always, always to normalize banal evil that he thinks he’ll benefit from
If accused criminals don't have rights no-one does
For those cheering on the murder on the high seas because the regime asserts that those killed are the most heinous criminals(not working for the regime) imaginable despite acknowledging that they don’t have the evidence to actually prove that in court, something to keep in mind: Fascist and/or dictatorial systems always need an Other to ‘punish’, a group to heap all the blame on for everything that goes wrong and when the current one starts becoming less effective they’ll look for a new one and when the exterior choices start getting sparse they’ll start looking inwards.
Sure you support the regime, but do you absolutely support it?
Sure you show your loyalty but do you show it enough?
Systems like that are built upon always having someone to blame and victimize, and given enough time they will always start going after their own to maintain themselves.
Always.
Interesting thing; I watched this video this morning. TL;DW, the blatant lies aren’t about trying to convince people of a thing, it’s a power play. Like the bully who says ‘stop hitting yourself’.
That video is from seven years ago, but this feels like the same thing; the cruelty, the lying, aren’t about trying to convince anyone, they’re about showing power.
I’d like to say ‘if Trump wants to act like a bully, we should treat him like one’, but I’m not sure how that’d work in practice.
Things like ICE raids and the national guard and mass murder aren’t really things you can ignore until they get the hint. And the adults in the room (the legal system) aren’t doing anything, or succeeding in doing anything. What option does that leave?
You’d have to have a modicum of intelligence to know this. Which is why MAGA doesn’t worry about it all. They’re all morons. And they cheer it on because they’re assholes.
I’ve been wondering since the first strike whether, if it goes on, someone’s gonna decide it’s open season on yank civvies at sea.
I’d find blaming them a nigh-impossible task, at present.
Re: They WANT death and violence and aren't too picky as to who
The messed up thing is if they aren’t already hoping for that to happen I’ve no doubt whatsoever that while publicly the regime would condemn such ‘cold-blooded murder of americans’ in private they would be cheering and laughing at being handed an excuse to engage in even more brutality and power-grabs.
Re: Re:
Yeah, I know. I’d imagine every single diplomat in the whole world agrees with you, too, but even if they don’t, states will still have to plan with contingencies in place for betrayal, extortion, reneging on whatever-the-fuck, etc.
The Netherlands and UK are already limiting what intel they share with their US’ counterparts, for example. That’s the UK — closest ally of 80 years, and Five-Eyes member — effectively saying the US is no longer a reliable or trustworthy partner, because it doesn’t want to be implicated in what the whole damn world knows are murders, in the Caribbean.
Simply switching out the administration is not going to fix this, whoever helms it.
Re: Re: Re:
Even if you set aside Trump and the critical damage that’s been and is continuing to be done to government agencies and the rule of law you’d still have the tens of millions of people who put him into office after seeing what a disaster he was the first time just waiting to do it again, so no, it’s going to rightly take a long time before the rest of the world can or should trust the US again even after the regime is no longer in power and trashing the country.
Perhaps the government is simply unaware that all they need to do is call the Coast Guard if they suspect a boat is smuggling drugs?
Re:
Not so much unaware as ‘refuses to’, as if they called in the Coast Guard they wouldn’t get to murder the entire boatload of people and that would take all the fun out of it.
To many facts not said.
I wont get into the USA corps trying to take over governments, in the South. Or the US Gov. trying to have more favorable Leaders in many of those countries, as a leader in destroying the most democratic nations.
“US government has killed at least 66 people this way.”
What is the Cost of Military craft, Flying around the Ocean looking for targets. What is the Cost of Ships and men deployed to the Gulf?
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/15/politics/us-military-deploying-caribbean-latin-america-cartel-mission
https://mexiconewsdaily.com/news/us-rubio-military-action-mexico/
What is the Cost of a Rocket/Missile. Being Launched at a small craft?
Where is this mentality that WE NEED to Rule the Earth.
Re:
Imagine if they spent that money on reducing the demand side of the drug problem instead. Seems like a better long-term solution.
What a great way to distract from Trump’s pedophile acts, by committing war crimes.
The silver lining is that he’ll probably end up dying in prison.
Re:
Prison is way, way too lenient for it.
Unless we’re talking Evin prison, in Tehran. In that case; yes, that’ll do.