NC GOP Threatens ProPublica: Drop This Story Or We’ll Call Trump To Punish You
from the censorial-thugs dept
The faux “party of free speech” strikes again. For years, the MAGA GOP has insisted that it is the true “party of free” speech even as all evidence suggests this administration is the most censorial and the most dismissive of the First Amendment in modern history. Over and over and over and over and over and over and over again we see the Trump administration engaging in blatant and obvious speech suppression.
So it’s no surprise that Republicans all across the country are now responding to any criticism or any reporting on their illegal activities as something they can threaten to suppress. ProPublica recently had an eye-opening deep dive into North Carolina’s Supreme Court chief justice, Paul Newby, who seems to view his job not as ensuring justice is served, but in bending every aspect of the North Carolina judicial system to favor and help Republicans.
It’s a long article, but you get the gist of it here:
Few beyond North Carolina’s borders grasp the outsize role Newby, 70, has played in transforming the state’s top court from a relatively harmonious judicial backwater to a front-line partisan battleground since his election in 2004.
Under North Carolina’s constitution, Supreme Court justices are charged with upholding the independence and impartiality of the courts, applying laws fairly and ensuring all citizens get treated equally.
Yet for years, his critics charge, Newby has worked to erode barriers to politicization.
He pushed to make judicial elections in North Carolina — once a national leader in minimizing political influence on judges — explicitly partisan and to get rid of public financing, leaving candidates more dependent on dark money. Since Newby’s allies in the legislature shepherded through laws enacting those changes, judicial campaigns have become vicious, high-dollar gunfights that have produced an increasingly polarized court dominated by hard-right conservatives.
As chief justice, he and courts under him have consistently backed initiatives by Republican lawmakers to strip power away from North Carolina’s governor, thwarting the will of voters who have chosen Democrats to lead the state since 2016. He’s also used his extensive executive authority to transform the court system according to his political views, such as by doing away with diversity initiatives. Under his leadership, some liberal and LGBTQ+ employees have been replaced with conservatives. A devout Christian and church leader, he speaks openly about how his faith has shaped his jurisprudence and administration of the courts.
As is happening all too often in American politics, what we’re seeing is the politicization of just about everything. That’s a shame for many reasons—namely that politics is supposed to be just about making the case for getting elected, but after that you should govern (and handle judicial matters) in an unbiased manner.
But the really striking thing in the piece is how the Republican Party tried to threaten ProPublica to drop the story by pulling a “if you don’t, we’ll tell Daddy Trump to punish you.”
When ProPublica emailed questions to Newby’s daughter, the North Carolina Republican Party’s communications director, Matt Mercer, responded, writing that ProPublica was waging a “jihad” against “NC Republicans,” which would “not be met with dignifying any comments whatsoever.”
“I’m sure you’re aware of our connections with the Trump Administration and I’m sure they would be interested in this matter,” Mercer said in his email. “I would strongly suggest dropping this story.”
It’s the Brendan Carr shakedown all over again. Just non-stop, thuggish, mafioso-style bullying. “If you don’t shut up, we’ll find a way to punish you.”
It remains truly astounding that Trump and the MAGA folks spent years claiming to be the party of free speech, when basically every few days yet another one of these stories pops up. Directly calling out that if ProPublica continues to report on a very powerful, extremely politically-motivated judge, they’re going to call up Daddy Trump and have him punish you?
Pure censorial thuggishness.
But it also reveals something crucial: the MAGA GOP knows that this kind of journalism works. When ProPublica exposes how North Carolina’s chief justice has systematically corrupted the state’s courts to favor Republicans, that exposure is genuinely dangerous to their project. The threat itself is the tell—they wouldn’t bother threatening reporters if this kind of reporting didn’t matter.
And that’s the real story here. Not that they’re hypocrites about free speech (we knew that), but that their entire governance model now depends on preventing the public from learning what they’re actually doing. They have no actual policy positions that can survive scrutiny, and what they’re doing is so ridiculously unpopular that their only remaining move is threatening anyone who documents it.
Which means: keep documenting it.
Filed Under: donald trump, journalism, matt mercer, north carolina, paul newby, threats
Companies: propublica




Comments on “NC GOP Threatens ProPublica: Drop This Story Or We’ll Call Trump To Punish You”
Not true
A devout Christian he is not. He adheres to a corrupted version of Christianity.
Re: 'I say unto you: if you see your brother going hungry, mock them.'
Ah I see the confusion, he’s a devout follower of Republican Jesus you see. Similar name, way different edicts and morals.
Re: Re:
That Jesus that will only sacrifice himself to save himself.
Re: Re: Re:
Nah, but he’d happily sacrifice someone else to save himself.
Re: Re:
Until they start practicing compassion for Jesùs they can stop talking about how much they love Jesus.
Re: Re: NC Supreme Court
I see you’re familiar with “supply-side Jesus”. He came to us in the Reagan years.
Re:
That’s like saying sewage is a corrupted version of apple juice. There is really no discernible connection.
Re:
It’s awfully late in the game for non-maga christians to try to rehabilitate the brand.
This extremist authoritarian turn was long in the making, so where’ve y’all been all this time?
Re:
Christian? I could’ve sworn it said Nazian for a second…
Re:
He goes to church. He reads the Bible. He believes in his version of it. He’s a Christian. He is.
It’s super convenient when Christians can look at a terrible person who hides behind Christianity in order to be terrible and say they aren’t a ‘real’ Christian. If you have a problem with them and what they’re doing, maybe find a new god
Re: Re:
Do they follow the teachings of Jesus? No? Not a Christian, period. The bible even says so:
Romans 16:17-18
17. I urge you, brothers and sisters, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them.
18. For such people are not serving our Lord Christ, but their own appetites. By smooth talk and flattery they deceive the minds of naive people
Someone doth protest too much...
Funny thing is their response confirms not just that the reporting is damning for them but that it’s accurate, because if anything was actually wrong they’d have said that rather than threatened to run to tattle to Trump about how mean they’re being and get him to try to silence the story/company.
I read the article the other day, his family connections to the GOP alone should be grounds for automatic recusal , on just about every case regarding political activity.
Much free. Very speech.
Re:
waow
Where did you learn that?
They learned if from you, dad…
Why would a state supreme court act any differently from the US Supreme Court?
And then sue in Northern Texas where the judges are willing to engage in such performative nonsense just like Media Matters is being subjected to.
Story is still up on ProPub.
Guessing they are all out of F’s to give.
Re: 'Thanks for pulling this story, now about the wording in your NEXT story...'
Perhaps someone on staff has done even the barest research into history, or they’ve seen just how well cowardly appeasement has worked out for everyone else that’s bent the knee to the regime?
Re: Re:
They might also see a email like that one and think “oh cool, this can be Exhibit A in the lawsuit we’re going to file if they decide to fuck around and find out”.
Re:
Oh, they have plenty of F’s.
But this is not their first rodeo. They have been there, done that, and seen off rather more horseshit than this little turd.
Incidentally, they need money. I give them some on a regular basis. Otherwise I have no relationship with them.
Genuinely, when someone says “free speech”, magats hear “calling people slurs”. That is the extent of their familiarity with the concept. (And it does not extend to calling white Christian cisgender heterosexual men slurs.) Free speech, to Trump’s base, means freedom not to be chided for speaking hatefully, freedom not to think before you speak.
Re:
Doesn’t it say something interesting about systemic power that I don’t even know any biting, universally recognized slurs for the stated type of person.
Re: Re:
Even if you did, it wouldn’t matter. No such slur would have the same level of cultural “bite” as the ethnic slurs for people of color.
Re: Re:
In the UK, we called the rabid xenophobic misogynist foam-at-the-mouth times “gammon” for the apopleptic colour they seem to go at any chance. Which they then complained was a ‘racial slur against whites’ even when used by whites against them. And would apply to anyone with that attitude (i.e. Priti Patel). Also has a glorious British tradition since Dickens…
“I would strongly suggest dropping this story.”
Yeah, nah.
Looks like ProPublica just earned another donation from me….