Leaking By Leaving: Guest Finds Trump-Putin Summit Docs In Alaskan Hotel Room

from the take-the-towels,-leave-the-itinerary dept

While this latest bit of low-key embarrassment may not be a black eye for the administration, it certainly isn’t putting any more lipstick on this pig. Whatever you may think about the recent summit meeting between these two international besties, you can be assured that some of the attendees thought even less of it than you did.

Is this how we’re leaking things to the press now? Seems careless, since there are multiple ways of identifying who left these documents behind. That being said, no one is named in the NPR reporting, which covers what was uncovered by hotel guests who happened to find these documents just sitting in a tray of one of the hotel’s public printers.

Papers with U.S. State Department markings, found Friday morning in the business center of an Alaskan hotel, revealed previously undisclosed and potentially sensitive details about the Aug. 15 meetings between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir V. Putin in Anchorage.

Eight pages, that appear to have been produced by U.S. staff and left behind accidentally, shared precise locations and meeting times of the summit and phone numbers of U.S. government employees.

The documents [PDF] are embedded below. What’s exposed in them is indeed sensitive information, but the sensitivity is directly proportionate to a specific time frame, which means a discovery that happened after the summit was over isn’t nearly as problematic as anything discovered before or during. The dates, times, and specific rooms used for meetings don’t mean nearly as much as they might have while this summit was still ongoing.

Still, it’s yet another lapse in judgment from people you might have assumed would know better, but have been disabused of that notion pretty much incessantly since the installation of Trump’s cabinet member picks. At this point, the administration has already invited journalists to Signal chats discussing military operations as they unfold and exposed ICE operations with ill-advised social media posts because the person heading that part of the administration loves a photo op more than she loves shooting pets that make her angry.

One of things that immediately stands out as having Trump’s tiny fingerprints all over it is the menu for the luncheon that never happened.

During the summit Friday, lunch was apparently cancelled. But it was intended to be a simple, three-course meal, the documents showed. After a green salad, the world leaders would dine on filet mignon and halibut olympia. Crème brûlée would be served for dessert.

Not just any green salad, mind you, but one served with “champagne vinaigrette.” I’m sure it’s the word “champagne” that earned Trump’s approval, not that he probably cares one way or another what’s served on a salad he isn’t going to eat.

Here’s the menu as it was printed (and left on a public printer):

Between the font selection and the menu options, this looks like something being offered by Waldorf Astoria in 1925, rather than by the most powerful nation in the world in 2025. And one assumes the filet mignon would have been served a la Trump (charred into submission; walloped with ketchup). Fortunately for Putin, the lunch was cancelled, preventing him from a.) having to witness Trump “enjoy” a steak, and b.) having to experience a fish swimming in mayonnaise. (Your mileage may vary.)

Low-hanging mockery aside, it’s still a problem. And since it is actually a problem, the White House is, of course, pretending it’s not a problem, calling the eight pages of information nothing more than a “multi-page lunch menu.” Even if you ignore all the information specifying who will be in which rooms at what particular times, there’s plenty of other information that generally doesn’t appear in lunch menus, no matter how many pages they run.

Pages 2 through 5 of the documents listed the names and phone numbers of three U.S. staff members as well as the names of 13 U.S. and Russian state leaders. The list provided phonetic pronouncers for all the Russian men expected at the summit, including “Mr. President POO-tihn.”

Even if this (perhaps intentional!) leak didn’t threaten national security, it’s emblematic of an administration that tends to operate with all the finesse of a bludgeon wielded by a bull in the china shop that is the world we live in. To expect better than this is human. To expect to see better than this, from this administration, is self-delusion.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Leaking By Leaving: Guest Finds Trump-Putin Summit Docs In Alaskan Hotel Room”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
19 Comments
That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

I was enjoying the WH talking head going on and on about how it was just a menu & nothing else, and it was shitty reporting like this is why they defunded NPR.

Its that thing where its sad the media refuses to ask a tough question or push back on lies, but wouldn’t publish (leak) the personal numbers of the advance staff they were in possession of now.

I mean nothing says opsec fail like calling the advance staff for comment about the entire packet for this turd & dictator show being left on a printer at a hotel.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Its that thing where its sad the media refuses to ask a tough question or push back on lies

Is it? I think that when spokespeople “[go] on and on” about how this or that doesn’t matter, the media’s terrible, who’s this reporter anyway, South Park hasn’t been relevant in years—it kind of speaks for itself. Don’t think about the pink elephant.

What’s the “tough question” here? A question that comes to mind is “Are you all totally fucking incompetent at OPSEC?”. But that seems more rhetorical than tough, particularly when asked to someone who has no apparent attachment to reality. There was the 2022 finding of illegally-removed classified records at Mar-a-Lago; the planning of drone strikes via a group chat on unapproved software, that somehow accidentally included a journalist; and… Putin’s lunch menu? Well, proposed lunch menu, which means that Putin’s like or dislike of halibut remains a mystery.

Anonymous Coward says:

Nothing to see here. Move along.

This isn’t worth wasting the time and bandwidth to report on. After the event, none of this information is sensitive except for the phone numbers – and they can easily be changed. Had these been leaked during the event, it may have had some minor interest, but the place was locked down like Fort Knox.

The only thing even remotely news worthy to me is that someone didn’t do their post event scrub of the venue very well. Had there been sensitive documents left behind it would have been a huge breach, but I doubt that any sensitive information was printed on a device not owned by the administration.

gatto (profile) says:

Re: firing and then some

it’s surprising to me nobody’s mentioned how hackable printers are. it’s not just that pages were left, it’s that sensitive information was being transmitted in a way that was trivially accessible.

these are the russians. if the hotel wasn’t hacked remotely beforehand, if the ethernet and wireless weren’t physically attacked, it would only have been because they never would have thought the americans would be so stupid.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

it’s surprising to me nobody’s mentioned how hackable printers are. it’s not just that pages were left, it’s that sensitive information was being transmitted in a way that was trivially accessible.

Apart from transmissions to printers often being unencrypted, printers sometimes have—or used to have—local storage. Long ago, people would sometimes buy used hard drives and find that they were formerly used as printer caches, and still had private data. I guess manufacturers are not using hard drives for that anymore, but who knows what they’re doing with non-removable flash storage?

The more likely hack, these days, might be to just install something like a botnet client on a printer, so as to have an entry point from Russia (for example) into the hotel network. About 8 years ago, someone hacked a casino via an internet-connected fish tank. Such things can come in handy later, in unexpected ways.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...