Trump FCC Boss Brendan Carr Harasses Google For Not Carrying Right Wing Religious Programming
from the I-have-zero-ideological-consistency-whatsoever dept
As somebody who has covered the telecom and media industries professionally for decades, there’s simply of no limit of problems in both sectors competent federal regulators could be taking aim at. Broadband price gouging by monopolies, widespread telecom privacy and security failures, or the obvious harm of unchecked media consolidation all come quickly to mind.
Instead of tackling any of this, new Trump FCC boss Brendan Carr has spent the lion’s share of his first months in office engaged in erratic zealotry, whether it’s abusing FCC authority to harass journalists who refuse to kiss Donald Trump’s ass, or investigating Verizon and Comcast for not being racist enough.
Last week Brendan took a break from abusing government power to abuse government power in a slightly different way — harassing Google for not including enough religious programming in its YouTube TV live streaming television lineup:
“FCC Chairman Brendan Carr sent a letter to the CEOs of Alphabet and Google, calling out the refusal of YouTube TV to carry a network, Great American Family, as a potential case of discrimination against faith-based programming.”
It is, of course, up to a cable or streaming company as to what channels it delivers to its audience. This is generally dictated, fairly coldly and mathematically, by which channels attract viewership eyeballs, and protected by the First Amendment. It’s not generally based on the random-ass zealotry of the head of the Federal Communications Commission.
In his letter, Carr tries to conflate Google’s refusal to offer users access to a barely watched religious programming with the broader false Republican claim that tech companies–that have tripped over their own asses to appease Republican ideology in recent years — “censor Republican viewpoints”:


Carr, again, could be doing any number of things to actually help markets function or improve consumer welfare. Instead he’s harassing a streaming TV provider he has no authority over for not carrying a religious channel not all that many people watched in the first place. This again aligns pretty well with the MAGA mantra that they believe in “free speech,” but only if they agree with what’s being said.
You’ll recall we went through something similar when DirecTV was accused of “censorship” because they refused to carry OAN, an unhinged and barely watched right wing propaganda network pretending to be journalism. They didn’t carry the channel because it wasn’t worth it financially. There’s nothing illegal or nefarious going on in either case. Carr’s complaint is baseless.
Carr has no legal leverage to force a streaming TV provider to do anything, but he dresses up his whining as if it’s a very serious good faith inquiry to “better understand the nature of carriage policies in the virtual MVPD sector.”
We’ve long established that Carr is a rank hypocrite: routinely changing his stance on what authority the FCC has. He’s been at the forefront of insisting the agency has no authority to police predatory behavior by giant telecoms or protect consumers, yet he routinely oversteps the agency’s authority when it’s time to pursue his fringe zealotry, whatever form it takes from week to week.
This all aligns with the broader GOP propaganda campaign to censor anything critical of Republican policies, while mandating the widespread distribution of right wing ideologies. It’s lazy cover for the fact that most Republican policies and ideologies aren’t popular; thus require being shoveled down the public’s throat whether they like it or not, leveraging the abuse of government power if necessary.
Like most companies, Google signed up for Trumpism because they wanted some mindless deregulation, a heightened war on labor, and some tax breaks. But as is always the case with authoritarianism (or say, Bespin’s gas mining trade deal with the Empire), most of these companies are quickly figuring out they may have bitten off more than they can chew.
They thought they might be getting another Ajit Pai — a corporatist lackey who simply rubber stamped the interests of corporate power. But authoritarianism is something much worse, as everybody — including many of the companies that signed up for it — are going to continue to learn in painful detail.
Filed Under: authoritarian, brendan carr, cable tv, fcc, propaganda, religious programming, streaming, telecom
Companies: google


Comments on “Trump FCC Boss Brendan Carr Harasses Google For Not Carrying Right Wing Religious Programming”
Hold up there Karl. What evidence do you have than “learning” will be happening? I agree that lesson will be available, but history provides no solid evidence that Alphabet will be doing any learning. See also: “all of this was entirely predicable from the previous Trump administration, and Carrs past behavior”
I wish they would censor conservative viewpoints.
Just remember; The worst human rights abuses in WWII came from corporations who worked with the government!
They rounded up tons of people who weren’t jewish, like gingers and everyone with a learning disability and anyone who spoke out against fascism!
The more you know!
(Also as a personal aside – I will burn this shit down to the ground before I let NAZI’s walk with their heads held high in America.)
Pity there was no way to see that coming...
In his letter, Carr tries to conflate Google’s refusal to offer users access to a barely watched religious programming with the broader false Republican claim that tech companies–that have tripped over their own asses to appease Republican ideology in recent years — “censor Republican viewpoints”:
One of these days the tech company execs will grow a spine and a brain and realize that no amount of appeasement will satisfy someone who’s not operating in good faith, but that is not today.
Today they get to find out what all that cowardly grovelling gets them, and surprise surprise it’s demands to grovel even more!
Re:
I think they are more likely to develop a taste for masochism.
Re:
And that is called paying the Dane-geld;
But we’ve proved it again and again,
That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld
You never get rid of the Dane.
-‘Dane-geld’, Rudyard Kipling
The right wing is all about free markets right up until you don’t want to buy their goods.
The right wing is all about free markets right up until you don’t want to buy their goods.
He’ll have a much easier time when congress repeals section 230, surely.
Re:
Why? This is a first amendment thing.
Re: Re:
And who’s gonna report him violating it?
Re: Re: Re:
If he does violate the first amendment, I’d imagine someone would sue him for it.
It’s not right wing religious programming they want, it’s right wing christian only. If google pushed broadcasts by other faiths that push hate on a similar level to that of the average megachurch pastor, they would be condemned and investigated by the likes of Brendan Carr for promoting terrorism.
Re:
“I’m all for religious freedom! But it has to be for my religion only.” — conservative Christians, more often than not
Re: Re:
It’s more focused than “conservative Christians” even — it’s specific groups of conservative Christians.
The amusing thing for me was when the ultranationalist conservative Christians saw that Trump had hired a “health and wealth” conservative Christian.
“Wait… not THAT type of conservative Christian!”
Re: Re:
‘Religious freedom’ is and always has been code for ‘I should be able to force my conservative christianity onto others and practice it as I want no matter what that means for others but they have no right to do the same to me!’, as was consistently made crystal clear any time some other religion tried to make use of it.
Anyone who thought it might be a good idea because it would apply to anyone but that category were just lying to themselves.
Religious "freedom"
Religous “freedom”, for Republicans, means they are free to practice their religion as they see fit. And YOU are free to practice their religion as they see fit.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Just want to interject and comment that the lack of design/css on this page is abysmal. This site looks like it was coded back in 1999.
Re:
Thank god for that. It would be awful if TD became an ugly, bloated abomination like the rest of the internet.
Re:
Sure, the 1990s had some bad page designs, but it was so much easier to see the actual content instead of having to scroll through a thousand experience manipulations and ads. Techdirt wouldn’t be improved by adding fancier distractions.
Best response to any religious request...
Google should reply that they have considered his request for religious programming and have agreed to add more religious content and after reviewing demographics have selected a Muslim streaming service…
Religious belief in the modern world — particularly among such wretches as are governing a fucking country — should require a license of some sort, to certify you are an actual, sentient adult, able to differentiate between reality and induced fantasy.
Religion is poison. Treat it as such.
Does anyone want a Satanic Temple streaming channel promoted alongside Televangelists due to a court order? This is how we get that. Aron Ra be praised!
Re:
Do Discordians make TV shows, or is that technically handled by [adult swim]’s 4:00 am programming?
Re: Re:
It takes a lot to make a stew
A pinch of salt and laughter, too
A scoop of kids to add the spice
A dash of love to make it nice, and you’ve got
Too many Cooks
Too many Cooks
Too many Cooks
Too many Cooks
Too many Cooks
Too many Cooks
Too many Cooks
Re: Re:
Well, there’s this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0x9ymMQUg8
Fcc
Brenden Carr is a dick wanting to be a dictator