Media Sites That Have Left Twitter Aren’t Missing The Traffic
from the which-is-probably-fine-by-elon dept
Elon Musk has made it clear that he’s no fan of the media. And while he seems to whine and pout when big media sites leave exTwitter, he keeps insisting that exTwitter doesn’t need journalists, because the his view of citizen journalism will magically be so much better. Of course, at the same time, he seemed to think that the media needed exTwitter so much that they’d pay $1,000/month to be verified, which basically did not happen.
Then, of course, there’s the recent nonsense of taking headlines away from link cards, which is a very anti-media move. And, of course, disabling the API made it so that sites like Techdirt no longer post to exTwitter at all, because we’d now have to do it manually, which is stupid. And while Twitter had been a decent driver of traffic over the years, it was never that big. And we’ve seen no clear decline in visits since Musk cut us off by cutting off the API.
It appears that others are seeing the same. Take NPR, which famously bailed on exTwitter after Elon falsely labeled them as “state-affiliated media” in contradiction with the company’s own explanation of what qualifies for such a label (which explicitly called out NPR as not qualifying). Elon did that to punish the respected media organization after he didn’t like some of the reporting they had done.
NPR made the correct decision to say “fuck this” and stop posting to its account.
Musk made some noise about how the organization would regret it, but… according to NiemanReports, it looks like there’s no regret to be found:
A memo circulated to NPR staff says traffic has dropped by only a single percentage point as a result of leaving Twitter, now officially renamed X, though traffic from the platform was small already and accounted for just under two percent of traffic before the posting stopped. (NPR declined an interview request but shared the memo and other information). While NPR’s main account had 8.7 million followers and the politics account had just under three million, “the platform’s algorithm updates made it increasingly challenging to reach active users; you often saw a near-immediate drop-off in engagement after tweeting and users rarely left the platform,” the memo says.
There’s one view of these numbers that confirms what many of us in news have long suspected — that Twitter wasn’t worth the effort, at least in terms of traffic. “It made up so little of our web traffic, such a marginal amount,” says Gabe Rosenberg, audience editor for KCUR in Kansas City, which stopped posting to Twitter at the same time as NPR.
Again, Musk will insist this doesn’t matter. He’ll claim that media that isn’t on exTwitter is missing out and that the users of the site are replacing the media he hates. And, who knows, perhaps it’ll happen. But so far, what the media is learning is that it just doesn’t need Elon at all.
Filed Under: elon musk, journalism, media, referral, traffic
Companies: npr, twitter, x


Comments on “Media Sites That Have Left Twitter Aren’t Missing The Traffic”
Then the marketing department came in...
A memo circulated to Twitter, now officially renamed X, staff says NPR traffic disasterously fell upward of 50% as a result of its leaving X. Original traffic to NPR is now half of what it used to be showing that clearly NPR is dying on the vine without XTwitter, and that the Musk Network™ can now leverage this huge boon to bludgeon any other so-called news-media to keep them on the hook.
Re:
…and that 50% lost results a 99% lost in advertising revenue, also making titles randomly disappearing in post, driving many of people to other social networks, with now a global traffic to only 10% of what it was when the company has brilliantly became private.
A lawsuit will soon follow. Stay tune on XXX for more great, and totally verified, news.
Re: Re:
With what proliferates on there, XXX is not wrong.
Re: 1% or 50%??
The original press release from NPR said that traffice had dropped ‘by a single percentage point’ but also that their traffic was less than 2% from X anyway. So, if traffic from X was only 2% to start with, and it has dropped by ‘a single percentage point’, is that a 1% reduction or a 50% reduction?
Re: Re: Love those Percentages
A % number means very little, if there is NO base number. Ask every state and Federal about Unemployment numbers, and they cant tell you the BASE number they are from.
(and if you really want to have that number its ~75m to 125m estimated jobs)
Re: Re: Re:
You are quoting the wrong number(s). With those numbers you are claiming that the true unemployment percentage in the US is between 30% & 50%
Anyhow according to the BLS the number of unemployed in the US in September was 6.4 million, contradicting your claim that they can’t do hard numbers.
The reason for percentages is simple they factor in demographic changes allowing comparisons over time without having to look up extra numbers (like total number of people of working age at that point in time) since that has already been done.
Re: Re:
Relative to total traffic, 1%; relative to traffic from twitter, 50%.
Re: Re:
So twitter played an insignificant role in promoting news before Musk, and it played an insignificant role after Musk, so why is TD still making half its articles about Twitter like any of this is important?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:
B/c MM is still seething that chief censor YR was sacked for interfering with the U.S. presidential election process…
Re: Re: Re:2
The only one seething here is you, proved by the fact that you you keep coming here sniping at Mike and TD on a daily basis, posting lies and other bullshit. You are just another manchild that refuses to grow up.
Re: Re: Re:2
…hallucinated nobody mentally competent, ever.
Re: Re: Re:2
Were you crying actual tears when you wrote that?
Re: Re: Re:
How is ‘Rich idiot spent billions in buying an online platform that millions of people used to communicate on and has been doing his best to burn it to the ground by blundering between one idiotic change after another’ not newsworthy?
If you don’t want TD to keep posting articles about Elon’s latest faceplant the one you should be talking to is Elon, convince him to stop being such a colossal buffoon and the articles are likely to dry right up.
Re: Re: Re:
I can understand your confusion, it stems from the fact that you have conflated two things, and it can be answered by a simple question: Do you buy all the magazines/newspapers that have a headline that sparks your interest?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Cleaning Up
X-Twitter users haven’t missed the fake news organizations, either. EU Commissioner Thierry Breton was asked to publicly point to disinformation on the platform, but without PBS he was unable to do so.
Re:
What news organization is completely devoid of this notorious Miss Information?
Not that it matters much, but your argument(?) is just as silly.
Re:
What’s the weather like on your home planet?
Re: Dear Koby
I wonder if you ever listen to PBS or NPR.
Do you realize how Simple news is? If you take out opinion and chatter, News isnt more then about 15 minutes of telling you What happened.
NOT what they Think happened of caused the incident. NOT talking to people around Getting OTHER opinions.
The longest news you will get is the weather.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
What are you smoking? They CONSTANTLY “interpret” and “explain” the news….which means bias and propaganda.
Re: Re: Re:
That you think factual reporting is propaganda reveals your bias, not theirs.
Re: Re: Re:
Hey bratty Matty does elmo know your name yet?
It’s only about user that used to click on NPR posts/tweets that drove them to the website. Estimating the real lost in visibility due to many people only peeking at headlines posted on social network without click may be more difficult.
Of course, the visibility they used to have is clearly not the same as it was one year ago, directly due to the hegemony of bots and cheap content (known as “the best open-source and transparent algorithm ever”).
What I see.
The creators are DONE.
They created something, that WORKS, but they Really didnt market what was there. they understood HOW the internet SHOULD work and WILL WORK.
Others see something that ISNT marketed, and Think they CAN create a market, AND MAKE MONEY ALSO.. But dont realize the PAST of the internet that has SHOWN WHAT WORKS.
Well, lets Jump in and take over and MAKE money? May not WORK!
I dont mind a few adverts, A FEW. But YT is getting bad.
I understand Someone/everyone needs a Raise Every year. And In the USA Capitalist Environment, If you are NOT connected direct to the Water hole, it gets expensive with all the people wanting to carry water TO YOU. And they Want to be paid.
Finding a site like TD, that Listened to us, and at LEAST understood, and may have tried a few other ways to bring in abit of Cash flow. Until those Sources UNDERSTAND the problem, and Quit trying to infect everyone with trackers, Just to see an advert.
Even YT is upset, and trying to Block the adblockers. Without Pissing people off.
Iv suggested to a few sites, for THEM to make the adverts for those companies.
And If they WOULD, POST that they would be LIABLE for any CRAP that lands on my machine that I CAN PROVE is from their site.
I Would remove my Blocker from their site. But my average is still 13,000 trackers per month.(ya, i know where they are coming from)
'Oh noes, less of the 'anything that insults the Dear Leader is fake news' crowd...'
Given who uses Twitter these days and what a disaster the ‘verification’ system has been turned into I imagine media platforms have several reasons to not be overly bothered should they be getting less traffic from the site.
Re: and
Less traffic, Less adverts to sell, and Less money.
I’m certain Elon’s whole intention with owning ExTwitter is to push right wing propaganda and lies during the upcoming presidential election. Okay, he also wants to push his own BS. (Perhaps the same thing) He probably doesn’t even really care about the money, other than how it makes him look bad.
Block the adblockers?
“Block the adblockers. Without Pissing people off”
Not possible.
When I can’t visit a site without blocking ads and trackers, I just go elsewhere. The web is big.
Re:
I block the ads and trackers regardless, but generally yes, if they decide not to render, I decide to Elsewhere.
Unfortunately, I can see media companies making the argument “see? See?! You social media sites need us more than we need you, so pay your link tax dammit!” (Just ignore that Twitter was always a fraction of the size of Facebook…)
If we ignore him, maybe he will go away. I submit that everyone who complains about Musk should cease using his products. Why do we continue to pander to this idiot?
Perception vs reality
Looks like musk drastically overestimated how many non-democrats had any interest in the D-party-projection.
Not surprising. Either way.
Most people realise that NOR is the voice of the Democrat party.
And
Most people realise that 99.9% of NPR views/listens/interaction is from that party’s members.
That, and musk generally doesn’t understand media interaction in the first place.
The only thing left of NPR is WLS.