Feckless Axios Fired A Reporter For Correctly Identifying DeSantis Propaganda
from the this-is-why-we-can't-have-nice-things dept
Mainstream political news outlets like Axios have long been accused of “both sides” or “view from nowhere” journalism where they bend over backward to frame everything through a lens of illusory objectivity as to not offend. This distortion is then routinely exploited by authoritarians and corporations keen on normalizing bigotry, rank corruption, or even the dismantling of democracy.
It’s been a rough decade of very ugly lessons on this front, yet there’s still zero indication of meaningful self-awareness of the editorial leadership of mainstream political news outlets like Axios, Semafor, or Politico.
Case in point: this week Axios fired local, respected Tampa reporter Ben Montgomery after he responded to a press release blast from the office of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis by calling it (quite accurately) propaganda. It began when the Florida Department of Education shared Montgomery’s reply publicly, apparently in a bid to make Montgomery seem radical:

The problem: the press release genuinely is propaganda. It’s not actually announcing anything meaningful, and is full of the usual anti-diversity screeds intended on making modest Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) efforts sound corrosively diabolical. It’s the same authoritarian gibberish we’ve seen parroted for years by anti-“woke” nanny state bullies intent on normalizing racism and dipshittery.
It’s bullshit, and Montgomery correctly identified it as such in a private reply:
“There was no, like, event to cover. It might have been a roundtable at some point, but there was no event that I had been alerted to. … This press release was just a series of quotes about DEI programs, and the ‘scam’ they are, and nothing else,” Montgomery said. “I was frustrated by this. I read the whole thing and my day is very busy.”
Correctly labeling propaganda as propaganda is a cardinal sin for outlets like Axios’, whose scoops, funding, and events generally rely on not making those in power (especially on the troll-happy right) upset. So Axios did what Axios often does: it buckled to authoritarian bullies. Montgomery very quickly got a call from Axios executive editor for local news, Jamie Stockwell, informing him he’d been fired:
“She started immediately by asking if I could confirm that I sent that email and I did immediately confirm it,” he continued. “She then sounded like she was reading from a script and she said … ‘Your reputation has been irreparably tarnished in the Tampa Bay area and, because of that, we have to terminate you.’”
On the call, Montgomery said he “objected with my full fucking throat on behalf of every hard-working journalist.” However, he said Stockwell “wasn’t answering any questions.” According to Montgomery, his laptop and access to company email were swiftly shut down.
It’s the latest in a long line of instances where DeSantis’ office has attempted to bully reporters and feckless media outlets into submission. And Axios just made it abundantly clear that when it comes to modern mainstream U.S. access journalism, it works. Not only does it work, but many mainstream shops still, a decade into Trumpism, don’t understand what’s actually happening. Or worse: know and don’t care.
That’s a problem for a country where violent, conspiracy and propaganda fueled authoritarianism is on the rise. U.S. journalism’s function is to convey something vaguely resembling the truth to your readership. But when your income depends heavily on strong relationships with right wing advertisers, sources, and event sponsors, the truth can be expensive.
So instead you get this sorry mush of “both sides” pseudo-journalism easily exploited by bullies and demagogues. Instead of “restoring trust in the press” (see Semafor’s recent launch missteps or the raging obtuseness of Politico’s new owner), the U.S. media sector has generally responded to surging authoritarianism by coddling bullshit artists, shifting coverage even further to the right, and penalizing reporters for speaking the truth.
If you’re not particularly keen on history, none of this ends well without some major, meaningful sea change. Or a massive funding infusion for independent media outlets with actual backbone. And there’s no real indication that either is coming anytime soon.
Filed Under: authoritarianism, ben montgomery, education, he said she said, journalism, media, propaganda, ron desantis, view from nowhere
Companies: axios
Comments on “Feckless Axios Fired A Reporter For Correctly Identifying DeSantis Propaganda”
But but the feelings!!
Karl, if they can’t bully people into submission their feelings might be hurt by pesky facts or heaven forbid face consequences for their actions!!!! We absolutely cannot stand for such horrific things to happen to white men in power in this day and age, they must be protected at all costs from nonsense like reality and coddled like the snowflakes they are!!!
/sarcasm
I’m sure Matthew M Bennett will be here shortly to passionately demand an investigation into whether a fascist state government sought to censor a journalist using intimidation tactics, right? Right?
Re:
He does like to rave about “censorship by proxy” And this sounds like it is the thing closed to an example of that (I didn’t see anything in the article that actually said DeSantis complained to Axios… but IMHO that is a reasonable intolerance)
Re: Re:
To clarify my point: I’m not suggest this was censorship (not without a lot more evidence… the whole coercion thing). But that it is consistent with what Matthew claims he hates.
Re: Re: Re: (not without a lot more evidence… )
well, modern use of the word “Propaganda” is as a pejorative, implying deliberate misleading or false information to advance a cause, etc.
Most U.S. political discourse from all sides contains aspects of propaganda.
However, the propaganda label is rarely used in domestic politics and media coverage, and is considered a rather extreme criticism.
A professional journalist would not use the term for routine political events & normal partisan viewpoints — and then only with clear objective proof of deliberate-disinformation.
political viewpoints that one strongly disagrees with — does not automatically qualify those other viewpoints as propaganda.
Re: Re: Re:2
“implying deliberate misleading or false information to advance a cause”
“from all sides ”
“a rather extreme criticism”
“routine political events & normal partisan viewpoints ”
“automatically qualify”
Karl, it’s a bit too late for that.
As much as I hope something needs to be done through peaceful means, I’m afraid we’re past that.
Re:
Violent revolution usually result in a tyranny being established, and that continues until a peaceful revolution or external forces restore democracy.
Re: Re:
And Jan 6 happened.
It’s safe to say the Republicans are not interested in talking or resolving anything peacefully.
Re: Re: Re:
But where would the US be if it had succeeded?
Re: Re: Re:2
… embroiled in the second US civil war?
‘In a vastly worst state’ would be the starting point had the insurrection succeeded, how and to what extent are the only unknowns.
Re: Re: Re:3
Still does not change the fact that Jan 6 actually happened.
Re: Re: Re:2
Depends on what you mean by “succeeded”. The stated aims were anything from a protest (that got out of hand) to halting the process of transferring the reins of power to literally executing sitting members of congress. The country would be in a far worse position either way, but the fallout from the latter aim being achieved is almost unthinkable.
Re: Re: Re:
Well, they are… but only when it means they win.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Trusted News Isnt Opinionated
I’m sure that if there were some actual evidence that Axios was contacted by the Desantis office, then there would have been a claim about that. But there isn’t. Instead, it looks like Axios is just enforcing traditional journalistic standards: don’t take sides. If the event isn’t newsworthy, don’t publish it. Or, be neutral and let the audience decide. But modern journalists aren’t going to succeed with a wide audience if they badmouth one side or the other.
Re:
That’s literally Fox News’ business model.
Re:
Ah, the view-from-nowhere standard that the spineless adhere to. Fascists just love that because it allows them to say whatever they want and it gets normalized because there are no pushback.
Even journalists can have opinions you know, and one of the actual traditional journalistic standards is that they highlight things that they think are wrong.
Don’t you find it odd that DeSantis always attack journalists and media that doesn’t report on him in a flattering way? I can’t remember what that’s called, you know, when a person in the government harass the media so they’ll stop reporting on some things.
Re:
Journalism 101: When someone says it’s raining and someone else says it’s sunny, your job isn’t to report both sides—it’s to look out the fucking window and see who’s right.
Journalism 102: It’s also your job to tell people who lied.
Re: Re:
‘Don’t take sides, don’t fact check or challenge what you’re told, just present it as-is’ isn’t journalism it’s acting as an unpaid PR stooge for whoever wants to use them.
Re: Re:
Journalism 103. It’s your job to let everyone know DeSantis is a fucking prick.
Re: Re:
This. The biggest problem with modern journalism is that when they’re not acting as the literal propaganda arm of some party, they’re pretending that there’s 2 sides with equal weight. This is rarely the case, evidence will show who has the greater argument and it’s often not close. It’s also rare for any complex issue to genuinely have just 2 sides.
The “both sides” nonsense is usually just to placate those who are continually wrong because they believe that there’s a conspiracy against them if they’re correctly told that they are. Neutrality in reporting doesn’t mean you hedge things in order to not offend anyone, it means you go where the evidence tells you instead of where you want it to take you.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
Not even vaguely what occurred.
Re: Re: Re:
All bluster no bite.
You constantly disregard somebody’s comment, without providing a single factual reason of why it should be disregarded.
So then tell us, what exactly did occur?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
He knows WHY what he said was bullshit, so it hardly merited my explaining.
he actually gave his political opinion and picked a political fight over it, making it harder to do his job and in violation of all jopurnalistic standards.
Thanks for playing, get fucked.
Re: Re: Re:3
Chozen’s not going to give you a horse, bucko.
Another example of why Ron DeSantis won’t play well on the national stage. He can hardly have every critical reporter sacked from every outlet.
It demonstrates how thin-skinned he is. That won’t play well either.
Re:
Uhh, about that…
Does the term ‘fake news’ ring any bells?
Re: Re:
Trump is also thin-skinned af.
Being Trump V.2 isn’t going to play well on the national stage, or did you miss that tfg lost the popular vote twice?
Re: Re: Re:
Sadly the US’ voting system is so utterly broken that even losing the popular vote by literally millions isn’t guaranteed to keep a candidate out of office so that’s one safety net that doesn’t exist, though thankfully his second attempt failed even in spite of that and hopefully enough of the right people are still motivated enough to keep Trump 2.0 out of office as well.
Re: Re: Re:2
I really don’t see DeSantis beating Trump in a primary unless he’s dead or in jail. The media hype around him feels like how they spent 2007 angrily insisting that Giuliani was the inevitable nominee.
Re: Re: Re:3
Talk about a situation equal parts messed up and horrifying that the biggest obstacle to Trump 2.0’s political ambitions is Trump 1.0.
Re: Re: Re:2
“even losing the popular vote by literally millions isn’t guaranteed to keep a candidate out of office”
Thanks for explaining that. I would never have guessed that was the case by ::checks notes:: Trump becoming president.
Trump was a nationally known figure in 2016 thanks to his TV (and sad film) career. Apart from people in New York and literally anyone who’d ever actually done business with/been sexually assaulted by him, everyone else thought of him as a glamorous successful businessman, and the media went along with it.
DeSantis was little known at all before he started his culture war bullshit, and what people nationally know of him is based pretty much on that bullshit. One’s interpretation of that behaviour depends on one’s political affiliations. But people who aren’t interested in politics will still not have formed a image of him in their minds equivalent to Trump’s presence.
Once DeSantis begins his formal run, then his record will become one for national attention – and I estimate that a lot of his persona will not play that well with middle America.
He has no capital to squander, no positive reputation as a successful businessman or celebrity to boost his decidedly unappealing persona. While I know your media will do its level best to make him sound like the second coming of Jesus, he’s got a much bigger hill to climb.
Stuff like silencing reporters will alienate the very people he needs to climb that hill. So will refusing to debate Biden or behaving like a child when challenged.
He’s got Murdoch behind him – but what if Murdoch drops dead before he can get him over the top?
And they wonder why people are getting their news elsewhere...
Tisk tisk, someone didn’t read the rulebook for modern journalism and as a result missed lesson number one:
‘Your job is not to question or contradict those in positions of power and/or authority but merely to repeat whatever they say without comment or correction.’
Hardly a wonder they got canned if they couldn’t even follow one of the core pillars of modern journalism.
Axios == Fox
The difference is reach. Neither are “news”.
But why would anyone expact anything different? Look at the founders.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
axios is liberal as hell you moron.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
All political press releases are "propaganda" you moron
I get that you hate DeSantis, but that doesn’t make it any more propaganda than normal.
Axios is liberal as hell. They fired the reporter because he burned his bridges with the administration that he was supposed to report on and made a huge scene. Not respected any more.
He acted like a child and got fired. Fucking cry about it.
And jesus christ how is this not a political blog, now?
Re:
FYI, you’re talking to Karl Bode, not Mike Masnick.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
I am and was aware, still a dumb political take that has nothing to do with tech.
Re: Re: Re:
You could always leave if you’re not happy about it, but we all know you’re too chickenshit to take your ball and go home.
Re:
It’s Mike’s blog you ignorant moron. He can do whatever he wants with it.
That he still allows you to post here shows how much more of a man he is than you can ever hope to be during your sad worthless life.
Re: Re:
Matty wants his money back. He was expecting a blog free of Twitter criticism, liberal ideas, and discussion of politics.
I wonder if he’d take his refund in Truth.Social membership fees?
Re: Re: Re:
Would that be in rubles? Appears that the group that owns Truth Social got $8 million in mystery loans last year from someone very close to Putin.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
You guys know that it’s now verified Biden’s whole family took money from China, right?
And that Clinton colluded with Russia, Trump didn’t.
Both 100% confirmed.
And you’re making ruble jokes for some reason?
Re:
But still propaganda. Boy, you’ll jump through any kind of hoop to disagree with TD, huh?
He was fired before he “made a huge scene”, you disingenuous dolt.
No, he accurately reported on republican bullshit and got fired.
Why do you care what they write about?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
It’s all propaganda. It’s a political press release. Bragging about whatever initiative they think is important.
That doesn’t mean it’s appropriate to start an argument with the politician about it. Very much not a journalists job. And he was fired for it.
Nothing else you said was valid nor had any relevance.
Just when they say something really dumb, which is often, actually. I don’t often post anything on the posts complaining about police violating 4th amendment and the like, cuz I agree.
This was dumb, going to say so. Really fucking dumb, actually.
Re:
Came here to see Matt the Rat smash his face into a wall in pure spite.
Wasn’t disappointed.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
But consequences!
The poor bastard getting fired for saying something that is arguably correct is “merely“ a consequence of that speech. Which, I’m told by the far left wing speech police, is totally cool and proper.
I’m sure this is different, somehow.
Re:
Can’t tell if making joke or being one, have a funny vote either way I guess.
Re: Re:
No, LittleCupcakes really is that stupid.
Re: Re: Re:
Poe’s Law and all that.
Re: Re: Re:2
In this day and age, it’s safe to assume Cupcakes is not only terminally stupid, but also violently stupid as well.
Re: Re: Re:2
It would be more likely to be a joke if they had ever posted anything but demented right-wing propaganda like that.
Re: Re:
It’s a troll. The tell is “far left wing speech police”
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:
If you think “far left wing speech police” isn’t an actual thing you’re even dumber than I think you are….which probably isn’t possible.
Re: Re: Re:2
Your limitations of experience and imagination aren’t my problem, little boy.
Why don’t you piss off and play on the freeway? At least as roadkill, you might feed a hungry wild animal, which will be more use than you can possibly be to anyone or anything else at the moment.
Re: Re: Re:2
“If you think “far left wing speech police” isn’t an actual thing”
It’s no more a thing than “far right wing speech police”. There’s literally court battles right now about the latter trying to control discourse.
Re: Re: Re:3
Horseshit
Re: Re: Re:4
Oops, read the comment incorrectly. Consider the horseshit retracted 😄
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
He’s being sarcastic, because no, it isn’t any different. Well actually, correction, it is very different than the usual cancel culture incident….in that was an employer firing someone directly for an inappropriate thing they did.
Most cancel culture incidents are pressure campaigns based on nothing of actual import.
Re: Re: Re:
Sounds like the complaint of a straight white incel who got angry a girl would rather get pegged by a futa than breathe the same oxygen as you. Get probed by a big black phallus you walking sperm donor.
Re:
And we’re still free to criticize the spinless propanganda rag who did it, fascist.
Especially when there’s evidence to prove how spineless the spineless propaganda rag employing the reporter decided to bow down to their fascist master.
Re:
Losing a twitter profile and losing a job are not equivalent. Making a new twitter profile and finding a new job are not equivalent.
Re:
Nobody here has ever said people shouldn’t suffer any consequences for their speech.
Also: Nobody here has ever said we had to like, or never criticize, those consequences.
The fired journalist will most likely find a better job that pays more elsewhere. Good to get out of Florida anyways.
I want to know where Desantis gets those sexy white high heel booties.
Re:
Probably the same place the butchers at my local supermarket have been getting them for 40 years. I really don’t get this line of attack. Dude’s policies are abhorrent enough, and its not like the far right cares about fashion.
Re: Re:
“not like the far right cares about fashion.
It is ok to wear a tan suit.
Any announcement by the a state governor’s office is propaganda, so long as it seeks to influence someone’s views. It doesn’t matter whether it’s good or bad, it’s propaganda. Reminding people towash their hands after taking a dump is propaganda. It’s not only bad people who try to influence others. The question is what is being communicated, and what purpose that message serves.
This is a pointless punishment in service of an appearance of objectivity that can never be more than a facade. And of course, it acts in defense of a major right-wing politician. Not surprising, but disappointing nevertheless.
Re:
“Any announcement by the a state governor’s office is propaganda”
Horse shit.
Re:
so long as it seeks to influence someone’s views.
This is a useless distinction. Every communication, everywhere, by anyone, seeks to influence someone’s views. If you didn’t want a view to be influenced, you wouldn’t have communicated at all.
Both political parties complain about impartial media, yet the solution to this problem is DEAD SIMPLE. Our “fake news” problem was created in 1987 by Ronald Reagan, when he unilaterally abolished the “Fairness Doctrine”, which decreed that all broadcasters provide equal time for opposing viewpoints, thus creating the twin echo chambers of Fox News and MSNBC, along with their many subsidiaries and clones.
AND THAT’S THE WAY IT IS…
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
so terribly one sided
Karl,
It’s a shame to read that you have gone so far to the left.
It’s not that DeSantis didn’t publish a bit o’ propaganda, he did and the reporter was correct to call him out on it.
It’s that the majority of your article reads like a pro-left hit piece where the article title was just an opening to vent your belief that it’s only the right that’s the problem with this country.
There’s equal amounts of shite coming from both major parties. The Democrats usually have a better story economically, but a much worse one culturally. While the Republicans are a disaster when it comes to economic issues but, with the exception of the far right (the actual far right not what the left claims is far-right, which is anything that isn’t far-left) the Republicans are actually closer to the majority of the country culturally.
Most of the technical stories here are quite good, and as Mike’s written (see recent story regarding Newsom and Wallgreens) both sides are equally capable doing wrong. Perhaps you might want to have a sit-down with Mike and learn to leave your obviously strong personal opinions at the door.
just a suggestion.
Re:
Yes, it’s just terrible isn’t it?
Everyone is entitled to their opinion(s) – just terrible.
Does Desantis think everyone is entitled to their own opinion(s)? Only when they align with his.
There is no both sides here, one side is insane. “The Right” does not have any redeeming qualities.
Re:
Can you tells us what you mean with “pro-left”? Is it calling out bullshit? Is it pointing out that DeSantis regularly mob and harass journalists that criticize him? I don’t think Karl is particularly far-left, I would say his opinions are slightly center-left using a yard-stick based on what is generally considered “left” in the rest of the world.
And Axios was feckless, they folded quicker than wet cardboard when they discovered that one of their journalists had the temerity to point out DeSantis bullshit. I don’t expect a company behaving in such way to be a bastion of journalism in any sense and they rightfully deserve all the scorn – regardless if you are on the right or the left.
No, there isn’t equal amount of shit coming from both parties. Both parties do some really stupid shit but the GOP positively shovels it out by the barrel.
There is no far-left in the US, Democrats are firmly right-center, Republicans are at best right but mostly far-right these days. The Overton-window have steadily shifted to the right the last 20 years and it really started accelerating the last 10.
And the argument that Republicans are “actually close to the majority of the country culturally” doesn’t hold water because if that was true why are they fighting tooth and nail to keep being relevant in any kind of fashion? They have lost touch with the people and all we see now are mostly grievance theatrics and obstructionism touted as the solution to all the problems the US has which of course are entirely the Democrats fault.
Re: Re:
“Democrats are firmly right-center”
Not all of them. There’s a solid progressive minority which is growing with every election, and they’ve been pushing Biden leftwards, which is good.
The Democrats are now on the left of our conservatives here in Australia, in that they recognise climate change is real, trans people are human beings with rights, and they support gay marriage and abortion rights.
You really don’t make progress by shitting on the people who are on your side 🙁
This was infuriating enough for me to seek out Jamie Stockwell on twitter to say something rude on my dormant twitter account.