All But 3 Of The 4,499 Refugees Admitted To The US Under Trump Are White South Africans

from the replacement-theory-in-action-I-guess dept

We’ve got a throwback administration that wants to bring us back to halcyon days of early 1950s America, that preceded Supreme Court-ordered school desegregation. If it could, I’m sure it would go back even further, taking at least another 100 years off the clock.

The Trump administration has no problem with embracing bigotry. That much has been made clear by the guy at the top of the org chart.

While most presidents — no matter how racist — would at least try to present something “statesmanlike” when talking to the public, Trump has delivered his hatred of non-whites in press conferences and social media tweets. He has frequently referred to non-white countries as “shitholes” and their citizens as “low IQ.” He has claimed Latin America and South America are “sending” the US nothing but terrorists, drug dealers, and rapists.

He has also asked publicly why we can’t get more immigrants from predominantly white countries, like Switzerland, Norway, and other countries where blue eyes and blond hair are commonplace. (The answer, of course, is that citizens of those countries actually like the nations they reside in, what with their sensible governments, the prioritization of social safety nets over golden parachutes, and affordable health care. They also prefer their government not be run by criminals and rapists, nor overly forgiving of certain terrorists.)

In hopes of replacing the browner people he’s actively displacing in his War on Migrants, Trump reached out to the supposedly persecuted white people of South Africa, which has only recently made steps towards treating Black people like human beings, rather than possessions or low-level subordinates. Having seen some out-of-context viral video, Trump was convinced white South Africans were being oppressed by Black South Africans, much in the same way he became convinced Haitian refugees were eating people’s pets and/or local water fowl.

All of this racism is now traceable. It’s in the official numbers, as Alex Ip pointed out on Bluesky. The latest refugee numbers compiled [PDF] by the State Department (and released every month) show there’s a new replacement theory in operation here — one that hopes to fill the US with as many white people as possible.

Between October 1, 2025 and March 31, 2026, 4,499 refugees were admitted to the US. All five pages (10 states each) tell the same story: every single refugee admitted during this six-month period was from South Africa. The only exception? Three Afghan refugees who are now residing in Colorado and who arrived here last November.

Since last November, every refugee has been from South Africa. While it may be presumptive to assume that every South African admitted was white, it’s the kind of assumption that’s safe to make because this administration publicly stated it’s only interested in rescuing white South Africans from largely imagined “racial violence.”

The state-by-state breakdown makes it clear the South Africans who have taken advantage of this refugee status are there because Trump rolled out the white carpet for them. The two states with by far the largest numbers of South African refugees are Texas (551) and Florida (331) — both deeply red states that are fully MAGA cooked. California runs a close third with 316, but that’s because California has always attracted arrivals from foreign countries, much in the same way it has attracted US citizens from all over the nation, with its promises of beaches, warm weather, and plenty of places to work while you wait for your script to be optioned.

The only thing working against the administration is all the efforts it’s made to prevent non-citizens from having any rights, much less an opportunity to vote. I’m sure the White House’s finest legal minds (smash cut to a million monkeys with typewriters and Trump U law degrees) are busy finding a way to speed run the naturalization process, but only for refugees admitted to this country since last November. The other irony is some South Africans who’ve taken advantage of this are now claiming they’d rather go back to living in the country they “fled” from because it seems far less dangerous than remaining in a country run by people who prefer fascism to democracy.

This is about as openly racist as it gets. And yet, it’s just going to end up being more bigoted flotsam that will be pushed aside by the next burst of awfulness by this administration. There will be more where this came from. Sooner or later, some of it will manage to break the surface.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “All But 3 Of The 4,499 Refugees Admitted To The US Under Trump Are White South Africans”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
25 Comments
That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: 'Why'd you leave south africa?' 'I feared for my life.' 'Why'd you leave the US?' 'I feared for my life!'

Oh sure, I just find it funny that the excuse to make exceptions and bring them to the US is that white people are being oppressed and killed in south africa, and yet they’d rather go back to such a ‘deadly’ place than stick around in the US. Really undermines the whole narrative when they’d rather ‘risk their lives’ in their previous county than stay in the US that’s supposedly so much safer and better for them.

ECA (profile) says:

I love the stats about the USA.

#1. If we dont have the idea, we WONT use any other nations idea that works.
#2. Enforce laws created to Stabilize Capitalism. Force competition and Min wage to Match the economy.
#3. 60+ Christian religions, and only 30% of the EU has religious affiliation. the USA? 70%+ Declare they have religious affiliations.
#4. Who OWNS the properties in the EU? Who is allowed to Control Property Value?

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Yeah, cuz the SA gov is super racist, and yes they ARE persecuting white people in SA.

This is what the asylum program is for. It is for people who are being persecuted. We’d presumably accept Uyghurs if any could escape the CCP but apparently they can’t.

The asylum program is NOT for people who just want to move from a poor country to a rich country. It’s not even really meant for refugees whose entire country is falling apart. (like Haiti, and before that Somalia. Yes, letting those people in was an abuse of the system) I

It is meant for people who are being specifically TARGETED…which includes white South Africans.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re:

Yeah, cuz the SA gov is super racist, and yes they ARE persecuting white people in SA.

Credible non-partisan citations please.

We’d presumably accept Uyghurs if any could escape the CCP but apparently they can’t.

No. No, we would not. You think the current regime gives a shit about Muslims? Shit, son, Trump was prepared to wipe out millions of them if Iran hadn’t agreed to a ceasefire.

The asylum program is NOT for people who just want to move from a poor country to a rich country.

I’d bet that a lot of the South African refugees aren’t as poor as you want everyone to believe they are.

It’s not even really meant for refugees whose entire country is falling apart.

“Those people should just die. Because fuck ’em. Especially if they’re brown-skinned.” — you, probably

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Credible non-partisan citations please.

Retard, you think NYT is “non-partisan”

Go fuuck yourself, you disingenuous fuuck.

I honestly give no fuccks what you think is “credible”.

I’d bet that a lot of the South African refugees aren’t as poor as you want everyone to believe they are.

I never said they were poor and I HAVE NO IDEA WHY YOU THINK THAT MATTERS. I literally just said it wasn’t about economics it was about being under targeted threat. Fuucking retard.

“Those people should just die. Because fuck ’em. Especially if they’re brown-skinned.”

1) Not an argument
2) The US literally cannot save the world, dipshit.
3) Yay, you called me racist for no reason. I’m probably correct then. It’s 2026, that doesn’t work anymore.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

[Ableist slur], you think NYT is “non-partisan”

No, I don’t. It’s right-leaning centrist at best; all its anti-trans bullshit stands as proof.

I honestly give no fuccks what you think is “credible”.

Your whining about my asking for credible non-partisan sources of data says otherwise. (Side note: Any reason you can’t spell “fuck” correctly? You, uh, startin’ to lose a little bit of the ol’ brainmatter, son?)

I never said they were poor

Quoting your own words: “The asylum program is NOT for people who just want to move from a poor country to a rich country.” You may be technically correct in that you didn’t explicitly say the white South Africans seeking asylum aren’t poor, but the implication that they’re poor is meant to work in tandem with the belief that they’re the victims of political persecuation and thus paint those specific asylum seekers as poor. You didn’t have to say they were poor⁠—the subtext said it for you.

Not an argument

So what?

The US literally cannot save the world, dipshit.

Then why do you want it to save a few thousand white people from being treated slightly worse than they were, but still treated better than Black people were, under apartheid? I mean, if there’s any group of people that would qualify for more direct aid in terms of being refugees running from politically motivated persecution, it would be Gazan Palestinians, but I don’t see you begging the US to take them in.

Yay, you called me racist for no reason.

Oh, I had a reason: You voted for racists, you openly support racists, you’ve said racist bullshit in the past, and you most likely have at least one of the two major symbols of modern American racism⁠—the Confederate flag and the MAGA hat⁠—somewhere in your home/on your person. If I struck a nerve, I don’t give a fuck. You’re a supporter of a man who threatened to kill millions of people⁠—to literally commit a genocide!⁠—as a bargaining tactic. Your feelings don’t matter to me at all.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2

No, I don’t. It’s right-leaning centrist at best;

Lol, what the fuucking fucck

all its anti-trans bullshit

There are no “trans” people, just people with a mental illness that need help.

You voted for racists

The left is openly racist. We’re the good guys shutting down your bullshit, sorry. And yes, that includes giving Asylum to white farmers subject racist oppression.

Go fuuck yourself, cake boy.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:4

You’re just some dumb kid cosplaying as MAGA.

I’ve been posting on your website (and I used to like you) for like 20-25 years. We’re around the same age, retard.

And yeah, we’re the good guys. Open borders is bad. Men is women’s sports is actually evil. Etc.

You have no idea how extreme your positions are.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:5

Dude, why are you so insistent on using that ableist slur so much nowadays? Practically every post you make uses it now. You never used to use it, or at least not that much. It’s kind of disturbing how you latched onto it as a provocatory poke when, at best, it just makes you come off as someone who can’t put together an argument and have to imply your “opposition” is developmentally disabled to make yourself look better. That doesn’t do you any favors.

Also: Saying “we’re the good guys” about a political party/ideological “tribe” that condones and endorses the use literal torture, physical and psychological, to make queer people either convert into being cishet or kill themselves (because either outcome is a “success”) really doesn’t do you any favors. And since when do “good guys” threaten to commit genocide in the way Donald Trump threated to destroy the “entire civilization” of Iran?

That One Guy (profile) says:

'The only acceptable immigrant is a WHITE immigrant.'

The Trump regime has said the quiet part out loud on a number of issues since they took power and on this one they’ve ripped the mask entirely off and made crystal clear that the anti-immigration stance the party-now-cult holds never had anything to do with ‘doing it the right/legal way’ and everything to do with what skin color the immigrants had.

Arijirija says:

But what about the ... ?

I’ve got friends from South Africa, and I get regular updates on the situation – and I tell you straight, I haven’t seen one green-skinned individual with the characteristic orange stripes and purple polka dots, at all!!! Not A Single One!!! Clearly they are in very serious danger of extermination and must be brought to safety in teh US ASAP!!! Save the Green-Skinned Orange-Striped Purple Polka-Dotted South Africans from Extermination ASAP!!!!

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...