DOJ Now Investigating Florida Sheriff's Office For Using A Federal Grant To Fund Its 'Predictive Policing' Harassment Programs

from the claw-it-back dept

The Pasco County (FL) Sheriff’s Office believes in “intelligence-led policing.” This is its formal slang for harassing residents until (in the office’s own words) “they sue or move.” The Sheriff’s Office turns anyone with a criminal background into a suspect-for-life. Deputies visit residences and residents on the “intelligence-led” shit list multiple times a month, demanding answers to questions they have no business asking. When residents fail to comply, nuisance (in every sense of the word) citations are issued for things like uncut grass or missing mailbox numbers.

It doesn’t really matter whether the Sheriff’s Office believes its own PR bullshit. It is fully engaged in harassing as many residents as possible. That’s why it’s allowed its so-called predictive policing program to infiltrate local schools, subjecting minors (and their families) to the same harassment previously limited to adults with criminal records. Almost anything can trigger unwelcome interactions with the office’s deputies, including slipping grades, missed school days, or simply being the victim of, or witness to domestic violence.

Local schools are apparently fine with this. They’ve been sharing student records with the Sheriff’s Office. And the Sheriff’s Office has been sharing this info with officers. Both of these actions appear to violate federal and local student privacy laws. Not that the Sheriff’s Office cares. It says it has done nothing wrong — only availed itself of records shared with it (unlawfully) by schools.

The exposure of these programs by the Tampa Bay Times has led to multiple investigations and accusations of lawbreaking. One of these investigations involves the federal government, which makes it clear it’s not just the locals that find the Sheriff’s Office’s programs abhorrent. The Department of Education opened an investigation in April to determine whether the in-school “intelligence-led policing” violated federal student privacy laws.

There’s a new federal investigation underway. The Department of Justice wants to know what the fuck is going on in Pasco County, Florida. (h/t WarOnPrivacy)

The U.S. Department of Justice is conducting an “intensive review” of the Pasco Sheriff’s Office’s latest intelligence program, federal officials said this week.

The Justice Department sent a letter to the Sheriff’s Office on Aug. 6 — two weeks after the Tampa Bay Times reported that the Sheriff’s Office had promised increased police scrutiny for people whose criminal histories included violent crimes and drug offenses.

The Justice Department’s letter raised concerns about the methodology used to identify targets, communications with the community and the “insufficient” coordination with relevant law enforcement agencies.

The DOJ’s interest no doubt has something to do with the Tampa Bay Times’ incredible reporting. But it also wants to know why it gave the Sheriff’s Office $700,000 if it was just going to use it to violate the terms of the Bureau of Justice Assistance grant.

This is from the DOJ’s letter [PDF] to the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office:

Agencies that receive SPI funding are expected to engage members of their communities as allies in reducing violence, ensure transparency in their crime reduction approaches whenever feasible, and establish innovative and effective working relationships with citizens and community leaders to gain support for their proposed policing initiatives. Trust, and building trust, is at the core of SPI funding.


PCSO recently circulated the attached letter to individuals regarding a PCSO-run program (the “PCSO program”), which claimed to be “in cooperation with the Department of Justice’s Strategies for Policing Innovation Initiative.” However, the letter does not adequately depict the dedicated training and technical resources under SPI provided by the Department, nor does it adequately describe the requirements for greater community engagement required for SPI’s success.


We also have concerns regarding the methodology used to identify individuals for inclusion in the PCSO program; the name of the program; communications about the program; the lack of involvement and communication with the greater community about the program; and the insufficient coordination with relevant law enforcement stakeholder groups. These shortcomings have the unfortunate consequence of eroding trust in the community, rather than building trust. Given this, and given the goals of SPI, BJA will undertake an immediate assessment of the activities funded under this grant award.

Brace for some federal damnation. Also, brace for opening up the Pasco County coffers to… um… cough up the $700,000 misused by the Sheriff’s Office to (and I will quote here) “erode trust in the community.”

The Sheriff’s Office has responded [PDF]. And it claims it is completely baffled that the DOJ would think its BS predictive policing/targeted harassment program would undermine trust in the community it’s supposed to be serving. Instead, it says it followed the instructions given to it by the Trump DOJ.

The Pasco Sheriff’s Office (PSO) is in receipt of your correspondence dated August 6, 2021 re- garding the Smart Policing Initiative grant awarded to PSO in 2018. After careful review of the letter, we are left confused as to the origins of the concerns and intentions expressed by the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA). Over the last two years, PSO has been working hand-in-hand with the subject matter experts (SMES)’ assigned by BIA to implement this grant. In fulfilling the conditions of the grant, PSO actively collaborates with the BJA-assigned SMEs as well as the University of South Florida (USF) in research partnership and follows all guidance and directives they provide. The written feedback provided by these SMEs included phrases such as “excellent job!” and “the messaging was delivered well,” and referenced the “fantastic partnerships” PSO established with the SPI project. Yet for reasons unknown to PSO, your letter directly contradicts the guidance we have been provided over the last two years.

No doubt the current DOJ (headed by Merrick Garland) takes a different view of community-oriented policing than the DOJ led by Jeff Sessions and Bill Barr did. If there’s any confusion, it’s due to the DOJ reining in its focus on civil rights violations under Donald Trump and its reemergence post Trump as an agency that will at least engage in investigations of problematic law enforcement agencies, even if it’s not that great at delivering sustainable results.

Too bad. Meet the new boss, not quite the same as the old boss. Flow my tears, the sheriff who didn’t want to comprehend the new paradigm said:

We were excited to work with BJA on this innovative, research-driven initiative, and we are extremely disappointed by this abrupt change in direction.

That’s weird. I thought law enforcement officers are trained experts on reacting to fast-moving situations. But maybe that only refers to the indiscriminate deployment of excessive and/or deadly force. Maybe the only ways cops can embrace change is with chokeholds and bullets.

Sure, it doesn’t help that the DOJ sent contradictory messages to the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office. But as Pasco County Sheriff Chris Nocco surely is aware (being that his position is an elected position), the rules can change when the regime changes. The previous administration may have felt the public was the problem and shows of force by armed government employees was the solution. But the current administration doesn’t feel that way. And it has every right to ask why the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office spent nearly a million dollars in federal money alienating the community and harassing their kids.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DOJ Now Investigating Florida Sheriff's Office For Using A Federal Grant To Fund Its 'Predictive Policing' Harassment Programs”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

'They trust us to be horrible people, same thing right?'

It is beyond rich that the same department who admitted that the goal of their harassment campaign was to force people to either sue them or move away is now trying to claim that they were and are doing a stellar job building trust with the community they are terrorizing, unfortunately for them it looks like the ones handing out the money aren’t of the opinion that the proper way to build trust is by beating people into compliance.

Getting the money back or at the very least stopping any more money going into the department would be a good start but a true fix will require disbanding the entire bloody department as corrupt beyond repair and bringing charges where appropriate, followed by looking to bring in replacements that don’t think the proper way to serve the public is with a fist.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

"This is its formal slang for harassing residents until (in the office’s own words) "they sue or move." "

You knew you were doing wrong.
You cheered you were doing wrong.
You violated FERPA.
You decided that people with any connection to a crime, even if they were a victim, were bad people & you needed to run them out of town.
You are the poster child for the racist, intolerant, and ignorant bullies who seek to have power over others to make you feel better about yourself.
You tell other citizens you only go after the "bad people", but the only bad person in this town is you and your officers who punish people over & over.
You never accept they paid for their ‘crimes’ & keep pushing them to where they will do something wrong again so you can proclaim victory.

Its a pity you won’t rot in jail & you won’t have to repay the funds you misused from your own pocket.
I do hope the DoJ will look at those you were working with because any humans telling you this was the best course of actions & violating federal law is okay because you’re doing it for the greater good should never be allowed in an oversight position over even a shopping cart.

RJ (profile) says:

Don't use such a broad brush?

Tim, I don’t know about you but in my opinion and experience there are many, many, many police who do not abuse their position of authority – probably most of them. Perhaps the judicious use of the modifier "some" would be more appropriate, as in:

"Maybe the only ways some cops can embrace change is with chokeholds and bullets."

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Rocky says:

Re: Don't use such a broad brush?

If most of them don’t abuse their position of authority why don’t we see them condemn the bad cops then? If they don’t speak up they are part of the problem and are as complicit to the abuse as those doing the abuse.

Your values are reflected by the company you keep.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: The deafening silence leaves no other brush available

Tim, I don’t know about you but in my opinion and experience there are many, many, many police who do not abuse their position of authority – probably most of them. Perhaps the judicious use of the modifier "some" would be more appropriate, as in:

You don’t have to be personally bludgeoning someone for laughs or robbing someone blind to be a bad cop, all it takes is a willingness to look the other way for those that do, so in response to your ‘most cops don’t do this’ I’d probably agree(with some notable exceptions) but the next question would be ‘Setting aside the blatantly corrupt how many of the others are willing to stand up against the corrupt amongst them, up to and including testifying in court against a fellow cop if needed?’

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Filhaal UK says:

Filhaal UK - Top Pakistani Brands Clothing Store

At Filhaal, we aim to provide traditional attire and accessories of all types to Pakistani females including small girls, teenagers, adults and even old ladies in an easy and fast way. The best thing about us is that we are unbeatable when it comes to price and quality. We feel proud to announce that we provide you with the dresses of your choice on the most competitive prices all over the UK. Visit our website to learn more!

Anna Griffith (profile) says:

pay for paper

We want you to succeed and know that our services are available to support you personally, both today and in the future and also pay for paper at site for quality work. Whether it’s finding a new job or updating your résumé, our specialists can help develop a plan for getting where you want to be.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...