As The FCC Guts Net Neutrality, Comcast Again Falsely Claims You Have Nothing To Worry About

from the you're-not-helping dept

As the Trump administration guts oversight of some of the least liked and least competitive companies in America in one of the most brazen examples of crony capitalism in tech policy history, ISPs like Verizon and Comcast seem intent on insisting that none of this is actually happening. Verizon, you’ll recall, went so far as to publish a comical video in which the company used a fake journalist to try and construct an alternate timeline; one in which Verizon hasn’t been trying to undermine net neutrality and a healthy, competitive internet for the last fifteen years:

Comcast lobbyists and PR reps have also been having grand old time pretending that this blatant example of regulatory capture isn’t real, and that the complete dismantling of telecom sector oversight won’t have a decidedly-foul impact on already frustrated end users and the internet. The company has penned blog post after blog post stating that sure, the FCC may be gutting already flimsy oversight of one of the least competitive sectors in America, but users shouldn’t worry because the company’s tireless love of consumers will somehow carry the day:

With the FCC formally confirming its plan to kill existing net neutrality protections December 15, Comcast is back again insisting that you have absolutely nothing to worry about. In a new blog post, top Comcast lobbyistChief Diversity Officer” David Cohen once again claims that net neutrality harmed industry investment (independent analysis and executive statements have repeatedly shown this to be a lie), that Comcast will be able to self-regulate in the absence of real oversight, and that gutting the Title II foundation underpinning the agency’s rules just isn’t that big of a deal:

“As we have said previously, this proposal is not the end of net neutrality rules. With the FCC transparency requirement and the restoration of the FTC?s role in overseeing information services, the agencies together will have the authority to take action against any ISP which does not make its open Internet practices clearly known to consumers, and if needed enforce against any anti-competitive or deceptive practices. Comcast has already made net neutrality promises to our customers, and we will continue to follow those standards, regardless of the regulations in place.”

That’s the same, debunked bullshit Cohen has been peddling for years. While the FCC hasn’t released its full rule-killing order as of this writing (it foolishly thought it could hide it behind the Thanksgiving holiday), folks I’ve spoken to who’ve seen the order say the remaining transparency requirements on ISPs are so loophole-filled as to be utterly useless. As such, Comcast is stating it will adhere to them happily — since there won’t be much of anything to actually adhere to. Yes, that’s really impressive, David.

Meanwhile, reversing the classification of ISPs as common carriers under Title II of the Communications Act absolutely destroys the rules. You’ll recall that when the FCC tried to impose rather flimsy net neutrality rules in 2010, the courts shot down that effort — making it clear that for real net neutrality, you needed to return ISPs to their 2002-era classification as “telecommunications services.” So that’s what it did in 2015. Reverse that classification (again), and you’ve eroded the FCC’s authority to police bad behavior by a sector with a rich history of anti-competitive behavior and predatory pricing.

As we’ve noted previously, the broadband industry’s lobbying plan is to pay lobby the government to dismantle the FCC’s ability to protect consumers, then shovel all remaining oversight to an FTC that’s ill-equipped to handle it. The FTC lacks the ability to craft new rules as needed, and is so under-funded and over-extended that policing ISP behavior will fall through the cracks. That’s something former FCC boss Tom Wheeler explained earlier this year:

In the Trump administration, people are talking about stripping regulatory power from the FCC, and essentially taking the agency apart (including moving jurisdiction over internet access to the Federal Trade Commission [FTC]). ?Modernizing? the FCC is the lingo being used. What?s your thought about that?

It?s a fraud. The FTC doesn?t have rule-making authority. They?ve got enforcement authority and their enforcement authority is whether or not something is unfair or deceptive. And the FTC has to worry about everything from computer chips to bleach labeling. Of course, carriers want [telecom issues] to get lost in that morass. This was the strategy all along.

So it doesn?t surprise me that the Trump transition team???who were with the American Enterprise Institute and basically longtime supporters of this concept???comes in and says, ?Oh, we oughta do away with this.? It makes no sense to get rid of an expert agency and to throw these issues to an agency with no rule-making power that has to compete with everything else that?s going on in the economy, and can only deal with unfair or deceptive practices.

And that’s not the end of it. AT&T is currently embroiled in a case against the FTC that could erode the FTC’s authority even further. AT&T was sued by the FTC after it lied to consumers about throttling their connections in the hopes of driving them to more expensive plans. If AT&T wins that fight, any company with a common carrier component (which extends to everything from parts of Google’s business to oil pipelines) could dodge FTC accountability. The FTC warned last year that should this come to pass, companies could buy unrelated common carrier subsidiaries just to dodge regulatory oversight.

So again, the goal here isn’t just for “more reasonable regulatory oversight” or “slightly less regulatory oversight,” the goal here is almost zero oversight of one of the most predatory and anti-competitive legacy business sectors in America. Any claim to the contrary is utterly disingenuous. And if you believe that letting Comcast run amok with neither competitive pressure nor regulatory oversight ends well for anyone not financially benefiting from it, you’ve fallen down a very deep, dark rabbit hole and should take a long hard look at history.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: at&t, comcast, verizon

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “As The FCC Guts Net Neutrality, Comcast Again Falsely Claims You Have Nothing To Worry About”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
22 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

What we have to worry about:

In the 90’s the market was rewarding growth with little consideration for fundamentals. Telecoms were growing fast, and employees were very often working at 65% of typical market pay because they were being awarded stock options.

Then Bernie Ebbers came along, committed fraud, and all of those options were worthless, essentially stealing many millions of dollars worth of sweat equity from employees in just about every telecom on earth. Ebbers wasn’t the only one committing fraud at the time, he was just the one that got caught. The way you know that, is that all of the telecoms trying to kill NN, all submitted revised quarterly reports adjusting their numbers after Ebbers got locked up.

In 2008, when the banks were making bad mortgage loans with no concern for long term equity ratios, they eventually became unstable. To solve this problem almost all of them externalized all of their risk into one insurance company: AIG. They then instructed brokers who worked for them to dump as much of AIG as possible into consumers mutual-funds, and then shorted AIG. Crashing the market, and robbing almost every single middle class person in the country of thousands of dollars EACH.

This is reflected in what we are seeing here today in the following way:

The massive content diversification brought on by the Internet has substantially diluted the valuation of intellectual property portfolios of major media companies. As the telecoms got so large they could no longer find other telecoms to buy, they pivoted and bought out those media companies. It was a bad investment. And they are discovering that now. And having no other big companies they can buy to show growth, they are compelled to actually make their financial models work. Which is difficult since they’re executives are stock fraudsters and never actually wanted to RUN a company.

They know that killing NN is not going to save them. This is mostly about externalizing litigation risk. Killing NN is a prelude to a period of state mandated market stagnation. Since they can’t grow, they want to insure that no one else can either.

Of course it isn’t going to work. Ajit Pai is right about one thing: killing NN will create new markets. Black markets. Other than that what your looking at it, is a bunch of banker run telecoms, looking at how to best profit on the destruction of the industry they have been buying up over the past few decades. They are bankers. They invent book value, not intrinsic value.

My expectation is that all of them are instructing the brokers managing their company managed retirement funds to get heavy in telecom stocks. Like what happened with stock options before worldcom tanked, and the mortgage insurance securities before AIG tanked. The reason is to temporarily bolster stock valuation before they reveal the massive fraud that is about to happen. Essentially this is premeditated burglary of their own employees assets.

Really anyone with any sense is dumping telecom stocks like mad, vesting their stock options, and moving their company retirement portfolios into private ones that carry zero telecom stock.

Because we know what is coming. We’ve seen it before. All the indicators are there.

Scar (user link) says:

Re: Re:

The FCC is fining Comcast and other ISPs for implementing data caps. Removing Title II classification will stop those fines. It’s as simple as that…

(Notice the fines aren’t stopping data caps.)

By the way, Thomas Wheeler killed true net neutrality when his FCC redefined it to only apply within the last mile. That redefinition is what opened the door for Comcast to throttle Netflix at the ISP interconnection points.

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

“net neutrality harmed industry investment”
LMFTFY
“net neutrality harmed industry profits”

There is no reason to invest into newer better things because consumers have no where else to go. A couple players own the whole playing field. We know we are upsetting some consumers so we need net neutrality dead so we can squeeze consumers a little bit more & websites if they want to have their site seen in a reasonable amount of time.

The FCC is a joke.
The free market is a joke.
Our political leadership does not lead, they do what they are paid to do… keep a few corps making obscene profits & finding ways to help them fleece more suckers.

ThatDevilTech (profile) says:

Business as usual....

Nothing to see here. But WHAT will it take for this $hit to stop? Seriously? What will have to be done to right the ship? Although, I’m afraid nothing can right the ship. We need some Standard Oil busting type legislation. Bust up “Ma Bell” again and put measures in place that say you can NOT buy up another competitor that puts you up over X # of subscribers or ends up limiting market options for customers. That and you can’t own content AND delivery, even under a “parent” company with a different name. They can’t be linked, period. But, we all know that isn’t going to happen. So few are making so much while every peon below them suffers for it.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
10:50 NY AG Proves Broadband Industry Funded Phony Public Support For Attack On Net Neutrality (10)
06:24 The GOP Is Using Veterans As Props To Demonize Net Neutrality (22)
06:03 Telecom Using Veterans As Props To Demonize California's New Net Neutrality Law (12)
09:32 AT&T Whines That California Net Neutrality Rules Are Forcing It To Behave (11)
06:23 The New York Times (Falsely) Informs Its 7 Million Readers Net Neutrality Is 'Pointless' (51)
15:34 Facebook's Australian News Ban Did Demonstrate The Evil Of Zero Rating (18)
04:58 'Net Neutrality Hurt Internet Infrastructure Investment' Is The Bad Faith Lie That Simply Won't Die (11)
05:48 Dumb New GOP Talking Point: If You Restore Net Neutrality, You HAVE To Kill Section 230. Just Because! (66)
06:31 DOJ Drops Ridiculous Trump-Era Lawsuit Against California For Passing Net Neutrality Rules (13)
06:27 The Wall Street Journal Kisses Big Telecom's Ass In Whiny Screed About 'Big Tech' (13)
10:45 New Interim FCC Boss Jessica Rosenworcel Will Likely Restore Net Neutrality, Just Not Yet (5)
15:30 Small Idaho ISP 'Punishes' Twitter And Facebook's 'Censorship' ... By Blocking Access To Them Entirely (81)
05:29 A Few Reminders Before The Tired Net Neutrality Debate Is Rekindled (13)
06:22 U.S. Broadband Speeds Jumped 90% in 2020. But No, It Had Nothing To Do With Killing Net Neutrality. (12)
12:10 FCC Ignores The Courts, Finalizes Facts-Optional Repeal Of Net Neutrality (19)
10:46 It's Opposite Day At The FCC: Rejects All Its Own Legal Arguments Against Net Neutrality To Claim It Can Be The Internet Speech Police (13)
12:05 Blatant Hypocrite Ajit Pai Decides To Move Forward With Bogus, Unconstitutional Rulemaking On Section 230 (178)
06:49 FCC's Pai Puts Final Bullet In Net Neutrality Ahead Of Potential Demotion (25)
06:31 The EU Makes It Clear That 'Zero Rating' Violates Net Neutrality (6)
06:22 DOJ Continues Its Quest To Kill Net Neutrality (And Consumer Protection In General) In California (11)
11:08 Hypocritical AT&T Makes A Mockery Of Itself; Says 230 Should Be Reformed For Real Net Neutrality (28)
06:20 Trump, Big Telecom Continue Quest To Ban States From Protecting Broadband Consumers (19)
06:11 Senators Wyden And Markey Make It Clear AT&T Is Violating Net Neutrality (13)
06:31 Net Neutrali-what? AT&T's New Streaming Service Won't Count Against Its Broadband Caps. But Netflix Will. (25)
06:23 Telecom's Latest Dumb Claim: The Internet Only Works During A Pandemic Because We Killed Net Neutrality (49)
13:36 Ex-FCC Staffer Says FCC Authority Given Up In Net Neutrality Repeal Sure Would Prove Handy In A Crisis (13)
06:27 Clarence Thomas Regrets Brand X Decision That Paved Way For The Net Neutrality Wars (11)
06:17 The FCC To Field More Comments On Net Neutrality. Maybe They'll Stop Identity Theft And Fraud This Time? (79)
08:56 AT&T, Comcast Dramatically Cut Network Spending Despite Net Neutrality Repeal (16)
06:18 Ajit Pai Hits CES... To Make Up Some Shit About Net Neutrality (24)
More arrow