Comcast Whines That The Net Neutrality Debate It Keeps Rekindling Is A Lot Like 'Groundhog Day'

from the I-wish-I-could-stop-punching-myself dept

Large ISPs continue to try their best to pretend they adore net neutrality, and have nothing to do with their own perpetual efforts to crush FCC rules designed to keep the internet relatively open and competitive. Verizon recently released an utterly-comical video that blatantly lied about its role in killing the FCC’s consumer protections. And companies like Comcast have penned blog post after blog post falsely claiming that the entire world somehow has it all wrong, and companies with a generation of documented anti-competitive behavior are really just misunderstood sweethearts being falsely maligned by fringe radicals.

You just know Comcast is telling the truth, since it has proudly, repeatedly declared as much in all caps and pretty colors:


Bullshit doesn’t magically become reality with a change of font. Enter top Comcast lobbyist (the company apparently hates it when you call him that) David Cohen, who recently penned yet another blog post whining incessantly about how the fifteen-year net neutrality debate has become a lot like Groundhog Day, with the same players being forced to make the same arguments over and over again, ad infinitum:

“As the comment period comes to a close in the FCC?s latest review of Open Internet rules, consumers, ISPs, edge providers, and other stakeholders might feel like it is “Groundhog Day,” with the same characters weighing in over and over on the same legal and policy issues that the FCC has considered again and again for a decade.”

Ignored by Cohen is the fact we wouldn’t all be stuck on this idiotic hamster wheel if Comcast and other major ISPs would simply accept the will of the public and stop trying to undermine the health of the god-damned internet. While it’s at it, Comcast and its hired policy flacks could stop incessantly lying about how the relatively-basic rules were an apocalypse for industry investment. Comcast complaining about the repetitive, endless nature of the net neutrality debate is much like an arsonist whining about the high temperature in the house he or she is currently burning down.

Of course it doesn’t take Cohen long to get to Comcast’s real motivation for the post; the company’s desire for a new, flimsier net neutrality law Cohen knows he and other industry lobbyists will be writing:

“It?s time to end this constant regulatory fluctuation and focus on protecting consumers and strengthening the American marketplace. As we?ve said before, and as both sides of the aisle have agreed, it?s time for Congress to enact bipartisan legislation that permanently establishes sensible and enforceable open Internet protections. However, until a permanent framework is in place, the FCC can and should ensure a durable backstop and maintain core open Internet protections through one or more of the options outlined in our comments and the comments of others.”

We’ve noted repeatedly how large ISPs are pushing hard for a new net neutrality law they know either won’t be passed (the debate remains notably toxic in Congress thanks to guys like Cohen) or will be so filled with lobbyist-crafted loopholes as to be entirely useless. The belief that this bickering, cash-soaked Congress is capable of passing tough consumer protections on this front is utterly laughable. In Cohen’s world you’re all too stupid to realize this, so Cohen proceeds glibly to again declare Comcast’s unyielding dedication to “strong, legally enforceable rules”:

“To be clear ? as we have said time and time again ? Comcast is committed to an open Internet. We support permanent, strong, legally enforceable net neutrality rules. We will continue to not block, throttle, or discriminate against lawful content, no matter what the FCC does. We stand ready to work with policymakers, legislators, and stakeholders to end this regulatory back-and-forth and craft an effective and enduring solution for consumers and the U.S. economy. Ping pong should be for players, not policy.”

Clever! Except Comcast could stop this entire game of regulatory ping pong itself — by simply putting down the paddle. The company lit a fire under the entire debate in 2008 when it repeatedly lied about throttling BitTorrent. It subsequently has abused the lack of competition via unnecessary usage caps and zero rating schemes aimed at hamstringing competitors. And it joined AT&T, Verizon and Charter in suing to overturn the FCC’s 2015 rules, utterly terrified that somebody might actually stop the company from abusing its captive, historically disgusted customers.

So yeah, Comcast has a peculiar definition of “commitment” and “support” for tough net neutrality protections, since it has fought viciously against every implementation of this idea over the last fifteen years. And Cohen would like you to ignore that the simplest solution to Groundhog Day purgatory he’s responsible for is right in front of his nose: leave the existing, popular rules the hell alone.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: comcast

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Comcast Whines That The Net Neutrality Debate It Keeps Rekindling Is A Lot Like 'Groundhog Day'”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: They can stop "Groundhog Day" any time they want...

See here is where we have a problem. We don’t know with 100% certainty that they won’t actually fight to make better protections and make NN law.
We have only their past actions to look back at and those are telling us, loud and clear, that there is at least a 99.9% certainty that they will do everything in their power to screw us over.

My point is that nobody is going to even let them have a say in getting NN right, because there is no way we can ever trust them to actually do so.

If we believed in politicians and the ISP’s could be trusted, then we wouldn’t have this weak Title II deal but instead would let them make a more permanent and stronger solution.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

There’s no reason they can’t be heard–they might raise points the authors of a law hadn’t considered (other than “we gave you money”). But ultimately the law is up to the people to decide. And Net Neutrality isn’t enough; it’s time to break up infrastructure and retail service, like OpenReach in the UK.

TheResidentSkeptic (profile) says:

Re: Re:

This group will NEVER get it “Right”. There is way too much money to be made through the current (and desired) way of screwing the customers out of every cent possible. And as long as that continues, then the bought-and-well-paid-for legislators will do as they are told and pass the submitted laws as written by the companies.

Unfortunately, this group may run it so far into the ground that the US gets to last place in network performance and first place in network costs.

It will take several generations to fix it to where it will even approach “right”.

Anonymous Coward says:

I find some statements very ironic

*”Strengthening the American marketplace”*
If the American marketplace only consists of ISP’s, then yes, they will be strengthened…. however literally every other business out there is going to lose in some way, so the marketplace i weakened. This is not even considering the startups and the public.

*”We will continue to not block, throttle, or discriminate against lawful content, no matter what the FCC does.”*
Considering how much time and effort they put into complaining about NN, this statement is quite funny… I hardly believe they would be so vocal if NN wasn’t affecting their plans for the future. This is not even considering all the clear evidence of them blocking, throttling and discriminating against lawful content in the past.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: I find some statements very ironic

It is just a case of you having to proove that you are not doing something illegal in the future. Since you can’t do that the assumption of you doing something illegal will stand and they can block, throttle or discriminate to their hearts desire!

All sir Cohen is saying is true under that assumption!

Anonymous Coward says:


Yet VERY active today!

Advocate (changed to Keisar Betancourt and back!) 5 Sep 2013 from 18 Aug 2007

FOUR NOW! And I’M the crazy one, eh?

dickeyrat: 3 comments TOTAL in TEN years! Aug 17th, 2017, Jun 23rd, 2011, and Jul 10th, 2010!!! On May 1st, 2017 Dec 15th, 2016

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Is that one of those 'rhetorical questions'?

And I’M the crazy one, eh?

Let’s see…

One person(or even four), that doesn’t comment regularly and only pops in to leave a comment rarely…


Someone who obsessively checks accounts and comments(to the tune of hundreds if you are who I think you are) looking for evidence of some conspiracy or other form of shenanigans…

Think you answered your own question there.

sciamiko (profile) says:

Cohen's very clear about it

In Cohen’s own words:

It’s time to end this constant regulatory fluctuation and focus on protecting consumers and strengthening the American marketplace.

Let’s parse this according to normal rules, and expand those "and"s:

It’s time to end this constant regulatory fluctuation and [time to end this] focus on protecting consumers and [time to end this] strengthening the American marketplace.



Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
04:48 Dumb Telecom Take Of The Week: Because The Internet Didn't Explode, Killing Net Neutrality Must Not Have Mattered (23)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
04:55 Axios Parrots A Lot Of Dumb, Debunked Nonsense About Net Neutrality (54)
10:50 NY AG Proves Broadband Industry Funded Phony Public Support For Attack On Net Neutrality (10)
06:24 The GOP Is Using Veterans As Props To Demonize Net Neutrality (22)
06:03 Telecom Using Veterans As Props To Demonize California's New Net Neutrality Law (12)
09:32 AT&T Whines That California Net Neutrality Rules Are Forcing It To Behave (11)
06:23 The New York Times (Falsely) Informs Its 7 Million Readers Net Neutrality Is 'Pointless' (51)
15:34 Facebook's Australian News Ban Did Demonstrate The Evil Of Zero Rating (18)
04:58 'Net Neutrality Hurt Internet Infrastructure Investment' Is The Bad Faith Lie That Simply Won't Die (11)
05:48 Dumb New GOP Talking Point: If You Restore Net Neutrality, You HAVE To Kill Section 230. Just Because! (66)
06:31 DOJ Drops Ridiculous Trump-Era Lawsuit Against California For Passing Net Neutrality Rules (13)
06:27 The Wall Street Journal Kisses Big Telecom's Ass In Whiny Screed About 'Big Tech' (13)
10:45 New Interim FCC Boss Jessica Rosenworcel Will Likely Restore Net Neutrality, Just Not Yet (5)
15:30 Small Idaho ISP 'Punishes' Twitter And Facebook's 'Censorship' ... By Blocking Access To Them Entirely (81)
05:29 A Few Reminders Before The Tired Net Neutrality Debate Is Rekindled (13)
06:22 U.S. Broadband Speeds Jumped 90% in 2020. But No, It Had Nothing To Do With Killing Net Neutrality. (12)
12:10 FCC Ignores The Courts, Finalizes Facts-Optional Repeal Of Net Neutrality (19)
10:46 It's Opposite Day At The FCC: Rejects All Its Own Legal Arguments Against Net Neutrality To Claim It Can Be The Internet Speech Police (13)
12:05 Blatant Hypocrite Ajit Pai Decides To Move Forward With Bogus, Unconstitutional Rulemaking On Section 230 (178)
06:49 FCC's Pai Puts Final Bullet In Net Neutrality Ahead Of Potential Demotion (25)
06:31 The EU Makes It Clear That 'Zero Rating' Violates Net Neutrality (6)
06:22 DOJ Continues Its Quest To Kill Net Neutrality (And Consumer Protection In General) In California (11)
11:08 Hypocritical AT&T Makes A Mockery Of Itself; Says 230 Should Be Reformed For Real Net Neutrality (28)
06:20 Trump, Big Telecom Continue Quest To Ban States From Protecting Broadband Consumers (19)
06:11 Senators Wyden And Markey Make It Clear AT&T Is Violating Net Neutrality (13)
06:31 Net Neutrali-what? AT&T's New Streaming Service Won't Count Against Its Broadband Caps. But Netflix Will. (25)
06:23 Telecom's Latest Dumb Claim: The Internet Only Works During A Pandemic Because We Killed Net Neutrality (49)
13:36 Ex-FCC Staffer Says FCC Authority Given Up In Net Neutrality Repeal Sure Would Prove Handy In A Crisis (13)
06:27 Clarence Thomas Regrets Brand X Decision That Paved Way For The Net Neutrality Wars (11)
More arrow