And had to have the title of the first book dumbed down for US audiences...
Try "Ally" in Scotland, like Ally McCoist.
Not necessarily. It can refer to two outcomes, being a win for the person setting it up, either way it goes. Sort of like how Palpatine turned the Phantom Menace into a win for him either way.
Ever heard Donny attempt to speak a sentence?
I'm just going to flag every post where you (unnecessarily) write "woke ideology" because apart from being boringly over-repetitive, it's a stupid meaningless phrase that says Fox News does your thinking for you. You have shown glimmers of independent thought in these threads. but mostly you seem to want to parrot right-wing fake talking points too much for that, or to be taken seriously. And I know "Democrats" in the US are supposed to be righter-wing than any other centre/left in the west, but you are so far right you really may want to re-calibrate your Overton Window.
I read that as "lisps in 'Merkia"...
Data doesn't have any organic tissue, bar a little temporarily when he was flirting with the Borg in First Contact. So he is what is usually called an android, a human-appearing robot - or since he's intelligent, cybernetic "organism" - our language struggles a bit here, since "robot" can be a purely unintelligent automaton. I'm not sure how Bishop or Ash are any less "self-aware" or "sentient" than Data - they just have more restrictive programming given their company origins (and Data's rogue origins). I've not seen past Season 1 of Stargate so can't comment on anything there. But yes, that was the point I was making with respect to Arnie-style Terminators - the flesh was purely for "aesthetics" (deception) and not an integral part of the Terminator.
So burning a flag makes you worthy of death. Nice Nationalist position. Got it.
Strictly speaking, they are robots with a flesh coating, in the case of Arnie. Previous models used rubber, and later models were all robot (if magical). A true cyborg would be something like the Six Million Dollar Man, or the Borg, where you start with human(oid) flesh and replace or augment it with robotics/cybernetics. Remember, it stands for "cybernetic organism", not "Robot with flesh added".
So why are supposedly free-speech conservatives so keen to eject dissenters from the conservative spaces of Parler, etc, and why are they so desperate to ban and burn books if "all speech is sacred"? Oh, because they are lying raging hypocrites who only feel speech is "free" for them.
And reproducing. Gotta out-compete those knuckleheads!
Looks like quality trolling to me. He's too coherent to be genuine, and his positions reek of deliberate contrariness. Although I was surprised by Chozen's strong masochism last month so I could be wrong.
For a country that sees regular school and other mass shootings as a feature not a bug, probably never. More guns than people give the cops all the excuse they need to perpetually "fear for their lives".
Most spam moderation is deliberately kept opaque or it will just instantly be gamed by spammers and trolls. If people know any post featuring penguins will automatically get through, then all spam will mention penguins.
Creative Commons are obviously upset at even being associated with this dumpster fire, and they are perfectly entitled to object to being misused by Tillis. I would assume that they themselves know their own business and position best.
If Moldova is that boring for you cross over to Ukraine, I hear they are looking for your sort. Though frankly you sound more like one of Vlad's goons.
I look forward to all the inbred yahoos in Rust Belt and Bible Belt states getting "appropriate justice" for all the Driving Under the Influence that they do then.
Well, I guess if they can agree enough on something to actually pass it, they can veto-proof it.
This is exactly what I see when arguing with flat earthers and creationists, but I repeat myself...
Sounds like every Putinbot ever over Ukraine. Oh, wait...