In the "wild west", people weren't actually allowed to carry their guns openly into every bank, saloon, etc that they went to. In fact, a lot of shootouts were because cowboys (actual cow ranchers) who spent most of their time guarding their cattle waltzed in everywhere carrying guns pissing off every law enforcer around.
They should just drop all the laws and just make one law that forbids criminals and only criminals from doing anything illegal.
"Good journalism", "journalistic standards" are stupid arguments to make. There are different kind of standards, and not all are equally important to everyone. Acting like any "well respected publication" has to follow some arbitrary standard set by some arbitrary person (why journalistic standards? why doesn't he need to follow "good engineering standards" or "good law school standards" or "good law enforcement standards" or "good software interoperativity standards"?).
It's even more stupid to try to fit a publication into a niche because YOU want it there or YOU think it belongs there.
Surprise: there are different kind of blogs.
There are news blogs.
There are law blogs.
There are opinion blogs.
There are cooking blogs.
There are Shakira fan club blogs.
Not all blogs have the same standards. That doesn't make them more or less credible. And news blogs aren't inherently less credible than the paper versions because they have "blog" in it.
Certainly Mike wasn't implying ALL blogs are credible, and definitely he wasn't saying that ALL blogs are news blogs. So no, it doesn't "go contrary" to anything (point the part in Mike's previous article where it says that a blog is automatically a credible news source).
Journalism? Where? This is an opinion blog.
Obviously, the point is not that anticompetitive practices resulted in an injustice, nope, the "point" is that an outside authority was called to correct that injustice!
Bias! Someone was called therefore BIAS! The wrong was righted, therefore BIAS!
"Man murders woman"
Man, you left out the part where they call the police!. That's so biased! This is just an attempt to further the anti-murder agenda by leaving important parts like that the police was called!
The Pirates should just have set up a disposable cutlery stand, and then have every other stand that gave free cutlery booted out of the festival for "unfair competition".
I read that as "hate meteor", and imagined a giant flaming rock hitting Earth and causing the extinction of all lawyers.
Wait, why didn't I hear about this?
Oh right, because nobody watches that shitty show here.
I see... so this GEMA thing is some sort of... BERLIN PAYWALL?
Ironically, this AC seems in dire need of one (therapist, not rapists, Mr. Connery!)
You mean, those three totally different people should go to Vegas together...
Apparently he does. He pointed it out accurately.
Wow, what are the chances, an Anonymous Coward just happens to have the same avatar as Wally and Sad Mac. Must be random.
Oh-oh-oh-oh...
Everybody was Kung Fu'ing dancers, those pigs were fast as lightning
In fact it was a little bit fright'ning, but they were busted with expert timing
There was funky policemen from funky Police Town
They were chopping them up, they were chopping them down
It's an ancient fascist art, and everybody knew their part
From a feint into a slip, then I'm kicked in the hip
Everybody was Kung Fu'ing dancers, those pigs were fast as lightning
In fact it was a little bit fright'ning, but they were busted with expert timing
There was funky Nabby Jones and little Johnny Law
He said, here comes the big boss, let's get it on
We took the cam and made a stand, started swaying with the band
A sudden motion made me skip, now we're into a brandnew trip
Everybody was Kung Fu'ing dancers, those pigs were fast as lightning
In fact it was a little bit fright'ning, but they were busted with expert timing
Clearly you don't know how these avatars work.
Hi bob,
I guess what you're trying to say is that the IDL is the Ultimate Paywall.
We know, we know. Hey, we should call it Big IDL.
I think all those "call ISP to enable service X (for a price)" are just a form of double-dipping.
They already cap internet usage, they charge you for that internet usage. Someone used the water analogy already: charging you for water, but charging you extra if you use it to water your garden, and "enabling the service" of using it to flush the toilet.
"That's right. You should sue people into behaving the way you want them to behave. Good on ya."
FTFY
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
From:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/07/23/1112703/-De-mythologizing-the-Wild-West-gun-laws-were-actually-stricter-then-than-now
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-winkler/did-the-wild-west-have-mo_b_956035.html
"Yet this is all based on a widely shared misunderstanding of the Wild West. Frontier towns -- places like Tombstone, Deadwood, and Dodge -- actually had the most restrictive gun control laws in the nation.
In fact, many of those same cities have far less burdensome gun control today then they did back in the 1800s.
Guns were obviously widespread on the frontier. Out in the untamed wilderness, you needed a gun to be safe from bandits, natives, and wildlife. In the cities and towns of the West, however, the law often prohibited people from toting their guns around. A visitor arriving in Wichita, Kansas in 1873, the heart of the Wild West era, would have seen signs declaring, "Leave Your Revolvers At Police Headquarters, and Get a Check."
A check? That's right. When you entered a frontier town, you were legally required to leave your guns at the stables on the outskirts of town or drop them off with the sheriff, who would give you a token in exchange. You checked your guns then like you'd check your overcoat today at a Boston restaurant in winter. Visitors were welcome, but their guns were not."