Wise? Biting? Snarky? Sarcastic?
Or (more likely) just play stupid.
To Some Dude Who Still Doesn’t Understand He Signed A Binding Contract To Buy It
Some dude?
A billionaire who doesn't understand contracts.
Yeah, that's your story. And you're sticking to it. Brilliant.
So, let me get this straight: Trump is censoring people for telling the Truth about the phony Stalinesque show trial that Congress has no jurisdiction to hold and are only doing so in order to try to get the DOJ to level more witch hunting bogus "charges" on Trump?
Of course! Wouldn't you? What was your point, again?
I can help you with your titling of your articles. For example, this one.
Instead of Being a Supreme Court Clerk Now Hazardous to your Privacy, try this:
Supreme Court Clerks Who Violate the Privacy of the Court Deserve Long Prison Sentence and Disbarment.
There. So much more accurate.
Well it ain't about rappers and video games. But it ain't about guns either. So both represented here are far far off the mark.
We can only hope that teachers start to arm themselves, all gun-free zones are removed forever, and only then will the rare school shootings (that make so much news but are anomalous) end.
Shoot back. No new laws or rules. Shoot back. Done.
But the problem is that ANY Content Moderation of Political thought and speech is too much. So what if it's a little? By the way, are you including speech about climate, about vaccines, about several other issues that are political even though they are not involving official politics?
Your not that much goes to over 60 percent then. Get a clue. Any moderation is anti-American. It's censorship.
Wow, mansplain much? I skim-read more of your article than is good for anyone's mental health, but I get it: you think that Musk is not for Free Speech because he had someone sign an NDA? Oh and also, Musk talked to someone you feel in your feelings is a dictator?
So maybe probably in your feral feelings (not mind, there is no thought in your writing--only feelings) that Musk is not for Free Speech?
How about you wait and see, splainer? But if it will make you feel any better, the next time I need to find the nearest Starbucks to get my soy latte, I will ask you to explain where it is.
Why did you write thousands of words about something that hasn't happened yet? Mansplainer you sounds worried that Musk might allow people he "feels" should not be allowed to speak. In Free Speech, even dictators get to speak, so tamp down on the hysterical thousand-word articles for now, ok?
Or as Shakespeare said: Methinks the lady doth protest [too] much! Your essay is a gigantic tell. Does anyone need your splainin' on what Free Speech? Jordan Peterson can help. Free Speech is the right to offend you. Free Speech is any speech. Feel me?
So much in what you write: One, does every drug-addicted, overdosing, thug who resists arrest and then dies of the drugs he ingested need to be called a victim in your world? Two, how many of any race other than black walk around after curfew with a gun in their possession? Three, what part of obey the law and the cops didn't this phony victim understand? Was it the don't walk around a riot zone after curfew part? Or was it don't fire at the only other men around in a riot zone cleared by an official curfew part?
Do black people need to obey the law at all? Should all cops let black people do whatever they want at all times? Because slavery?
When you crow like a hysterical, brain dead cockatoo about overdosing thugs being "murdered" or menacing weirdos walking around riot zones with guns after curfew calling them "victims" do you realize you are saying....: to the cops, don't enforce the law when blacks are involved (black privilege); saying to blacks, you are all weak victims not responsible for your own actions, not for following any laws; not following the law will lead you to a 7 figure payday.
You realize the world you apparently prefer and promote? You are a promoter of black privilege, the only privilege in America today. Be careful of what you wish for.
No. Free Speech means the freedom to be an asshole. To you. Because who decides what thing that someone says makes them an asshole? You? The Ministry of Truth?
So, I'm happy to be an asshole. In your eyes. Free Speech means that assholes are just as free to speak as you (who call yourself a non-asshole, I assume. The trouble is that, so many of us think you are the asshole. But that doesn't stop you writing these stupid articles mis-stating Free Speech.
As we complaining? Nope. You are free to be an asshole. No one cares or should care. And if you don't understand this basic concept? You don't understand Free Speech.
You are still free to be an asshole though. Only an asshole would even think of trying to limit free speech. Turn the channel if you don't like the speech, bud. Take you nonsense censorship tendencies down the road. To the sinkhole. Then jump in. Poof. No more articles against Free Speech by an asshole! Yay!
But you know, there's always going to be another asshole to write more of this pap. Oy vey.
I laughed so hard when I read this author's headline. Twitter aggressively defending free speech? Oh my God, maybe you should try some stand up. Woke stand up perhaps?
So all of the people banned and censored on Twitter are starting to return. Now that that aggressive team you dreamed up in your mind is gone from Twitter.
Which is all you need to see to know that free speech was never a concern with the Twitter people. Perhaps free speech will prevail. No thanks to anyone who was or is working at Twitter.
Musk should let most if not all of them go off and do whatever censoring busybodies do for other work. Pick cotten? Turn tricks? Who knows that these useless people can do if they aren't doing the Stalinist thing with people's speech.
Don't let the door hit you in the ass as you leave, but do get out and let the people who love America and all it stands for (hint: the only thing that makes America what it is, is free speech. Without that you don't have America).
Your quote that you are using to prove "obvious" bigotry is several statements of fact that are just real science with no bigotry whatsoever. They only thing that is obvious is you think it's bigoted to say that men who think they are women are calling themselves transgender. And calling BLM a Trojan horse is truthful not bigoted.
Both concepts and many more are subject currently to radical differences of opinion, and that's what ALL of them are: matters of opinion. Saying a person whose opinion is different than yours is a bigot is infantile and fales, and makes you seem like a little spoiled kid who can't get his way other than calling names.
Cut it out. Let coalitions of groups of all opinions gather to remove all trusts from US tech and the public square.
I can help with that misunderstanding. Just say to Elon: Hey, all and any content moderation is bad. It violates Free Speech and is anti-American. Prevent any and all content moderation of any kind anywhere by any one.
There!! Hope that helped you. Elon clearly doesn't need that (what I call The Talk). He knows the content moderation got to go. No matter what you write or say, it's bad for human beings. Help Elon to remove all content moderation now!
So, Larry King had a show on RT. But he had nothing to do with Russia at all. Jesse Ventura has a show right now on RT, but there is no Russian connection whatsoever. Same with anyone else who had or has a show on RT. RT provides entertainment for English-speaking viewers. It's give us product and we put it on our channel. The producers are Americans or English people talking about things that concern or are of interest to Americans in their country or Englishmen in theirs. In other words, there is no connection to Russia in having a show on Russia Today. And it would be a deliberate misstatement to say that there was a connection.
The money and effort would be better expended to change black violent crime culture. Want less black men in prison? Try quelling the violent behavior coming from them.
Changing cop culture? Are you nutz? How do these delusional articles keep getting written here? What happened to the Teck in TeckDirt?
In other words, write about what you know, and you certainly know nothing about the off the wall black violent crime rates in the United States (and any other country on Earth with substantial black populations).
See how far writing about that gets you with your faithful readership........
Since all censorship is unfair, why are you writing articles making fun of those who protest unfair censorship? Why are you defending the right of someone to say fuck the police but celebrating the censorship of the right?
Why do you tie your shoes? The cognitive dissonance is strong in this one, Luke.
I've heard that every living soul who decided it was smart in any way to resist arrest says the words over and over again "I can't breathe".
Every living soul. Who resists. Arrest.
So, if you truly can't breathe? Stop resisting arrest. Take a breath break. Lie still. Instead say: "I can breathe, officer, because I stopped resisting arrest."
Then take notes on the different outcomes. One is death and the other is life. Dead men can blame someone for their own actions, but they are still dead. Try staying alive. That would be my choice.
Don't think being dead in order to make some point is the smartest or wisest thing one could do in life. You? Why do you run these incessant articles when it's so easy to solve this problem. Have a class in the last 10 grades of school on NOT RESISTING ARREST. Make getting at least one passing grade in one of the 10-years worth of classes mandatory for graduation. Send all who refuse to pass to juvenile detention and tutor them 8 hour per day until they pass the class. Do not let them out on the street until they do. It's for their own good, and of course the "community" vastly benefits from having one less lunatic screaming he can't breathe.
Since content moderation and fact checking are both solely used to censor free speech, ANY ban on those two evils is good. Much love to the "Alaskan" who is doing something about it. Where's a Teddy Roosevelt when you need one?
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by restless94110.
Funny?
Wise? Biting? Snarky? Sarcastic? Or (more likely) just play stupid. To Some Dude Who Still Doesn’t Understand He Signed A Binding Contract To Buy It Some dude? A billionaire who doesn't understand contracts. Yeah, that's your story. And you're sticking to it. Brilliant.
Truth
So, let me get this straight: Trump is censoring people for telling the Truth about the phony Stalinesque show trial that Congress has no jurisdiction to hold and are only doing so in order to try to get the DOJ to level more witch hunting bogus "charges" on Trump? Of course! Wouldn't you? What was your point, again?
Much needed Help
I can help you with your titling of your articles. For example, this one. Instead of Being a Supreme Court Clerk Now Hazardous to your Privacy, try this: Supreme Court Clerks Who Violate the Privacy of the Court Deserve Long Prison Sentence and Disbarment. There. So much more accurate.
What it's Not
Well it ain't about rappers and video games. But it ain't about guns either. So both represented here are far far off the mark. We can only hope that teachers start to arm themselves, all gun-free zones are removed forever, and only then will the rare school shootings (that make so much news but are anomalous) end. Shoot back. No new laws or rules. Shoot back. Done.
Moderation
But the problem is that ANY Content Moderation of Political thought and speech is too much. So what if it's a little? By the way, are you including speech about climate, about vaccines, about several other issues that are political even though they are not involving official politics? Your not that much goes to over 60 percent then. Get a clue. Any moderation is anti-American. It's censorship.
Splainin
Wow, mansplain much? I skim-read more of your article than is good for anyone's mental health, but I get it: you think that Musk is not for Free Speech because he had someone sign an NDA? Oh and also, Musk talked to someone you feel in your feelings is a dictator? So maybe probably in your feral feelings (not mind, there is no thought in your writing--only feelings) that Musk is not for Free Speech? How about you wait and see, splainer? But if it will make you feel any better, the next time I need to find the nearest Starbucks to get my soy latte, I will ask you to explain where it is. Why did you write thousands of words about something that hasn't happened yet? Mansplainer you sounds worried that Musk might allow people he "feels" should not be allowed to speak. In Free Speech, even dictators get to speak, so tamp down on the hysterical thousand-word articles for now, ok? Or as Shakespeare said: Methinks the lady doth protest [too] much! Your essay is a gigantic tell. Does anyone need your splainin' on what Free Speech? Jordan Peterson can help. Free Speech is the right to offend you. Free Speech is any speech. Feel me?
Questions
So much in what you write: One, does every drug-addicted, overdosing, thug who resists arrest and then dies of the drugs he ingested need to be called a victim in your world? Two, how many of any race other than black walk around after curfew with a gun in their possession? Three, what part of obey the law and the cops didn't this phony victim understand? Was it the don't walk around a riot zone after curfew part? Or was it don't fire at the only other men around in a riot zone cleared by an official curfew part? Do black people need to obey the law at all? Should all cops let black people do whatever they want at all times? Because slavery? When you crow like a hysterical, brain dead cockatoo about overdosing thugs being "murdered" or menacing weirdos walking around riot zones with guns after curfew calling them "victims" do you realize you are saying....: to the cops, don't enforce the law when blacks are involved (black privilege); saying to blacks, you are all weak victims not responsible for your own actions, not for following any laws; not following the law will lead you to a 7 figure payday. You realize the world you apparently prefer and promote? You are a promoter of black privilege, the only privilege in America today. Be careful of what you wish for.
Meaning
No. Free Speech means the freedom to be an asshole. To you. Because who decides what thing that someone says makes them an asshole? You? The Ministry of Truth? So, I'm happy to be an asshole. In your eyes. Free Speech means that assholes are just as free to speak as you (who call yourself a non-asshole, I assume. The trouble is that, so many of us think you are the asshole. But that doesn't stop you writing these stupid articles mis-stating Free Speech. As we complaining? Nope. You are free to be an asshole. No one cares or should care. And if you don't understand this basic concept? You don't understand Free Speech. You are still free to be an asshole though. Only an asshole would even think of trying to limit free speech. Turn the channel if you don't like the speech, bud. Take you nonsense censorship tendencies down the road. To the sinkhole. Then jump in. Poof. No more articles against Free Speech by an asshole! Yay! But you know, there's always going to be another asshole to write more of this pap. Oy vey.
Things that make you wanna go hmm
I laughed so hard when I read this author's headline. Twitter aggressively defending free speech? Oh my God, maybe you should try some stand up. Woke stand up perhaps? So all of the people banned and censored on Twitter are starting to return. Now that that aggressive team you dreamed up in your mind is gone from Twitter. Which is all you need to see to know that free speech was never a concern with the Twitter people. Perhaps free speech will prevail. No thanks to anyone who was or is working at Twitter. Musk should let most if not all of them go off and do whatever censoring busybodies do for other work. Pick cotten? Turn tricks? Who knows that these useless people can do if they aren't doing the Stalinist thing with people's speech. Don't let the door hit you in the ass as you leave, but do get out and let the people who love America and all it stands for (hint: the only thing that makes America what it is, is free speech. Without that you don't have America).
Proof
Your quote that you are using to prove "obvious" bigotry is several statements of fact that are just real science with no bigotry whatsoever. They only thing that is obvious is you think it's bigoted to say that men who think they are women are calling themselves transgender. And calling BLM a Trojan horse is truthful not bigoted. Both concepts and many more are subject currently to radical differences of opinion, and that's what ALL of them are: matters of opinion. Saying a person whose opinion is different than yours is a bigot is infantile and fales, and makes you seem like a little spoiled kid who can't get his way other than calling names. Cut it out. Let coalitions of groups of all opinions gather to remove all trusts from US tech and the public square.
Help is on the Way
I can help with that misunderstanding. Just say to Elon: Hey, all and any content moderation is bad. It violates Free Speech and is anti-American. Prevent any and all content moderation of any kind anywhere by any one. There!! Hope that helped you. Elon clearly doesn't need that (what I call The Talk). He knows the content moderation got to go. No matter what you write or say, it's bad for human beings. Help Elon to remove all content moderation now!
What about?
So, Larry King had a show on RT. But he had nothing to do with Russia at all. Jesse Ventura has a show right now on RT, but there is no Russian connection whatsoever. Same with anyone else who had or has a show on RT. RT provides entertainment for English-speaking viewers. It's give us product and we put it on our channel. The producers are Americans or English people talking about things that concern or are of interest to Americans in their country or Englishmen in theirs. In other words, there is no connection to Russia in having a show on Russia Today. And it would be a deliberate misstatement to say that there was a connection.
Changes
The money and effort would be better expended to change black violent crime culture. Want less black men in prison? Try quelling the violent behavior coming from them. Changing cop culture? Are you nutz? How do these delusional articles keep getting written here? What happened to the Teck in TeckDirt? In other words, write about what you know, and you certainly know nothing about the off the wall black violent crime rates in the United States (and any other country on Earth with substantial black populations). See how far writing about that gets you with your faithful readership........
All
Since all censorship is unfair, why are you writing articles making fun of those who protest unfair censorship? Why are you defending the right of someone to say fuck the police but celebrating the censorship of the right? Why do you tie your shoes? The cognitive dissonance is strong in this one, Luke.
Common
I've heard that every living soul who decided it was smart in any way to resist arrest says the words over and over again "I can't breathe". Every living soul. Who resists. Arrest. So, if you truly can't breathe? Stop resisting arrest. Take a breath break. Lie still. Instead say: "I can breathe, officer, because I stopped resisting arrest." Then take notes on the different outcomes. One is death and the other is life. Dead men can blame someone for their own actions, but they are still dead. Try staying alive. That would be my choice. Don't think being dead in order to make some point is the smartest or wisest thing one could do in life. You? Why do you run these incessant articles when it's so easy to solve this problem. Have a class in the last 10 grades of school on NOT RESISTING ARREST. Make getting at least one passing grade in one of the 10-years worth of classes mandatory for graduation. Send all who refuse to pass to juvenile detention and tutor them 8 hour per day until they pass the class. Do not let them out on the street until they do. It's for their own good, and of course the "community" vastly benefits from having one less lunatic screaming he can't breathe.
Good News
Since content moderation and fact checking are both solely used to censor free speech, ANY ban on those two evils is good. Much love to the "Alaskan" who is doing something about it. Where's a Teddy Roosevelt when you need one?