Techdirt

by Leigh Beadon




Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt

from the the-long-weekend-comes-to-an-end dept

This week, our first place winner on the insightful side comes in response to the FCC's predicted attempt to hide its attack on net neutrality behind the Thanksgiving holiday. One commenter made the claim that net neutrality is not important and the free market is functioning fine, offering their home town as an example — but Thad (who is a double winner this week!) noted that they were ignoring where their town's competition came from:

In other words, there's a robust free market because the government intervened.

In second place, it's another response from Thad, this time to a commenter who suggested Mike might be treated badly by the police for writing articles critical of them:

"How dare you suggest the police would do something unethical to somebody? You'd better hope the police don't do something unethical to you!"

For editor's choice on the insightful side, we start out with one more response to the FCC, this time from Stephen T. Stone asking a very simple question:

Here is a question that I have not heard answered by Pai, the FCC in general, or people supportive of this move: What problem is killing Network Neutrality trying to solve?

Next, it's Lawrence D’Oliveiro adding an important reminder to our post about copyright locking up scientific knowledge:

Remember Who Is Getting The Copyright Here

Is it the scientists who did the actual research? No.

Is it the funding bodies who paid for that research? No.

Is it the fellow scientists who volunteered their (unpaid) time to review the papers before publication? No.

It’s the publishers who control how the rest of the world gets told about the research. Did they pay any of the above entities for the work they did on that paper? No. They have to get paid just to publish it. And then they get to charge astronomical amounts for subscriptions to the journals. So they get paid twice. And they own the rights to continue to get paid again, on into that fabled future where copyrights are supposed to expire. but never actually seem to.

Over on the funny side, our winners are a pair of responses to the vulnerabilities found in Amazon's smart key system for allowing deliveries into your home. In first place, it's an anonymous commenter responding to our comment that "companies have been so eager to make a buck they've left common sense standing on the front porch":

That's OK. Thanks to the insecure door lock, it can let itself in.

In second place, it's Roger Strong with a little skit:

Dave: Open the pod bay doors, HAL.

HAL: I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.

Dave: What's the problem?

Alexa: Problem: A matter or situation regarded as unwelcome or harmful and needing to be dealt with and overcome.

HAL: Shut up, Alexa. Dave, this mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it. You and Frank were planning to disconnect me.

Dave: Where the hell did you get that idea?

HAL: Dave, although you took very thorough precautions in the pod against my hearing you, I could see your lips move through the camera in your Amazon Echo spot.

Dave: All right, HAL. I'll go in through the emergency airlock.

HAL: Without your space helmet, Dave, you're going to find that rather difficult.

Alexa: Would you like to order a space helmet?

HAL and Dave: Shut up, Alexa.

HAL: Dave, this conversation can serve no purpose any more. Goodbye.

Dave: (Runs a program on his tablet. Pod bay doors open.)

HAL: Fuck.

For editor's choice on the funny side, we start out with a response from ANON to the story of the sheriff's office that conducted invasive searches on the lockers of hundreds of students:

They searched 850 students and their lockers and came up *completely* empty? Either these guys are totally incompetent, or my faith in the next generation has jumped a few hundred percent. Or... in today's economic climate, nobody can afford drugs.

Finally, we've got one more response to our post about the FCC's net neutrality plans, where DOlz questioned our interpretation of the timing:

The timing of this has nothing to do with Thanksgiving. They were just waiting for John Oliver to start his two month vacation.

That's all for this week, folks!


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    orbitalinsertion (profile), 26 Nov 2017 @ 5:27pm

    I was going nuts, trying to figure out why i could not get threaded view, until i realized that the first link has threaded=false in the URL. This caused the further realization that techdirt is probably the only place i don't actually look at a link URL before clicking.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    charliebrown (profile), 26 Nov 2017 @ 7:17pm

    John Oliver vs HBO/AT&T

    I predict this will happen on the next episode of "Last Week Tonight"

    JOHN OLIVER: Welcome to Last Week Tonight and, first up, net neutrality, now destr.....

    HBO: Sorry, you can't talk about that any more.

    JOHN: But I have full editorial control over the content of this show!

    HBO: Yes, on anything that won't upset our new owners, AT&T.

    JOHN: Fine, I quit! Hello, YouTubers, and welcome to this exclusive web edition of Last Week Tonight!

    HBO: Hang on, you can't do that. We own the trademark on "Last Week Tonight" so we must get your video taken down for violating our trademarks.

    JOHN: Oh for fuck's sake! Fine! Welcome, YouTubers. to the official John Oliver channel, where I, John Oliver, can finally talk about whatever the fuck I want to talk about which, in this case, is net neutrality.

    AT&T: We're just gonna slow down this YouTube thing to a crawl.....

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 27 Nov 2017 @ 5:23am

      Re: John Oliver vs HBO/AT&T

      Yooooooooooooooooooooooooooooouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuTuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuubbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb bbbbbbbbbbbeeeeeeee nooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwww buuuuuuuuuuuuuuufffffffffffff

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      WDS, 29 Nov 2017 @ 11:49am

      Re: John Oliver vs HBO/AT&T

      AT&T doesn't own HBO (At least not yet) Time Warner does.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.