Super Meth Isn’t The Hero We Want, But It’s The Hero We Deserve
from the saving-us-from-the-hideous-burden-of...-teeth dept
Our war on drugs began with a simple man with a simple plan. That plan was this: give the government more powers at the expense of civil rights, all under the “leadership” of soon-to-be-deposed president Richard Nixon and known drug enthusiast, Elvis Presley.
While that summary is long on pithiness and short on detail, it’s not that far from the truth. The government wanted more ways to lock people up and take their stuff, and a “war” on drugs was the best way to sidestep constitutional protections that might otherwise prevent the government from locking up as many minorities as possible.
The “War on Drugs” has always been racist. Pretty much the only reason marijuana and opium were originally determined to be illegal was because Black and Chinese people became the convenient scapegoats, even when it was clear whites were far more likely to abuse these drugs, especially the opiates.
Racism and the Drug War have gone hand in hand since the early 1900s. It gained even more traction following the passage of laws protecting the civil rights of minorities, which saw Richard Nixon trying to undo the good Lyndon Johnson had done as perhaps the only redneck-with-a-conscience this nation has ever elected as president.
Since the usual racist shit doesn’t play quite as well as it used to 50 years ago (well, except for at the federal level), cops are now pretending drugs currently on the market are more powerful and dangerous than ever. This should be an indictment of the War on Drugs, but drug warriors are incapable of recognizing their contribution to the purity and easy availability of the same drugs they claim they’re fighting on behalf of America.
Cops like to pretend that the mere presence of fentanyl during busts and arrests is enough to kill officers, even though it’s impossible to overdose on any drug without actually ingesting it. Meth used to be the drug scourge of choice when the government felt like getting its racism on, but that fell out of favor when it was discovered to be the substance of choice of white people residing in the Midwest and southern Bible Belt.
Efforts were made to tie drug use to non-whites, which has resulted in the Trump administration declaring it’s legally in the right to drone strike any boats cruising through international waters south of the US border.
Panic artists continue to pretend every drug is the mass murderer, including former reality TV stars hoping to contain control of one this nation’s largest cities, as Miles Klee reports for Wired.
Spencer Pratt, once the villain of the 2000s MTV reality show The Hills and now an insurgent candidate in this year’s Los Angeles mayoral race, had a breakthrough moment in his first debate performance last Wednesday.
Turning to his signature issue of public safety, Pratt berated his opponents—Mayor Karen Bass and city councilmember Nithya Raman—for not doing enough about unhoused people dealing with drug addiction.
“The reality is, no matter how many beds you give these people, they are on super meth,” Pratt said, criticizing Raman’s plan to expand addiction treatment. “I will go below the Harbor Freeway tomorrow with her, and we can find some of the people she’s gonna offer treatment for. She’s gonna get stabbed in the neck. These people do not want a bed. They want fentanyl or super meth.”
SUPER METH. Dang.

Hopefully, it’s as cheap and easy to obtain as regular meth. I mean, it should be.
What is “super” meth, you might ask? Well, if it actually exists at all, it’s a direct result of this nation’s Drug War efforts to prevent regular non-drug users from obtaining stuff like Sudafed without having to get pharmacy staff involved.
Super Meth Is More Potent Than Traditional Meth: After U.S. restrictions on meth precursors in 2006, cartels developed a purer form—often at least 93% pure—that can produce a high lasting up to 24 hours, significantly increasing addiction and overdose risk.
That’s from “rehab” super group Aliya, which helpfully has a “brands” page on its website, along with this statement (no citations included) about the existence and origin of “super meth.”
It would seem the most rational response to US efforts to curtail local efforts to brew up acceptable meth would be to offer a cheap knockoff that undercut US restrictions by giving users what they wanted without generating more expenses on the supply side. I’ll tap the screen again to remind readers that this claim by a for-profit rehab center that — at the end of April 2026 — laid off 80 employees and closed at least two California rehab facilities. This may or may not be related to Aliya’s legal troubles with the federal government:
Not long after Johnson’s appointment, the company found itself the target of a U.S. Federal Trade Commission lawsuit in June 2025. The FTC accused that a former owner of an addiction treatment center that Aliya acquired, consultant groups and others of engaging in deceptive marketing practices.
A lot of this is neither here nor there. But it’s hardly encouraging that the first few so-called expert sources on “super meth” have been generated by entities in the for-profit rehab business. And so it is for opportunists/political hopefuls like Spencer Pratt. It doesn’t matter whether or not any of this adds up. It doesn’t matter than it doesn’t make sense for international drug cartels to make a stronger product to compete with tepid domestic US meth and then apparently sell it at the same price point.
These are words of opportunists who want regular people to believe a new drug scourge is worth throwing money at. Whether that money is harvested by a corporation that offers for-profit rehab services or a politician who thinks adding the word “super” to something makes them a better candidate doesn’t matter. Both entities are exploiting a knowledge gap to enrich themselves.
Pratt can be forgiven for just being a mayoral hopeful willing to traffic in lies to get elected. Aliya (and others like it) have no excuse. They’re leveraging ignorance to increase profits. They’re both entirely wrong about this supposed new drug plague.
“Thankfully, super meth isn’t real,” says Claire Zagorski, a paramedic, harm reductionist, and PhD candidate at the University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy. “If there really was a new type of meth, it’d have its own chemical name and we’d be hearing about it from much more reputable sources than Mr. Pratt.”
The reality of the situation is far more mundane than these people are willing to admit. Meth production relied on phenyl-2-propanone (P2P) for decades before it was placed on the DEA’s drug schedule in 1980. The next closest thing was pseudoephedrine (Sudafed, etc.), which meth producers used until the government cracked down on that by treating regular people like drug dealers by limiting their purchases and requiring they turn over their identifying info to obtain what used to be an over-the-counter medication.
Now that pseudoephedrine is about as difficult to obtain as P2P, the drug has undergone iterations depending on what’s more easily available. It didn’t suddenly make meth “super.” All it did was change (depending on what’s available) the end product. And yet, we’re getting another wave of panic led by aspiring politicians and rehab centers who want potential clients to feel that the meth they’re currently using is far more potent than the meth they’ve always been using.
Color me cynical. Everyone knows meth will fuck you up on multiple levels. Meth users aren’t going to be dissuaded just because someone is saying weird stuff about “super meth.” Everything about this is performative and does a disservice to everyone — including the people these entities (public and private) claim to be helping — by pretending whatever meth is currently available is an insta-killer that can only be stopped by (1) oppressive government action and/or (2) paying a whole lot of money to people who would have charged less for services if “super meth” wasn’t currently making national headlines.
In the end, it’s the same old bullshit. People in government want more power, so they’ll use the most convenient excuse to obtain it. People in the business of milking every last dollar out of the victims of the US’s failed Drug War will do the same thing. Meanwhile, no one gets better and the flow of drugs to users doesn’t decrease. But these middlemen will continue to see steady profits, all while they pretend to care about the people they’re using as pawns.
Filed Under: california, death cult, gop, hysteria, los angeles, spencer pratt, war on drugs


Comments on “Super Meth Isn’t The Hero We Want, But It’s The Hero We Deserve”
More a matter of willingness than capability. They know they’re lying. They know they’re part of the problem. They also know that by making a problem and lying about it, they can keep from getting kicked to the unemployment rolls where they belong.
And Latinos. That’s why they got us all calling cannabis by its Spanish name.
Re:
I have never heard that before and had no idea. Very interesting.
So a potential marginal improvement over what was called “ice” and widely available in the early 90s.
Fuck me, these drug warriors cannot stop huffing their own bullshit.
Anytime you crack down on a precursor, the chemists just move one step up the chain. 10-15 years back, there was a lot of blotter benzos making the rounds that proved this pretty conclusively.
Tell a tweaker someone’s selling super meth, they’ll want to know who and where, and they’ll steal your catalytic convertor to pay for it on the way.
Oddly the cartels may have done just what’s described. The normal process for manufacturing ephedrin, amphetamin and so on produces a racemic mixture (equal parts) of the dextro- and levo- chiral forms, but only the dextro- form is useful as a drug. Based on analysis of seized drug shipments, the cartels had developed a process that produced mostly the dextro- form, resulting in improved yield. Pharmaceutical chemists were rather annoyed because they’d been trying to do that for years with no success.
Re:
Which just means the dealers will cut it more, or there would be sudden mass overdoses. Maybe “super” just means “more profitable”, like in other capitalist enterprises.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
You guys literally think everything is racist. No , disparate impact is not racist. Yes, some races commit more crimes. No, you’re not going to keep us from cleaning up open air drug markets by screaming “racism”. We don’t care and it doesn’t matter. It has to be stopped.
Ah, there it is. Bass has failed on every level, total embarrassment who should not have run again, and the other main contender is a literal, actual commie. So all you shitlibs are panicking that Mr. “Hey, letting large chunks of the city burn down is bad, actually” might actually win.
So you’re coming up with absolute bullshit like “trying to get rid of homeless encampments full druggies pooping in the streets is super racist.”
Lol, what a buncha freakish losers you are.
Re:
Hey, you’re a Trumpist, so I have a question for you.
Donald Trump said that if I voted for Kamala Harris, the costs of gas, groceries, and utilities would rise. I voted for her, and all those costs did rise. So how isn’t that the fault of the guy who actually won the election?
Re: Re:
They didn’t actually, only gas rose, very recently, and only because of a problem Biden and Obama should have taken care of years ago, but didn’t.
Besides that none of what you said actually made any sense. Literally everything would have been worse under Kamala, primarily cuz she’s a drunk idiot.
Re: Re: Re:
Yes, they have. I can see the rise in prices myself. Gaslighting someone who doesn’t believe in what Dear Leader says all the time isn’t going to be as easy as saying “don’t believe what your eyes tell you”, son.
Didn’t Obama strike a deal with Iran, and—unlike Trump—didn’t both Biden and Obama refuse to strike Iran militarily and therefore not cause Iran to take control of the Strait of Hormuz?
Only to someone who thinks Donald Trump’s insanity makes sense. But let me break it down for you again.
Donald Trump said that if I voted for Kamala Harris, the costs of gas, groceries, and utilities would rise. I voted for Kamala Harris. She lost. The costs of gas, groceries, and utilities still rose despite her loss. So why isn’t that the fault of the man who won that election, then started trade wars with half the world, then started a war of choice with Iran that caused the Strait of Hormuz to effectively close in a way that it wouldn’t have if that war hadn’t started? And remember, Trump and his regime has had control of the federal government for sixteen months, so trying to go “but Biden”, “but Obama”, or “but [liberal woman]” isn’t going to work as a credible argument here.
Re: Re: vote for Kamala Harris
It’s your fault.
You were told voting for Harris would increase those prices, you voted for her and they went up. QED
Just because she lost doesn’t mean she’s not to blame!!
/s if needed
Re:
You should put down your super-meth pipe once in a while.
Re:
Oh look. A moron.
Look there, up in the sky! Is it a bird? A plane? No! Its Super Meth!
It can make you feel faster than a locomotive, and able to leap tall buildings in a single bound!
Re:
Give it 5 to 10 years, and the back-story will have gotten so complicated that only the most loyal fans will be able to explain Super Meth’s role in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
Re: Re:
Hey, even I know Super Meth came into existence as a side effect of Thanos performing The Snap in Avengers: Infinity War. How is that not common knowledge? People are so uncultured these days, I swear to Thor…
Is this the same guy
Is this the same guy who went to the Pacific Palisades to claim that the “gubermint” wasn’t doing anything to help the residents after the fire and got clowned on by residents posting rebuttals and receipts showing his claims were wrong or overblown?
If “Super Meth” isn’t a thing, what is called the drug Trump is taking, because he’s been high for more than an year now.
Re:
Trumps drug of choice is “power”
Re: Re:
Re: Adderall
Due to his advanced dementia, his drug of choice is adderall. And boy can you tell when he takes it, he almost sounds lucid. His second drug of choice is viagra. Aside from those, he’ll say or do whatever he’s told by whomever is puppeteering him at that time (most recently Miller).
I hate to break this to them, but most illicit meth was made using p2p before the mid-eighties.
My prediction that “Legalizing marijuana will lead to more people using marijuana” was fully correct as was my prediction that “Crowds of drunk people are extremely annoying. Crowds of high people will be equally annoying.” And my prediction that “The people who do ads about drunk driving will have to start doing ads about driving while high.”
Honestly, everything that happened with the legalization of marijuana was highly predictable, but people try to tell me I was wrong every time I made these predictions.
Still annoyed with that. I successfully predict the future quite often, and people don’t like it because I’m not telling them what they want to hear.
And…?