DOJ’s Losing Streak Continues Because Federal Officers Just Can’t Stop Lying
from the snot-nosed-punks dept
I’ll take my joy where I can. And this iteration of the Trump DOJ continues to provide bright bursts of schadenfreude-tinted sunshine.
Any competent DOJ can close cases. Any barely competent prosecutor can push a case past a grand jury. Any sufficiently slippery solicitor (mixing in some British for the sheer alliteration of it all) can convince a judge that the lies told by officers were merely good faith blunders not worthy of anything more than a judicial “no one’s perfect” shrug.
This DOJ fails at every single level. It can’t secure indictments. It can’t convince grand juries that vindictive prosecutions are legitimate prosecutions. And its prosecutors are constantly undermined by (1) prejudicial, fact-free social media posts and public statements by administration officials, (2) the illegal actions of federal officers, (3) their own ineptitude, (4) the lies told by federal officers, and (5) any or all of the above.
High-level prosecutors keep getting sidelined because they’ve been illegally appointed. Other prosecutors have refused to engage with the administration’s vindictive plans, resulting in most of them retiring or being fired. Consequently, there’s a shortage of qualified, experienced prosecutors. The void is being constantly refilled by some of the emptiest people ever to leverage MAGA loyalty into federal employment.
It took less than a year for the Trump DOJ to almost completely destroy the “presumption of regularity” — the legal concept that the government is acting in good faith, even if its legal arguments aren’t the best. It took less than a year for the Trump DOJ to turn grand juries into coin flips.
I mean, this is how it went for years prior to Trump 2.0:
In 2016, the most recent year for which the Justice Department has published data, federal prosecutors concluded more than 155,000 prosecutions and declined over 25,000 cases presented by investigators. In only six instances was a grand jury’s refusal to indict listed as the reason for dropping the matter.
Six times in a one year over 25,000 declined cases. Trump’s loyalist US Attorney pick, Lindsey Halligan, put her insurance law background to work and… managed to do this twice during a single (attempted) prosecution.
When prosecutors aren’t shooting themselves in the foot (or being shot in the foot by their employer), they’re losing cases because the people they expect to back up their cases — the federal officers claiming to have been assaulted, etc. — can’t even back up their own narratives when testifying in court.
This was already a problem by late summer of last year. The Guardian reports that things appear to have gotten even worse.
The most recent significant fumble came from Minneapolis prosecutors, who last week dismissed felony assault charges they had filed against two Venezuelan men accused of “violently beating” an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer “with weapons” on 14 January.
According to the early government narrative, federal officers were assaulted by “violent criminal illegal aliens” during a stop of an undocumented Venezuelan. The officers claimed two other men came out of a nearby apartment and attacked an officer with a “snow shovel and broom handle.” That case is now dead because… well, the testifying officers lied.
[O]n 12 February, prosecutors filed a motion to dismiss both men’s cases, saying: “Newly discovered evidence in this matter is materially inconsistent with the allegations in the complaint affidavit.”
[…]
ICE director Todd Lyons said ICE and the DoJ had opened an investigation into the case after videos revealed “sworn testimony provided by two separate officers appears to have made untruthful statements”, marking a rare acknowledgement of possible wrongdoing by DHS officials.
It’s extremely rare for the government to dismiss its own prosecution with prejudice, meaning it can’t ever seek to refile these criminal charges against the alleged perpetrators. And I don’t know if Todd Lyons just misspoke or if he actually tried to use the exonerative tense while simultaneously stating these officers lied. “Sworn testimony… appears to have made untruthful statements” sounds like the courtroom version of a government official discussing a shooting by an officer with the phrase “the officer’s weapon discharged,” suggesting no one actually pulled the trigger.
Whatever the case, there’s definitely a trend here.
In Chicago, of 92 people arrested for assaulting or impeding officers last fall, 74 cases have resulted in no charges; in 13 cases, charges were filed and dismissed; and five charged cases were still pending, a recent investigation by Fox 9, a Minneapolis-based station, showed. As of the end of January, there have been no convictions.
In LA, the federal public defenders have won all six cases filed against ICE protesters that have gone to trial since June, the LA Times recently reported. Fewer than 1% of federal criminal defendants were acquitted across the US in fiscal year 2024, with US prosecutors traditionally having a roughly 90% conviction rate, the paper noted.
Juries have also issued not guilty verdicts for people accused of assaulting ICE or similar charges in Louisville, Kentucky, Seattle and Washington DC.
I assume the DOJ bloodshed will continue. Trump hates losing and he hates people who lose in his name even more. But replacing talent with loyalists isn’t going to end this losing streak. If nothing else, this iteration of the DOJ has the chance to go down in history as one of the worst ever assembled, even if we consider nothing else but its win-loss record.
It doesn’t mean the DOJ is harmless, however. It’s still more than willing to engage in vindictive prosecutions, ignore court orders, and take bite after bite of the apple (so to speak) until it finally manages to at least pierce the skin. And that means a lot of people are going to have their lives upended, even if only temporarily, just to please a tyrant who thinks anything or anyone presenting even the most minimal of opposition should be subjected to punishment.
Filed Under: cbp, dhs, doj, failure, grand juries, ice, mass deportation, trump administration


Comments on “DOJ’s Losing Streak Continues Because Federal Officers Just Can’t Stop Lying”
It’s better to have incompetent people clearly misusing their positions than have competent people getting away with miscarriages of justice. I am very skeptical of the government in criminal cases often anyway.
Are ya winnin’, MAGA?
Re:
Haven’t you noticed, they sound exactly the same when they get what they want as when they don’t get what they want – loud, stupid and obnoxious complaints about how woke leftists are to blame.
Re:
Yes, actually.
Re:
(MAGA:) AYE AYE CAPTAIN!
Re: Re:
Warcraft II uses to be a lot more fun.
Re: Re: Re:
“Join the army they said,
See the world they said,
I’d rather be sailing.”
And my favorite from the peasant:
I’m not listening, I’m not listening.
Re: Re:
I CAN’T HEARRR YOU!
Tim, were you referring to the DOJ continuing to lose cases, or the DOJ continuing to assault people doing things they don’t like (like choosing to be the wrong ethnicity in the wrong place at the wrong time)?
Re:
Por que no los dos?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Holy cherry-picking batman!
You guys always mention when the activist judge makes some insane ruling in your favor, never when they’re inevitably overturned. (some of these rulings you champion, the judges do not have the jurisdiction to make, absolutely clown show stuff)
Yeah, it appears two officers lied. Do I need to point out all the times that happened under the Biden administration? Heck Mayorkas lied almost every time he was in front of a camera.
But keep on whining into the dark!
They all gotta go home.
Re:
Good fucking lord.
No, you dumb, fucking pedophile defender.
If you could read as well as the immigrants you hate you would understand this, and wouldn’t be a poor use fuck who loses jobs to actually smart and capable people.
It’s the fact the they have lost, dozens, and hundreds, of repeated cases, at rights FAR, FAR higher than any presidency before them.
A judge probably has more trust in a gang members word,than they do in anyone in the doj or dhs.
Re:
Agents of the government shouldn’t be lying to the courts no matter what political party in charge. So what makes lying to the courts punishable when it happened under Biden but dismissable (or even morally righteous) when it happens under Trump?
Re: Re:
Didn’t you know? These days, the morality of an action is determined not by the action itself, but by the person performing it. It’s a good thing when it’s done by a good person (Donald Trump, Republicans, proper god-fearing Christians) and the same thing is a bad thing when it’s done by a bad person (Obama, libruls, Catholic heathens).
Get with the times, old man. /s
Re:
But keep on whining into the dark!
Why don’t you fuckers try it for a change? You bitched during Biden and here you are continuing to bitch during Trunt. If you’re never going to be happy, fuck the hell off so the rest of us don’t have to listen to your inane nonsense.
You’re the whiniest fucking winners I’ve ever seen. Grow the fuck up, morons.
clearly, the problem...
Clearly, the problem is the law is obviously wrong. When Trump and his DOJ cannot charge, try, and convict the people that Trump wants, or the people who object to what Trump wants, the law is the problem. Trump and his illegal, illegitimate actions; and the corrupt, incompetent, and unfit prosecutors and arrests being made could not possibly be the problem. Right?
The fact that these charges and arrests are literally “trumped up”, still doesn’t make up for the mess it makes of ordinary, decent, law-abiding and Constitution respecting people’s lives.
Re:
Nono, it’s the activist judges.
As Big Daddy might say, “There ain’t nothin’ more powerful than the odor of mendacity. You can smell it. It smells like the Trump DOJ.”
And I assume those officers have been fired right…. right????
(insert Anakin & Padame in a field meme here)
They need to be charged with perjury. Lawyers need to be sanctioned if not outright disbarred.
Its time the courts took the gloves off. After all, a court that throws the book at the worst of the worst is exactly what MAGA wants.
Re:
Howzabout “imprisoned”?
Re:
By who?
Re: Re:
By the prosecutorial branch of the govern….. oh!
Re: Re:
Interestingly the judicial branch has a number of ways to really make Trumps life miserable. It ranges from hearings in court, goes over civil punishments and to bar referrals.
When enough Make Attorneys Get Attorneys have lost their licenses, Trumps DOJ will struggle to function to an extend where he is forced to make the ultimate stand of completely ignoring the courts and burning the constitution.