Trump Opens DOJ Investigation Because Crime Rates In Washington D.C. Aren’t High Enough
from the this-is-your-federal-government-on-stupid-[sizzling-noises] dept
Here’s how things are going in Washington D.C. ever since some former DOGE employee known as “Big Balls” got his ass handed to him by a couple of teenagers during an alleged failed carjacking:
Now that one of DOGE’s dipshits was almost carjacked, Trump thinks it’s time to federalize the policing of Washington, DC. Utilizing the same racist paranoia that fueled his baseless full-page accusations against the Central Park Five back in the 1990s, Trump is pretending DC is such a criminal hellhole, it can only be handled by the imposition of federal force — something that more than likely will involve the National Guard and other war fighters.
Forget “more than likely.” It’s an actual thing in D.C.:
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has authorized National Guard troops deployed to Washington to bring their weapons with them on their mission. But it was not clear whether the troops would be armed as they walked through the city, or simply store their weapons in their vehicles, which would not be a significant change over their current status.
Trump’s claims about D.C. being a crime-ridden hellhole are undercut by stats released by none other than his own FBI. According to those numbers, the violent crime rate in D.C. has continued to plummet to historical lows, following an abnormal spike provoked by an abnormal situation: a worldwide pandemic Trump handled no better than he’s handling this current crime “crisis.”
Here’s what’s happening now, since the crime rates won’t align themselves with Trump’s bullshit narrative. Trump is sending in the DOJ to “investigate” the DC police for allegedly fudging the crime numbers.
The Justice Department is investigating whether Washington, D.C., police manipulated data to make crime rates appear lower, escalating tensions between the Trump administration and local officials who have repeatedly cited drops in violent crime to protest the need for a federal takeover of law enforcement.
[…]
“D.C. gave Fake Crime numbers in order to create a false illusion of safety,” President Donald Trump wrote on social media Monday night, confirming the existence of the probe.
It’s unclear what exactly Trump is referring to in his social media posts because… well… it’s usually up to everyone else to draw a line from his randomly capitalized Truth Social posts to anything that might be conceivably actionable and/or somewhat supported by actual facts.
In this case, it appears to be an ongoing investigation into claims that some crime reports may have been altered to falsely present a lower crime rate in the D.C. area. This was reported last month by NBC, which covered an investigation already in progress that was being performed by entities without an ulterior martial law motive.
A D.C. police commander is under investigation for allegedly making changes to crime statistics in his district.
The Metropolitan Police Department confirmed Michael Pulliam was placed on paid administrative leave in mid-May. That happened just a week after Pulliam filed an equal employment opportunity complaint against an assistant chief and the police union accused the department of deliberately falsifying crime data, according to three law enforcement sources familiar with the complaint.
Not great, if true. But this isn’t an anomaly. Crime rates are manipulated all the time. The question to ask is why they were manipulated. If it’s time for budgets to be passed, cop shops may juice the numbers to make it appear as those they need more funding. If top officials are up for re-appointment or facing an election run, they may do what’s alleged here: turn alleged felonies into misdemeanors and misdemeanors into nothing.
The police union claims it’s the latter:
“When our members respond to the scene of a felony offense where there is a victim reporting that a felony occurred, inevitably there will be a lieutenant or a captain that will show up on that scene and direct those members to take a report for a lesser offense,” Fraternal Order of Police Chairman Gregg Pemberton said. “So, instead of taking a report for a shooting or a stabbing or a carjacking, they will order that officer to take a report for a theft or an injured person to the hospital or a felony assault, which is not the same type of classification.”
The union feels this is a slam-dunk statement. But who’s being dunked on? To follow this argument to its logical conclusion, the union is arguing that D.C. PD officers are terrible at their jobs and the only reason the public doesn’t know this is because someone been altering crime stats to make officers look better at deterring crime than they actually are.
To sum up, this is everything that’s given the president the excuse he needs to wield the DOJ vindictively against another political opponent — one that’s embodied by Trump’s villain du jour: the entire District of Columbia.
- Cop official: fudge the numbers to make the PD look better
- Union leader: no, my guys are terrible at preventing/investigating crime. it’s as bad as it ever was.
- Trump: who cares, this is just performance
- DOJ: we’re just hand puppets
Even if the numbers were manipulated, a competent president and a DOJ headed by people who swore to serve the country, rather than any particular president, would have waited to see if these allegations of crime rate manipulation were substantiated. What any normal president wouldn’t do is take control of local policing and add armed soldiers to the mix. So whatever’s being claimed here doesn’t really matter. Trump did it because he wanted to, not because he actually had a justifiable reason to do it.
There’s no reason to believe DC crime rates have been substantially fudged. It’s not an outlier in the midst of nationwide violent crime spikes. It’s just more of the same thing that’s been observed in pretty much every city in the nation, including those Trump continues to claim are so ridden with violent crime he has no choice but to send in the troops.
Crime statistics reported by the D.C. police were generally in line with trends seen nationally. The District’s violent crimes — which include homicide, aggravated assault, rape and robbery — fell 10 percent from 2023 to 2024. In that same time, FBI data showed, those crimes across the country decreased 13 percent.
This year, cities including Philadelphia, Chicago and Los Angeles have seen steep declines in reported incidents. Homicides in Philadelphia, for example, are down 16 percent, while homicides in Atlanta are down 25 percent, police department data shows.
But this investigation will become part of the pattern and practice of this administration filled with aspiring fascists. Trump has already declared that other major cities (but only those headed by “liberal” mayors) are next in line for this treatment. The reality is that of the 23 cities with the biggest increase in homicides, a third of those are located in “red” states.
But the administration hasn’t stated any desire to flood the streets of those cities with federal officers and National Guard troops, which means all of this is nothing more than politically motivated vindictiveness. And since that’s all it is, it really doesn’t matter whether or not some crime stats were altered to show lower crime rates. Trump would have done this anyway. All he wants now is something that might plausibly justify actions he’s already put in motion.
Filed Under: crime, crime stats, doj, donald trump, fbi, washington dc


Comments on “Trump Opens DOJ Investigation Because Crime Rates In Washington D.C. Aren’t High Enough”
About 200 National Guard storing guns in hundreds of cars. What could go wrong?
Well see if you simply believe that cops in only blue areas are all corrupt liars it makes perfect sense.
Re:
Except corrupt cops exist everywhere, it just so happens that corrupt cops in blue areas have extra incentive to lie. Didn’t think of that one, did you, thug shill?
These would be the crime stats that no one has to report anyway.
You find crime where you find people. The amount of crime per thousand people will be pretty much the same whether you’re in the city, the ‘burbs, or out in the sticks. Actually, though, now that Trump’s crew is in DC, you can find a lot more crime there than before (but it’s all of the govt. malfeasance type).
FBI should have no problem jumping in as well. They’re apparently done redacting Donald Trump’s name from the list of Epstein-related child rapists.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Incompetent City Leaders Get Dunked On
The rank and file PD officers are mostly good at their jobs, but cannot effectively deter crime because of the politics. The police can arrest a gang banger, but if city policy orders him to be released the following day, on no bond, and a slap on the wrist, then this individual continues his crime spree. The public DOES know this, and experiences high crime rates, and begs city leaders to do something about it. But then they get fed a line of bull honkey that crime is decreasing.
So then the police get federalized, the almost daily murders magically disappear, and the locals are now praising the takeover.
Re:
This thought brought to you by Big Brother™!
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
Big Brother was a mass surveillance program from the novel 1984. Locking up thugs until their trial date hardly constitutes a spy program.
Re: Re: Re:
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
Re: Re: Re:
Who operated Big Brother? Spoiler, dumbass: The government did it. And Big Brother was merely one reason the government in that story was as authoritarian as it gets—which is why people keep saying “Nineteen Eighty-Four was not an instruction manual”.
The President of the United States sending armed soldiers into an American city under the pretext of “upholding law and order” should lead you to ask what he means by “order”, especially when the city is neither a war zone nor an area affected by a natural disaster. Does he want people to feel at ease, or does he want people to feel afraid to step outside their homes? Does he intend to relinquish control of D.C. soon, or does he intend to keep soldiers in the streets until the midterm elections? The fact that you never ask these questions to yourself—that you are content to let yourself be ruled by a weak crybully who made you believe he was God’s second son—makes you complicit with the real Big Brother.
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. And you followed it without thinking twice. You will always follow it, even if it requires your death. That, in a nutshell, is your life: You would rather die in and for a fantasy than live in reality.
Re: Re: Re:
We all saw your president try to intimidate a journalist into pretending an obvious Photoshop was a real tattoo.
Re:
These are just right-wing talking points. You’re not actually addressing anything that was said here. At all.
Re:
Numbers don’t real. Only Koby’s feels real.
When they said “fuck your feelings,” they meant “my feelings should overrule observable and measurable reality.”
Re:
Really makes you wonder how these cities became economic powerhouses without a bunch of clueless cousin-fuckers goose-stepping through the streets.
Re:
Even if sending troops to a major city to reduce the crime on long term (more than few weeks) is working (if so), this will never scale up. How much National Guards and Marines need to be send over the next years to every street in every 50 largest cities? And how crime is supposed to stay low after that? And how people are supposed to justify National Guards in the streets once the crime is lower?
Look more like a very expensive experience without any way to estimate how low crime is supposed to be.
Federal police is already in the street when there is just a investigation started to know in the numbers are fakes.
Re:
If the crime was so bad, why are our National Guard troops raking and picking up trash? Damn, those criminal litterers!
The title of this article is 100% on targe.
Love the way this title cuts through the nonsense – no pretending it’s the DOJ or the AG pulling strings. This is all Trump.
The rest of that administration are just sycophants fetching sticks for their master.
Senile old orange man hallucinates shit, again. What a surprise.
cmon Trump: use the Reichstag gambit
Trump lacks imagination. He should organize some thugs to commit crimes in DC and drive the crime rate up, THEN send in the troops to “rescue” everyone. Geeze. Does he need me to go to work for him and teach him the basics of Fascism 101? Trump can’t even do fascism competently.
Refuted by himself
As was noted in an vid I watched semi-recently Trump’s claims that DC is a crime-ridden hellhole is extra priceless because it directly contradicts none other than Trump himself from not that long ago when he was claiming DC was perfectly safe for people to visit in order to watch the military parade in his honor.
Re:
Trump has the best memory, but he just didn’t remember that one.
Not to go all Q here, but it wouldn’t surprise me if that whole “Big Balls” carjacking thing was a setup to give Trump an excuse to send in the troops. All that blood, but he refused treatment at the scene? And what are the odds that this guy, who’s been plastered all over the news for the last few months due to being part of DOGE so people know who he is, would be carjacked? If we lived in any other timeline the thought wouldn’t even cross my mind.