Trump Pretends Crime Rates Are Up To Justify Sending Troops To DC Streets. Too Many Americans Believe Him.
from the selling-fear-because-someone's-always-buying dept
This was the way it was always going to end: with Trump turning the Oval Office into the palace of a king. One need look no further than Trump’s attempt to invoke the vengeful spirits of the Overlook Hotel by adding a $200 million ballroom to the White House, as though this were the early 1900s and we, the people, would be easily impressed by gilded, ostentatious displays of excess.

Now that one of DOGE’s dipshits was almost carjacked, Trump thinks it’s time to federalize the policing of Washington, DC. Utilizing the same racist paranoia that fueled his baseless full-page accusations against the Central Park Five back in the 1990s, Trump is pretending DC is such a criminal hellhole, it can only be handled by the imposition of federal force — something that more than likely will involve the National Guard and other war fighters.
Of course, Trump has never let reality intrude on his fantasies. While crime rates continue to drop around the nation, Trump continues to claim the crime problem has never been worse, especially in cities and states overseen by “liberal” politicians. This narrative always existed, even without Trump’s involvement. But anomalous crime rate spikes driven by a once-in-a-lifetime (we hope!) worldwide pandemic gave Trump and his fellow idiots all the ammunition they needed to shove their moral panic narrative into the general discourse. And these opportunists heaped the blame on migrants and “democrat” politicians equally, as though any politician was proactively trying to generate a violent crime surge in their own jurisdiction.
Most media agencies aren’t helping, at least not those on the local levels who know “if it bleeds, it leads” is instrumental to their ongoing existence. But the facts have never matched the outlandish claims, which have far outpaced the crime rate since the early 1990s. America and Americans have never been safer, even if no cop or cop-lover will tell you otherwise.
Because some white dude (one who apparently welcomed the nickname “Big Balls”) got punched in the nose by a couple of teens while (almost) being carjacked in DC, Trump is pretty much declaring war on a city that hasn’t been this safe since the days of liberal hero JFK.
None other than Kash Patel’s FBI has released its latest Uniform Crime Report (UCR), which says none of the things Trump and his cabinet members are saying. As Judd Legum and Rebecca Crosby point out in their extensive report for Popular Information, crime rates continue to recede back to the historic lows Americans have enjoyed (despite thinking otherwise) for more than 30 years.
An overwhelming majority of Americans, 64 percent, believe that crime increased across the country in 2024, according to a Gallup survey conducted late last year. An overwhelming majority of Americans are wrong.
On Tuesday, August 5, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) released its comprehensive report on crime in the United States for 2024. As crime data expert Jeff Asher noted, not only did the report reveal that overall crime was down substantially in 2024, but crime “fell in 2024 across every category and population group.” Specifically, it “was down in all seven categories of crime across all 10 population groups that the FBI measures.”
Moreover, the new FBI data shows that both violent crime and property crime are at their lowest level since the 1960s.
Here’s what property crime looks like when broken down over the past fifty years:

Other declines are evident in the FBI’s data, which shows an across-the-board decrease in violent crime rates from last year.

Here’s the public perception of crime rates, which is, on the whole, tracking with reality.

This chart may make you believe most Americans aren’t buying into the moral panic. But that’s simply not true. If you want to know who’s buying into Trump’s blatant lies about crime rates, it’s the usual suspects. It’s the same people who usually support, believe, and endorse whatever falls out of Trump’s mouth and/or splatters itself across Trump’s extremely captive marketplace of bigoted ideas, Truth Social:

It’s not just small town press outlets skewing the perception of small town residents. Some of the most-read newspapers in the United States (Washington Post, New York Times) are more than willing to give front-page space to factual reports about crime rate increases, like those that followed the pandemic shutdowns around the nation. But when crime rates return to historic lows, coverage is buried by press outlets, even they even bother to report on it at all.
Trump capitalizing on this massive gap between reality and reporting doesn’t make him any different than the thousands of politicians who have come before him. What does set him apart from his thousands of predecessors is his disturbing willingness to leverage public ignorance to lay the groundwork for a police state, if not actual martial law. If these authoritarian desires are ever manifested, the press will have blood on its hands because their willingness to act as the government’s stenographer apparently only manifests when top-level government officials have a narrative to push, rather than facts to report.
Filed Under: bullshit, crime rates, fbi, martial law, moral panic, national guard, trump administration


Comments on “Trump Pretends Crime Rates Are Up To Justify Sending Troops To DC Streets. Too Many Americans Believe Him.”
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Fake news!
The crime rate graph has been obvious reversed, the all-time low has been during Reagan, a Republican President and great patriot, and then been rising since because of Clinton, Obama and Biden. You’re factually lying!
Re:
graphs, numbers, and words are easily manipulated to deceive
and gotta luv the strange new terms “tribal confession” & “master gaslight”
Re:
To the contrary — you are factually “making shit up”.
Re:
Poe’s Law Much?
Re: Re:
Discerning sarcasm from sincerity has become much harder since the MAGA movement openly embraced Trump’s lies as the Word of God.
Re:
Name just one thing Reagan did that you think Trump would approve of (besides dying).
Trumpism is literally every single thing that Reaganism is not. Perhaps one of the most disgusting things about Trumpism is the way it flays Reaganism and wears its skin like a suit. Eat shit.
Re: Re:
Does “fucking up Black people’s lives” count?
Re: Re: Re:
I don’t think I would equate opposing the Black Panther party with “fucking up the lives of black people”. Reagan has a black granddaughter, I don’t even know what you’re on about.
Any national guard that are willing to be deployed against their own should be treated like the traitors they are.
Re:
Unfortunately, it’s not just the National Guard. Trump’s enablers include all the people who voted him in, after he had clearly shown who he is.
In other words, one third of the country is your enemy.
Re: Re:
It’s not even one third of the country, depressingly enough, merely one third of people eligible to vote. That’s why it’s so important that everyone who can should vote in every single election, then perhaps we can keep already powerful bigots like Trump out of the top job.
Re: Rules of engagement
Every national guardsman is advised on the rules of war, what they are allowed to do, and so those willing to fire on US civilians get used as examples to the Army and USMC of what not to do (See Kent State, Ohio. See also the CS&N folk song Ohio about Kent)
There are extremely narrow limits what a national guardsman is allowed to do, and when a governor or the President gives them an illegal order, they suffer the consequences for obeying it.
At the same time the rank and file of every US armed service are advised off the record how jolly sorry they’ll be should they refuse to obey an illegal order, in what has been a drift towards coerced obedience since the end of the cold war, conspicuously when the enemy shifted from proxy soldiers and Eastern bloc to NGO terrorists.
The end result has not been units totally loyal to the administration, but fragile units with cohesion that shatters whenever they have to process an illegal order. The post-George-W-Bush training has tried to undo the damage, but between health problems and counter-recruitment based on Iraq-war era stories, recruitment efforts have been failing to meet quotas.
Trump inherited a mess within the ranks, and he and his autocratic regime are only going to make it worse, and may put the loyalty of units into play should civil war ever go hot.
There’s a funny thing that happens when things become really rare. It goes from a routine thing to something really noteworthy and exceptional, which causes people to talk about it and notice it, and before you know it it’s everywhere you look.
People don’t live outside in the world. They live in the news articles that tell them about the wildest and most interesting (or macabre) things going on somewhere.
Re:
Bezoaar bezoaar bezoaar.
Re: True Crime
There was a discussion of Murder in the You’re Wrong About podcast, a sudden rise in the rate of uncleared intentional homicide cases in the 1960s and 1970s. In fact the intentional rate was going down as battered wives shelters provided an alternative to letting fights escalate, and then eventually women had their own credit cards, and could spend a night or three at a Motel 6.
Similarly in the 1970s it was reported serial killers claimed about 5000 victims a year. Later we’d find this (published as non-fiction) report was entirely made up, that actual serial killers are extremely rare, and the scariest ones are the ones that successfully can cloak their victims’ deaths in another color, such as nurses of mercy and police officers who are a bit quick on escalating to violence.
But we love to read about extreme criminal violence, and collect cards with famous killers and make inspired-by-true-stories cinema and television based on them, and that gives the illusion that there’s a Jeffry Dahmer, or even a Jason Voorhees in every neighborhood.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
I Bet You Won't Move There
It’s a tough sell if you celebrate an assault in one breath, and then bemoan that the perception is that violence is increasing with the next.
Last month, a DC police commander was suspended for cooking the numbers to make crime statistics look better than they actually are. Usually, Techdirt celebrates when police malfeasance is uncovered and held accountable. But I’m guessing that for this one, not so much.
Re:
Always with the misdirection and strawmen so you can avoid addressing the elephant in the room. How much are you paid to write this shit and is it in rubles or yuan?
Re:
Why? A singular commander cooking the books doesn’t change the stats that the FBI released, you horse’s patoot.
Re: Re:
I thought we didn’t believe in the “one bad apple” excuse when it comes to bad cops around here…
Re: Re: Re:
We don’t believe in deflections or non sequiturs, either.
It’s amazing how good MAGA types are at misapplying simple, straight-forward logical arguments.
Re: Re:
And if there’s any law enforcement agency that should be under suspiction of cooking the books—albeit in the opposite direction—it should be the one staffed with Trump loyalists who would be more than happy to give him an excuse for a federal occupation of a major U.S. city.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Sad your comment is true but hidden by deniers
Your comment is true, yet the TDS victims of TDSDirt flagged it. Lol not one of them would walk around D.C at night. Zero
Re: Re:
I am in DC regularly and have never had any fear of walking around at night. I’m sorry that you’re so scared of people. Must be a pretty shitty and pathetic way of living.
Re: Re: Re:
I don’t think he’s scared of people in general, so much as he was raised to be afraid of/hateful towards people of a certain racial group that makes up a significant amount of the D.C. population.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2 Yah
I live outside DC in NOvA and yes there are areas you can walk in at night. Go a block or two off the main area and good luck. Anyone please take a camera and record yourself walking through DC sketchy areas. You won’t because you value your life. You assume I’m white which I’m not, sugar plum
Re: Re: Re:3
[citation needed]
Re: Re: Re:3
So you admit you lied earlier in saying that no one here would walk around DC at night?
Good to know.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:4 Lied?
I didn’t lie. Anyone living in or around DC like the many reporters who regularly blast DC crime know I’m right. I don’t believe you regularly walk around bad neighborhoods at night. The around 274 murder victims last year and 4th highest murder rate in the US are rationalized by TDS victims as “decreased crime in D.C. shows who the liars are
Re: Re: Re:5
I mean, you absolutely did. Anyone can scroll up and see. You said: “Lol not one of them would walk around D.C at night. Zero”
I pointed out that I absolutely would. In fact, I am now in DC right now and just walked back to where I’m staying from dinner. It’s a bit fucking humid, but other than that, no big deal.
You then moved the goalposts and admitted “yes there are areas you can walk in at night.” which is an admission that you lied before when you said zero people would walk around DC at night.
What you now admit you meant is that there are some rough areas where you are scared to walk because you are a pitiful scaredy cat. But either way you’re claim that no one here would walk around was a lie.
It’s also very, very different to say “you wouldn’t walk around DC at night” and “you wouldn’t walk around a few rough areas at night.” And if you actually do live here, you know full well that there are precious few such areas, and you’re mostly actually fine in those areas unless you’re an idiot.
As for “4th highest” not according to the report I saw, which put DC at 19th, and showing that St. Louis, New Orleans, Cleveland, Kansas CIty, Memphis and many others had significantly higher rates.
https://freedomforallamericans.org/highest-murders-in-us-by-city/
Re: Re: Re:4
He also lied in claiming to be Hunter Biden’s crack dealer. Hunter Biden doesn’t smoke crack, he smokes the grass I sell him. /jk
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re: Yah
I live outside DC in NOvA and yes there are areas you can walk in at night. Go a block or two off the main area and good luck. Anyone please take a camera and record yourself walking through DC sketchy areas. You won’t becaus you value your life.
Re: Re:
FYI, the best time of day to go out for a slice is at night, especially during spring and fall. The cold but pleasant weather gives the pizza extra flavor, something I guess you’re missing out on if you’re too scared to go out at night.
Re: Re:
Really? Because I wasn’t aware that any MAGAts had flagged the comment in question.
Re:
I thought we didn’t believe in the “one bad apple” excuse when it comes to bad cops around here…
Back in 2016, we had a name for them
“Low Information Voters”. It’s still true.
The more law enforcement trump throws at street crime in DC and immigration, the less investigations into white-collar crime.
For the more conspiracy-minded...
One of Trump’s main targets with this initiative appears to be the homeless.
Also, will these military personnel still be on the ground through 2029? Militarizing the capital through the 2026 and 2028 election cycles would be a prerequisite for various forms of chicanery surrounding those elections.
PS – at first when Trump posted on Truth Social “Crime, Savagery, Filth, and Scum will DISAPPEAR. I will, MAKE OUR CAPITAL GREAT AGAIN!” I was hoping he was announcing his resignation. No such luck.
Re:
LOL. And I say that with the sad realization that’s only funny because it’s so true.
Re: CECOT, the Everglades encampment, etc.
We’ve seen the places to stay Trump offers his victims.
Oops, botched the formatting. Hope it still makes sense.
So. Who in the FBI is about to get fired because they published a report that contradicts what the idiot in chief is spewing out of his mouth?
Re:
That stuff came from his mouth!?!?
Re: Re:
Better his mouth than his ass.
Re: Re: Re:
I thought his diaper was overfilled.
Re: Re: Re:2
That’s no way to talk about Kristi Noem.
Re: Re: Re:
TBH, I thought he was talking out of his ass.
Oh, you just have to remember that when Trump says “crime”, he means black and brown people. DC may not resemble Baghdad at all in crime statistics, but the comparison makes a little more sense when you realise it’s about skin tone.
Re:
Yet if a deeply tanned person can say they’re white, Trump doesn’t seem as bothered by them as he is by light-skinned Indians, so maybe it’s less about skin tone and more about ethnicity.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Stats
“You have less chance of being victimized, but if you are victimized, you have more of a chance of dying,” John Jay adjunct lecturer Jillian Snider, a retired New York Police Department officer, told Fox News Digital Tuesday of violent crime trends in the nation’s capital.
Snider was referring to a report published by the Council on Criminal Justice in July, which studied violent crime data of 17 large U.S. cities between 2018 and 2024, specifically diving into the lethality of violent crimes in those cities. It found Washington, D.C., had the highest lethality level out of the group – which included cities such as Baltimore and Chicago – at a 38% increase in lethality in 2024 compared with 2018.
Lethality in D.C. jumped by a whopping 341% when compared to 2012 data, the study found, reporting that there were 13 homicides per 1,000 serious violent crimes in 2012 to 57 homicides per 1,000 serious violent crimes in 2024.
Re: Re:
What does this even mean without context for how overall “serious violent crime” has changed during the same period? If you completely eliminated all violent crime except for 1 homicide per year, the number of homicides per 1000 serious violent crimes would be 1000, a “shocking” 7592% increase! Except it would be obviously stupid to cite as evidence of rising crime.
Prelude...
He wants boots on the ground in DC when he postpones the mid-term election or throws out the results as “voter draud”…
American Mathletes...
Americans understand crime statistics as well as they understand the economic impact of tariffs…
Re:
Why even go as far as tariffs?
It’s a country that can’t even worm its way over the subterranean bar of understanding
more guns = more gun deaths
Re: Re:
Coupled with more guns for self-protection = more deaths of juveniles by gunshot.
Re: Re:
When marital law is declared, guns will be banned for anyone but the people of the troops. Will you liberals decide you love Trump for making kids safe when that happens?
Hell, you lot couldn’t even go a decade before proclaiming the Cheney family was one of the most heroic in the nation after they almost single-handedly killed thousands of people in two countries.
Re: Re: Re:
Let’s hope not, I’m not interested in marriage.
“It’s hard enough being the greatest and most terrificust and most stable genuis president the world has ever been blessed with only to see criminal poor people and homeless scum on my streets as I’m chauffeured to my golf course. Ruin my day and stink the place up. GET RID OF THEM!”
The crime of existing but not kissing his ass is definitely skyrocketing. Damn the lack of efficiency! Full speed ahead! (and over the cliff–give the lemmings something to do, something to overreact to, probably violently)
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
The only crime rate you can believe is murder rate
Everything else can be gamed by changing the reporting rates (and a lot of jurisdictions do).
What you don’t seem to appreciate is that crime rate in DC is STILL way to high, and Trump has every right to do this.
Re:
Even if this were true (and it’s not) the numbers still show you’re wrong.
The homicide rate dropped 32% last year and is already on pace to have dropped another 11% this year, and is way way way down from old highs.
Here are the numbers the DC police released today that say that homicide rates are way down:
https://mpdc.dc.gov/dailycrime
And, again, I spend a lot of time in DC and the idea that it’s crime-ridden is ridiculous.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Stats lol
“You have less chance of being victimized, but if you are victimized, you have more of a chance of dying,” John Jay adjunct lecturer Jillian Snider, a retired New York Police Department officer, told Fox News Digital Tuesday of violent crime trends in the nation’s capital.
Snider was referring to a report published by the Council on Criminal Justice in July, which studied violent crime data of 17 large U.S. cities between 2018 and 2024, specifically diving into the lethality of violent crimes in those cities. It found Washington, D.C., had the highest lethality level out of the group – which included cities such as Baltimore and Chicago – at a 38% increase in lethality in 2024 compared with 2018.
Lethality in D.C. jumped by a whopping 341% when compared to 2012 data, the study found, reporting that there were 13 homicides per 1,000 serious violent crimes in 2012 to 57 homicides per 1,000 serious violent crimes in 2024.
Re: Re: Re:
You do realize that that is not a thing, right? This “lethality” stat? It’s a new stat that was just made up yesterday to appease idiot MAGA folks. Right? It’s a stat that says “okay, yes, sorry, despite us claiming crime was up, crime is actually way down, but then within that reduced crime, a higher percentage is murders, even though murders are also way, way down.”
Anyone with half a brain recognizes that’s nonsense.
So what’s your excuse?
Re:
No. No one has the right to do it.
Things have been much worse, and no one did it.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Come to DC and let’s see
I urge anyone saying D.C. is safe to fly into Washington. I’ll pick you up and drop you off in D.C on a hot Saturday night. You can then walk around NE D.C. and enjoy being safe. More BS from TDS victims
Re:
I literally am going to DC this week, and I will have zero fear walking around (except maybe of the National Guard play acting as cops), as I do every time I’m in DC. And, yes, that includes in NE DC (where I’ve stayed multiple times at Airbnbs). Usually when I’m in town, even if not staying there, I pick up some excellent Ethiopian food in that part of town and have never had any sort of problem.
What is it with the MAGA types who preach manliness, yet are so scared of perfectly safe cities? Oh, wait, I know, you’re scared of people with darker skin than you’re own. Pathetic.
It’s truly astounding how chicken shit MAGA folks are.
Re: Re:
Because every single republican male is a bully who can only beat on women or kids, or needs to gang up on adults.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re: Amazed you can even spell Republican
Lol at your ridiculous comment. A look in the mirror ma’am
Re: Re:
It’s their religion.
No, seriously—in Christian lore, large cities are enemies of the followers of God/Jesus Christ. Babylon (Old Testament) and Rome (New Testament) are no different to conservative/extremist Christians than New York City or San Franciso: Cities are “worldly” and full of “heathens” (i.e., non-Christians) and corruptive forces that seek to destroy Christianity, which makes them anathema to conservative/evangelical Christians. The fact that big cities are also racially and religiously diverse is probably a driving factor in that fear, but it’s primarily driven by the fear of being “corrupted” into being an atheist or a Satanist or (even worse) a sociopolitically progressive Christian by so much as looking at any part of a city that isn’t an explicit “safe haven” for Christians.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re: Another one
Sounds like you need to actually talk to people. Popular vote went to Republicans due to politicians who sound like you. Sad for the Democrat party which won’t see any positive results in 2026 as polls show people trust Republicans and dismiss Democrats as only capable of one thing. Trying to get rid of Trump
Re: Re: Re:2
No, the popular vote went to Trump because he made a lot of big promises he hasn’t kept (or couldn’t ever keep) while the Democrats waited too long to replace Biden, muzzled the Harris/Walz ticket from going low against Trump right when Walz’s “they’re weird” bit was breaking through to the mainstream, and kept trying to chase the mythical “Liz Cheney” voter without realizing that Republican-leaning voters would just vote for a Republican instead of a Diet Republican.
Re: Re: Re:3 Why Trump won
There are two big factors that seem to indicate how Trump got the thin leads in the battleground states.
The first is the trillion dollar propaganda machine that still holds most of the viewership (which is in turn helped by algos directing people towards right-wing content). Looking at people I know for whom FOX News is their regular diet, and my own dad regurgitating FOX talking points that he once disagreed with, it’s a mind-control machine for which we don’t yet have a countermeasure.
The other is a factor affecting most nations that pit a neoliberal party versus a far right party, and that is neoliberalism is leaving a lot of folks in precarity. There was a general global shift to the right around November 2024, which halted when the world watched what Trump was doing in / to the US (which has informed election results since).
When frogs are dying under King Log, there’s a temptation to vote King Heron for any change, hoping Heron will eat the other frogs first.
This is why I think the DNC in 2019 should have gone progressive, and when that failed Biden needed to go more progressive than he did (even though he was more progressive than his own historical average), and then Harris needed to go even more progressive than that, instead of palling around with Cheney.
On 60 Minutes, Harris assured the US she was still a capitalist and a staunch neoliberal, and all the frogs running out of options were going to continue running out of options, so they didn’t come to the polls.
There’s also the conspicuous numbers of top-only votes for Trump (save for a vote for trump, the ballots were empty — US general elections have a conspicuous lot of those). The MAGA zombies heeded Trump’s eldritch call in vast numbers.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Lol Maga types
Sad that any disagreement with the liberal mantra gets dismissed as MAGA. Lol. Lifelong Democrat here who isn’t afraid to call out the TDS BS getting spewed
Re: Re: Re:
Every accusation, a confession—and in the case of so-called Trump Derangement Syndrome, the derangement comes from people who are oh-so-willing to excuse everything Trump says and does, from mocking the physically disabled to firing anyone who dares make Dear Leader look even the least bit bad, while treating even the slightest misstep or fuck-up from Democrats as The Worst Fucking Thing To Ever Happen In History™.
I’m more than willing to admit that the majority of the Democrat Party is made up of spineless right-of-center dipshits who are so afraid of being seen as fighting against “the other side” that they think they should be working with that they capitulate way too fast to every bit of GOP framing on any issue and still believe in a sense of bipartisanship on numerous issues that has long since been burnt down in the name of MAGA. But none of that means the GOP, and Donald Trump, are immune from criticism of being a hate-filled death cult. If you’re not willing to give both sides the criticism they deserve, you’re not as bi- or unpartisan as you’d like people to think.
I vote Democrat because voting Republican is anathema to my values. Were ranked-choice voting available in all elections (which would give third parties a better chance of winning), I’d vote for a third party candidate if I thought they were better than the ones from the Big Two. Can you say the same about yourself, or did you vote for Trump because he promised to get rid of all the brown people and make you feel safe?
Re: Re: Re:
Lol. Bullshit. We see your choice of name here. I’ve followed your comment history. I know the (fake) email address you put in here.
You are about as far from a “lifelong Democrat” as can be. You have posted nothing but MAGA nonsense from the start.
We weren’t born yesterday.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2 Lifelong Democrat yes
Unfortunately you’re completely wrong as usual, but given you rationalize the 4th highest murder rate in the US as no big deal, you’re a bit prejudiced to any commentary that triggers your cognitive dissonance. I voted for Clinton, Gore, Obama twice. Hillary Clinton would have made a better candidate than Joe Biden. Sad that you can’t handle any criticism without the accompanying “MAGA” BS. Trump is an idiot loudmouth buffoon narcissist but the Democrat candidates were so toxic to Democrat and Republican voters that he got elected twice.
Re: Re: Re:3
You absolutely did not vote for Clinton. You are full of shit and everyone knows it.
You literally call yourself Hunter Biden’s crack dealer and every single comment you make here is a far right MAGA nonsense talking point.
I don’t call anyone who disagrees with me “MAGA.” But if you do is spew MAGA bullshit, then fuck yes I will call you MAGA.
The saddest, most pathetic part of this is that you’re so obviously MAGA but even you’re too ashamed to admit it. Hilariously pathetic.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2 Lifelong Democrat yes
I voted for Clinton, Gore, Obama twice. Hillary Clinton would have made a better candidate than Joe Biden. Sad that you can’t handle any criticism without the accompanying “MAGA” BS. Trump is an idiot loudmouth buffoon narcissist but the Democrat candidates were so toxic to Democrat and Republican voters that he got elected twice.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2 Wrong again
I voted for Clinton, Gore, Obama twice. Hillary Clinton would have made a better candidate than Joe Biden. Sad that you can’t handle any criticism without the accompanying “MAGA” BS. Trump is an idiot loudmouth buffoon narcissist but the Democrat candidates were so toxic to Democrat and Republican voters that he got elected twice.
Re: I've made this point before.
I’ve been in some of the most famous crime zones of the US, specifically the ones in California, not only walked around, took busses, engaged in commerce and went about my life.
There were street gangs. They offered to sell me weed (ganja). Since I wasn’t from another gang, I wasn’t a threat.
There were belligerents, occasionally. Some of the saltier folk liked to get roaring drunk and look for a fight. It was very easy to get out of their way until a friend (or friendly neighborhood watch guy) guided them home.
In Oakland, the gang was more of a neighborhood watch, since the police patrols didn’t actually care about citizen safety, rather wanted to harry people for paraphernalia.
I thought it was funny, that in a single Payday 2 mission, I killed more DC police and SWAT than ever died in the line of duty through DC history.
Checking the BJS I’m…having trouble finding a rate for DC for all violent crime (including simple assault). The intentional homicide rate is 23 per 100,000 per year.
Yes, that’s high even for a municipal area, but that’s also low risk for day-to-day living.
Re:
You forgot to state that the greatest danger is all the pedophiles and rapists in dc. Ya know, republicans.
The most dangerous thing that happened in DC today was when dozens of people, some masked, rushed a fender bender, with guns drawn.
Re:
Oh lookit that!
A problem you can’t 2nd Amendment your way out of?
I thought you MAGA people are supposed to be badasses…why don’t you do something patriotic like drive a big truck with a flag flying off of the back? That should show ’em, right?
Or get those Proud Kids and 1%ers to go ahead of you, like a parade of morons being all ‘murican and shit.
Calls himself Big Balls, huh? The more you have to declare something, the less likely you are to actually be that thing. See “nice guys” or the “Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.”
And just like the latter examples, it sounds very much like everyone should avoid them at all costs.
Re:
It’s apparently not a self-given nickname, even if the person in question does approve. And Wikipedia says it’s “an unspecific sign of various testicular diseases”, so perhaps we should have some sympathy.
Re:
To wit: Trump’s declarations of innocence in…oh, name any situation where he’s been accused of at least some sort of non-criminal personal malfeasance, then work your way up to the felonies he was convicted of committing.
Re:
i think of Bill Hicks every time i hear a reference to the idiot.
The ballroom...
…kinda looks… French 🪟🔪
Re: ETA
I wonder if we could influence the DC political sector to adapt white and cream suits as 2025+ fashion.
Re: Re:
No, make them wear tan suits.
Well, at least Trump will finally be able to say he has big balls…
This is adding to an ever increasing number of reasons why I am seriously considering leaving the US and seeking asylum outside the continent. Far too many people are willing to believe the lies that are spewed out and legacy media are all to willing to cover that type of story, instead of doing the job of reporting truth and facts with the solid evidence to back it up. Similar happened nearly a century ago across the Atlantic in Germany, there are quite a number of books and papers covering that topic.
Re:
The problem is that this problem is very much everywhere. Best wishes selecting a landing.
political
This is nothing more than political fearmongering. Trump is pushing a false narrative about crime to justify sending troops into D.C. a city where crime is actually decreasing. It’s a reckless abuse of power, exploiting public fear for personal and political gain. Ignoring facts to justify military presence on American streets sets a dangerous precedent and undermines local democracy. It’s authoritarian in tone, and deeply irresponsible.
Two teenagers who are, by virtue of their age, unlikely to be homeless (unless their parents are also homeless), and thus that naturally justifies turning unfortunate circumstances into a “crime” for the Republiturds. 🤦♂️
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
How about that! When you don’t convict people of crimes, the crime rate goes down. Amazing!
Re:
The FBI data isn’t the rate of convictions, it’s the rate of reported crimes.
Re:
Great logic! Let’s apply that to what Trump is doing, and really see that line skyrocket!
To be fair, DC did have a spike in violent crime.
It was in the first week of January 2021, I believe.
Re:
Fair enough.
Crime in DC is way up. An awful lot of it is coming from inside Federal buildings.
Half right on the wrong side
Trump is absolutely correct that DC has seen an unprecedented rise in crime, he just leaves off that he’s personally responsible for the overwhelming majority of it.