Trump Pretends Crime Rates Are Up To Justify Sending Troops To DC Streets. Too Many Americans Believe Him.

from the selling-fear-because-someone's-always-buying dept

This was the way it was always going to end: with Trump turning the Oval Office into the palace of a king. One need look no further than Trump’s attempt to invoke the vengeful spirits of the Overlook Hotel by adding a $200 million ballroom to the White House, as though this were the early 1900s and we, the people, would be easily impressed by gilded, ostentatious displays of excess.

Now that one of DOGE’s dipshits was almost carjacked, Trump thinks it’s time to federalize the policing of Washington, DC. Utilizing the same racist paranoia that fueled his baseless full-page accusations against the Central Park Five back in the 1990s, Trump is pretending DC is such a criminal hellhole, it can only be handled by the imposition of federal force — something that more than likely will involve the National Guard and other war fighters.

Of course, Trump has never let reality intrude on his fantasies. While crime rates continue to drop around the nation, Trump continues to claim the crime problem has never been worse, especially in cities and states overseen by “liberal” politicians. This narrative always existed, even without Trump’s involvement. But anomalous crime rate spikes driven by a once-in-a-lifetime (we hope!) worldwide pandemic gave Trump and his fellow idiots all the ammunition they needed to shove their moral panic narrative into the general discourse. And these opportunists heaped the blame on migrants and “democrat” politicians equally, as though any politician was proactively trying to generate a violent crime surge in their own jurisdiction.

Most media agencies aren’t helping, at least not those on the local levels who know “if it bleeds, it leads” is instrumental to their ongoing existence. But the facts have never matched the outlandish claims, which have far outpaced the crime rate since the early 1990s. America and Americans have never been safer, even if no cop or cop-lover will tell you otherwise.

Because some white dude (one who apparently welcomed the nickname “Big Balls”) got punched in the nose by a couple of teens while (almost) being carjacked in DC, Trump is pretty much declaring war on a city that hasn’t been this safe since the days of liberal hero JFK.

None other than Kash Patel’s FBI has released its latest Uniform Crime Report (UCR), which says none of the things Trump and his cabinet members are saying. As Judd Legum and Rebecca Crosby point out in their extensive report for Popular Information, crime rates continue to recede back to the historic lows Americans have enjoyed (despite thinking otherwise) for more than 30 years.

An overwhelming majority of Americans, 64 percent, believe that crime increased across the country in 2024, according to a Gallup survey conducted late last year. An overwhelming majority of Americans are wrong.

On Tuesday, August 5, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) released its comprehensive report on crime in the United States for 2024. As crime data expert Jeff Asher noted, not only did the report reveal that overall crime was down substantially in 2024, but crime “fell in 2024 across every category and population group.” Specifically, it “was down in all seven categories of crime across all 10 population groups that the FBI measures.”

Moreover, the new FBI data shows that both violent crime and property crime are at their lowest level since the 1960s. 

Here’s what property crime looks like when broken down over the past fifty years:

Other declines are evident in the FBI’s data, which shows an across-the-board decrease in violent crime rates from last year.

Here’s the public perception of crime rates, which is, on the whole, tracking with reality.

This chart may make you believe most Americans aren’t buying into the moral panic. But that’s simply not true. If you want to know who’s buying into Trump’s blatant lies about crime rates, it’s the usual suspects. It’s the same people who usually support, believe, and endorse whatever falls out of Trump’s mouth and/or splatters itself across Trump’s extremely captive marketplace of bigoted ideas, Truth Social:

It’s not just small town press outlets skewing the perception of small town residents. Some of the most-read newspapers in the United States (Washington Post, New York Times) are more than willing to give front-page space to factual reports about crime rate increases, like those that followed the pandemic shutdowns around the nation. But when crime rates return to historic lows, coverage is buried by press outlets, even they even bother to report on it at all.

Trump capitalizing on this massive gap between reality and reporting doesn’t make him any different than the thousands of politicians who have come before him. What does set him apart from his thousands of predecessors is his disturbing willingness to leverage public ignorance to lay the groundwork for a police state, if not actual martial law. If these authoritarian desires are ever manifested, the press will have blood on its hands because their willingness to act as the government’s stenographer apparently only manifests when top-level government officials have a narrative to push, rather than facts to report.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Trump Pretends Crime Rates Are Up To Justify Sending Troops To DC Streets. Too Many Americans Believe Him.”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
100 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

n00bdragon (profile) says:

Re:

I’ve spoken of the shining city all my political life, but I don’t know if I ever quite communicated what I saw when I said it. But in my mind it was a tall, proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, wind-swept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace; a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity. And if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here. That’s how I saw it, and see it still.

Name just one thing Reagan did that you think Trump would approve of (besides dying).

Trumpism is literally every single thing that Reaganism is not. Perhaps one of the most disgusting things about Trumpism is the way it flays Reaganism and wears its skin like a suit. Eat shit.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Re: Rules of engagement

Every national guardsman is advised on the rules of war, what they are allowed to do, and so those willing to fire on US civilians get used as examples to the Army and USMC of what not to do (See Kent State, Ohio. See also the CS&N folk song Ohio about Kent)

There are extremely narrow limits what a national guardsman is allowed to do, and when a governor or the President gives them an illegal order, they suffer the consequences for obeying it.

At the same time the rank and file of every US armed service are advised off the record how jolly sorry they’ll be should they refuse to obey an illegal order, in what has been a drift towards coerced obedience since the end of the cold war, conspicuously when the enemy shifted from proxy soldiers and Eastern bloc to NGO terrorists.

The end result has not been units totally loyal to the administration, but fragile units with cohesion that shatters whenever they have to process an illegal order. The post-George-W-Bush training has tried to undo the damage, but between health problems and counter-recruitment based on Iraq-war era stories, recruitment efforts have been failing to meet quotas.

Trump inherited a mess within the ranks, and he and his autocratic regime are only going to make it worse, and may put the loyalty of units into play should civil war ever go hot.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
n00bdragon (profile) says:

There’s a funny thing that happens when things become really rare. It goes from a routine thing to something really noteworthy and exceptional, which causes people to talk about it and notice it, and before you know it it’s everywhere you look.

People don’t live outside in the world. They live in the news articles that tell them about the wildest and most interesting (or macabre) things going on somewhere.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Re: True Crime

There was a discussion of Murder in the You’re Wrong About podcast, a sudden rise in the rate of uncleared intentional homicide cases in the 1960s and 1970s. In fact the intentional rate was going down as battered wives shelters provided an alternative to letting fights escalate, and then eventually women had their own credit cards, and could spend a night or three at a Motel 6.

Similarly in the 1970s it was reported serial killers claimed about 5000 victims a year. Later we’d find this (published as non-fiction) report was entirely made up, that actual serial killers are extremely rare, and the scariest ones are the ones that successfully can cloak their victims’ deaths in another color, such as nurses of mercy and police officers who are a bit quick on escalating to violence.

But we love to read about extreme criminal violence, and collect cards with famous killers and make inspired-by-true-stories cinema and television based on them, and that gives the illusion that there’s a Jeffry Dahmer, or even a Jason Voorhees in every neighborhood.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Koby (profile) says:

I Bet You Won't Move There

It’s a tough sell if you celebrate an assault in one breath, and then bemoan that the perception is that violence is increasing with the next.

Last month, a DC police commander was suspended for cooking the numbers to make crime statistics look better than they actually are. Usually, Techdirt celebrates when police malfeasance is uncovered and held accountable. But I’m guessing that for this one, not so much.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Strawb (profile) says:

Re:

Last month, a DC police commander was suspended for cooking the numbers to make crime statistics look better than they actually are. Usually, Techdirt celebrates when police malfeasance is uncovered and held accountable. But I’m guessing that for this one, not so much.

Why? A singular commander cooking the books doesn’t change the stats that the FBI released, you horse’s patoot.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Hunter Biden’s crack dealer says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Yah

I live outside DC in NOvA and yes there are areas you can walk in at night. Go a block or two off the main area and good luck. Anyone please take a camera and record yourself walking through DC sketchy areas. You won’t because you value your life. You assume I’m white which I’m not, sugar plum

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Hunter Bidens crack dealer says:

Re: Re: Re:4 Lied?

I didn’t lie. Anyone living in or around DC like the many reporters who regularly blast DC crime know I’m right. I don’t believe you regularly walk around bad neighborhoods at night. The around 274 murder victims last year and 4th highest murder rate in the US are rationalized by TDS victims as “decreased crime in D.C. shows who the liars are

Mike Masnick (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:5

I didn’t lie

I mean, you absolutely did. Anyone can scroll up and see. You said: “Lol not one of them would walk around D.C at night. Zero”

I pointed out that I absolutely would. In fact, I am now in DC right now and just walked back to where I’m staying from dinner. It’s a bit fucking humid, but other than that, no big deal.

You then moved the goalposts and admitted “yes there are areas you can walk in at night.” which is an admission that you lied before when you said zero people would walk around DC at night.

What you now admit you meant is that there are some rough areas where you are scared to walk because you are a pitiful scaredy cat. But either way you’re claim that no one here would walk around was a lie.

It’s also very, very different to say “you wouldn’t walk around DC at night” and “you wouldn’t walk around a few rough areas at night.” And if you actually do live here, you know full well that there are precious few such areas, and you’re mostly actually fine in those areas unless you’re an idiot.

As for “4th highest” not according to the report I saw, which put DC at 19th, and showing that St. Louis, New Orleans, Cleveland, Kansas CIty, Memphis and many others had significantly higher rates.

https://freedomforallamericans.org/highest-murders-in-us-by-city/

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Bruce C. says:

For the more conspiracy-minded...

One of Trump’s main targets with this initiative appears to be the homeless.

On Sunday, he declared that “the Homeless” in D.C. will “have to move out, IMMEDIATELY,” while assuring that the government “will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital.”
This marks an expansion of his attacks against immigrants to another marginal group. Does “FAR” mean a prison in El Salvador?

Also, will these military personnel still be on the ground through 2029? Militarizing the capital through the 2026 and 2028 election cycles would be a prerequisite for various forms of chicanery surrounding those elections.

PS – at first when Trump posted on Truth Social “Crime, Savagery, Filth, and Scum will DISAPPEAR. I will, MAKE OUR CAPITAL GREAT AGAIN!” I was hoping he was announcing his resignation. No such luck.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Trump continues to claim the crime problem has never been worse, especially in cities and states overseen by “liberal” politicians.

Oh, you just have to remember that when Trump says “crime”, he means black and brown people. DC may not resemble Baghdad at all in crime statistics, but the comparison makes a little more sense when you realise it’s about skin tone.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Hunter Bidens art dealer says:

Re: Stats

“You have less chance of being victimized, but if you are victimized, you have more of a chance of dying,” John Jay adjunct lecturer Jillian Snider, a retired New York Police Department officer, told Fox News Digital Tuesday of violent crime trends in the nation’s capital.

Snider was referring to a report published by the Council on Criminal Justice in July, which studied violent crime data of 17 large U.S. cities between 2018 and 2024, specifically diving into the lethality of violent crimes in those cities. It found Washington, D.C., had the highest lethality level out of the group – which included cities such as Baltimore and Chicago – at a 38% increase in lethality in 2024 compared with 2018.

Lethality in D.C. jumped by a whopping 341% when compared to 2012 data, the study found, reporting that there were 13 homicides per 1,000 serious violent crimes in 2012 to 57 homicides per 1,000 serious violent crimes in 2024.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Nonsense says:

Re: Re:

What does this even mean without context for how overall “serious violent crime” has changed during the same period? If you completely eliminated all violent crime except for 1 homicide per year, the number of homicides per 1000 serious violent crimes would be 1000, a “shocking” 7592% increase! Except it would be obviously stupid to cite as evidence of rising crime.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

When marital law is declared, guns will be banned for anyone but the people of the troops. Will you liberals decide you love Trump for making kids safe when that happens?

Hell, you lot couldn’t even go a decade before proclaiming the Cheney family was one of the most heroic in the nation after they almost single-handedly killed thousands of people in two countries.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Mike Masnick (profile) says:

Re:

The only crime rate you can believe is murder rate

Even if this were true (and it’s not) the numbers still show you’re wrong.

The homicide rate dropped 32% last year and is already on pace to have dropped another 11% this year, and is way way way down from old highs.

Here are the numbers the DC police released today that say that homicide rates are way down:

https://mpdc.dc.gov/dailycrime

And, again, I spend a lot of time in DC and the idea that it’s crime-ridden is ridiculous.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Hunter Bidens art dealer says:

Re: Re: Stats lol

“You have less chance of being victimized, but if you are victimized, you have more of a chance of dying,” John Jay adjunct lecturer Jillian Snider, a retired New York Police Department officer, told Fox News Digital Tuesday of violent crime trends in the nation’s capital.

Snider was referring to a report published by the Council on Criminal Justice in July, which studied violent crime data of 17 large U.S. cities between 2018 and 2024, specifically diving into the lethality of violent crimes in those cities. It found Washington, D.C., had the highest lethality level out of the group – which included cities such as Baltimore and Chicago – at a 38% increase in lethality in 2024 compared with 2018.

Lethality in D.C. jumped by a whopping 341% when compared to 2012 data, the study found, reporting that there were 13 homicides per 1,000 serious violent crimes in 2012 to 57 homicides per 1,000 serious violent crimes in 2024.

Mike Masnick (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

You do realize that that is not a thing, right? This “lethality” stat? It’s a new stat that was just made up yesterday to appease idiot MAGA folks. Right? It’s a stat that says “okay, yes, sorry, despite us claiming crime was up, crime is actually way down, but then within that reduced crime, a higher percentage is murders, even though murders are also way, way down.”

Anyone with half a brain recognizes that’s nonsense.

So what’s your excuse?

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Mike Masnick (profile) says:

Re:

I literally am going to DC this week, and I will have zero fear walking around (except maybe of the National Guard play acting as cops), as I do every time I’m in DC. And, yes, that includes in NE DC (where I’ve stayed multiple times at Airbnbs). Usually when I’m in town, even if not staying there, I pick up some excellent Ethiopian food in that part of town and have never had any sort of problem.

What is it with the MAGA types who preach manliness, yet are so scared of perfectly safe cities? Oh, wait, I know, you’re scared of people with darker skin than you’re own. Pathetic.

It’s truly astounding how chicken shit MAGA folks are.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re:

What is it with the MAGA types who preach manliness, yet are so scared of perfectly safe cities?

It’s their religion.

No, seriously⁠—in Christian lore, large cities are enemies of the followers of God/Jesus Christ. Babylon (Old Testament) and Rome (New Testament) are no different to conservative/extremist Christians than New York City or San Franciso: Cities are “worldly” and full of “heathens” (i.e., non-Christians) and corruptive forces that seek to destroy Christianity, which makes them anathema to conservative/evangelical Christians. The fact that big cities are also racially and religiously diverse is probably a driving factor in that fear, but it’s primarily driven by the fear of being “corrupted” into being an atheist or a Satanist or (even worse) a sociopolitically progressive Christian by so much as looking at any part of a city that isn’t an explicit “safe haven” for Christians.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Hunter Biden’s crack dealer says:

Re: Re: Re: Another one

Sounds like you need to actually talk to people. Popular vote went to Republicans due to politicians who sound like you. Sad for the Democrat party which won’t see any positive results in 2026 as polls show people trust Republicans and dismiss Democrats as only capable of one thing. Trying to get rid of Trump

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2

Popular vote went to Republicans due to politicians who sound like you.

No, the popular vote went to Trump because he made a lot of big promises he hasn’t kept (or couldn’t ever keep) while the Democrats waited too long to replace Biden, muzzled the Harris/Walz ticket from going low against Trump right when Walz’s “they’re weird” bit was breaking through to the mainstream, and kept trying to chase the mythical “Liz Cheney” voter without realizing that Republican-leaning voters would just vote for a Republican instead of a Diet Republican.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3 Why Trump won

There are two big factors that seem to indicate how Trump got the thin leads in the battleground states.

The first is the trillion dollar propaganda machine that still holds most of the viewership (which is in turn helped by algos directing people towards right-wing content). Looking at people I know for whom FOX News is their regular diet, and my own dad regurgitating FOX talking points that he once disagreed with, it’s a mind-control machine for which we don’t yet have a countermeasure.

The other is a factor affecting most nations that pit a neoliberal party versus a far right party, and that is neoliberalism is leaving a lot of folks in precarity. There was a general global shift to the right around November 2024, which halted when the world watched what Trump was doing in / to the US (which has informed election results since).

When frogs are dying under King Log, there’s a temptation to vote King Heron for any change, hoping Heron will eat the other frogs first.

This is why I think the DNC in 2019 should have gone progressive, and when that failed Biden needed to go more progressive than he did (even though he was more progressive than his own historical average), and then Harris needed to go even more progressive than that, instead of palling around with Cheney.

On 60 Minutes, Harris assured the US she was still a capitalist and a staunch neoliberal, and all the frogs running out of options were going to continue running out of options, so they didn’t come to the polls.

There’s also the conspicuous numbers of top-only votes for Trump (save for a vote for trump, the ballots were empty — US general elections have a conspicuous lot of those). The MAGA zombies heeded Trump’s eldritch call in vast numbers.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

TDS

Every accusation, a confession⁠—and in the case of so-called Trump Derangement Syndrome, the derangement comes from people who are oh-so-willing to excuse everything Trump says and does, from mocking the physically disabled to firing anyone who dares make Dear Leader look even the least bit bad, while treating even the slightest misstep or fuck-up from Democrats as The Worst Fucking Thing To Ever Happen In History™.

I’m more than willing to admit that the majority of the Democrat Party is made up of spineless right-of-center dipshits who are so afraid of being seen as fighting against “the other side” that they think they should be working with that they capitulate way too fast to every bit of GOP framing on any issue and still believe in a sense of bipartisanship on numerous issues that has long since been burnt down in the name of MAGA. But none of that means the GOP, and Donald Trump, are immune from criticism of being a hate-filled death cult. If you’re not willing to give both sides the criticism they deserve, you’re not as bi- or unpartisan as you’d like people to think.

I vote Democrat because voting Republican is anathema to my values. Were ranked-choice voting available in all elections (which would give third parties a better chance of winning), I’d vote for a third party candidate if I thought they were better than the ones from the Big Two. Can you say the same about yourself, or did you vote for Trump because he promised to get rid of all the brown people and make you feel safe?

Mike Masnick (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Lifelong Democrat here

Lol. Bullshit. We see your choice of name here. I’ve followed your comment history. I know the (fake) email address you put in here.

You are about as far from a “lifelong Democrat” as can be. You have posted nothing but MAGA nonsense from the start.

We weren’t born yesterday.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Hunter Bidens crack dealer says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Lifelong Democrat yes

Unfortunately you’re completely wrong as usual, but given you rationalize the 4th highest murder rate in the US as no big deal, you’re a bit prejudiced to any commentary that triggers your cognitive dissonance. I voted for Clinton, Gore, Obama twice. Hillary Clinton would have made a better candidate than Joe Biden. Sad that you can’t handle any criticism without the accompanying “MAGA” BS. Trump is an idiot loudmouth buffoon narcissist but the Democrat candidates were so toxic to Democrat and Republican voters that he got elected twice.

Mike Masnick (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3

You absolutely did not vote for Clinton. You are full of shit and everyone knows it.

You literally call yourself Hunter Biden’s crack dealer and every single comment you make here is a far right MAGA nonsense talking point.

I don’t call anyone who disagrees with me “MAGA.” But if you do is spew MAGA bullshit, then fuck yes I will call you MAGA.

The saddest, most pathetic part of this is that you’re so obviously MAGA but even you’re too ashamed to admit it. Hilariously pathetic.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Hunter Bidens crack dealer says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Lifelong Democrat yes

I voted for Clinton, Gore, Obama twice. Hillary Clinton would have made a better candidate than Joe Biden. Sad that you can’t handle any criticism without the accompanying “MAGA” BS. Trump is an idiot loudmouth buffoon narcissist but the Democrat candidates were so toxic to Democrat and Republican voters that he got elected twice.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Hunte says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Wrong again

I voted for Clinton, Gore, Obama twice. Hillary Clinton would have made a better candidate than Joe Biden. Sad that you can’t handle any criticism without the accompanying “MAGA” BS. Trump is an idiot loudmouth buffoon narcissist but the Democrat candidates were so toxic to Democrat and Republican voters that he got elected twice.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Re: I've made this point before.

I’ve been in some of the most famous crime zones of the US, specifically the ones in California, not only walked around, took busses, engaged in commerce and went about my life.

There were street gangs. They offered to sell me weed (ganja). Since I wasn’t from another gang, I wasn’t a threat.

There were belligerents, occasionally. Some of the saltier folk liked to get roaring drunk and look for a fight. It was very easy to get out of their way until a friend (or friendly neighborhood watch guy) guided them home.

In Oakland, the gang was more of a neighborhood watch, since the police patrols didn’t actually care about citizen safety, rather wanted to harry people for paraphernalia.

I thought it was funny, that in a single Payday 2 mission, I killed more DC police and SWAT than ever died in the line of duty through DC history.

Checking the BJS I’m…having trouble finding a rate for DC for all violent crime (including simple assault). The intentional homicide rate is 23 per 100,000 per year.

Yes, that’s high even for a municipal area, but that’s also low risk for day-to-day living.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Oh lookit that!

A problem you can’t 2nd Amendment your way out of?

I thought you MAGA people are supposed to be badasses…why don’t you do something patriotic like drive a big truck with a flag flying off of the back? That should show ’em, right?

Or get those Proud Kids and 1%ers to go ahead of you, like a parade of morons being all ‘murican and shit.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re:

The more you have to declare something, the less likely you are to actually be that thing.

To wit: Trump’s declarations of innocence in…oh, name any situation where he’s been accused of at least some sort of non-criminal personal malfeasance, then work your way up to the felonies he was convicted of committing.

DisgruntledAnonymous (profile) says:

This is adding to an ever increasing number of reasons why I am seriously considering leaving the US and seeking asylum outside the continent. Far too many people are willing to believe the lies that are spewed out and legacy media are all to willing to cover that type of story, instead of doing the job of reporting truth and facts with the solid evidence to back it up. Similar happened nearly a century ago across the Atlantic in Germany, there are quite a number of books and papers covering that topic.

Chris (user link) says:

political

This is nothing more than political fearmongering. Trump is pushing a false narrative about crime to justify sending troops into D.C. a city where crime is actually decreasing. It’s a reckless abuse of power, exploiting public fear for personal and political gain. Ignoring facts to justify military presence on American streets sets a dangerous precedent and undermines local democracy. It’s authoritarian in tone, and deeply irresponsible.

Anonymous Coward says:

Because some white dude (one who apparently welcomed the nickname “Big Balls”) got punched in the nose by a couple of teens while (almost) being carjacked in DC, Trump is pretty much declaring war on a city that hasn’t been this safe since the days of liberal hero JFK.

Two teenagers who are, by virtue of their age, unlikely to be homeless (unless their parents are also homeless), and thus that naturally justifies turning unfortunate circumstances into a “crime” for the Republiturds. 🤦‍♂️

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...